Leisure
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
DOGZ vs FRPT vs HIMS vs CENT vs CHWY
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Packaged Foods
Medical - Equipment & Services
Packaged Foods
Specialty Retail
DOGZ vs FRPT vs HIMS vs CENT vs CHWY — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Leisure | Packaged Foods | Medical - Equipment & Services | Packaged Foods | Specialty Retail |
| Market Cap | $10M | $2.74B | $6.63B | $2.40B | $9.80B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $36M | $1.14B | $2.35B | $3.16B | $12.35B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-11M | $200M | $128M | $171M | $151M |
| Gross Margin | 22.9% | 38.9% | 69.7% | 32.2% | 29.5% |
| Operating Margin | -36.6% | 8.8% | 4.6% | 8.2% | 1.3% |
| Forward P/E | — | 41.1x | 51.5x | 13.5x | 27.0x |
| Total Debt | $15M | $560M | $1.12B | $1.44B | $502M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $13M | $278M | $229M | $882M | $596M |
DOGZ vs FRPT vs HIMS vs CENT vs CHWY — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dogness (Internatio… (DOGZ) | 100 | 5.4 | -94.6% |
| Freshpet, Inc. (FRPT) | 100 | 72.4 | -27.6% |
| Hims & Hers Health,… (HIMS) | 100 | 258.4 | +158.4% |
| Central Garden & Pe… (CENT) | 100 | 134.1 | +34.1% |
| Chewy, Inc. (CHWY) | 100 | 53.2 | -46.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: DOGZ vs FRPT vs HIMS vs CENT vs CHWY
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
DOGZ ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.42, Low D/E 15.6%, current ratio 3.35x
- Beta 0.42, current ratio 3.35x
- Beta 0.42 vs HIMS's 2.40, lower leverage
FRPT has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in quality and efficiency.
- 17.6% margin vs DOGZ's -31.4%
- 11.4% ROA vs DOGZ's -9.5%, ROIC 5.3% vs -5.2%
HIMS is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 59.0%, EPS growth -3.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 64.5%
- 161.9% 10Y total return vs FRPT's 5.2%
- 59.0% revenue growth vs CENT's -2.2%
CENT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.65
- Lower P/E (13.5x vs 27.0x)
- +11.8% vs DOGZ's -93.1%
Among these 5 stocks, CHWY doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 59.0% revenue growth vs CENT's -2.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (13.5x vs 27.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 17.6% margin vs DOGZ's -31.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.42 vs HIMS's 2.40, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +11.8% vs DOGZ's -93.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.4% ROA vs DOGZ's -9.5%, ROIC 5.3% vs -5.2% |
DOGZ vs FRPT vs HIMS vs CENT vs CHWY — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
DOGZ vs FRPT vs HIMS vs CENT vs CHWY — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
FRPT leads in 1 of 6 categories
CHWY leads 1 • HIMS leads 1 • CENT leads 1 • DOGZ leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FRPT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CHWY is the larger business by revenue, generating $12.3B annually — 347.2x DOGZ's $36M. FRPT is the more profitable business, keeping 17.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to DOGZ's -31.4%. On growth, HIMS holds the edge at +28.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $36M | $1.1B | $2.3B | $3.2B | $12.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$6M | $165M | $164M | $302M | $313M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$11M | $200M | $128M | $171M | $151M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$3M | $223M | $73M | $282M | $463M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +22.9% | +38.9% | +69.7% | +32.2% | +29.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -36.6% | +8.8% | +4.6% | +8.2% | +1.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -31.4% | +17.6% | +5.5% | +5.4% | +1.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -8.9% | +19.6% | +3.1% | +8.9% | +3.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +5.5% | +13.1% | +28.4% | +8.7% | +8.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +4.0% | +4.5% | -27.3% | +30.6% | -79.4% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — DOGZ and CENT each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 15.1x trailing earnings, CENT trades at a 70% valuation discount to HIMS's 50.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CENT's 8.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CHWY's 42.8x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $10M | $2.7B | $6.6B | $2.4B | $9.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $13M | $3.0B | $7.5B | $3.0B | $9.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -2.95x | 21.16x | 50.32x | 15.11x | 25.99x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 41.11x | 51.51x | 13.55x | 27.02x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 5.04x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 16.62x | 42.68x | 8.45x | 42.76x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.49x | 2.49x | 2.82x | 0.77x | 0.83x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.15x | 2.59x | 12.25x | 1.55x | 38.99x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 221.45x | 89.61x | 8.25x | 21.67x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CHWY leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CHWY delivers a 38.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $39 in annual profit, vs $-11 for DOGZ. DOGZ carries lower financial leverage with a 0.16x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HIMS's 2.07x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CENT scores 8/9 vs HIMS's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -11.4% | +17.0% | +23.7% | +10.7% | +38.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -9.5% | +11.4% | +6.0% | +4.7% | +4.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -5.2% | +5.3% | +10.7% | +9.1% | +28.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -6.5% | +6.0% | +10.9% | +8.7% | +12.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 6 | 4 | 8 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.16x | 0.46x | 2.07x | 0.91x | 1.92x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2M | $282M | $892M | $558M | -$93M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $13M | $278M | $229M | $882M | $596M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $15M | $560M | $1.1B | $1.4B | $502M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -60.36x | 13.29x | — | 1200.51x | 35.37x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HIMS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HIMS five years ago would be worth $23,764 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $359 for DOGZ. Over the past 12 months, CENT leads with a +11.8% total return vs DOGZ's -93.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HIMS at 29.4% vs DOGZ's -60.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -89.6% | -7.1% | -23.2% | +20.6% | -29.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -93.1% | -31.1% | -51.0% | +11.8% | -38.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -93.9% | -17.4% | +116.6% | +30.9% | -29.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -96.4% | -68.4% | +137.6% | -17.2% | -66.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.9% | +517.3% | +161.9% | +161.6% | -32.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -60.7% | -6.2% | +29.4% | +9.4% | -10.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — DOGZ and CENT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
DOGZ is the less volatile stock with a 0.42 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HIMS's 2.40 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CENT currently trades 93.3% from its 52-week high vs DOGZ's 3.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.42x | 0.91x | 2.40x | 0.65x | 0.70x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $31.48 | $89.80 | $70.43 | $41.30 | $48.62 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.02 | $46.76 | $13.74 | $28.77 | $22.74 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +3.6% | +62.2% | +36.4% | +93.3% | +48.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 28.4 | 29.1 | 54.5 | 47.2 | 41.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 59K | 1.5M | 34.9M | 74K | 7.7M |
Analyst Outlook
CENT leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: FRPT as "Buy", HIMS as "Hold", CENT as "Buy", CHWY as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 76.3% upside for CHWY (target: $42) vs 15.6% for HIMS (target: $30).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $73.42 | $29.67 | $51.00 | $41.71 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 29 | 19 | 10 | 38 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — | — | 2 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +1.4% | +6.5% | +9.6% |
FRPT leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). CHWY leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
DOGZ vs FRPT vs HIMS vs CENT vs CHWY: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is DOGZ or FRPT or HIMS or CENT or CHWY a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Hims & Hers Health, Inc.
(HIMS) is the stronger pick with 59. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 2% for Central Garden & Pet Company (CENT). Central Garden & Pet Company (CENT) offers the better valuation at 15. 1x trailing P/E (13. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Freshpet, Inc. (FRPT) a "Buy" — based on 29 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — DOGZ or FRPT or HIMS or CENT or CHWY?
On trailing P/E, Central Garden & Pet Company (CENT) is the cheapest at 15.
1x versus Hims & Hers Health, Inc. at 50. 3x. On forward P/E, Central Garden & Pet Company is actually cheaper at 13. 5x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — DOGZ or FRPT or HIMS or CENT or CHWY?
Over the past 5 years, Hims & Hers Health, Inc.
(HIMS) delivered a total return of +137. 6%, compared to -96. 4% for Dogness (International) Corporation (DOGZ). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FRPT returned +517. 3% versus DOGZ's -98. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — DOGZ or FRPT or HIMS or CENT or CHWY?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Dogness (International) Corporation (DOGZ) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
42β versus Hims & Hers Health, Inc. 's 2. 40β — meaning HIMS is approximately 467% more volatile than DOGZ relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Dogness (International) Corporation (DOGZ) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 16% versus 2% for Hims & Hers Health, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — DOGZ or FRPT or HIMS or CENT or CHWY?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Hims & Hers Health, Inc.
(HIMS) is pulling ahead at 59. 0% versus -2. 2% for Central Garden & Pet Company (CENT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Chewy, Inc. grew EPS 893. 4% year-over-year, compared to -3. 8% for Hims & Hers Health, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, HIMS leads at 64. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — DOGZ or FRPT or HIMS or CENT or CHWY?
Freshpet, Inc.
(FRPT) is the more profitable company, earning 12. 6% net margin versus -24. 6% for Dogness (International) Corporation — meaning it keeps 12. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FRPT leads at 8. 6% versus -31. 7% for DOGZ. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HIMS leads at 59. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is DOGZ or FRPT or HIMS or CENT or CHWY more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Central Garden & Pet Company (CENT) trades at 13.
5x forward P/E versus 51. 5x for Hims & Hers Health, Inc. — 38. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CHWY: 76. 3% to $41. 71.
08Which pays a better dividend — DOGZ or FRPT or HIMS or CENT or CHWY?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is DOGZ or FRPT or HIMS or CENT or CHWY better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Dogness (International) Corporation (DOGZ) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
42)). Hims & Hers Health, Inc. (HIMS) carries a higher beta of 2. 40 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (DOGZ: -98. 9%, HIMS: +161. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between DOGZ and FRPT and HIMS and CENT and CHWY?
These companies operate in different sectors (DOGZ (Consumer Cyclical) and FRPT (Consumer Defensive) and HIMS (Healthcare) and CENT (Consumer Defensive) and CHWY (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: DOGZ is a small-cap high-growth stock; FRPT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; HIMS is a small-cap high-growth stock; CENT is a small-cap deep-value stock; CHWY is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.