DOW
Dow Inc.
Chemicals
Market Cap$26.86B
5Y Perf.-3.3%
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
DOW vs TROX vs HUN vs EMN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
TROX
Tronox Holdings plc
Chemicals
Market Cap$1.34B
5Y Perf.+26.7%
HUN
Huntsman Corporation
Chemicals
Market Cap$2.56B
5Y Perf.-18.8%
EMN
Eastman Chemical Company
Chemicals - Specialty
Market Cap$8.43B
5Y Perf.+8.2%
DOW vs TROX vs HUN vs EMN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | DOW | TROX | HUN | EMN |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Chemicals | Chemicals | Chemicals | Chemicals - Specialty |
| Market Cap | $26.86B | $1.34B | $2.56B | $8.43B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $39.33B | $2.92B | $5.69B | $8.64B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-2.76B | $-359M | $-324M | $399M |
| Gross Margin | 6.2% | 5.8% | 12.9% | 19.8% |
| Operating Margin | -2.3% | -4.8% | -1.0% | 9.4% |
| Forward P/E | 12.6x | — | — | 12.5x |
| Total Debt | $19.60B | $3.59B | $2.73B | $5.08B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3.82B | $211M | $429M | $566M |
DOW vs TROX vs HUN vs EMN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
DOW
TROX
HUN
EMN
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dow Inc. (DOW) | 100 | 96.7 | -3.3% |
| Tronox Holdings plc (TROX) | 100 | 126.7 | +26.7% |
| Huntsman Corporation (HUN) | 100 | 81.2 | -18.8% |
| Eastman Chemical Co… (EMN) | 100 | 108.2 | +8.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: DOW vs TROX vs HUN vs EMN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: EMN leads in 3 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Tronox Holdings plc is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and recent price momentum and sentiment. DOW and HUN also each lead in at least one category. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
DOW
Dow Inc.
The Income Pick
DOW is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.76, yield 5.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.76, current ratio 1.97x
- Beta 0.76, yield 5.6%, current ratio 1.97x
- Beta 0.76 vs TROX's 2.37, lower leverage
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
TROX
Tronox Holdings plc
The Growth Play
TROX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth -5.7%, EPS growth -8.9%, 3Y rev CAGR -5.7%
- 116.1% 10Y total return vs HUN's 57.6%
- -5.7% revenue growth vs DOW's -7.0%
- +76.9% vs EMN's +2.3%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
HUN
Huntsman Corporation
The Income Pick
HUN is the clearest fit if your priority is dividends.
- 5.7% yield, vs EMN's 4.5%
Best for: dividends
EMN
Eastman Chemical Company
The Value Play
EMN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for value and quality.
- Better valuation composite
- 4.6% margin vs TROX's -12.3%
- 2.6% ROA vs TROX's -7.7%, ROIC 6.7% vs -0.3%
Best for: value and quality
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | TROX | -5.7% revenue growth vs DOW's -7.0% |
| Value | EMN | Better valuation composite |
| Quality / Margins | EMN | 4.6% margin vs TROX's -12.3% |
| Stability / Safety | DOW | Beta 0.76 vs TROX's 2.37, lower leverage |
| Dividends | HUN | 5.7% yield, vs EMN's 4.5% |
| Momentum (1Y) | TROX | +76.9% vs EMN's +2.3% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | EMN | 2.6% ROA vs TROX's -7.7%, ROIC 6.7% vs -0.3% |
DOW vs TROX vs HUN vs EMN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2025
FY 2025
FY 2025
FY 2025
DOW vs TROX vs HUN vs EMN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLEMNLAGGINGHUN
Who Leads Where
EMN leads in 3 of 6 categories
TROX leads 1 • DOW leads 0 • HUN leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓HUNHuntsman Corporation
0leads
DOWDow Inc.
0leads
TROXTronox Holdings plc
1leads
EMNEastman Chemical Comp…
3leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs TROXvs DOWMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
EMN4/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
EMN3/6
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
EMN7/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
TROX3/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
Tied
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
EMN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DOW is the larger business by revenue, generating $39.3B annually — 13.5x TROX's $2.9B. EMN is the more profitable business, keeping 4.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TROX's -12.3%. On growth, TROX holds the edge at +3.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | DOWDow Inc. | TROXTronox Holdings p… | HUNHuntsman Corporat… | EMNEastman Chemical … |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $39.3B | $2.9B | $5.7B | $8.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.3B | $166M | $160M | $1.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$2.8B | -$359M | -$324M | $399M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$2.0B | -$139M | $135M | $498M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +6.2% | +5.8% | +12.9% | +19.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -2.3% | -4.8% | -1.0% | +9.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -7.0% | -12.3% | -5.7% | +4.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -5.1% | -4.8% | +2.4% | +5.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -6.1% | +3.0% | +0.7% | -4.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -68.2% | +7.1% | -3.3% | -40.8% |
EMN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
EMN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, EMN's 9.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than HUN's 19.6x.
| Metric | DOWDow Inc. | TROXTronox Holdings p… | HUNHuntsman Corporat… | EMNEastman Chemical … |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $26.9B | $1.3B | $2.6B | $8.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $42.6B | $4.7B | $4.9B | $12.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -10.11x | -2.83x | -9.27x | 17.97x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 12.62x | — | — | 12.50x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 5.59x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 13.78x | 16.80x | 19.64x | 8.96x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.67x | 0.46x | 0.45x | 0.96x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.52x | 0.92x | 0.86x | 1.41x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 22.11x | 19.87x |
EMN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
EMN leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
EMN delivers a 6.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $7 in annual profit, vs $-30 for TROX. EMN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.84x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TROX's 2.48x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), EMN scores 5/9 vs HUN's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | DOWDow Inc. | TROXTronox Holdings p… | HUNHuntsman Corporat… | EMNEastman Chemical … |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -15.4% | -30.4% | -8.1% | +6.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -4.6% | -7.7% | -4.6% | +2.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +0.6% | -0.3% | -0.6% | +6.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +0.5% | -0.4% | -0.7% | +7.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.12x | 2.48x | 0.92x | 0.84x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $15.8B | $3.4B | $2.3B | $4.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3.8B | $211M | $429M | $566M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $19.6B | $3.6B | $2.7B | $5.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1.51x | -1.16x | -1.08x | 2.22x |
EMN leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TROX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in DOW five years ago would be worth $7,281 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,493 for TROX. Over the past 12 months, TROX leads with a +76.9% total return vs EMN's +2.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors EMN at 1.1% vs HUN's -12.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | DOWDow Inc. | TROXTronox Holdings p… | HUNHuntsman Corporat… | EMNEastman Chemical … |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +55.2% | +98.1% | +45.5% | +15.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +37.3% | +76.9% | +37.5% | +2.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -17.5% | -23.6% | -33.3% | +3.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -27.2% | -55.1% | -39.8% | -28.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +12.2% | +116.1% | +57.6% | +35.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -6.2% | -8.6% | -12.6% | +1.1% |
TROX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — DOW and HUN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
DOW is the less volatile stock with a 0.76 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TROX's 2.37 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HUN currently trades 92.7% from its 52-week high vs TROX's 79.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | DOWDow Inc. | TROXTronox Holdings p… | HUNHuntsman Corporat… | EMNEastman Chemical … |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.76x | 2.37x | 1.73x | 1.36x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $42.74 | $10.59 | $15.89 | $84.18 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $20.40 | $2.86 | $7.30 | $56.11 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +87.3% | +79.4% | +92.7% | +87.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 48.9 | 58.5 | 65.4 | 56.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 14.4M | 3.1M | 6.2M | 1.5M |
Evenly matched — DOW and HUN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — HUN and EMN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: DOW as "Hold", TROX as "Buy", HUN as "Hold", EMN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 6.0% upside for DOW (target: $40) vs -18.6% for HUN (target: $12). For income investors, HUN offers the higher dividend yield at 5.74% vs TROX's 3.60%.
| Metric | DOWDow Inc. | TROXTronox Holdings p… | HUNHuntsman Corporat… | EMNEastman Chemical … |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $39.55 | $7.25 | $12.00 | $77.29 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 35 | 17 | 33 | 35 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +5.6% | +3.6% | +5.7% | +4.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.09 | $0.30 | $0.85 | $3.30 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.1% | +1.2% |
Evenly matched — HUN and EMN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
EMN leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). TROX leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
Best OverallEastman Chemical Company (EMN)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
DOW vs TROX vs HUN vs EMN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is DOW or TROX or HUN or EMN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Tronox Holdings plc (TROX) is the stronger pick with -5.
7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -7. 0% for Dow Inc. (DOW). Eastman Chemical Company (EMN) offers the better valuation at 18. 0x trailing P/E (12. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Tronox Holdings plc (TROX) a "Buy" — based on 17 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — DOW or TROX or HUN or EMN?
On forward P/E, Eastman Chemical Company is actually cheaper at 12.
5x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — DOW or TROX or HUN or EMN?
Over the past 5 years, Dow Inc.
(DOW) delivered a total return of -27. 2%, compared to -55. 1% for Tronox Holdings plc (TROX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TROX returned +116. 1% versus DOW's +12. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — DOW or TROX or HUN or EMN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Dow Inc.
(DOW) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 76β versus Tronox Holdings plc's 2. 37β — meaning TROX is approximately 213% more volatile than DOW relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Eastman Chemical Company (EMN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 84% versus 2% for Tronox Holdings plc — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — DOW or TROX or HUN or EMN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Tronox Holdings plc (TROX) is pulling ahead at -5.
7% versus -7. 0% for Dow Inc. (DOW). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Huntsman Corporation grew EPS -44. 5% year-over-year, compared to -890. 0% for Tronox Holdings plc. Over a 3-year CAGR, TROX leads at -5. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — DOW or TROX or HUN or EMN?
Eastman Chemical Company (EMN) is the more profitable company, earning 5.
4% net margin versus -16. 2% for Tronox Holdings plc — meaning it keeps 5. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: EMN leads at 10. 6% versus -0. 7% for TROX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — EMN leads at 21. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is DOW or TROX or HUN or EMN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Eastman Chemical Company (EMN) trades at 12.
5x forward P/E versus 12. 6x for Dow Inc. — 0. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for DOW: 6. 0% to $39. 55.
08Which pays a better dividend — DOW or TROX or HUN or EMN?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Huntsman Corporation (HUN) offers the highest yield at 5. 7%, versus 3. 6% for Tronox Holdings plc (TROX).
09Is DOW or TROX or HUN or EMN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Dow Inc.
(DOW) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 76), 5. 6% yield). Tronox Holdings plc (TROX) carries a higher beta of 2. 37 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (DOW: +12. 2%, TROX: +116. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between DOW and TROX and HUN and EMN?
Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: DOW is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; TROX is a small-cap income-oriented stock; HUN is a small-cap income-oriented stock; EMN is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
Revenue Growth>
%
(DOW: -6.1% · TROX: 3.0%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.