REIT - Office
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
DLR vs IRM vs EQIX vs PSA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Specialty
REIT - Specialty
REIT - Industrial
DLR vs IRM vs EQIX vs PSA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Office | REIT - Specialty | REIT - Specialty | REIT - Industrial |
| Market Cap | $67.59B | $39.18B | $106.36B | $52.46B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $6.19B | $7.25B | $9.46B | $4.86B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1.31B | $272M | $1.42B | $1.90B |
| Gross Margin | 40.0% | 55.0% | 51.3% | 60.6% |
| Operating Margin | 13.7% | 18.0% | 20.8% | 50.8% |
| Forward P/E | 97.2x | 58.6x | 63.7x | 31.3x |
| Total Debt | $24.18B | $19.05B | $22.73B | $10.25B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3.45B | $159M | $1.73B | $318M |
DLR vs IRM vs EQIX vs PSA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Digital Realty Trus… (DLR) | 100 | 139.1 | +39.1% |
| Iron Mountain Incor… (IRM) | 100 | 512.7 | +412.7% |
| Equinix, Inc. (EQIX) | 100 | 155.9 | +55.9% |
| Public Storage (PSA) | 100 | 152.4 | +52.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: DLR vs IRM vs EQIX vs PSA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
DLR is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 10.0%, EPS growth 122.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 9.2%
IRM is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 321.4% 10Y total return vs EQIX's 262.9%
- 12.2% FFO/revenue growth vs PSA's 2.7%
- +38.9% vs PSA's +3.5%
EQIX is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and valuation efficiency.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.42, current ratio 1.32x
- PEG 2.37 vs PSA's 4.20
- Beta 0.42 vs IRM's 1.10
- 1.8% yield, 9-year raise streak, vs PSA's 4.4%
PSA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.51, yield 4.4%
- Beta 0.51, yield 4.4%, current ratio 0.75x
- Lower P/E (31.3x vs 58.6x)
- 39.2% margin vs IRM's 3.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 12.2% FFO/revenue growth vs PSA's 2.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (31.3x vs 58.6x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 39.2% margin vs IRM's 3.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.42 vs IRM's 1.10 | |
| Dividends | 1.8% yield, 9-year raise streak, vs PSA's 4.4% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +38.9% vs PSA's +3.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 9.4% ROA vs IRM's 1.3%, ROIC 8.9% vs 6.2% |
DLR vs IRM vs EQIX vs PSA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
DLR vs IRM vs EQIX vs PSA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
PSA leads in 3 of 6 categories
IRM leads 1 • DLR leads 0 • EQIX leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PSA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
EQIX is the larger business by revenue, generating $9.5B annually — 1.9x PSA's $4.9B. PSA is the more profitable business, keeping 39.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to IRM's 3.8%. On growth, IRM holds the edge at +21.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $6.2B | $7.2B | $9.5B | $4.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $2.7B | $2.3B | $4.1B | $3.6B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1.3B | $272M | $1.4B | $1.9B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $233M | -$625M | $888M | $3.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +40.0% | +55.0% | +51.3% | +60.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +13.7% | +18.0% | +20.8% | +50.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +21.1% | +3.8% | +15.0% | +39.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +3.8% | -8.6% | +9.4% | +63.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +19.3% | +21.6% | +9.8% | +2.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -51.0% | +7.9% | +20.0% | +33.1% |
Valuation Metrics
PSA leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 33.2x trailing earnings, PSA trades at a 88% valuation discount to IRM's 268.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), DLR offers better value at 1.89x vs PSA's 4.45x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $67.6B | $39.2B | $106.4B | $52.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $88.3B | $58.1B | $127.4B | $62.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 54.94x | 268.78x | 78.38x | 33.17x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 97.24x | 58.61x | 63.68x | 31.29x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.89x | — | 2.91x | 4.45x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 34.59x | 23.90x | 32.54x | 18.32x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 11.06x | 5.68x | 11.49x | 10.87x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.78x | — | 7.46x | 5.63x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 28.02x | — | — | 18.11x |
Profitability & Efficiency
PSA leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
PSA delivers a 20.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $20 in annual profit, vs $5 for DLR. DLR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.97x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to EQIX's 1.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DLR scores 7/9 vs IRM's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +5.3% | — | +10.0% | +20.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.7% | +1.3% | +3.6% | +9.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +1.2% | +6.2% | +4.3% | +8.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +1.5% | +8.2% | +5.4% | +11.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 4 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.97x | — | 1.60x | 1.10x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $20.7B | $18.9B | $21.0B | $9.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3.5B | $159M | $1.7B | $318M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $24.2B | $19.1B | $22.7B | $10.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.87x | 1.28x | 3.53x | 6.88x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
IRM leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in IRM five years ago would be worth $37,537 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $13,290 for PSA. Over the past 12 months, IRM leads with a +38.9% total return vs PSA's +3.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors IRM at 35.5% vs PSA's 4.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +27.7% | +59.3% | +41.8% | +16.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +21.0% | +38.9% | +24.3% | +3.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +119.2% | +149.0% | +52.8% | +13.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +47.1% | +275.4% | +66.7% | +32.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +163.8% | +321.4% | +262.9% | +55.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +29.9% | +35.5% | +15.2% | +4.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — IRM and EQIX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
EQIX is the less volatile stock with a 0.42 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than IRM's 1.10 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. IRM currently trades 99.9% from its 52-week high vs DLR's 94.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.77x | 1.10x | 0.42x | 0.51x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $208.09 | $131.80 | $1128.68 | $313.51 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $146.23 | $77.77 | $710.52 | $256.54 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +94.5% | +99.9% | +95.6% | +95.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 61.0 | 75.1 | 61.9 | 48.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.9M | 1.5M | 558K | 1.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — EQIX and PSA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: DLR as "Buy", IRM as "Buy", EQIX as "Buy", PSA as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 6.3% upside for DLR (target: $209) vs 0.5% for IRM (target: $132). For income investors, PSA offers the higher dividend yield at 4.38% vs EQIX's 1.75%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $209.00 | $132.33 | $1117.40 | $304.82 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 48 | 20 | 51 | 36 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.5% | +2.3% | +1.8% | +4.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 4 | 9 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $4.92 | $3.09 | $18.92 | $13.09 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
PSA leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). IRM leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
DLR vs IRM vs EQIX vs PSA: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is DLR or IRM or EQIX or PSA a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Iron Mountain Incorporated (IRM) is the stronger pick with 12.
2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 7% for Public Storage (PSA). Public Storage (PSA) offers the better valuation at 33. 2x trailing P/E (31. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Digital Realty Trust, Inc. (DLR) a "Buy" — based on 48 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — DLR or IRM or EQIX or PSA?
On trailing P/E, Public Storage (PSA) is the cheapest at 33.
2x versus Iron Mountain Incorporated at 268. 8x. On forward P/E, Public Storage is actually cheaper at 31. 3x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Equinix, Inc. wins at 2. 37x versus Public Storage's 4. 20x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — DLR or IRM or EQIX or PSA?
Over the past 5 years, Iron Mountain Incorporated (IRM) delivered a total return of +275.
4%, compared to +32. 9% for Public Storage (PSA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IRM returned +314. 2% versus PSA's +55. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — DLR or IRM or EQIX or PSA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Equinix, Inc.
(EQIX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 42β versus Iron Mountain Incorporated's 1. 10β — meaning IRM is approximately 160% more volatile than EQIX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Digital Realty Trust, Inc. (DLR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 97% versus 160% for Equinix, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — DLR or IRM or EQIX or PSA?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Iron Mountain Incorporated (IRM) is pulling ahead at 12.
2% versus 2. 7% for Public Storage (PSA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Digital Realty Trust, Inc. grew EPS 122. 4% year-over-year, compared to -19. 7% for Iron Mountain Incorporated. Over a 3-year CAGR, IRM leads at 10. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — DLR or IRM or EQIX or PSA?
Public Storage (PSA) is the more profitable company, earning 37.
0% net margin versus 2. 1% for Iron Mountain Incorporated — meaning it keeps 37. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PSA leads at 46. 7% versus 10. 8% for DLR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — DLR leads at 55. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is DLR or IRM or EQIX or PSA more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Equinix, Inc. (EQIX) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 2. 37x versus Public Storage's 4. 20x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Public Storage (PSA) trades at 31. 3x forward P/E versus 97. 2x for Digital Realty Trust, Inc. — 65. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for DLR: 6. 3% to $209. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — DLR or IRM or EQIX or PSA?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Public Storage (PSA) offers the highest yield at 4. 4%, versus 1. 8% for Equinix, Inc. (EQIX).
09Is DLR or IRM or EQIX or PSA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Equinix, Inc.
(EQIX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 42), 1. 8% yield, +262. 9% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (EQIX: +262. 9%, IRM: +314. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between DLR and IRM and EQIX and PSA?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: DLR is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; IRM is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; EQIX is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; PSA is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.