REIT - Office
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
DLR vs EQIX vs IRM vs AMT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Specialty
REIT - Specialty
REIT - Specialty
DLR vs EQIX vs IRM vs AMT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Office | REIT - Specialty | REIT - Specialty | REIT - Specialty |
| Market Cap | $67.59B | $106.36B | $39.18B | $82.98B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $6.19B | $9.46B | $7.25B | $10.82B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1.31B | $1.42B | $272M | $2.88B |
| Gross Margin | 40.0% | 51.3% | 55.0% | 73.4% |
| Operating Margin | 13.7% | 20.8% | 18.0% | 44.2% |
| Forward P/E | 97.2x | 63.7x | 58.4x | 27.2x |
| Total Debt | $24.18B | $22.73B | $19.05B | $44.96B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3.45B | $1.73B | $159M | $1.47B |
DLR vs EQIX vs IRM vs AMT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Digital Realty Trus… (DLR) | 100 | 137.0 | +37.0% |
| Equinix, Inc. (EQIX) | 100 | 154.6 | +54.6% |
| Iron Mountain Incor… (IRM) | 100 | 511.3 | +411.3% |
| American Tower Corp… (AMT) | 100 | 69.0 | -31.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: DLR vs EQIX vs IRM vs AMT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
DLR is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and defensive.
- Rev growth 10.0%, EPS growth 122.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 9.2%
- Beta 0.77, yield 2.5%, current ratio 4.50x
EQIX is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and valuation efficiency.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.42, current ratio 1.32x
- PEG 2.37 vs AMT's 3.72
- Beta 0.42 vs IRM's 1.10
IRM is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 321.4% 10Y total return vs EQIX's 262.9%
- 12.2% FFO/revenue growth vs AMT's 5.1%
- +38.9% vs AMT's -17.4%
AMT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 11 yrs, beta -0.04, yield 3.8%
- Lower P/E (27.2x vs 58.4x)
- 26.6% margin vs IRM's 3.8%
- 3.8% yield, 11-year raise streak, vs EQIX's 1.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 12.2% FFO/revenue growth vs AMT's 5.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (27.2x vs 58.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 26.6% margin vs IRM's 3.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.42 vs IRM's 1.10 | |
| Dividends | 3.8% yield, 11-year raise streak, vs EQIX's 1.8% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +38.9% vs AMT's -17.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.5% ROA vs IRM's 1.3%, ROIC 6.9% vs 6.2% |
DLR vs EQIX vs IRM vs AMT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
DLR vs EQIX vs IRM vs AMT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
AMT leads in 4 of 6 categories
IRM leads 1 • DLR leads 0 • EQIX leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMT is the larger business by revenue, generating $10.8B annually — 1.7x DLR's $6.2B. AMT is the more profitable business, keeping 26.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to IRM's 3.8%. On growth, IRM holds the edge at +21.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $6.2B | $9.5B | $7.2B | $10.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $2.7B | $4.1B | $2.3B | $6.9B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1.3B | $1.4B | $272M | $2.9B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $233M | $888M | -$625M | $3.8B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +40.0% | +51.3% | +55.0% | +73.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +13.7% | +20.8% | +18.0% | +44.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +21.1% | +15.0% | +3.8% | +26.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +3.8% | +9.4% | -8.6% | +34.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +19.3% | +9.8% | +21.6% | +6.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -51.0% | +20.0% | +7.9% | +76.9% |
Valuation Metrics
AMT leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 33.0x trailing earnings, AMT trades at a 88% valuation discount to IRM's 268.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), DLR offers better value at 1.89x vs AMT's 4.53x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $67.6B | $106.4B | $39.2B | $83.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $88.3B | $127.4B | $58.1B | $126.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 54.94x | 78.38x | 268.78x | 33.05x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 97.24x | 63.68x | 58.45x | 27.18x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.89x | 2.91x | — | 4.53x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 34.59x | 32.54x | 23.90x | 18.22x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 11.06x | 11.49x | 5.68x | 7.80x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.78x | 7.46x | — | 8.07x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 28.02x | — | — | 21.93x |
Profitability & Efficiency
AMT leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AMT delivers a 27.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $27 in annual profit, vs $5 for DLR. DLR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.97x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AMT's 4.34x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DLR scores 7/9 vs IRM's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +5.3% | +10.0% | — | +27.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.7% | +3.6% | +1.3% | +4.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +1.2% | +4.3% | +6.2% | +6.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +1.5% | +5.4% | +8.2% | +8.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 5 | 4 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.97x | 1.60x | — | 4.34x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $20.7B | $21.0B | $18.9B | $43.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3.5B | $1.7B | $159M | $1.5B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $24.2B | $22.7B | $19.1B | $45.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.87x | 3.53x | 1.28x | 3.99x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
IRM leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in IRM five years ago would be worth $37,537 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,426 for AMT. Over the past 12 months, IRM leads with a +38.9% total return vs AMT's -17.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors IRM at 35.5% vs AMT's 0.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +27.7% | +41.8% | +59.3% | +2.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +21.0% | +24.3% | +38.9% | -17.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +119.2% | +52.8% | +149.0% | +0.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +47.1% | +66.7% | +275.4% | -15.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +163.8% | +262.9% | +321.4% | +113.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +29.9% | +15.2% | +35.5% | +0.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — IRM and AMT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AMT is the less volatile stock with a -0.04 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than IRM's 1.10 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. IRM currently trades 99.9% from its 52-week high vs AMT's 76.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.77x | 0.42x | 1.10x | -0.04x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $208.09 | $1128.68 | $131.80 | $234.33 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $146.23 | $710.52 | $77.77 | $165.08 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +94.5% | +95.6% | +99.9% | +76.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 61.0 | 61.9 | 75.1 | 53.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.9M | 558K | 1.5M | 2.9M |
Analyst Outlook
AMT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: DLR as "Buy", EQIX as "Buy", IRM as "Buy", AMT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 21.5% upside for AMT (target: $216) vs 0.5% for IRM (target: $132). For income investors, AMT offers the higher dividend yield at 3.78% vs EQIX's 1.75%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $209.00 | $1117.40 | $132.33 | $216.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 48 | 51 | 20 | 49 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.5% | +1.8% | +2.3% | +3.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 9 | 4 | 11 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $4.92 | $18.92 | $3.09 | $6.73 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.4% |
AMT leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). IRM leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.
DLR vs EQIX vs IRM vs AMT: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is DLR or EQIX or IRM or AMT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Iron Mountain Incorporated (IRM) is the stronger pick with 12.
2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 1% for American Tower Corporation (AMT). American Tower Corporation (AMT) offers the better valuation at 33. 0x trailing P/E (27. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Digital Realty Trust, Inc. (DLR) a "Buy" — based on 48 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — DLR or EQIX or IRM or AMT?
On trailing P/E, American Tower Corporation (AMT) is the cheapest at 33.
0x versus Iron Mountain Incorporated at 268. 8x. On forward P/E, American Tower Corporation is actually cheaper at 27. 2x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Equinix, Inc. wins at 2. 37x versus American Tower Corporation's 3. 72x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — DLR or EQIX or IRM or AMT?
Over the past 5 years, Iron Mountain Incorporated (IRM) delivered a total return of +275.
4%, compared to -15. 7% for American Tower Corporation (AMT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IRM returned +321. 4% versus AMT's +113. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — DLR or EQIX or IRM or AMT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), American Tower Corporation (AMT) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
04β versus Iron Mountain Incorporated's 1. 10β — meaning IRM is approximately -3041% more volatile than AMT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Digital Realty Trust, Inc. (DLR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 97% versus 4% for American Tower Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — DLR or EQIX or IRM or AMT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Iron Mountain Incorporated (IRM) is pulling ahead at 12.
2% versus 5. 1% for American Tower Corporation (AMT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Digital Realty Trust, Inc. grew EPS 122. 4% year-over-year, compared to -19. 7% for Iron Mountain Incorporated. Over a 3-year CAGR, IRM leads at 10. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — DLR or EQIX or IRM or AMT?
American Tower Corporation (AMT) is the more profitable company, earning 23.
8% net margin versus 2. 1% for Iron Mountain Incorporated — meaning it keeps 23. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AMT leads at 45. 8% versus 10. 8% for DLR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AMT leads at 73. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is DLR or EQIX or IRM or AMT more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Equinix, Inc. (EQIX) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 2. 37x versus American Tower Corporation's 3. 72x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, American Tower Corporation (AMT) trades at 27. 2x forward P/E versus 97. 2x for Digital Realty Trust, Inc. — 70. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AMT: 21. 5% to $216. 33.
08Which pays a better dividend — DLR or EQIX or IRM or AMT?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
American Tower Corporation (AMT) offers the highest yield at 3. 8%, versus 1. 8% for Equinix, Inc. (EQIX).
09Is DLR or EQIX or IRM or AMT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, American Tower Corporation (AMT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
04), 3. 8% yield, +113. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (AMT: +113. 0%, IRM: +321. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between DLR and EQIX and IRM and AMT?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: DLR is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; EQIX is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; IRM is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; AMT is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.