Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
DSGN vs BEAM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
DSGN vs BEAM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $881M | $3.23B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $132M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-70M | $-65M |
| Gross Margin | — | -64.2% |
| Operating Margin | — | -281.0% |
| Total Debt | $645K | $294M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $17M | $295M |
DSGN vs BEAM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Mar 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Therapeutics… (DSGN) | 100 | 47.2 | -52.8% |
| Beam Therapeutics I… (BEAM) | 100 | 39.3 | -60.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: DSGN vs BEAM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
DSGN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 1.51
- Lower volatility, beta 1.51, Low D/E 0.3%, current ratio 17.14x
- Beta 1.51, current ratio 17.14x
BEAM is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 120.0%, EPS growth 82.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 31.9%
- 67.8% 10Y total return vs DSGN's -66.0%
- 120.0% revenue growth vs DSGN's -24.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 120.0% revenue growth vs DSGN's -24.6% | |
| Quality / Margins | 4.3% margin vs BEAM's -49.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.51 vs BEAM's 2.14, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +323.4% vs BEAM's +93.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -4.6% ROA vs DSGN's -31.3%, ROIC -31.1% vs -28.5% |
DSGN vs BEAM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BEAM leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BEAM and DSGN operate at a comparable scale, with $132M and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $132M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$78M | -$355M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$70M | -$65M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$54M | -$384M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | -64.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | -2.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | -49.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | -2.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -100.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +6.5% | +26.6% |
Valuation Metrics
BEAM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $881M | $3.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $864M | $3.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -11.56x | -38.85x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 23.14x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.80x | 2.51x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — DSGN and BEAM each lead in 4 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BEAM delivers a -5.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-6 in annual profit, vs $-33 for DSGN. DSGN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BEAM's 0.24x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BEAM scores 4/9 vs DSGN's 2/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -33.1% | -5.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -31.3% | -4.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -28.5% | -31.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -34.8% | -33.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.00x | 0.24x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$16M | -$1M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $17M | $295M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $645,000 | $294M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 1.08x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
DSGN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in DSGN five years ago would be worth $5,027 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,444 for BEAM. Over the past 12 months, DSGN leads with a +323.4% total return vs BEAM's +93.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors DSGN at 22.9% vs BEAM's -1.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +54.9% | +16.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +323.4% | +93.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +85.5% | -5.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -49.7% | -55.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -66.0% | +67.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +22.9% | -1.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — DSGN and BEAM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
DSGN is the less volatile stock with a 1.51 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BEAM's 2.14 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BEAM currently trades 86.4% from its 52-week high vs DSGN's 81.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.51x | 2.14x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $17.25 | $36.44 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.11 | $15.35 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +81.7% | +86.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 62.3 | 60.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 377K | 2.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates DSGN as "Buy" and BEAM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 29.7% upside for BEAM (target: $41) vs 18.8% for DSGN (target: $17).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $16.75 | $40.83 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 6 | 27 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
BEAM leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). DSGN leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
DSGN vs BEAM: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is DSGN or BEAM a better buy right now?
Analysts rate Design Therapeutics, Inc.
(DSGN) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — DSGN or BEAM?
Over the past 5 years, Design Therapeutics, Inc.
(DSGN) delivered a total return of -49. 7%, compared to -55. 6% for Beam Therapeutics Inc. (BEAM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BEAM returned +67. 8% versus DSGN's -66. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — DSGN or BEAM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Design Therapeutics, Inc.
(DSGN) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 51β versus Beam Therapeutics Inc. 's 2. 14β — meaning BEAM is approximately 41% more volatile than DSGN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Design Therapeutics, Inc. (DSGN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 24% for Beam Therapeutics Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — DSGN or BEAM?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Beam Therapeutics Inc.
grew EPS 82. 3% year-over-year, compared to -38. 6% for Design Therapeutics, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — DSGN or BEAM?
Design Therapeutics, Inc.
(DSGN) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus -57. 2% for Beam Therapeutics Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: DSGN leads at 0. 0% versus -274. 6% for BEAM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BEAM leads at 84. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — DSGN or BEAM?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is DSGN or BEAM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Design Therapeutics, Inc.
(DSGN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding. Beam Therapeutics Inc. (BEAM) carries a higher beta of 2. 14 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (DSGN: -66. 0%, BEAM: +67. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between DSGN and BEAM?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: DSGN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BEAM is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.