Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare DigitalOcean Holdings, Inc. (DOCN) vs Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) vs Oracle Corporation (ORCL) vs CoreWeave, Inc. Class A Common Stock (CRWV) vs Nutanix, Inc. (NTNX) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | CRWV | 167.9% revenue growth vs ORCL's 8.4% |
| Value | MSFT | Better valuation composite |
| Quality / Margins | MSFT | 39.0% net margin vs CRWV's -22.7% |
| Stability / Safety | MSFT | Beta 0.88 vs CRWV's 2.33, lower leverage |
| Dividends | ORCL | 1.1% yield, 18-year raise streak, vs MSFT's 0.8% |
| Momentum (1Y) | CRWV | +98.9% vs NTNX's -50.2% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | MSFT | 17.9% ROA vs CRWV's -2.4%, ROIC 27.9% vs -0.3% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Valuation efficiency (growth/$)
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
DigitalOcean is a cloud computing platform that provides infrastructure and developer tools primarily for startups, small businesses, and individual developers. It generates revenue through subscription-based cloud services — including compute instances, storage, databases, and networking — with infrastructure-as-a-service accounting for the majority of its income. The company's competitive advantage lies in its developer-friendly simplicity and transparent pricing, which appeals to smaller customers who find larger cloud providers overly complex.
Microsoft is a global technology company that develops software, cloud services, and hardware products. It generates revenue primarily through cloud services like Azure (~40% of revenue), productivity software including Office 365 and Dynamics, and personal computing through Windows licensing and Surface devices. Its key competitive advantage is the deeply entrenched enterprise ecosystem—Windows and Office dominance creates a powerful network effect that drives adoption of its cloud and productivity suites.
Oracle is a global enterprise software and cloud computing company that provides database management systems, enterprise applications, and cloud infrastructure services. It generates revenue primarily through cloud services and license support (~70% of total revenue) and cloud license and on-premise license sales (~20%), with hardware and services making up the remainder. The company's key moat is its entrenched position in enterprise database software—particularly with its flagship Oracle Database—which creates significant switching costs and lock-in for large corporate customers.
CoreWeave operates a specialized cloud computing platform focused on GPU-accelerated workloads for artificial intelligence and high-performance computing. It generates revenue primarily through its cloud infrastructure services — including GPU compute, storage, and managed services — with GPU compute being its largest segment. The company's competitive advantage lies in its specialized infrastructure optimized for AI workloads and its early access to scarce high-end NVIDIA GPUs.
Nutanix provides a hyperconverged infrastructure platform that combines computing, storage, and virtualization into a single software solution. It generates revenue primarily through subscription software licenses — about 90% of total revenue — with the remainder from hardware sales and support services. The company's key advantage is its software-defined architecture that simplifies data center management and enables seamless hybrid cloud operations.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 5 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
MSFT leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). CRWV leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.
Financial Metrics (TTM)
MSFT is the larger business by revenue, generating $305.5B annually — 338.9x DOCN's $901M. MSFT is the more profitable business, keeping 39.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CRWV's -22.7%. On growth, CRWV holds the edge at +110.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | DOCNDigitalOcean Hold… | MSFTMicrosoft Corpora… | ORCLOracle Corporation | CRWVCoreWeave, Inc. C… | NTNXNutanix, Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $901M | $305.5B | $61.0B | $5.1B | $2.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $345M | $184.8B | $22.6B | $1.6B | $288M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $259M | $119.3B | $15.4B | -$1.2B | $267M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $37M | $77.4B | -$13.2B | -$7.3B | $777M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +59.9% | +68.6% | +70.7% | +71.7% | +87.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +17.4% | +46.7% | +30.3% | -0.9% | +8.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +28.8% | +39.0% | +25.3% | -22.7% | +9.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +4.1% | +25.3% | -21.6% | -141.3% | +28.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +18.3% | +16.7% | +14.2% | +110.3% | +10.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +31.6% | +59.8% | +90.9% | -6.1% | +89.5% |
Valuation Metrics
At 22.2x trailing earnings, DOCN trades at a 62% valuation discount to NTNX's 58.9x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), MSFT offers better value at 1.53x vs ORCL's 4.72x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | DOCNDigitalOcean Hold… | MSFTMicrosoft Corpora… | ORCLOracle Corporation | CRWVCoreWeave, Inc. C… | NTNXNutanix, Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $5.2B | $2.92T | $408.1B | $32.6B | $10.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $5.6B | $2.95T | $501.5B | $43.8B | $11.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 22.25x | 28.79x | 33.50x | -28.31x | 58.89x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 55.98x | 23.84x | 19.71x | — | 21.13x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.53x | 4.72x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 19.12x | 18.12x | 21.02x | — | 45.16x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 5.72x | 10.36x | 7.11x | 6.35x | 4.08x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 8.54x | 19.87x | 10.40x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 16.65x | 40.74x | — | — | 13.81x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ORCL delivers a 50.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $51 in annual profit, vs $-35 for CRWV. MSFT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.18x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ORCL's 4.96x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DOCN scores 7/9 vs CRWV's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | DOCNDigitalOcean Hold… | MSFTMicrosoft Corpora… | ORCLOracle Corporation | CRWVCoreWeave, Inc. C… | NTNXNutanix, Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +30.5% | +50.6% | -35.0% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +14.1% | +17.9% | +7.5% | -2.4% | +8.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +15.6% | +27.9% | +12.8% | -0.3% | +6.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +11.9% | +29.7% | +14.4% | -0.2% | +12.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.18x | 4.96x | 4.54x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $476M | $30.3B | $93.3B | $11.2B | $713M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $254M | $30.2B | $10.8B | $3.9B | $770M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $731M | $60.6B | $104.1B | $15.2B | $1.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 15.40x | 56.44x | 3.24x | 0.21x | 12.48x |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in ORCL five years ago would be worth $23,146 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,465 for NTNX. Over the past 12 months, CRWV leads with a +98.9% total return vs NTNX's -50.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CRWV at 25.8% vs NTNX's 10.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | DOCNDigitalOcean Hold… | MSFTMicrosoft Corpora… | ORCLOracle Corporation | CRWVCoreWeave, Inc. C… | NTNXNutanix, Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +14.5% | -16.8% | -25.5% | +0.3% | -24.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +30.8% | -0.2% | -11.2% | +98.9% | -50.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +75.3% | +61.3% | +72.3% | +98.9% | +35.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +31.9% | +71.9% | +131.5% | +98.9% | +24.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +31.9% | +718.2% | +327.4% | +98.9% | +3.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +20.6% | +17.3% | +19.9% | +25.8% | +10.7% |
Risk & Volatility
MSFT is the less volatile stock with a 0.88 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CRWV's 2.33 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. DOCN currently trades 79.6% from its 52-week high vs ORCL's 42.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | DOCNDigitalOcean Hold… | MSFTMicrosoft Corpora… | ORCLOracle Corporation | CRWVCoreWeave, Inc. C… | NTNXNutanix, Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.06x | 0.88x | 1.40x | 2.33x | 1.25x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $70.43 | $555.45 | $345.72 | $187.00 | $83.36 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $25.45 | $344.79 | $118.86 | $33.51 | $35.39 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +79.6% | +70.7% | +42.1% | +42.5% | +45.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 41.1 | 39.8 | 41.2 | 54.7 | 43.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.2M | 28.4M | 20.9M | 21.2M | 3.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: DOCN as "Buy", MSFT as "Buy", ORCL as "Buy", CRWV as "Buy", NTNX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 103.5% upside for ORCL (target: $296) vs 17.4% for DOCN (target: $66). For income investors, ORCL offers the higher dividend yield at 1.14% vs MSFT's 0.82%.
| Metric | DOCNDigitalOcean Hold… | MSFTMicrosoft Corpora… | ORCLOracle Corporation | CRWVCoreWeave, Inc. C… | NTNXNutanix, Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $65.83 | $583.67 | $295.85 | $121.07 | $60.55 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 19 | 78 | 86 | 25 | 31 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.8% | +1.1% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 19 | 18 | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $3.23 | $1.65 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.1% | +0.6% | +0.4% | 0.0% | +3.0% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | Apr 25 | Feb 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| DigitalOcean Holdin… (DOCN) | 100 | 177.01 | +77.0% |
| Microsoft Corporati… (MSFT) | 100 | 110.77 | +10.8% |
| Oracle Corporation (ORCL) | 100 | 112.77 | +12.8% |
| CoreWeave, Inc. Cla… (CRWV) | 131.42 | 222.35 | +69.2% |
| Nutanix, Inc. (NTNX) | 100 | 57.45 | -42.6% |
Oracle Corporation (ORCL) returned +131% over 5 years vs Nutanix, Inc. (NTNX)'s +25%. A $10,000 investment in ORCL 5 years ago would be worth $23,146 today (including dividends reinvested).
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| DigitalOcean Holdin… (DOCN) | $203M | $901M | +343.8% |
| Microsoft Corporati… (MSFT) | $91.2B | $281.7B | +209.1% |
| Oracle Corporation (ORCL) | $37.0B | $57.4B | +54.9% |
| CoreWeave, Inc. Cla… (CRWV) | $229M | $5.1B | +2141.2% |
| Nutanix, Inc. (NTNX) | $503M | $2.5B | +404.1% |
Microsoft Corporation's revenue grew from $91.2B (2016) to $281.7B (2025) — a 13.4% CAGR.
Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| DigitalOcean Holdin… (DOCN) | -17.7% | 28.8% | +262.3% |
| Microsoft Corporati… (MSFT) | 22.5% | 36.1% | +60.4% |
| Oracle Corporation (ORCL) | 24.0% | 21.7% | -9.8% |
| CoreWeave, Inc. Cla… (CRWV) | -2.6% | -22.7% | -777.0% |
| Nutanix, Inc. (NTNX) | -21.5% | 7.4% | +134.5% |
Microsoft Corporation's net margin went from 23% (2016) to 36% (2025).
Chart 4P/E Ratio History — 9 Years
| Stock | 2017 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| DigitalOcean Holdin… (DOCN) | 183.5 | 19.1 | -89.6% |
| Microsoft Corporati… (MSFT) | 26.3 | 35.5 | +35.0% |
| Oracle Corporation (ORCL) | 21.4 | 44.9 | +109.8% |
DigitalOcean Holdings, Inc. has traded in a 19x–184x P/E range over 3 years; current trailing P/E is ~22x. Microsoft Corporation has traded in a 25x–48x P/E range over 9 years; current trailing P/E is ~29x.
Chart 5EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| DigitalOcean Holdin… (DOCN) | -0.41 | 2.52 | +714.6% |
| Microsoft Corporati… (MSFT) | 2.1 | 13.64 | +549.5% |
| Oracle Corporation (ORCL) | 2.07 | 4.34 | +109.7% |
| CoreWeave, Inc. Cla… (CRWV) | -1.47 | -2.81 | -91.2% |
| Nutanix, Inc. (NTNX) | -0.79 | 0.65 | +182.3% |
Microsoft Corporation's EPS grew from $2.10 (2016) to $13.64 (2025) — a 23% CAGR.
Chart 6Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
DigitalOcean Holdings, Inc. generated $310M FCF in 2025 (+1189% vs 2021). Microsoft Corporation generated $72B FCF in 2025 (+28% vs 2021).
DOCN vs MSFT vs ORCL vs CRWV vs NTNX: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is DOCN or MSFT or ORCL or CRWV or NTNX a better buy right now?
DigitalOcean Holdings, Inc. (DOCN) offers the better valuation at 22.2x trailing P/E (56.0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate DigitalOcean Holdings, Inc. (DOCN) a "Buy" — based on 19 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — DOCN or MSFT or ORCL or CRWV or NTNX?
On trailing P/E, DigitalOcean Holdings, Inc. (DOCN) is the cheapest at 22.2x versus Nutanix, Inc. at 58.9x. On forward P/E, Oracle Corporation is actually cheaper at 19.7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Microsoft Corporation wins at 1.27x versus Oracle Corporation's 2.78x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — DOCN or MSFT or ORCL or CRWV or NTNX?
Over the past 5 years, Oracle Corporation (ORCL) delivered a total return of +131.5%, compared to +24.6% for Nutanix, Inc. (NTNX). A $10,000 investment in ORCL five years ago would be worth approximately $23K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MSFT returned +718.2% versus NTNX's +3.5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — DOCN or MSFT or ORCL or CRWV or NTNX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) is the lower-risk stock at 0.88β versus CoreWeave, Inc. Class A Common Stock's 2.33β — meaning CRWV is approximately 164% more volatile than MSFT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 18% versus 5% for Oracle Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which has better profit margins — DOCN or MSFT or ORCL or CRWV or NTNX?
Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) is the more profitable company, earning 36.1% net margin versus -22.7% for CoreWeave, Inc. Class A Common Stock — meaning it keeps 36.1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MSFT leads at 45.6% versus -0.9% for CRWV. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NTNX leads at 86.8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is DOCN or MSFT or ORCL or CRWV or NTNX more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential. By this metric, Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1.27x versus Oracle Corporation's 2.78x. A PEG below 1.5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, Oracle Corporation (ORCL) trades at 19.7x forward P/E versus 56.0x for DigitalOcean Holdings, Inc. — 36.3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ORCL: 103.5% to $295.85.
07Which pays a better dividend — DOCN or MSFT or ORCL or CRWV or NTNX?
In this comparison, ORCL (1.1% yield), MSFT (0.8% yield) pay a dividend. DOCN, CRWV, NTNX do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is DOCN or MSFT or ORCL or CRWV or NTNX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.88), 0.8% yield, +718.2% 10Y return). DigitalOcean Holdings, Inc. (DOCN) carries a higher beta of 2.06 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MSFT: +718.2%, DOCN: +31.9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between DOCN and MSFT and ORCL and CRWV and NTNX?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. MSFT, ORCL pay a dividend while DOCN, CRWV, NTNX do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.