Auto - Recreational Vehicles
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
DOOO vs BC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Auto - Recreational Vehicles
DOOO vs BC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Auto - Recreational Vehicles | Auto - Recreational Vehicles |
| Market Cap | $2.34B | $5.26B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $7.79B | $5.52B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-38M | $-137M |
| Gross Margin | 21.2% | 18.0% |
| Operating Margin | 5.5% | 5.2% |
| Forward P/E | 13.4x | 19.0x |
| Total Debt | $3.13B | $2.43B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $181M | $275M |
DOOO vs BC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | Mar 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| BRP Inc. (DOOO) | 100 | 185.5 | +85.5% |
| Brunswick Corporati… (BC) | 100 | 145.8 | +45.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: DOOO vs BC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
DOOO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth -24.5%, EPS growth -130.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 0.8%
- 323.8% 10Y total return vs BC's 96.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.17, current ratio 1.31x
BC is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 13 yrs, beta 1.69, yield 2.1%
- Beta 1.69, yield 2.1%, current ratio 1.44x
- 2.4% revenue growth vs DOOO's -24.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 2.4% revenue growth vs DOOO's -24.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (13.4x vs 19.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | -0.5% margin vs BC's -2.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.17 vs BC's 1.69 | |
| Dividends | 2.1% yield, 13-year raise streak, vs DOOO's 0.9% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +87.4% vs BC's +79.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -0.6% ROA vs BC's -2.5%, ROIC 12.8% vs -0.8% |
DOOO vs BC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
DOOO vs BC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DOOO leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DOOO and BC operate at a comparable scale, with $7.8B and $5.5B in trailing revenue. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from -0.5% (DOOO) to -2.5% (BC). On growth, BC holds the edge at +12.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $7.8B | $5.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $868M | $511M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$38M | -$137M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $481M | $341M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +21.2% | +18.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +5.5% | +5.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -0.5% | -2.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +6.2% | +6.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.5% | +12.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.7% | +6.7% |
Valuation Metrics
DOOO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, DOOO's 6.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than BC's 29.3x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.3B | $5.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4.5B | $7.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -31.06x | -38.82x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 13.45x | 18.98x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 6.33x | 29.31x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.42x | 0.98x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 26.77x | 3.26x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 10.37x | 13.27x |
Profitability & Efficiency
BC leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BC delivers a -5.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-5 in annual profit, vs $-8 for DOOO. BC carries lower financial leverage with a 1.49x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to DOOO's 12.68x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BC scores 4/9 vs DOOO's 3/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -7.6% | -5.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -0.6% | -2.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +12.8% | -0.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +13.6% | -1.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 12.68x | 1.49x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2.9B | $2.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $181M | $275M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3.1B | $2.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.82x | 4.34x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BC five years ago would be worth $7,649 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,194 for DOOO. Over the past 12 months, DOOO leads with a +87.4% total return vs BC's +79.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BC at 1.2% vs DOOO's -4.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -10.4% | +7.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +87.4% | +79.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -11.5% | +3.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -28.1% | -23.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +323.8% | +96.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -4.0% | +1.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — DOOO and BC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
DOOO is the less volatile stock with a 1.17 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BC's 1.69 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BC currently trades 89.5% from its 52-week high vs DOOO's 78.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.17x | 1.69x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $81.89 | $90.23 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $33.22 | $45.52 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +78.4% | +89.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 29.4 | 57.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 198K | 886K |
Analyst Outlook
BC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates DOOO as "Buy" and BC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 60.1% upside for DOOO (target: $103) vs 9.9% for BC (target: $89). For income investors, BC offers the higher dividend yield at 2.12% vs DOOO's 0.94%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $102.85 | $88.78 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 13 | 31 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.9% | +2.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 4 | 13 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.84 | $1.71 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +6.6% | +1.5% |
BC leads in 3 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). DOOO leads in 2 (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
DOOO vs BC: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is DOOO or BC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Brunswick Corporation (BC) is the stronger pick with 2.
4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -24. 5% for BRP Inc. (DOOO). Analysts rate BRP Inc. (DOOO) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — DOOO or BC?
Over the past 5 years, Brunswick Corporation (BC) delivered a total return of -23.
5%, compared to -28. 1% for BRP Inc. (DOOO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: DOOO returned +323. 8% versus BC's +96. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — DOOO or BC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), BRP Inc.
(DOOO) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 17β versus Brunswick Corporation's 1. 69β — meaning BC is approximately 44% more volatile than DOOO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Brunswick Corporation (BC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 149% versus 13% for BRP Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — DOOO or BC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Brunswick Corporation (BC) is pulling ahead at 2.
4% versus -24. 5% for BRP Inc. (DOOO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: BRP Inc. grew EPS -130. 4% year-over-year, compared to -207. 8% for Brunswick Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, DOOO leads at 0. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — DOOO or BC?
Brunswick Corporation (BC) is the more profitable company, earning -2.
6% net margin versus -2. 7% for BRP Inc. — meaning it keeps -2. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: DOOO leads at 7. 0% versus -0. 7% for BC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BC leads at 24. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is DOOO or BC more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, BRP Inc.
(DOOO) trades at 13. 4x forward P/E versus 19. 0x for Brunswick Corporation — 5. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for DOOO: 60. 1% to $102. 85.
07Which pays a better dividend — DOOO or BC?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Brunswick Corporation (BC) offers the highest yield at 2. 1%, versus 0. 9% for BRP Inc. (DOOO).
08Is DOOO or BC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, BRP Inc.
(DOOO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 17), 0. 9% yield, +323. 8% 10Y return). Brunswick Corporation (BC) carries a higher beta of 1. 69 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (DOOO: +323. 8%, BC: +96. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between DOOO and BC?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.