DUO vs BEKE

For growth investors, KE Holdings Inc.

(BEKE) is the stronger pick with 20. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 19. 0% for Fangdd Network Group Ltd. (DUO). Fangdd Network Group Ltd. (DUO) offers the better valuation at 3. 2x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate KE Holdings Inc. (BEKE) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Fangdd Network Group Ltd.

(DUO) is the cheapest at 3. 2x versus KE Holdings Inc. at 35. 9x.

Over the past 5 years, KE Holdings Inc.

(BEKE) delivered a total return of -61. 1%, compared to -100. 0% for Fangdd Network Group Ltd. (DUO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BEKE returned -48. 6% versus DUO's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), KE Holdings Inc.

(BEKE) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 83β versus Fangdd Network Group Ltd. 's 1. 69β — meaning DUO is approximately 104% more volatile than BEKE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Fangdd Network Group Ltd. (DUO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 32% for KE Holdings Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), KE Holdings Inc.

(BEKE) is pulling ahead at 20. 2% versus 19. 0% for Fangdd Network Group Ltd. (DUO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Fangdd Network Group Ltd. grew EPS 115. 2% year-over-year, compared to -29. 4% for KE Holdings Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, BEKE leads at 5. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Fangdd Network Group Ltd.

(DUO) is the more profitable company, earning 9. 1% net margin versus 4. 3% for KE Holdings Inc. — meaning it keeps 9. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BEKE leads at 4. 0% versus -37. 1% for DUO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BEKE leads at 24. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

In this comparison, BEKE (1.

9% yield) pays a dividend. DUO does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, KE Holdings Inc.

(BEKE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 83), 1. 9% yield). Fangdd Network Group Ltd. (DUO) carries a higher beta of 1. 69 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (BEKE: -48. 6%, DUO: -100. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

BEKE pays a dividend while DUO does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.