Medical - Diagnostics & Research
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
DRIO vs OMCL vs TDOC vs GDRX vs AMWL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Healthcare Information Services
Medical - Healthcare Information Services
Medical - Healthcare Information Services
Medical - Healthcare Information Services
DRIO vs OMCL vs TDOC vs GDRX vs AMWL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Diagnostics & Research | Medical - Healthcare Information Services | Medical - Healthcare Information Services | Medical - Healthcare Information Services | Medical - Healthcare Information Services |
| Market Cap | $388M | $1.99B | $1.31B | $1.01B | $133M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $22M | $1.23B | $2.51B | $788M | $182M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $62M | $20M | $-171M | $29M | $-88M |
| Gross Margin | 56.6% | 43.5% | 65.6% | 89.3% | 38.7% |
| Operating Margin | -163.9% | 2.7% | -7.6% | 10.0% | -50.6% |
| Forward P/E | 6.3x | 22.6x | — | 9.4x | — |
| Total Debt | $32M | $204M | $1.04B | $60M | $5M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $26M | $197M | $781M | $262M | $182M |
DRIO vs OMCL vs TDOC vs GDRX vs AMWL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Sep 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| DarioHealth Corp. (DRIO) | 100 | 2.3 | -97.7% |
| Omnicell, Inc. (OMCL) | 100 | 58.7 | -41.3% |
| Teladoc Health, Inc. (TDOC) | 100 | 3.3 | -96.7% |
| GoodRx Holdings, In… (GDRX) | 100 | 5.3 | -94.7% |
| American Well Corpo… (AMWL) | 100 | 1.3 | -98.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: DRIO vs OMCL vs TDOC vs GDRX vs AMWL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
DRIO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 0.21
- Lower volatility, beta 0.21, Low D/E 46.7%, current ratio 3.73x
- Beta 0.21, current ratio 3.73x
- Better valuation composite
OMCL is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 37.9% 10Y total return vs TDOC's -38.7%
- 6.5% revenue growth vs DRIO's -17.3%
- +72.6% vs DRIO's -44.2%
TDOC plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
GDRX is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 0.6%, EPS growth 104.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 1.3%
Among these 5 stocks, AMWL doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 6.5% revenue growth vs DRIO's -17.3% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 276.1% margin vs AMWL's -48.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.21 vs TDOC's 1.89, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +72.6% vs DRIO's -44.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 54.7% ROA vs AMWL's -25.1%, ROIC -37.2% vs -95.1% |
DRIO vs OMCL vs TDOC vs GDRX vs AMWL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
DRIO vs OMCL vs TDOC vs GDRX vs AMWL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
GDRX leads in 2 of 6 categories
TDOC leads 1 • OMCL leads 1 • DRIO leads 0 • AMWL leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GDRX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TDOC is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.5B annually — 112.5x DRIO's $22M. DRIO is the more profitable business, keeping 2.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AMWL's -48.2%. On growth, OMCL holds the edge at +14.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $22M | $1.2B | $2.5B | $788M | $182M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$37M | $111M | $42M | $165M | -$59M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $62M | $20M | -$171M | $29M | -$88M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$26M | $112M | $251M | $132M | -$42M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +56.6% | +43.5% | +65.6% | +89.3% | +38.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -163.9% | +2.7% | -7.6% | +10.0% | -50.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +2.8% | +1.7% | -6.8% | +3.7% | -48.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -116.7% | +9.1% | +10.0% | +16.7% | -22.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -31.2% | +14.9% | -2.5% | -4.4% | -100.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +8.3% | +2.7% | +32.1% | -1.3% | +44.5% |
Valuation Metrics
TDOC leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 6.3x trailing earnings, DRIO trades at a 99% valuation discount to OMCL's 989.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, GDRX's 4.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than OMCL's 23.8x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $388M | $2.0B | $1.3B | $1.0B | $133M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $393M | $2.0B | $1.6B | $810M | -$45M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 6.30x | 989.16x | -6.36x | 34.23x | -1.34x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 22.62x | — | 9.40x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 23.83x | 15.65x | 4.69x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 17.34x | 1.68x | 0.52x | 1.27x | 0.53x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 5.71x | 1.65x | 0.92x | 1.69x | 0.52x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 22.94x | 4.58x | 6.16x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
GDRX leads this category, winning 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
DRIO delivers a 88.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $88 in annual profit, vs $-33 for AMWL. AMWL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TDOC's 0.75x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), OMCL scores 7/9 vs DRIO's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +88.0% | +1.6% | -12.4% | +4.8% | -33.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +54.7% | +1.0% | -5.9% | +1.9% | -25.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -37.2% | +0.3% | -11.5% | +10.6% | -95.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -36.1% | +0.3% | -10.0% | +7.2% | -36.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 7 | 6 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.47x | 0.17x | 0.75x | 0.10x | 0.02x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $32M | $8M | $259M | -$202M | -$178M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $26M | $197M | $781M | $262M | $182M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $32M | $204M | $1.0B | $60M | $5M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -10.91x | 18.41x | -8.76x | 3.50x | -239.18x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
OMCL leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in OMCL five years ago would be worth $3,373 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $224 for DRIO. Over the past 12 months, OMCL leads with a +72.6% total return vs DRIO's -44.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors OMCL at -12.3% vs DRIO's -52.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -25.8% | -2.9% | +2.8% | +6.2% | +64.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -44.2% | +72.6% | +2.4% | -31.1% | +14.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -89.4% | -32.6% | -72.2% | -36.7% | -80.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.8% | -66.3% | -94.9% | -90.7% | -96.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.6% | +37.9% | -38.7% | -94.2% | -98.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -52.7% | -12.3% | -34.7% | -14.1% | -41.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — DRIO and AMWL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
DRIO is the less volatile stock with a 0.21 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TDOC's 1.89 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AMWL currently trades 87.1% from its 52-week high vs DRIO's 44.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.21x | 1.25x | 1.89x | 1.50x | 1.31x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $17.74 | $55.00 | $9.77 | $5.81 | $9.15 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $5.94 | $24.85 | $4.40 | $1.77 | $3.71 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +44.0% | +79.7% | +74.2% | +50.3% | +87.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 56.4 | 63.7 | 76.1 | 74.9 | 72.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 14K | 551K | 5.2M | 2.2M | 60K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: DRIO as "Buy", OMCL as "Hold", TDOC as "Hold", GDRX as "Hold", AMWL as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 104.9% upside for DRIO (target: $16) vs -27.9% for AMWL (target: $6).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $16.00 | $57.20 | $7.58 | $3.25 | $5.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 8 | 19 | 42 | 24 | 15 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +3.9% | 0.0% | +20.4% | +0.0% |
GDRX leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). TDOC leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
DRIO vs OMCL vs TDOC vs GDRX vs AMWL: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is DRIO or OMCL or TDOC or GDRX or AMWL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Omnicell, Inc.
(OMCL) is the stronger pick with 6. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -17. 3% for DarioHealth Corp. (DRIO). DarioHealth Corp. (DRIO) offers the better valuation at 6. 3x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate DarioHealth Corp. (DRIO) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — DRIO or OMCL or TDOC or GDRX or AMWL?
On trailing P/E, DarioHealth Corp.
(DRIO) is the cheapest at 6. 3x versus Omnicell, Inc. at 989. 2x. On forward P/E, GoodRx Holdings, Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — DRIO or OMCL or TDOC or GDRX or AMWL?
Over the past 5 years, Omnicell, Inc.
(OMCL) delivered a total return of -66. 3%, compared to -97. 8% for DarioHealth Corp. (DRIO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: OMCL returned +37. 9% versus DRIO's -99. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — DRIO or OMCL or TDOC or GDRX or AMWL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), DarioHealth Corp.
(DRIO) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 21β versus Teladoc Health, Inc. 's 1. 89β — meaning TDOC is approximately 807% more volatile than DRIO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, American Well Corporation (AMWL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 75% for Teladoc Health, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — DRIO or OMCL or TDOC or GDRX or AMWL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Omnicell, Inc.
(OMCL) is pulling ahead at 6. 5% versus -17. 3% for DarioHealth Corp. (DRIO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: DarioHealth Corp. grew EPS 267. 6% year-over-year, compared to -83. 6% for Omnicell, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TDOC leads at 1. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — DRIO or OMCL or TDOC or GDRX or AMWL?
DarioHealth Corp.
(DRIO) is the more profitable company, earning 276. 1% net margin versus -38. 4% for American Well Corporation — meaning it keeps 276. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GDRX leads at 11. 0% versus -163. 9% for DRIO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GDRX leads at 92. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is DRIO or OMCL or TDOC or GDRX or AMWL more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, GoodRx Holdings, Inc.
(GDRX) trades at 9. 4x forward P/E versus 22. 6x for Omnicell, Inc. — 13. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for DRIO: 104. 9% to $16. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — DRIO or OMCL or TDOC or GDRX or AMWL?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is DRIO or OMCL or TDOC or GDRX or AMWL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, DarioHealth Corp.
(DRIO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 21)). Teladoc Health, Inc. (TDOC) carries a higher beta of 1. 89 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (DRIO: -99. 6%, TDOC: -38. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between DRIO and OMCL and TDOC and GDRX and AMWL?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: DRIO is a small-cap deep-value stock; OMCL is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TDOC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GDRX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AMWL is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.