Oil & Gas Midstream
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
DLNG vs TK vs GLNG vs INSW vs TNK
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Midstream
Oil & Gas Midstream
Oil & Gas Midstream
Oil & Gas Midstream
DLNG vs TK vs GLNG vs INSW vs TNK — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Midstream | Oil & Gas Midstream | Oil & Gas Midstream | Oil & Gas Midstream | Oil & Gas Midstream |
| Market Cap | $140M | $1.18B | $5.75B | $4.46B | $2.83B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $158M | $993M | $394M | $676M | $952M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $60M | $79M | $66M | $546M | $351M |
| Gross Margin | 53.4% | 28.1% | 46.9% | 40.6% | 27.5% |
| Operating Margin | 48.0% | 24.8% | 34.4% | 44.4% | 27.5% |
| Forward P/E | 3.3x | 64.0x | 69.3x | 8.5x | 6.0x |
| Total Debt | $321M | $66M | $2.76B | $576M | $55M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $68M | $685M | $1.18B | $117M | $831M |
DLNG vs TK vs GLNG vs INSW vs TNK — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dynagas LNG Partner… (DLNG) | 100 | 237.0 | +137.0% |
| Teekay Corporation (TK) | 100 | 480.9 | +380.9% |
| Golar LNG Limited (GLNG) | 100 | 693.9 | +593.9% |
| International Seawa… (INSW) | 100 | 397.6 | +297.6% |
| Teekay Tankers Ltd. (TNK) | 100 | 467.6 | +367.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: DLNG vs TK vs GLNG vs INSW vs TNK
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
DLNG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.00, yield 10.5%
- Beta 0.00, yield 10.5%, current ratio 0.93x
- Lower P/E (3.3x vs 6.0x)
- Beta 0.00 vs INSW's 0.43
TK lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
GLNG ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 51.1%, EPS growth 35.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 13.7%
- 51.1% revenue growth vs TNK's -22.6%
INSW is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 10.1% 10Y total return vs TNK's 187.7%
- 80.8% margin vs TK's 7.9%
- +160.2% vs DLNG's +12.5%
- 20.1% ROA vs GLNG's 1.2%, ROIC 9.4% vs 2.9%
TNK is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.35, Low D/E 2.7%, current ratio 7.98x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 51.1% revenue growth vs TNK's -22.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (3.3x vs 6.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 80.8% margin vs TK's 7.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.00 vs INSW's 0.43 | |
| Dividends | 10.5% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs GLNG's 5.5% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +160.2% vs DLNG's +12.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 20.1% ROA vs GLNG's 1.2%, ROIC 9.4% vs 2.9% |
DLNG vs TK vs GLNG vs INSW vs TNK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
DLNG vs TK vs GLNG vs INSW vs TNK — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
DLNG leads in 2 of 6 categories
TNK leads 1 • INSW leads 1 • TK leads 0 • GLNG leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DLNG leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TK is the larger business by revenue, generating $993M annually — 6.3x DLNG's $158M. INSW is the more profitable business, keeping 80.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TK's 7.9%. On growth, GLNG holds the edge at +101.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $158M | $993M | $394M | $676M | $952M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $108M | $334M | $185M | $465M | $348M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $60M | $79M | $66M | $546M | $351M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $103M | $241M | -$430M | $193M | $113M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +53.4% | +28.1% | +46.9% | +40.6% | +27.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +48.0% | +24.8% | +34.4% | +44.4% | +27.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +37.9% | +7.9% | +16.7% | +80.8% | +36.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +65.0% | +24.2% | -109.2% | +28.5% | +11.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -0.5% | -29.0% | +101.5% | -91.3% | -26.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +24.4% | -2.4% | +2.1% | +4.8% | +46.0% |
Valuation Metrics
DLNG leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 3.7x trailing earnings, DLNG trades at a 96% valuation discount to GLNG's 84.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, TK's 1.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than GLNG's 39.7x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $140M | $1.2B | $5.8B | $4.5B | $2.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $392M | $565M | $7.3B | $4.9B | $2.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 3.66x | 9.92x | 84.66x | 14.48x | 8.05x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 3.31x | 64.05x | 69.28x | 8.52x | 6.00x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | 0.26x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 3.58x | 1.23x | 39.69x | 10.48x | 6.80x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.89x | 0.97x | 14.62x | 5.29x | 2.97x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.29x | 0.68x | 2.70x | 2.21x | 1.38x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 1.52x | 3.02x | — | 117.08x | 25.09x |
Profitability & Efficiency
TNK leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
INSW delivers a 27.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $27 in annual profit, vs $3 for GLNG. TNK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GLNG's 1.33x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DLNG scores 9/9 vs TNK's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +12.7% | +4.0% | +3.2% | +27.1% | +17.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +7.3% | +3.5% | +1.2% | +20.1% | +15.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.6% | +19.1% | +2.9% | +9.4% | +12.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +12.8% | +18.1% | +3.3% | +12.1% | +10.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 9 | 6 | 8 | 6 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.66x | 0.03x | 1.33x | 0.29x | 0.03x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $253M | -$620M | $1.6B | $459M | -$776M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $68M | $685M | $1.2B | $117M | $831M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $321M | $66M | $2.8B | $576M | $55M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.87x | 69.29x | 4.50x | 0.90x | 109.95x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
INSW leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TNK five years ago would be worth $61,384 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $14,931 for DLNG. Over the past 12 months, INSW leads with a +160.2% total return vs DLNG's +12.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TK at 51.1% vs DLNG's 17.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +4.6% | +59.8% | +45.7% | +96.5% | +58.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +12.5% | +91.5% | +43.7% | +160.2% | +80.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +62.8% | +244.7% | +173.7% | +179.7% | +136.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +49.3% | +412.3% | +406.8% | +438.1% | +513.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -33.0% | +97.1% | +243.7% | +1014.5% | +187.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +17.6% | +51.1% | +39.9% | +40.9% | +33.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — DLNG and TK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
DLNG is the less volatile stock with a 0.00 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than INSW's 0.43 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TK currently trades 99.1% from its 52-week high vs DLNG's 86.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.00x | 0.38x | 0.19x | 0.43x | 0.35x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4.45 | $14.22 | $57.29 | $91.58 | $83.54 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.40 | $7.12 | $35.02 | $35.60 | $41.05 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +86.3% | +99.1% | +96.1% | +98.5% | +97.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 40.9 | 60.2 | 56.3 | 67.3 | 57.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 101K | 513K | 2.1M | 597K | 542K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — DLNG and GLNG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: DLNG as "Hold", TK as "Buy", GLNG as "Buy", INSW as "Buy", TNK as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 17.2% upside for DLNG (target: $5) vs -7.6% for INSW (target: $83). For income investors, DLNG offers the higher dividend yield at 10.46% vs TNK's 2.44%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $4.50 | — | $53.00 | $83.33 | $90.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 16 | 14 | 48 | 13 | 23 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +10.5% | +6.5% | +5.5% | +3.2% | +2.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 3 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.40 | $0.91 | $3.02 | $2.92 | $1.98 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.2% | +9.8% | +2.5% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
DLNG leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). TNK leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
DLNG vs TK vs GLNG vs INSW vs TNK: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is DLNG or TK or GLNG or INSW or TNK a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Golar LNG Limited (GLNG) is the stronger pick with 51.
1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -22. 6% for Teekay Tankers Ltd. (TNK). Dynagas LNG Partners LP (DLNG) offers the better valuation at 3. 7x trailing P/E (3. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Teekay Corporation (TK) a "Buy" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — DLNG or TK or GLNG or INSW or TNK?
On trailing P/E, Dynagas LNG Partners LP (DLNG) is the cheapest at 3.
7x versus Golar LNG Limited at 84. 7x. On forward P/E, Dynagas LNG Partners LP is actually cheaper at 3. 3x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — DLNG or TK or GLNG or INSW or TNK?
Over the past 5 years, Teekay Tankers Ltd.
(TNK) delivered a total return of +513. 8%, compared to +49. 3% for Dynagas LNG Partners LP (DLNG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: INSW returned +1015% versus DLNG's -33. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — DLNG or TK or GLNG or INSW or TNK?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Dynagas LNG Partners LP (DLNG) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
00β versus International Seaways, Inc. 's 0. 43β — meaning INSW is approximately 8838% more volatile than DLNG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Teekay Tankers Ltd. (TNK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 133% for Golar LNG Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — DLNG or TK or GLNG or INSW or TNK?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Golar LNG Limited (GLNG) is pulling ahead at 51.
1% versus -22. 6% for Teekay Tankers Ltd. (TNK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Dynagas LNG Partners LP grew EPS 59. 1% year-over-year, compared to -25. 7% for International Seaways, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TK leads at 21. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — DLNG or TK or GLNG or INSW or TNK?
Teekay Tankers Ltd.
(TNK) is the more profitable company, earning 36. 9% net margin versus 11. 0% for Teekay Corporation — meaning it keeps 36. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: DLNG leads at 49. 5% versus 22. 6% for TNK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — DLNG leads at 55. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is DLNG or TK or GLNG or INSW or TNK more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Dynagas LNG Partners LP (DLNG) trades at 3.
3x forward P/E versus 69. 3x for Golar LNG Limited — 66. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for DLNG: 17. 2% to $4. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — DLNG or TK or GLNG or INSW or TNK?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Dynagas LNG Partners LP (DLNG) offers the highest yield at 10. 5%, versus 2. 4% for Teekay Tankers Ltd. (TNK).
09Is DLNG or TK or GLNG or INSW or TNK better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, International Seaways, Inc.
(INSW) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 43), 3. 2% yield, +1015% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (INSW: +1015%, TK: +97. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between DLNG and TK and GLNG and INSW and TNK?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: DLNG is a small-cap deep-value stock; TK is a small-cap deep-value stock; GLNG is a small-cap high-growth stock; INSW is a small-cap deep-value stock; TNK is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.