Real Estate - Services
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
DUO vs BEKE vs COMP vs EXPI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Real Estate - Services
Software - Application
Real Estate - Services
DUO vs BEKE vs COMP vs EXPI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Real Estate - Services | Real Estate - Services | Software - Application | Real Estate - Services |
| Market Cap | $14M | $60.54B | $4.08B | $1.01B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $403M | $103.52B | $8.31B | $4.77B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-25M | $3.48B | $14M | $-23M |
| Gross Margin | 15.6% | 21.9% | 10.8% | 7.0% |
| Operating Margin | -32.0% | 3.2% | -4.2% | -0.4% |
| Forward P/E | 3.2x | 3.3x | 44.4x | 93.1x |
| Total Debt | $1M | $22.65B | $454M | $0.00 |
| Cash & Equiv. | $75M | $11.44B | $199M | $124M |
DUO vs BEKE vs COMP vs EXPI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Apr 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fangdd Network Grou… (DUO) | 100 | 0.0 | -100.0% |
| KE Holdings Inc. (BEKE) | 100 | 36.1 | -63.9% |
| Compass, Inc. (COMP) | 100 | 48.6 | -51.4% |
| eXp World Holdings,… (EXPI) | 100 | 19.0 | -81.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: DUO vs BEKE vs COMP vs EXPI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
DUO is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (3.2x vs 44.4x)
BEKE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.83, yield 1.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.83, Low D/E 31.7%, current ratio 1.45x
- 3.4% margin vs DUO's -6.1%
- Beta 0.83 vs COMP's 1.79, lower leverage
COMP is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 23.7%, EPS growth 67.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.0%
- 23.7% revenue growth vs EXPI's 4.5%
- -8.2% vs DUO's -57.8%
EXPI is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and defensive.
- 6.6% 10Y total return vs BEKE's -48.6%
- Beta 1.57, yield 3.1%, current ratio 1.53x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 23.7% revenue growth vs EXPI's 4.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (3.2x vs 44.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 3.4% margin vs DUO's -6.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.83 vs COMP's 1.79, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.9% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs EXPI's 3.1%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -8.2% vs DUO's -57.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 2.7% ROA vs EXPI's -5.1%, ROIC 3.7% vs -15.3% |
DUO vs BEKE vs COMP vs EXPI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
DUO vs BEKE vs COMP vs EXPI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
BEKE leads in 3 of 6 categories
COMP leads 1 • DUO leads 0 • EXPI leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BEKE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BEKE is the larger business by revenue, generating $103.5B annually — 257.2x DUO's $403M. BEKE is the more profitable business, keeping 3.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to DUO's -6.1%. On growth, COMP holds the edge at +99.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $403M | $103.5B | $8.3B | $4.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$128M | $4.3B | -$100M | -$12M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$25M | $3.5B | $14M | -$23M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$85M | $2.4B | $16M | $108M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +15.6% | +21.9% | +10.8% | +7.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -32.0% | +3.2% | -4.2% | -0.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -6.1% | +3.4% | +0.2% | -0.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -21.0% | +2.3% | +0.2% | +2.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +45.3% | +2.1% | +99.4% | +8.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -3.7% | -32.7% | +133.3% | -24.4% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — COMP and EXPI each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 3.2x trailing earnings, DUO trades at a 91% valuation discount to BEKE's 35.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, COMP's 52.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than BEKE's 88.9x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $14M | $60.5B | $4.1B | $1.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3M | $62.2B | $4.3B | $887M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 3.17x | 35.90x | -72.60x | -44.86x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 3.33x | 44.40x | 93.14x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 88.86x | 51.99x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.29x | 4.42x | 0.59x | 0.21x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.25x | 2.04x | 5.27x | 4.13x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 49.15x | 20.07x | 9.28x |
Profitability & Efficiency
BEKE leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BEKE delivers a 5.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $5 in annual profit, vs $-9 for EXPI. DUO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to COMP's 0.58x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DUO scores 5/9 vs EXPI's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -6.5% | +5.0% | +1.1% | -9.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -3.6% | +2.7% | +0.4% | -5.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -49.7% | +3.7% | -2.5% | -15.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -40.2% | +4.7% | -2.9% | -9.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.00x | 0.32x | 0.58x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$74M | $11.2B | $255M | -$124M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $75M | $11.4B | $199M | $124M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1M | $22.7B | $454M | $0 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 131.87x | -0.12x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
COMP leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in COMP five years ago would be worth $4,248 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1 for DUO. Over the past 12 months, COMP leads with a -8.2% total return vs DUO's -57.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors COMP at 42.9% vs DUO's -81.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +1.9% | +14.4% | -30.9% | -30.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -57.8% | -11.8% | -8.2% | -25.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.3% | +20.1% | +191.6% | -47.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -61.1% | -57.5% | -76.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -48.6% | -64.0% | +662.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -81.3% | +6.3% | +42.9% | -19.5% |
Risk & Volatility
BEKE leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BEKE is the less volatile stock with a 0.83 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than COMP's 1.79 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BEKE currently trades 86.5% from its 52-week high vs DUO's 26.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.69x | 0.83x | 1.79x | 1.57x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $6.08 | $20.98 | $13.96 | $12.23 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.01 | $14.40 | $5.66 | $5.66 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +26.3% | +86.5% | +52.0% | +51.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 62.7 | 66.3 | 38.4 | 47.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 49K | 4.0M | 14.1M | 1.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — BEKE and EXPI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BEKE as "Buy", COMP as "Buy", EXPI as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 96.8% upside for COMP (target: $14) vs 22.0% for BEKE (target: $22). For income investors, EXPI offers the higher dividend yield at 3.07% vs BEKE's 1.94%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $22.13 | $14.29 | $11.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 12 | 10 | 5 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.9% | — | +3.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 2 | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $2.40 | — | $0.19 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.2% | 0.0% | +5.6% |
BEKE leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). COMP leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
DUO vs BEKE vs COMP vs EXPI: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is DUO or BEKE or COMP or EXPI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Compass, Inc.
(COMP) is the stronger pick with 23. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 4. 5% for eXp World Holdings, Inc. (EXPI). Fangdd Network Group Ltd. (DUO) offers the better valuation at 3. 2x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate KE Holdings Inc. (BEKE) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — DUO or BEKE or COMP or EXPI?
On trailing P/E, Fangdd Network Group Ltd.
(DUO) is the cheapest at 3. 2x versus KE Holdings Inc. at 35. 9x. On forward P/E, KE Holdings Inc. is actually cheaper at 3. 3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — DUO or BEKE or COMP or EXPI?
Over the past 5 years, Compass, Inc.
(COMP) delivered a total return of -57. 5%, compared to -100. 0% for Fangdd Network Group Ltd. (DUO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: EXPI returned +688. 3% versus DUO's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — DUO or BEKE or COMP or EXPI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), KE Holdings Inc.
(BEKE) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 83β versus Compass, Inc. 's 1. 79β — meaning COMP is approximately 117% more volatile than BEKE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Fangdd Network Group Ltd. (DUO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 58% for Compass, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — DUO or BEKE or COMP or EXPI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Compass, Inc.
(COMP) is pulling ahead at 23. 7% versus 4. 5% for eXp World Holdings, Inc. (EXPI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Fangdd Network Group Ltd. grew EPS 115. 2% year-over-year, compared to -29. 4% for KE Holdings Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, BEKE leads at 5. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — DUO or BEKE or COMP or EXPI?
Fangdd Network Group Ltd.
(DUO) is the more profitable company, earning 9. 1% net margin versus -0. 8% for Compass, Inc. — meaning it keeps 9. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BEKE leads at 4. 0% versus -37. 1% for DUO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BEKE leads at 24. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is DUO or BEKE or COMP or EXPI more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, KE Holdings Inc.
(BEKE) trades at 3. 3x forward P/E versus 93. 1x for eXp World Holdings, Inc. — 89. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for COMP: 96. 8% to $14. 29.
08Which pays a better dividend — DUO or BEKE or COMP or EXPI?
In this comparison, EXPI (3.
1% yield), BEKE (1. 9% yield) pay a dividend. DUO, COMP do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is DUO or BEKE or COMP or EXPI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, KE Holdings Inc.
(BEKE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 83), 1. 9% yield). Compass, Inc. (COMP) carries a higher beta of 1. 79 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (BEKE: -46. 8%, COMP: -64. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between DUO and BEKE and COMP and EXPI?
These companies operate in different sectors (DUO (Real Estate) and BEKE (Real Estate) and COMP (Technology) and EXPI (Real Estate)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: DUO is a small-cap high-growth stock; BEKE is a mid-cap high-growth stock; COMP is a small-cap high-growth stock; EXPI is a small-cap income-oriented stock. BEKE, EXPI pay a dividend while DUO, COMP do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.