Auto - Recreational Vehicles
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
DOOO vs MCFT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Auto - Recreational Vehicles
DOOO vs MCFT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Auto - Recreational Vehicles | Auto - Recreational Vehicles |
| Market Cap | $2.34B | $417M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $7.79B | $298M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-38M | $11M |
| Gross Margin | 21.2% | 23.1% |
| Operating Margin | 5.5% | 3.7% |
| Forward P/E | 13.4x | 17.0x |
| Total Debt | $3.13B | $0.00 |
| Cash & Equiv. | $181M | $29M |
DOOO vs MCFT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | Mar 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| BRP Inc. (DOOO) | 100 | 185.5 | +85.5% |
| MasterCraft Boat Ho… (MCFT) | 100 | 144.9 | +44.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: DOOO vs MCFT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
DOOO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 1.17, yield 0.9%
- 323.8% 10Y total return vs MCFT's 121.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.17, current ratio 1.31x
MCFT is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth -22.5%, EPS growth -6.5%, 3Y rev CAGR -23.8%
- -22.5% revenue growth vs DOOO's -24.5%
- 3.7% margin vs DOOO's -0.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -22.5% revenue growth vs DOOO's -24.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (13.4x vs 17.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 3.7% margin vs DOOO's -0.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.17 vs MCFT's 1.25 | |
| Dividends | 0.9% yield; 4-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +87.4% vs MCFT's +45.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.2% ROA vs DOOO's -0.6%, ROIC 4.4% vs 12.8% |
DOOO vs MCFT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
DOOO vs MCFT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MCFT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DOOO is the larger business by revenue, generating $7.8B annually — 26.1x MCFT's $298M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 3.7% (MCFT) to -0.5% (DOOO).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $7.8B | $298M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $868M | $14M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$38M | $11M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $481M | $25M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +21.2% | +23.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +5.5% | +3.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -0.5% | +3.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +6.2% | +8.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.5% | +3.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.7% | -2.6% |
Valuation Metrics
DOOO leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, DOOO's 6.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MCFT's 18.7x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.3B | $417M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4.5B | $388M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -31.06x | 59.63x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 13.45x | 16.98x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 6.33x | 18.67x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.42x | 1.47x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 26.77x | 2.31x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 10.37x | 15.81x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MCFT leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MCFT delivers a 5.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $6 in annual profit, vs $-8 for DOOO. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MCFT scores 6/9 vs DOOO's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -7.6% | +5.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -0.6% | +4.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +12.8% | +4.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +13.6% | +5.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 12.68x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2.9B | -$29M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $181M | $29M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3.1B | $0 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.82x | 100.99x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
DOOO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MCFT five years ago would be worth $8,619 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,194 for DOOO. Over the past 12 months, DOOO leads with a +87.4% total return vs MCFT's +45.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors DOOO at -4.0% vs MCFT's -4.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -10.4% | +35.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +87.4% | +45.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -11.5% | -11.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -28.1% | -13.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +323.8% | +121.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -4.0% | -4.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — DOOO and MCFT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
DOOO is the less volatile stock with a 1.17 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MCFT's 1.25 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MCFT currently trades 96.8% from its 52-week high vs DOOO's 78.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.17x | 1.25x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $81.89 | $26.49 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $33.22 | $16.46 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +78.4% | +96.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 29.4 | 62.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 198K | 146K |
Analyst Outlook
DOOO leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates DOOO as "Buy" and MCFT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 60.1% upside for DOOO (target: $103) vs -3.8% for MCFT (target: $25). DOOO is the only dividend payer here at 0.94% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $102.85 | $24.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 13 | 10 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.9% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 4 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.84 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +6.6% | +2.3% |
DOOO leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). MCFT leads in 2 (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.
DOOO vs MCFT: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is DOOO or MCFT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, MasterCraft Boat Holdings, Inc.
(MCFT) is the stronger pick with -22. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -24. 5% for BRP Inc. (DOOO). MasterCraft Boat Holdings, Inc. (MCFT) offers the better valuation at 59. 6x trailing P/E (17. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate BRP Inc. (DOOO) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — DOOO or MCFT?
On forward P/E, BRP Inc.
is actually cheaper at 13. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — DOOO or MCFT?
Over the past 5 years, MasterCraft Boat Holdings, Inc.
(MCFT) delivered a total return of -13. 8%, compared to -28. 1% for BRP Inc. (DOOO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: DOOO returned +323. 8% versus MCFT's +121. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — DOOO or MCFT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), BRP Inc.
(DOOO) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 17β versus MasterCraft Boat Holdings, Inc. 's 1. 25β — meaning MCFT is approximately 7% more volatile than DOOO relative to the S&P 500.
05Which is growing faster — DOOO or MCFT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), MasterCraft Boat Holdings, Inc.
(MCFT) is pulling ahead at -22. 5% versus -24. 5% for BRP Inc. (DOOO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: MasterCraft Boat Holdings, Inc. grew EPS -6. 5% year-over-year, compared to -130. 4% for BRP Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, DOOO leads at 0. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — DOOO or MCFT?
MasterCraft Boat Holdings, Inc.
(MCFT) is the more profitable company, earning 2. 5% net margin versus -2. 7% for BRP Inc. — meaning it keeps 2. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: DOOO leads at 7. 0% versus 4. 0% for MCFT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — DOOO leads at 22. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is DOOO or MCFT more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, BRP Inc.
(DOOO) trades at 13. 4x forward P/E versus 17. 0x for MasterCraft Boat Holdings, Inc. — 3. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for DOOO: 60. 1% to $102. 85.
08Which pays a better dividend — DOOO or MCFT?
In this comparison, DOOO (0.
9% yield) pays a dividend. MCFT does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is DOOO or MCFT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, BRP Inc.
(DOOO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 17), 0. 9% yield, +323. 8% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (DOOO: +323. 8%, MCFT: +121. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between DOOO and MCFT?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
DOOO pays a dividend while MCFT does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.