Auto - Recreational Vehicles
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
DOOO vs MBUU
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Auto - Recreational Vehicles
DOOO vs MBUU — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Auto - Recreational Vehicles | Auto - Recreational Vehicles |
| Market Cap | $2.34B | $473M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $7.79B | $826M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-38M | $-5M |
| Gross Margin | 21.2% | 15.4% |
| Operating Margin | 5.5% | 0.1% |
| Forward P/E | 13.4x | 20.9x |
| Total Debt | $3.13B | $25M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $181M | $37M |
DOOO vs MBUU — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | Mar 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| BRP Inc. (DOOO) | 100 | 185.5 | +85.5% |
| Malibu Boats, Inc. (MBUU) | 100 | 69.0 | -31.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: DOOO vs MBUU
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
DOOO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 1.17, yield 0.9%
- 323.8% 10Y total return vs MBUU's 76.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.17, current ratio 1.31x
MBUU is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth -2.6%, EPS growth 127.7%, 3Y rev CAGR -12.7%
- -2.6% revenue growth vs DOOO's -24.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -2.6% revenue growth vs DOOO's -24.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (13.4x vs 20.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | -0.5% margin vs MBUU's -0.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.17 vs MBUU's 1.71 | |
| Dividends | 0.9% yield; 4-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +87.4% vs MBUU's -14.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -0.6% ROA vs MBUU's -0.7%, ROIC 12.8% vs 3.2% |
DOOO vs MBUU — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
DOOO vs MBUU — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DOOO leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DOOO is the larger business by revenue, generating $7.8B annually — 9.4x MBUU's $826M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from -0.5% (DOOO) to -0.6% (MBUU).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $7.8B | $826M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $868M | $11M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$38M | -$5M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $481M | $40M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +21.2% | +15.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +5.5% | +0.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -0.5% | -0.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +6.2% | +4.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.5% | +3.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.7% | -118.2% |
Valuation Metrics
DOOO leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, DOOO's 6.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MBUU's 7.6x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.3B | $473M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4.5B | $461M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -31.06x | 33.42x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 13.45x | 20.89x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 6.33x | 7.64x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.42x | 0.59x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 26.77x | 0.96x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 10.37x | 16.53x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MBUU leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MBUU delivers a -1.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-1 in annual profit, vs $-8 for DOOO. MBUU carries lower financial leverage with a 0.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to DOOO's 12.68x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MBUU scores 7/9 vs DOOO's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -7.6% | -1.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -0.6% | -0.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +12.8% | +3.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +13.6% | +3.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 12.68x | 0.05x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2.9B | -$12M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $181M | $37M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3.1B | $25M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.82x | 1.84x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
DOOO leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in DOOO five years ago would be worth $7,194 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,004 for MBUU. Over the past 12 months, DOOO leads with a +87.4% total return vs MBUU's -14.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors DOOO at -4.0% vs MBUU's -24.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -10.4% | -11.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +87.4% | -14.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -11.5% | -56.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -28.1% | -70.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +323.8% | +76.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -4.0% | -24.2% |
Risk & Volatility
DOOO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
DOOO is the less volatile stock with a 1.17 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MBUU's 1.71 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. DOOO currently trades 78.4% from its 52-week high vs MBUU's 64.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.17x | 1.71x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $81.89 | $39.65 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $33.22 | $23.84 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +78.4% | +64.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 29.4 | 50.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 198K | 336K |
Analyst Outlook
DOOO leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates DOOO as "Buy" and MBUU as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 60.1% upside for DOOO (target: $103) vs 28.9% for MBUU (target: $33). DOOO is the only dividend payer here at 0.94% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $102.85 | $32.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 13 | 16 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.9% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 4 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.84 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +6.6% | +7.6% |
DOOO leads in 5 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). MBUU leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency).
DOOO vs MBUU: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is DOOO or MBUU a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Malibu Boats, Inc.
(MBUU) is the stronger pick with -2. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -24. 5% for BRP Inc. (DOOO). Malibu Boats, Inc. (MBUU) offers the better valuation at 33. 4x trailing P/E (20. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate BRP Inc. (DOOO) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — DOOO or MBUU?
On forward P/E, BRP Inc.
is actually cheaper at 13. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — DOOO or MBUU?
Over the past 5 years, BRP Inc.
(DOOO) delivered a total return of -28. 1%, compared to -70. 0% for Malibu Boats, Inc. (MBUU). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: DOOO returned +323. 8% versus MBUU's +76. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — DOOO or MBUU?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), BRP Inc.
(DOOO) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 17β versus Malibu Boats, Inc. 's 1. 71β — meaning MBUU is approximately 46% more volatile than DOOO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Malibu Boats, Inc. (MBUU) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 13% for BRP Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — DOOO or MBUU?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Malibu Boats, Inc.
(MBUU) is pulling ahead at -2. 6% versus -24. 5% for BRP Inc. (DOOO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Malibu Boats, Inc. grew EPS 127. 7% year-over-year, compared to -130. 4% for BRP Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, DOOO leads at 0. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — DOOO or MBUU?
Malibu Boats, Inc.
(MBUU) is the more profitable company, earning 1. 8% net margin versus -2. 7% for BRP Inc. — meaning it keeps 1. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: DOOO leads at 7. 0% versus 2. 7% for MBUU. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — DOOO leads at 22. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is DOOO or MBUU more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, BRP Inc.
(DOOO) trades at 13. 4x forward P/E versus 20. 9x for Malibu Boats, Inc. — 7. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for DOOO: 60. 1% to $102. 85.
08Which pays a better dividend — DOOO or MBUU?
In this comparison, DOOO (0.
9% yield) pays a dividend. MBUU does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is DOOO or MBUU better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, BRP Inc.
(DOOO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 17), 0. 9% yield, +323. 8% 10Y return). Malibu Boats, Inc. (MBUU) carries a higher beta of 1. 71 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (DOOO: +323. 8%, MBUU: +76. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between DOOO and MBUU?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
DOOO pays a dividend while MBUU does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.