EAF
GrafTech International Ltd.
Electrical Equipment & Parts
Market Cap$2.34B
5Y Perf.-86.9%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
EAF vs KRO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
KRO
Kronos Worldwide, Inc.
Chemicals - Specialty
Market Cap$811M
5Y Perf.-27.8%
EAF vs KRO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | EAF | KRO |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Electrical Equipment & Parts | Chemicals - Specialty |
| Market Cap | $2.34B | $811M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $517M | $1.88B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-224M | $-134M |
| Gross Margin | -2.7% | 10.1% |
| Operating Margin | -11.4% | -3.1% |
| Total Debt | $1.09B | $577M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $138M | $37M |
EAF vs KRO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
EAF
KRO
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| GrafTech Internatio… (EAF) | 100 | 13.1 | -86.9% |
| Kronos Worldwide, I… (KRO) | 100 | 72.2 | -27.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: EAF vs KRO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: KRO leads in 5 of 6 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. GrafTech International Ltd. is the stronger pick specifically for recent price momentum and sentiment. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
EAF
GrafTech International Ltd.
The Income Pick
EAF is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 2.02
- +23.5% vs KRO's -1.2%
Best for: income & stability
KRO
Kronos Worldwide, Inc.
The Growth Play
KRO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth -1.5%, EPS growth -228.0%, 3Y rev CAGR -1.2%
- 129.0% 10Y total return vs EAF's -83.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.57, Low D/E 76.9%, current ratio 2.70x
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | KRO | -1.5% revenue growth vs EAF's -6.4% |
| Quality / Margins | KRO | -7.1% margin vs EAF's -43.2% |
| Stability / Safety | KRO | Beta 1.57 vs EAF's 2.02 |
| Dividends | KRO | 2.8% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | EAF | +23.5% vs KRO's -1.2% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | KRO | -9.4% ROA vs EAF's -21.1%, ROIC -1.9% vs -7.9% |
EAF vs KRO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2021
FY 2014
EAF vs KRO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLKROLAGGINGEAF
EAFGrafTech Internationa…
0leads
KROKronos Worldwide, Inc.
4leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs EAFMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
KRO4/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
Tied
—
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
KRO6/7
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
KRO5/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
KRO2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
—
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KRO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KRO is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.9B annually — 3.6x EAF's $517M. KRO is the more profitable business, keeping -7.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to EAF's -43.2%. On growth, EAF holds the edge at +11.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | EAFGrafTech Internat… | KROKronos Worldwide,… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $517M | $1.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$11M | -$9M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$224M | -$134M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$105M | $35M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -2.7% | +10.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -11.4% | -3.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -43.2% | -7.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -20.3% | +1.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +11.9% | +4.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -13.3% | -126.1% |
KRO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — EAF and KRO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | EAFGrafTech Internat… | KROKronos Worldwide,… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.3B | $811M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.3B | $1.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -10.56x | -7.34x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 40.71x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.65x | 0.44x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 1.08x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Evenly matched — EAF and KRO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KRO leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KRO scores 5/9 vs EAF's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | EAFGrafTech Internat… | KROKronos Worldwide,… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | -17.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -21.1% | -9.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -7.9% | -1.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -7.8% | -2.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.77x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $956M | $540M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $138M | $37M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.1B | $577M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.50x | -2.32x |
KRO leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
KRO leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in KRO five years ago would be worth $5,607 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $743 for EAF. Over the past 12 months, EAF leads with a +23.5% total return vs KRO's -1.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors KRO at -0.2% vs EAF's -39.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | EAFGrafTech Internat… | KROKronos Worldwide,… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -45.3% | +58.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +23.5% | -1.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -78.2% | -0.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -92.6% | -43.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -83.5% | +129.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -39.8% | -0.2% |
KRO leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KRO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KRO is the less volatile stock with a 1.57 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than EAF's 2.02 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KRO currently trades 89.2% from its 52-week high vs EAF's 44.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | EAFGrafTech Internat… | KROKronos Worldwide,… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.02x | 1.57x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $20.32 | $7.90 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $4.92 | $4.08 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +44.2% | +89.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 63.2 | 63.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 281K | 350K |
KRO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates EAF as "Hold" and KRO as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 11.4% upside for EAF (target: $10) vs -29.1% for KRO (target: $5). KRO is the only dividend payer here at 2.84% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | EAFGrafTech Internat… | KROKronos Worldwide,… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $10.00 | $5.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 9 | 7 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +2.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.20 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.0% | 0.0% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway
KRO leads in 4 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 1 category is tied.
Best OverallKronos Worldwide, Inc. (KRO)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
EAF vs KRO: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is EAF or KRO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Kronos Worldwide, Inc.
(KRO) is the stronger pick with -1. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -6. 4% for GrafTech International Ltd. (EAF). Analysts rate GrafTech International Ltd. (EAF) a "Hold" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — EAF or KRO?
Over the past 5 years, Kronos Worldwide, Inc.
(KRO) delivered a total return of -43. 9%, compared to -92. 6% for GrafTech International Ltd. (EAF). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: KRO returned +129. 0% versus EAF's -83. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — EAF or KRO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Kronos Worldwide, Inc.
(KRO) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 57β versus GrafTech International Ltd. 's 2. 02β — meaning EAF is approximately 28% more volatile than KRO relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — EAF or KRO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Kronos Worldwide, Inc.
(KRO) is pulling ahead at -1. 5% versus -6. 4% for GrafTech International Ltd. (EAF). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: GrafTech International Ltd. grew EPS -66. 7% year-over-year, compared to -228. 0% for Kronos Worldwide, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, KRO leads at -1. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — EAF or KRO?
Kronos Worldwide, Inc.
(KRO) is the more profitable company, earning -6. 0% net margin versus -43. 6% for GrafTech International Ltd. — meaning it keeps -6. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KRO leads at -1. 7% versus -15. 3% for EAF. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KRO leads at 11. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — EAF or KRO?
In this comparison, KRO (2.
8% yield) pays a dividend. EAF does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is EAF or KRO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Kronos Worldwide, Inc.
(KRO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (2. 8% yield, +129. 0% 10Y return). GrafTech International Ltd. (EAF) carries a higher beta of 2. 02 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (KRO: +129. 0%, EAF: -83. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between EAF and KRO?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
KRO pays a dividend while EAF does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(EAF: 11.9% · KRO: 4.1%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.