Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
DSWL vs PLPC vs LYTS vs IIIN vs KFRC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Electrical Equipment & Parts
Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Manufacturing - Metal Fabrication
Staffing & Employment Services
DSWL vs PLPC vs LYTS vs IIIN vs KFRC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Electrical Equipment & Parts | Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Manufacturing - Metal Fabrication | Staffing & Employment Services |
| Market Cap | $52M | $1.69B | $760M | $527M | $790M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $137M | $697M | $592M | $678M | $1.33B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $19M | $34M | $26M | $48M | $35M |
| Gross Margin | 20.1% | 30.9% | 25.3% | 15.0% | 27.2% |
| Operating Margin | 3.6% | 8.0% | 6.5% | 9.2% | 3.8% |
| Forward P/E | 4.7x | 34.4x | 22.3x | 16.6x | 18.0x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $48M | $67M | $4M | $70M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $28M | $83M | $3M | $39M | $2M |
DSWL vs PLPC vs LYTS vs IIIN vs KFRC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Deswell Industries,… (DSWL) | 100 | 130.3 | +30.3% |
| Preformed Line Prod… (PLPC) | 100 | 696.1 | +596.1% |
| LSI Industries Inc. (LYTS) | 100 | 397.7 | +297.7% |
| Insteel Industries,… (IIIN) | 100 | 153.8 | +53.8% |
| Kforce Inc. (KFRC) | 100 | 143.1 | +43.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: DSWL vs PLPC vs LYTS vs IIIN vs KFRC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
DSWL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 7 yrs, beta 0.20, yield 6.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.20, current ratio 5.45x
- Beta 0.20, yield 6.1%, current ratio 5.45x
- Lower P/E (4.7x vs 18.0x)
PLPC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 7.9% 10Y total return vs DSWL's 210.5%
- +159.0% vs IIIN's -18.7%
LYTS lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
IIIN ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure and valuation efficiency.
- Rev growth 22.4%, EPS growth 112.1%, 3Y rev CAGR -7.8%
- PEG 1.01 vs PLPC's 9.54
- 22.4% revenue growth vs KFRC's -5.4%
Among these 5 stocks, KFRC doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 22.4% revenue growth vs KFRC's -5.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (4.7x vs 18.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 13.8% margin vs KFRC's 2.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.20 vs PLPC's 1.58 | |
| Dividends | 6.1% yield, 7-year raise streak, vs KFRC's 3.6% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +159.0% vs IIIN's -18.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 15.7% ROA vs PLPC's 5.3%, ROIC 3.3% vs 9.8% |
DSWL vs PLPC vs LYTS vs IIIN vs KFRC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
DSWL vs PLPC vs LYTS vs IIIN vs KFRC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
IIIN leads in 1 of 6 categories
DSWL leads 1 • PLPC leads 1 • LYTS leads 0 • KFRC leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IIIN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KFRC is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.3B annually — 9.7x DSWL's $137M. DSWL is the more profitable business, keeping 13.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KFRC's 2.6%. On growth, IIIN holds the edge at +23.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $137M | $697M | $592M | $678M | $1.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $8M | $73M | $51M | $81M | $56M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $19M | $34M | $26M | $48M | $35M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $26M | $35M | $38M | $439,000 | $43M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +20.1% | +30.9% | +25.3% | +15.0% | +27.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +3.6% | +8.0% | +6.5% | +9.2% | +3.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +13.8% | +4.9% | +4.3% | +7.0% | +2.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +19.0% | +5.0% | +6.4% | +0.1% | +3.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.5% | +18.7% | -0.5% | +23.3% | +0.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +19.2% | -8.2% | +11.1% | +6.1% | +2.2% |
Valuation Metrics
DSWL leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 4.7x trailing earnings, DSWL trades at a 90% valuation discount to PLPC's 48.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), IIIN offers better value at 0.78x vs PLPC's 13.40x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $52M | $1.7B | $760M | $527M | $790M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $24M | $1.7B | $823M | $492M | $858M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 4.67x | 48.39x | 30.91x | 12.92x | 22.05x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 34.44x | 22.34x | 16.60x | 17.96x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 13.40x | 1.82x | 0.78x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 4.96x | 21.22x | 17.03x | 6.76x | 15.42x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.77x | 2.53x | 1.33x | 0.81x | 0.59x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.51x | 3.59x | 3.26x | 1.43x | 6.17x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 3.95x | 50.75x | 21.94x | 27.81x | 16.88x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — DSWL and KFRC each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KFRC delivers a 27.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $27 in annual profit, vs $7 for PLPC. IIIN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KFRC's 0.56x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DSWL scores 7/9 vs KFRC's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +18.5% | +7.3% | +10.9% | +13.2% | +27.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +15.7% | +5.3% | +6.5% | +10.4% | +9.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.3% | +9.8% | +9.5% | +14.1% | +19.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.4% | +11.0% | +12.6% | +14.1% | +20.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.10x | 0.29x | 0.01x | 0.56x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$28M | -$35M | $63M | -$35M | $68M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $28M | $83M | $3M | $39M | $2M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $48M | $67M | $4M | $70M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 39.48x | 13.52x | 1192.54x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PLPC leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PLPC five years ago would be worth $50,171 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,325 for KFRC. Over the past 12 months, PLPC leads with a +159.0% total return vs IIIN's -18.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PLPC at 34.7% vs KFRC's -4.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -3.8% | +63.2% | +32.8% | -16.2% | +39.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +55.6% | +159.0% | +58.0% | -18.7% | +18.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +40.2% | +144.2% | +100.0% | +10.4% | -13.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +7.6% | +401.7% | +223.4% | -12.0% | -16.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +210.5% | +794.9% | +108.5% | +48.0% | +195.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +11.9% | +34.7% | +26.0% | +3.3% | -4.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — DSWL and LYTS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
DSWL is the less volatile stock with a 0.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PLPC's 1.58 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LYTS currently trades 98.7% from its 52-week high vs IIIN's 65.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.20x | 1.58x | 1.43x | 1.01x | 0.53x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4.48 | $371.80 | $24.75 | $41.64 | $47.48 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.93 | $132.15 | $15.31 | $24.35 | $24.49 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +73.0% | +92.9% | +98.7% | +65.2% | +91.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 53.6 | 64.9 | 70.1 | 39.5 | 65.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 10K | 165K | 378K | 211K | 305K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — DSWL and KFRC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PLPC as "Buy", LYTS as "Buy", IIIN as "Buy", KFRC as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 64.3% upside for KFRC (target: $71) vs -20.4% for PLPC (target: $275). For income investors, DSWL offers the higher dividend yield at 6.11% vs PLPC's 0.24%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $275.00 | $27.00 | — | $71.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 1 | 5 | 4 | 10 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +6.1% | +0.2% | +0.8% | +4.1% | +3.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 7 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 8 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.20 | $0.83 | $0.19 | $1.11 | $1.55 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.6% | 0.0% | +0.4% | +6.4% |
IIIN leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). DSWL leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.
DSWL vs PLPC vs LYTS vs IIIN vs KFRC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is DSWL or PLPC or LYTS or IIIN or KFRC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Insteel Industries, Inc.
(IIIN) is the stronger pick with 22. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 4% for Kforce Inc. (KFRC). Deswell Industries, Inc. (DSWL) offers the better valuation at 4. 7x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Preformed Line Products Company (PLPC) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — DSWL or PLPC or LYTS or IIIN or KFRC?
On trailing P/E, Deswell Industries, Inc.
(DSWL) is the cheapest at 4. 7x versus Preformed Line Products Company at 48. 4x. On forward P/E, Insteel Industries, Inc. is actually cheaper at 16. 6x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Insteel Industries, Inc. wins at 1. 01x versus Preformed Line Products Company's 9. 54x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — DSWL or PLPC or LYTS or IIIN or KFRC?
Over the past 5 years, Preformed Line Products Company (PLPC) delivered a total return of +401.
7%, compared to -16. 8% for Kforce Inc. (KFRC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PLPC returned +794. 9% versus IIIN's +48. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — DSWL or PLPC or LYTS or IIIN or KFRC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Deswell Industries, Inc.
(DSWL) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 20β versus Preformed Line Products Company's 1. 58β — meaning PLPC is approximately 688% more volatile than DSWL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Insteel Industries, Inc. (IIIN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 56% for Kforce Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — DSWL or PLPC or LYTS or IIIN or KFRC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Insteel Industries, Inc.
(IIIN) is pulling ahead at 22. 4% versus -5. 4% for Kforce Inc. (KFRC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Insteel Industries, Inc. grew EPS 112. 1% year-over-year, compared to -25. 2% for Kforce Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, LYTS leads at 8. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — DSWL or PLPC or LYTS or IIIN or KFRC?
Deswell Industries, Inc.
(DSWL) is the more profitable company, earning 16. 5% net margin versus 2. 6% for Kforce Inc. — meaning it keeps 16. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: IIIN leads at 8. 4% versus 3. 8% for KFRC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PLPC leads at 31. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is DSWL or PLPC or LYTS or IIIN or KFRC more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Insteel Industries, Inc. (IIIN) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 01x versus Preformed Line Products Company's 9. 54x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, Insteel Industries, Inc. (IIIN) trades at 16. 6x forward P/E versus 34. 4x for Preformed Line Products Company — 17. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for KFRC: 64. 3% to $71. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — DSWL or PLPC or LYTS or IIIN or KFRC?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Deswell Industries, Inc. (DSWL) offers the highest yield at 6. 1%, versus 0. 2% for Preformed Line Products Company (PLPC).
09Is DSWL or PLPC or LYTS or IIIN or KFRC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Deswell Industries, Inc.
(DSWL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 20), 6. 1% yield, +210. 5% 10Y return). Preformed Line Products Company (PLPC) carries a higher beta of 1. 58 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (DSWL: +210. 5%, PLPC: +794. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between DSWL and PLPC and LYTS and IIIN and KFRC?
These companies operate in different sectors (DSWL (Technology) and PLPC (Industrials) and LYTS (Technology) and IIIN (Industrials) and KFRC (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: DSWL is a small-cap deep-value stock; PLPC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; LYTS is a small-cap high-growth stock; IIIN is a small-cap high-growth stock; KFRC is a small-cap income-oriented stock. DSWL, LYTS, IIIN, KFRC pay a dividend while PLPC does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.