Medical - Healthcare Information Services
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
DOCS vs HIMS vs WELL vs NVCR vs VEEV
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Equipment & Services
REIT - Healthcare Facilities
Medical - Instruments & Supplies
Medical - Healthcare Information Services
DOCS vs HIMS vs WELL vs NVCR vs VEEV — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Healthcare Information Services | Medical - Equipment & Services | REIT - Healthcare Facilities | Medical - Instruments & Supplies | Medical - Healthcare Information Services |
| Market Cap | $5.24B | $6.63B | $149.25B | $1.92B | $27.35B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $638M | $2.35B | $11.63B | $674M | $3.20B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $239M | $128M | $1.43B | $-173M | $909M |
| Gross Margin | 89.7% | 69.7% | 39.1% | 75.2% | 75.5% |
| Operating Margin | 37.4% | 4.6% | 4.4% | -27.2% | 28.7% |
| Forward P/E | 16.8x | 51.5x | 78.4x | — | 19.0x |
| Total Debt | $12M | $1.12B | $21.38B | $290M | $96M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $210M | $229M | $5.03B | $103M | $1.42B |
DOCS vs HIMS vs WELL vs NVCR vs VEEV — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Doximity, Inc. (DOCS) | 100 | 44.7 | -55.3% |
| Hims & Hers Health,… (HIMS) | 100 | 235.7 | +135.7% |
| Welltower Inc. (WELL) | 100 | 256.3 | +156.3% |
| NovoCure Limited (NVCR) | 100 | 7.6 | -92.4% |
| Veeva Systems Inc. (VEEV) | 100 | 54.1 | -45.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: DOCS vs HIMS vs WELL vs NVCR vs VEEV
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
DOCS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.21 vs VEEV's 1.04
- Better valuation composite
- 37.5% margin vs NVCR's -25.7%
- 20.7% ROA vs NVCR's -16.5%, ROIC 20.0% vs -16.4%
HIMS ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 59.0%, EPS growth -3.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 64.5%
- 59.0% revenue growth vs NVCR's 8.3%
WELL is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.13, yield 1.3%
- 223.1% 10Y total return vs VEEV's 5.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.13, Low D/E 49.5%, current ratio 5.34x
- Beta 0.13, yield 1.3%, current ratio 5.34x
NVCR lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Among these 5 stocks, VEEV doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 59.0% revenue growth vs NVCR's 8.3% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 37.5% margin vs NVCR's -25.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.13 vs HIMS's 2.40, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.3% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +42.7% vs DOCS's -55.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 20.7% ROA vs NVCR's -16.5%, ROIC 20.0% vs -16.4% |
DOCS vs HIMS vs WELL vs NVCR vs VEEV — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
DOCS vs HIMS vs WELL vs NVCR vs VEEV — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
DOCS leads in 3 of 6 categories
WELL leads 2 • HIMS leads 0 • NVCR leads 0 • VEEV leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DOCS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WELL is the larger business by revenue, generating $11.6B annually — 18.2x DOCS's $638M. DOCS is the more profitable business, keeping 37.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NVCR's -25.7%. On growth, WELL holds the edge at +40.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $638M | $2.3B | $11.6B | $674M | $3.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $250M | $164M | $2.8B | -$165M | $956M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $239M | $128M | $1.4B | -$173M | $909M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $314M | $73M | $2.5B | -$48M | $1.4B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +89.7% | +69.7% | +39.1% | +75.2% | +75.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +37.4% | +4.6% | +4.4% | -27.2% | +28.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +37.5% | +5.5% | +12.3% | -25.7% | +28.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +49.2% | +3.1% | +21.9% | -7.1% | +43.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +9.8% | +28.4% | +40.3% | +12.3% | +16.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -16.2% | -27.3% | +22.5% | -100.0% | +23.9% |
Valuation Metrics
DOCS leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 23.5x trailing earnings, DOCS trades at a 85% valuation discount to WELL's 153.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), DOCS offers better value at 0.30x vs VEEV's 1.70x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $5.2B | $6.6B | $149.2B | $1.9B | $27.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $5.0B | $7.5B | $165.6B | $2.1B | $26.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 23.45x | 50.32x | 153.25x | -13.80x | 30.92x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 16.83x | 51.51x | 78.42x | — | 18.98x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.30x | — | — | — | 1.70x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 21.14x | 42.68x | 66.40x | — | 28.40x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 9.18x | 2.82x | 13.99x | 2.92x | 8.56x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.84x | 12.25x | 3.35x | 5.51x | 3.89x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 19.64x | 89.61x | 52.41x | — | 19.33x |
Profitability & Efficiency
DOCS leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
DOCS delivers a 24.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $24 in annual profit, vs $-51 for NVCR. DOCS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HIMS's 2.07x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DOCS scores 9/9 vs HIMS's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +24.4% | +23.7% | +3.5% | -50.8% | +13.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +20.7% | +6.0% | +2.3% | -16.5% | +11.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +20.0% | +10.7% | +0.5% | -16.4% | +12.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +22.3% | +10.9% | +0.6% | -28.9% | +13.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 9 | 4 | 7 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.01x | 2.07x | 0.49x | 0.85x | 0.01x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$197M | $892M | $16.3B | $187M | -$1.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $210M | $229M | $5.0B | $103M | $1.4B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $12M | $1.1B | $21.4B | $290M | $96M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — | 0.26x | -96.80x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WELL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WELL five years ago would be worth $30,234 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $875 for NVCR. Over the past 12 months, WELL leads with a +42.7% total return vs DOCS's -55.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WELL at 42.5% vs NVCR's -37.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -39.9% | -23.2% | +14.3% | +28.3% | -23.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -55.4% | -51.0% | +42.7% | +1.1% | -29.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -24.2% | +116.6% | +189.5% | -75.7% | -5.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -50.9% | +137.6% | +202.3% | -91.3% | -35.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -50.9% | +161.9% | +223.1% | +30.3% | +519.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -8.8% | +29.4% | +42.5% | -37.6% | -1.8% |
Risk & Volatility
WELL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
WELL is the less volatile stock with a 0.13 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HIMS's 2.40 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WELL currently trades 97.0% from its 52-week high vs DOCS's 34.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.03x | 2.40x | 0.13x | 2.20x | 0.77x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $76.51 | $70.43 | $219.59 | $20.06 | $310.50 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $20.55 | $13.74 | $142.65 | $9.82 | $148.05 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +34.0% | +36.4% | +97.0% | +83.9% | +54.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 60.1 | 54.5 | 60.2 | 69.8 | 49.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.7M | 34.9M | 2.6M | 1.5M | 2.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: DOCS as "Buy", HIMS as "Hold", WELL as "Buy", NVCR as "Buy", VEEV as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 99.0% upside for NVCR (target: $34) vs 6.3% for WELL (target: $227). WELL is the only dividend payer here at 1.30% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $42.79 | $29.67 | $226.50 | $33.50 | $280.10 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 22 | 19 | 34 | 15 | 42 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +1.3% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 2 | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $2.76 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.3% | +1.4% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.6% |
DOCS leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). WELL leads in 2 (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility).
DOCS vs HIMS vs WELL vs NVCR vs VEEV: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is DOCS or HIMS or WELL or NVCR or VEEV a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Hims & Hers Health, Inc.
(HIMS) is the stronger pick with 59. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 8. 3% for NovoCure Limited (NVCR). Doximity, Inc. (DOCS) offers the better valuation at 23. 5x trailing P/E (16. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Doximity, Inc. (DOCS) a "Buy" — based on 22 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — DOCS or HIMS or WELL or NVCR or VEEV?
On trailing P/E, Doximity, Inc.
(DOCS) is the cheapest at 23. 5x versus Welltower Inc. at 153. 3x. On forward P/E, Doximity, Inc. is actually cheaper at 16. 8x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Doximity, Inc. wins at 0. 21x versus Veeva Systems Inc. 's 1. 04x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — DOCS or HIMS or WELL or NVCR or VEEV?
Over the past 5 years, Welltower Inc.
(WELL) delivered a total return of +202. 3%, compared to -91. 3% for NovoCure Limited (NVCR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: VEEV returned +519. 4% versus DOCS's -50. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — DOCS or HIMS or WELL or NVCR or VEEV?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Welltower Inc.
(WELL) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 13β versus Hims & Hers Health, Inc. 's 2. 40β — meaning HIMS is approximately 1707% more volatile than WELL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Doximity, Inc. (DOCS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 2% for Hims & Hers Health, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — DOCS or HIMS or WELL or NVCR or VEEV?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Hims & Hers Health, Inc.
(HIMS) is pulling ahead at 59. 0% versus 8. 3% for NovoCure Limited (NVCR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Doximity, Inc. grew EPS 54. 2% year-over-year, compared to -11. 5% for Welltower Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, HIMS leads at 64. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — DOCS or HIMS or WELL or NVCR or VEEV?
Doximity, Inc.
(DOCS) is the more profitable company, earning 39. 1% net margin versus -20. 8% for NovoCure Limited — meaning it keeps 39. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: DOCS leads at 39. 9% versus -23. 5% for NVCR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — DOCS leads at 90. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is DOCS or HIMS or WELL or NVCR or VEEV more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Doximity, Inc. (DOCS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 21x versus Veeva Systems Inc. 's 1. 04x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Doximity, Inc. (DOCS) trades at 16. 8x forward P/E versus 78. 4x for Welltower Inc. — 61. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NVCR: 99. 0% to $33. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — DOCS or HIMS or WELL or NVCR or VEEV?
In this comparison, WELL (1.
3% yield) pays a dividend. DOCS, HIMS, NVCR, VEEV do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is DOCS or HIMS or WELL or NVCR or VEEV better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Welltower Inc.
(WELL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 13), 1. 3% yield, +223. 1% 10Y return). NovoCure Limited (NVCR) carries a higher beta of 2. 20 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (WELL: +223. 1%, NVCR: +30. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between DOCS and HIMS and WELL and NVCR and VEEV?
These companies operate in different sectors (DOCS (Healthcare) and HIMS (Healthcare) and WELL (Real Estate) and NVCR (Healthcare) and VEEV (Healthcare)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: DOCS is a small-cap high-growth stock; HIMS is a small-cap high-growth stock; WELL is a mid-cap high-growth stock; NVCR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; VEEV is a mid-cap high-growth stock. WELL pays a dividend while DOCS, HIMS, NVCR, VEEV do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.