Shell Companies
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
DMAA vs NUVB vs KYMR vs TPST
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
DMAA vs NUVB vs KYMR vs TPST — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Shell Companies | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $111M | $1.66B | $7.03B | $56M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $143M | $51M | $0.00 |
| Net Income (TTM) | $6M | $-146M | $-315M | $-36M |
| Gross Margin | — | 91.6% | 33.2% | — |
| Operating Margin | — | -105.0% | -7.0% | — |
| Total Debt | $662.00 | $10M | $82M | $15M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1K | $164M | $357M | $30M |
DMAA vs NUVB vs KYMR vs TPST — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Feb 25 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Drugs Made In Ameri… (DMAA) | 100 | 106.3 | +6.3% |
| Nuvation Bio Inc. (NUVB) | 100 | 243.1 | +143.1% |
| Kymera Therapeutics… (KYMR) | 100 | 274.6 | +174.6% |
| Tempest Therapeutic… (TPST) | 100 | 18.9 | -81.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: DMAA vs NUVB vs KYMR vs TPST
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
DMAA is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if efficiency is your priority.
- 2.4% ROA vs TPST's -210.5%
NUVB is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 7.0%, EPS growth 71.6%
- 7.0% revenue growth vs KYMR's -16.7%
KYMR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- beta 1.03
- 158.8% 10Y total return vs DMAA's 6.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.03, Low D/E 5.2%, current ratio 10.47x
- Beta 1.03, current ratio 10.47x
TPST is the clearest fit if your priority is quality.
- 0.4% margin vs KYMR's -6.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 7.0% revenue growth vs KYMR's -16.7% | |
| Quality / Margins | 0.4% margin vs KYMR's -6.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.03 vs NUVB's 1.97 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +179.8% vs TPST's -70.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 2.4% ROA vs TPST's -210.5% |
DMAA vs NUVB vs KYMR vs TPST — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
DMAA vs NUVB vs KYMR vs TPST — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
KYMR leads in 2 of 6 categories
NUVB leads 1 • DMAA leads 1 • TPST leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NUVB leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NUVB and TPST operate at a comparable scale, with $143M and $0 in trailing revenue. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from -102.1% (NUVB) to -6.1% (KYMR). On growth, NUVB holds the edge at +26.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $143M | $51M | $0 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$726,546 | -$145M | -$352M | -$36M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $6M | -$146M | -$315M | -$36M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$414,132 | -$126M | -$244M | -$33M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +91.6% | +33.2% | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | -105.0% | -7.0% | — |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | -102.1% | -6.1% | — |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | -88.1% | -4.7% | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +26.0% | +55.5% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +106.3% | +13.4% | -92.7% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — DMAA and NUVB and TPST each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $111M | $1.7B | $7.0B | $56M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $111M | $1.5B | $6.8B | $41M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -189.29x | -7.98x | -23.33x | -1.33x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9999.00x | — | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 26.44x | 179.28x | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 5.35x | 4.60x | 2.90x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
KYMR leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KYMR delivers a -25.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-25 in annual profit, vs $-6 for TPST. NUVB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TPST's 0.80x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NUVB scores 4/9 vs TPST's 2/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | -44.1% | -25.0% | -5.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.4% | -23.8% | -22.3% | -2.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | -54.3% | -24.9% | -5.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | -42.8% | -27.2% | -121.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.03x | 0.05x | 0.80x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $661 | -$154M | -$275M | -$15M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1,351 | $164M | $357M | $30M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $662 | $10M | $82M | $15M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -162.11x | -2119.53x | -78.41x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
KYMR leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in KYMR five years ago would be worth $19,577 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,228 for TPST. Over the past 12 months, KYMR leads with a +179.8% total return vs TPST's -70.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors KYMR at 45.9% vs TPST's -57.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +2.1% | -44.2% | +18.3% | -32.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +5.0% | +128.1% | +179.8% | -70.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +6.4% | +195.7% | +210.3% | -92.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +6.4% | -56.6% | +95.8% | -87.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +6.4% | -52.1% | +158.8% | -99.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +2.1% | +43.5% | +45.9% | -57.9% |
Risk & Volatility
DMAA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
DMAA is the less volatile stock with a 0.00 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NUVB's 1.97 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. DMAA currently trades 100.0% from its 52-week high vs TPST's 16.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.00x | 1.97x | 1.03x | 1.61x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $10.60 | $9.75 | $103.00 | $12.23 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $10.09 | $1.57 | $28.06 | $1.50 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +100.0% | +49.1% | +83.6% | +16.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 71.1 | 52.5 | 50.5 | 51.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 166K | 4.3M | 583K | 206K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NUVB as "Buy", KYMR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 158.9% upside for NUVB (target: $12) vs 37.2% for KYMR (target: $118).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $12.40 | $118.06 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 9 | 26 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
KYMR leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). NUVB leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 1 tied.
DMAA vs NUVB vs KYMR vs TPST: Key Questions Answered
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is DMAA or NUVB or KYMR or TPST a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Nuvation Bio Inc.
(NUVB) is the stronger pick with 699. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -16. 7% for Kymera Therapeutics, Inc. (KYMR). Analysts rate Nuvation Bio Inc. (NUVB) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — DMAA or NUVB or KYMR or TPST?
Over the past 5 years, Kymera Therapeutics, Inc.
(KYMR) delivered a total return of +95. 8%, compared to -87. 7% for Tempest Therapeutics, Inc. (TPST). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: KYMR returned +158. 8% versus TPST's -99. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — DMAA or NUVB or KYMR or TPST?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Drugs Made In America Acquisition Corp.
Ordinary Shares (DMAA) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 00β versus Nuvation Bio Inc. 's 1. 97β — meaning NUVB is approximately Infinity% more volatile than DMAA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Nuvation Bio Inc. (NUVB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 80% for Tempest Therapeutics, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — DMAA or NUVB or KYMR or TPST?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Nuvation Bio Inc.
(NUVB) is pulling ahead at 699. 0% versus -16. 7% for Kymera Therapeutics, Inc. (KYMR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Nuvation Bio Inc. grew EPS 71. 6% year-over-year, compared to -23. 8% for Kymera Therapeutics, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — DMAA or NUVB or KYMR or TPST?
Drugs Made In America Acquisition Corp.
Ordinary Shares (DMAA) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus -794. 4% for Kymera Therapeutics, Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: DMAA leads at 0. 0% versus -891. 3% for KYMR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KYMR leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — DMAA or NUVB or KYMR or TPST?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is DMAA or NUVB or KYMR or TPST better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Drugs Made In America Acquisition Corp.
Ordinary Shares (DMAA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 00)). Nuvation Bio Inc. (NUVB) carries a higher beta of 1. 97 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (DMAA: +6. 4%, NUVB: -52. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between DMAA and NUVB and KYMR and TPST?
These companies operate in different sectors (DMAA (Financial Services) and NUVB (Healthcare) and KYMR (Healthcare) and TPST (Healthcare)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: DMAA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NUVB is a small-cap high-growth stock; KYMR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TPST is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.