Apparel - Retail
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
DXLG vs BURL vs KSS vs RL vs PVH
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Apparel - Retail
Department Stores
Apparel - Manufacturers
Apparel - Manufacturers
DXLG vs BURL vs KSS vs RL vs PVH — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Apparel - Retail | Apparel - Retail | Department Stores | Apparel - Manufacturers | Apparel - Manufacturers |
| Market Cap | $35M | $19.40B | $1.61B | $47.87B | $4.06B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $442M | $11.56B | $15.53B | $7.83B | $8.78B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-8M | $610M | $271M | $919M | $469M |
| Gross Margin | 44.4% | 41.9% | 36.1% | 69.6% | 58.2% |
| Operating Margin | -2.3% | 8.9% | 3.3% | 15.0% | 7.4% |
| Forward P/E | — | 31.3x | 10.3x | 21.7x | 8.1x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $3.99B | $2.45B | $2.67B | $3.39B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $24M | $1.23B | $674M | $1.92B | $748M |
DXLG vs BURL vs KSS vs RL vs PVH — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Destination XL Grou… (DXLG) | 100 | 149.8 | +49.8% |
| Burlington Stores, … (BURL) | 100 | 146.2 | +46.2% |
| Kohl's Corporation (KSS) | 100 | 74.7 | -25.3% |
| Ralph Lauren Corpor… (RL) | 100 | 468.2 | +368.2% |
| PVH Corp. (PVH) | 100 | 194.9 | +94.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: DXLG vs BURL vs KSS vs RL vs PVH
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Among these 5 stocks, DXLG doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
BURL has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 8.9%, EPS growth 21.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 10.0%
- 440.2% 10Y total return vs RL's 319.2%
- 8.9% revenue growth vs DXLG's -6.9%
- Beta 1.30 vs KSS's 2.32
KSS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if dividends and momentum is your priority.
- 3.4% yield, vs RL's 0.9%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
- +127.8% vs DXLG's -35.6%
RL ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 1.50, yield 0.9%
- Beta 1.50, yield 0.9%, current ratio 1.78x
- 11.7% margin vs DXLG's -1.7%
- 11.8% ROA vs DXLG's -1.9%, ROIC 20.6% vs -6.8%
PVH is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and valuation efficiency.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.48, Low D/E 66.0%, current ratio 1.27x
- PEG 0.60 vs RL's 1.18
- Lower P/E (8.1x vs 21.7x), PEG 0.60 vs 1.18
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 8.9% revenue growth vs DXLG's -6.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.1x vs 21.7x), PEG 0.60 vs 1.18 | |
| Quality / Margins | 11.7% margin vs DXLG's -1.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.30 vs KSS's 2.32 | |
| Dividends | 3.4% yield, vs RL's 0.9%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +127.8% vs DXLG's -35.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.8% ROA vs DXLG's -1.9%, ROIC 20.6% vs -6.8% |
DXLG vs BURL vs KSS vs RL vs PVH — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
DXLG vs BURL vs KSS vs RL vs PVH — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
RL leads in 3 of 6 categories
DXLG leads 1 • BURL leads 0 • KSS leads 0 • PVH leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RL leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KSS is the larger business by revenue, generating $15.5B annually — 35.1x DXLG's $442M. RL is the more profitable business, keeping 11.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to DXLG's -1.7%. On growth, RL holds the edge at +12.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $442M | $11.6B | $15.5B | $7.8B | $8.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $5M | $1.5B | $1.2B | $1.4B | $924M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$8M | $610M | $271M | $919M | $469M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$11M | $232M | $1.2B | $695M | $516M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +44.4% | +41.9% | +36.1% | +69.6% | +58.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -2.3% | +8.9% | +3.3% | +15.0% | +7.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -1.7% | +5.3% | +1.7% | +11.7% | +5.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -2.6% | +2.0% | +7.5% | +8.9% | +5.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -5.2% | +11.5% | -4.2% | +12.2% | +4.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -137.7% | +20.4% | +153.5% | +24.7% | +65.0% |
Valuation Metrics
DXLG leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 6.1x trailing earnings, KSS trades at a 81% valuation discount to BURL's 32.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), PVH offers better value at 0.62x vs RL's 1.65x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $35M | $19.4B | $1.6B | $47.9B | $4.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $11M | $22.2B | $3.4B | $48.6B | $6.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.97x | 32.24x | 6.06x | 30.45x | 8.39x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 31.34x | 10.26x | 21.72x | 8.12x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 1.65x | 0.62x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 17.49x | 2.80x | 42.21x | 6.61x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.08x | 1.68x | 0.10x | 6.76x | 0.47x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.32x | 5.05x | 0.41x | 8.74x | 0.98x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 18.82x | 113.08x | 1.46x | 46.98x | 6.97x |
Profitability & Efficiency
RL leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
RL delivers a 31.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $32 in annual profit, vs $-5 for DXLG. KSS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.61x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to RL's 1.03x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), RL scores 8/9 vs DXLG's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -5.5% | +29.7% | +6.9% | +31.8% | +9.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -1.9% | +6.5% | +2.0% | +11.8% | +4.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -6.8% | +10.3% | +4.6% | +20.6% | +7.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -6.4% | +12.0% | +4.8% | +18.6% | +8.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 7 | 7 | 8 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 1.03x | 0.61x | 1.03x | 0.66x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$24M | $2.8B | $1.8B | $746M | $2.6B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $24M | $1.2B | $674M | $1.9B | $748M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $4.0B | $2.5B | $2.7B | $3.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 11.36x | 2.17x | 23.25x | 2.42x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
RL leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in RL five years ago would be worth $26,443 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,516 for KSS. Over the past 12 months, KSS leads with a +127.8% total return vs DXLG's -35.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors RL at 48.2% vs DXLG's -47.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -28.9% | +2.8% | -32.1% | -2.2% | +30.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -35.6% | +25.1% | +127.8% | +48.6% | +24.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -85.6% | +68.1% | -9.7% | +225.3% | +7.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -55.2% | -7.4% | -64.8% | +164.4% | -24.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -88.1% | +440.2% | -25.3% | +319.2% | -1.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -47.6% | +18.9% | -3.3% | +48.2% | +2.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — BURL and RL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BURL is the less volatile stock with a 1.30 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than KSS's 2.32 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. RL currently trades 89.9% from its 52-week high vs DXLG's 37.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.30x | 1.30x | 2.32x | 1.50x | 1.48x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $1.69 | $351.85 | $25.22 | $393.41 | $100.15 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.43 | $218.52 | $6.47 | $237.83 | $59.60 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +37.9% | +87.1% | +56.9% | +89.9% | +88.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 58.2 | 44.5 | 50.7 | 54.8 | 60.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 144K | 721K | 4.6M | 532K | 1.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — KSS and RL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BURL as "Buy", KSS as "Hold", RL as "Buy", PVH as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 25.4% upside for KSS (target: $18) vs 8.2% for BURL (target: $332). For income investors, KSS offers the higher dividend yield at 3.39% vs PVH's 0.17%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $331.88 | $18.00 | $428.75 | $100.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 35 | 39 | 48 | 38 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +3.4% | +0.9% | +0.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $0.49 | $3.14 | $0.15 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +39.2% | +1.4% | 0.0% | +1.0% | +12.9% |
RL leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). DXLG leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
DXLG vs BURL vs KSS vs RL vs PVH: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is DXLG or BURL or KSS or RL or PVH a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Burlington Stores, Inc.
(BURL) is the stronger pick with 8. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -6. 9% for Destination XL Group, Inc. (DXLG). Kohl's Corporation (KSS) offers the better valuation at 6. 1x trailing P/E (10. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Burlington Stores, Inc. (BURL) a "Buy" — based on 35 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — DXLG or BURL or KSS or RL or PVH?
On trailing P/E, Kohl's Corporation (KSS) is the cheapest at 6.
1x versus Burlington Stores, Inc. at 32. 2x. On forward P/E, PVH Corp. is actually cheaper at 8. 1x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: PVH Corp. wins at 0. 60x versus Ralph Lauren Corporation's 1. 18x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — DXLG or BURL or KSS or RL or PVH?
Over the past 5 years, Ralph Lauren Corporation (RL) delivered a total return of +164.
4%, compared to -64. 8% for Kohl's Corporation (KSS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BURL returned +440. 2% versus DXLG's -88. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — DXLG or BURL or KSS or RL or PVH?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Burlington Stores, Inc.
(BURL) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 30β versus Kohl's Corporation's 2. 32β — meaning KSS is approximately 78% more volatile than BURL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Kohl's Corporation (KSS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 61% versus 103% for Ralph Lauren Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — DXLG or BURL or KSS or RL or PVH?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Burlington Stores, Inc.
(BURL) is pulling ahead at 8. 9% versus -6. 9% for Destination XL Group, Inc. (DXLG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Kohl's Corporation grew EPS 144. 3% year-over-year, compared to -1420. 0% for Destination XL Group, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, BURL leads at 10. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — DXLG or BURL or KSS or RL or PVH?
Ralph Lauren Corporation (RL) is the more profitable company, earning 10.
5% net margin versus -8. 3% for Destination XL Group, Inc. — meaning it keeps 10. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: RL leads at 13. 2% versus -4. 2% for DXLG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RL leads at 68. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is DXLG or BURL or KSS or RL or PVH more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, PVH Corp. (PVH) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 60x versus Ralph Lauren Corporation's 1. 18x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, PVH Corp. (PVH) trades at 8. 1x forward P/E versus 31. 3x for Burlington Stores, Inc. — 23. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for KSS: 25. 4% to $18. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — DXLG or BURL or KSS or RL or PVH?
In this comparison, KSS (3.
4% yield), RL (0. 9% yield), PVH (0. 2% yield) pay a dividend. DXLG, BURL do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is DXLG or BURL or KSS or RL or PVH better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Ralph Lauren Corporation (RL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (0.
9% yield, +319. 2% 10Y return). Destination XL Group, Inc. (DXLG) carries a higher beta of 2. 30 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (RL: +319. 2%, DXLG: -88. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between DXLG and BURL and KSS and RL and PVH?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: DXLG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BURL is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; KSS is a small-cap deep-value stock; RL is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; PVH is a small-cap deep-value stock. KSS, RL pay a dividend while DXLG, BURL, PVH do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.