Software - Application
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
DUOT vs PESI vs KO vs PEP vs CWST vs JPM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Waste Management
Beverages - Non-Alcoholic
Beverages - Non-Alcoholic
Waste Management
Banks - Diversified
DUOT vs PESI vs KO vs PEP vs CWST vs JPM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Waste Management | Beverages - Non-Alcoholic | Beverages - Non-Alcoholic | Waste Management | Banks - Diversified |
| Market Cap | $214M | $204M | $355.61B | $197.17B | $5.60B | $896.00B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $25M | $59M | $49.28B | $93.92B | $1.88B | $280.33B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-11M | $-18M | $13.70B | $8.24B | $7M | $57.05B |
| Gross Margin | 33.0% | 4.1% | 61.7% | 54.1% | 17.4% | 60.0% |
| Operating Margin | -46.8% | -26.3% | 29.3% | 12.2% | 4.5% | 25.9% |
| Forward P/E | 292.0x | — | 25.3x | 16.7x | 66.0x | 14.4x |
| Total Debt | $5M | $4M | $45.49B | $49.90B | $1.24B | $942.38B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $15M | $12M | $10.27B | $9.16B | $124M | $343.34B |
DUOT vs PESI vs KO vs PEP vs CWST vs JPM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Duos Technologies G… (DUOT) | 100 | 253.9 | +153.9% |
| Perma-Fix Environme… (PESI) | 100 | 172.1 | +72.1% |
| The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO) | 100 | 184.9 | +84.9% |
| PepsiCo, Inc. (PEP) | 100 | 109.1 | +9.1% |
| Casella Waste Syste… (CWST) | 100 | 171.5 | +71.5% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 341.0 | +241.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: DUOT vs PESI vs KO vs PEP vs CWST vs JPM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
DUOT has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure.
- Rev growth 271.2%, EPS growth 54.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 21.6%
- 271.2% revenue growth vs KO's 1.9%
- +46.7% vs CWST's -24.5%
PESI doesn't hold a clear category lead here; it's more of a secondary option in this specific comparison.
KO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and efficiency is your priority.
- 27.8% margin vs DUOT's -45.4%
- 13.1% ROA vs PESI's -20.2%, ROIC 15.8% vs -21.7%
PEP ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 54 yrs, beta -0.11, yield 3.9%
- 3.9% yield, 54-year raise streak, vs KO's 2.5%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
CWST is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.27, Low D/E 79.0%, current ratio 1.26x
- Beta 0.27, current ratio 1.26x
- Beta 0.27 vs DUOT's 2.73
JPM is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 465.8% 10Y total return vs CWST's 11.1%
- PEG 0.81 vs PEP's 5.11
- Lower P/E (14.4x vs 66.0x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 271.2% revenue growth vs KO's 1.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (14.4x vs 66.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 27.8% margin vs DUOT's -45.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.27 vs DUOT's 2.73 | |
| Dividends | 3.9% yield, 54-year raise streak, vs KO's 2.5%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +46.7% vs CWST's -24.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.1% ROA vs PESI's -20.2%, ROIC 15.8% vs -21.7% |
DUOT vs PESI vs KO vs PEP vs CWST vs JPM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
DUOT vs PESI vs KO vs PEP vs CWST vs JPM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 6 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
KO leads in 3 of 6 categories
JPM leads 2 • DUOT leads 0 • PESI leads 0 • PEP leads 0 • CWST leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 11306.7x DUOT's $25M. KO is the more profitable business, keeping 27.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to DUOT's -45.4%. On growth, KO holds the edge at +12.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $25M | $59M | $49.3B | $93.9B | $1.9B | $280.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$10M | -$14M | $15.5B | $14.3B | $414M | $81.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$11M | -$18M | $13.7B | $8.2B | $7M | $57.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$75M | -$18M | $12.6B | $7.7B | $102M | $100.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +33.0% | +4.1% | +61.7% | +54.1% | +17.4% | +60.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -46.8% | -26.3% | +29.3% | +12.2% | +4.5% | +25.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -45.4% | -30.1% | +27.8% | +8.8% | +0.4% | +20.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -3.0% | -29.9% | +25.5% | +8.2% | +5.5% | +36.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -45.0% | -20.1% | +12.1% | +5.6% | +9.6% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +16.7% | -110.5% | +18.2% | +66.7% | -18.6% | +16.0% |
Valuation Metrics
JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 16.0x trailing earnings, JPM trades at a 98% valuation discount to CWST's 744.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), JPM offers better value at 0.90x vs PEP's 7.37x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $214M | $204M | $355.6B | $197.2B | $5.6B | $896.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $203M | $197M | $390.8B | $237.9B | $6.7B | $1.50T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -18.25x | -14.66x | 27.18x | 24.05x | 744.75x | 16.00x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 292.00x | — | 25.27x | 16.68x | 66.00x | 14.40x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 2.43x | 7.37x | — | 0.90x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 26.39x | 16.63x | 16.34x | 18.36x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 7.92x | 3.31x | 7.42x | 2.10x | 3.05x | 3.20x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.68x | 4.05x | 10.40x | 9.63x | 3.62x | 2.47x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 67.15x | 25.70x | 66.07x | 8.88x |
Profitability & Efficiency
KO leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KO delivers a 41.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $-34 for PESI. PESI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.09x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KO scores 7/9 vs CWST's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -21.5% | -34.5% | +41.1% | +40.1% | +0.5% | +15.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -15.7% | -20.2% | +13.1% | +7.7% | +0.2% | +1.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -34.7% | -21.7% | +15.8% | +14.9% | +2.6% | +4.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -27.4% | -16.7% | +17.3% | +16.1% | +2.9% | +8.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 | 7 | 5 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.10x | 0.09x | 1.33x | 2.43x | 0.79x | 2.60x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$11M | -$7M | $35.2B | $40.7B | $1.1B | $599.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $15M | $12M | $10.3B | $9.2B | $124M | $343.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5M | $4M | $45.5B | $49.9B | $1.2B | $942.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -98.47x | -42.14x | 10.70x | 10.34x | 1.12x | 0.74x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
JPM leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth $21,820 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,008 for DUOT. Over the past 12 months, DUOT leads with a +46.7% total return vs CWST's -24.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JPM at 33.6% vs PEP's -4.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +8.1% | -10.2% | +20.3% | +3.5% | -9.4% | -0.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +46.7% | +6.4% | +17.2% | +13.4% | -24.5% | +21.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +137.9% | -2.9% | +47.0% | -11.7% | -3.3% | +138.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +10.1% | +59.6% | +65.6% | +14.3% | +36.2% | +118.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -58.6% | +101.0% | +121.1% | +82.3% | +1107.7% | +465.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +33.5% | -1.0% | +13.7% | -4.1% | -1.1% | +33.6% |
Risk & Volatility
KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than DUOT's 2.73 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KO currently trades 98.3% from its 52-week high vs PESI's 66.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.73x | 1.97x | -0.20x | -0.11x | 0.27x | 0.94x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $15.28 | $16.50 | $84.04 | $171.48 | $118.91 | $337.25 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $5.78 | $8.02 | $65.35 | $127.60 | $74.05 | $262.71 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +76.4% | +66.6% | +98.3% | +84.1% | +75.2% | +95.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 54.4 | 45.6 | 60.6 | 41.6 | 59.2 | 59.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 628K | 195K | 12.7M | 6.0M | 686K | 7.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — KO and PEP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: DUOT as "Buy", PESI as "Hold", KO as "Buy", PEP as "Hold", CWST as "Buy", JPM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 63.7% upside for PESI (target: $18) vs 4.2% for KO (target: $86). For income investors, PEP offers the higher dividend yield at 3.86% vs JPM's 1.86%.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $17.00 | $18.00 | $86.13 | $167.88 | $112.33 | $339.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 3 | 1 | 48 | 45 | 19 | 61 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +2.5% | +3.9% | — | +1.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 1 | 56 | 54 | 1 | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $2.04 | $5.57 | — | $5.95 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.2% | +0.5% | 0.0% | +3.9% |
KO leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). JPM leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). 1 tied.
DUOT vs PESI vs KO vs PEP vs CWST vs JPM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is DUOT or PESI or KO or PEP or CWST or JPM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Duos Technologies Group, Inc.
(DUOT) is the stronger pick with 271. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 9% for The Coca-Cola Company (KO). JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) offers the better valuation at 16. 0x trailing P/E (14. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Duos Technologies Group, Inc. (DUOT) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — DUOT or PESI or KO or PEP or CWST or JPM?
On trailing P/E, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the cheapest at 16. 0x versus Casella Waste Systems, Inc. at 744. 8x. On forward P/E, JPMorgan Chase & Co. is actually cheaper at 14. 4x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: JPMorgan Chase & Co. wins at 0. 81x versus PepsiCo, Inc. 's 5. 11x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — DUOT or PESI or KO or PEP or CWST or JPM?
Over the past 5 years, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) delivered a total return of +118. 2%, compared to +10. 1% for Duos Technologies Group, Inc. (DUOT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CWST returned +1108% versus DUOT's -58. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — DUOT or PESI or KO or PEP or CWST or JPM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
20β versus Duos Technologies Group, Inc. 's 2. 73β — meaning DUOT is approximately -1464% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc. (PESI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 9% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — DUOT or PESI or KO or PEP or CWST or JPM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Duos Technologies Group, Inc.
(DUOT) is pulling ahead at 271. 2% versus 1. 9% for The Coca-Cola Company (KO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Duos Technologies Group, Inc. grew EPS 54. 0% year-over-year, compared to -47. 8% for Casella Waste Systems, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, DUOT leads at 21. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — DUOT or PESI or KO or PEP or CWST or JPM?
The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the more profitable company, earning 27.
3% net margin versus -36. 4% for Duos Technologies Group, Inc. — meaning it keeps 27. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KO leads at 28. 7% versus -36. 1% for DUOT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KO leads at 61. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is DUOT or PESI or KO or PEP or CWST or JPM more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 81x versus PepsiCo, Inc. 's 5. 11x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) trades at 14. 4x forward P/E versus 292. 0x for Duos Technologies Group, Inc. — 277. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PESI: 63. 7% to $18. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — DUOT or PESI or KO or PEP or CWST or JPM?
In this comparison, PEP (3.
9% yield), KO (2. 5% yield), JPM (1. 9% yield) pay a dividend. DUOT, PESI, CWST do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is DUOT or PESI or KO or PEP or CWST or JPM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
20), 2. 5% yield, +121. 1% 10Y return). Duos Technologies Group, Inc. (DUOT) carries a higher beta of 2. 73 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +121. 1%, DUOT: -58. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between DUOT and PESI and KO and PEP and CWST and JPM?
These companies operate in different sectors (DUOT (Technology) and PESI (Industrials) and KO (Consumer Defensive) and PEP (Consumer Defensive) and CWST (Industrials) and JPM (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: DUOT is a small-cap high-growth stock; PESI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock; PEP is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; CWST is a small-cap high-growth stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock. KO, PEP, JPM pay a dividend while DUOT, PESI, CWST do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.