Electrical Equipment & Parts
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
EAF vs NOVT vs MKSI vs MP vs ONTO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Industrial Materials
Semiconductors
EAF vs NOVT vs MKSI vs MP vs ONTO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Electrical Equipment & Parts | Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Industrial Materials | Semiconductors |
| Market Cap | $2.34B | $4.86B | $20.25B | $12.28B | $13.63B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $517M | $981M | $4.07B | $305M | $1.03B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-224M | $54M | $327M | $-71M | $106M |
| Gross Margin | -2.7% | 44.4% | 45.2% | 8.3% | 48.8% |
| Operating Margin | -11.4% | 11.9% | 14.8% | -36.4% | 10.0% |
| Forward P/E | — | 38.2x | 30.4x | 274.3x | 38.7x |
| Total Debt | $1.09B | $342M | $4.69B | $1.04B | $17M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $138M | $381M | $675M | $1.17B | $346M |
EAF vs NOVT vs MKSI vs MP vs ONTO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| GrafTech Internatio… (EAF) | 100 | 11.3 | -88.7% |
| Novanta Inc. (NOVT) | 100 | 127.6 | +27.6% |
| MKS Inc. (MKSI) | 100 | 265.6 | +165.6% |
| MP Materials Corp. (MP) | 100 | 693.4 | +593.4% |
| Onto Innovation Inc. (ONTO) | 100 | 805.0 | +705.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: EAF vs NOVT vs MKSI vs MP vs ONTO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
EAF is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 2.02
Among these 5 stocks, NOVT doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
MKSI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 9.6%, EPS growth 55.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 3.5%
- Lower P/E (30.4x vs 274.3x)
- 0.3% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
- +306.1% vs NOVT's +14.6%
MP is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and defensive is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.40, Low D/E 43.6%, current ratio 7.24x
- Beta 1.40, current ratio 7.24x
- 35.1% revenue growth vs EAF's -6.4%
- Beta 1.40 vs ONTO's 2.66
ONTO ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 14.3% 10Y total return vs NOVT's 8.5%
- PEG 1.12 vs NOVT's 11.61
- 10.3% margin vs EAF's -43.2%
- 4.7% ROA vs EAF's -21.1%, ROIC 5.7% vs -7.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 35.1% revenue growth vs EAF's -6.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (30.4x vs 274.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 10.3% margin vs EAF's -43.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.40 vs ONTO's 2.66 | |
| Dividends | 0.3% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +306.1% vs NOVT's +14.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.7% ROA vs EAF's -21.1%, ROIC 5.7% vs -7.9% |
EAF vs NOVT vs MKSI vs MP vs ONTO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
EAF vs NOVT vs MKSI vs MP vs ONTO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ONTO leads in 2 of 6 categories
MKSI leads 2 • EAF leads 0 • NOVT leads 0 • MP leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ONTO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MKSI is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.1B annually — 13.3x MP's $305M. ONTO is the more profitable business, keeping 10.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to EAF's -43.2%. On growth, MP holds the edge at +49.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $517M | $981M | $4.1B | $305M | $1.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$11M | $179M | $945M | -$43M | $158M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$224M | $54M | $327M | -$71M | $106M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$105M | $48M | $401M | -$314M | $239M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -2.7% | +44.4% | +45.2% | +8.3% | +48.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -11.4% | +11.9% | +14.8% | -36.4% | +10.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -43.2% | +5.5% | +8.0% | -23.3% | +10.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -20.3% | +4.9% | +9.8% | -102.8% | +23.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +11.9% | +8.5% | +15.2% | +49.1% | +9.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -13.3% | -2.2% | +53.2% | +121.4% | -48.5% |
Valuation Metrics
MKSI leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 68.8x trailing earnings, MKSI trades at a 30% valuation discount to ONTO's 98.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), ONTO offers better value at 2.85x vs NOVT's 28.13x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.3B | $4.9B | $20.2B | $12.3B | $13.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.3B | $4.8B | $24.3B | $12.2B | $13.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -10.56x | 92.71x | 68.83x | -138.26x | 98.57x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 38.25x | 30.36x | 274.33x | 38.74x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 28.13x | — | — | 2.85x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 27.00x | 26.70x | — | 68.79x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.65x | 4.96x | 5.15x | 44.59x | 13.56x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 3.81x | 7.49x | 4.92x | 6.43x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 100.38x | 40.74x | — | 45.47x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ONTO leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MKSI delivers a 12.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $-4 for MP. ONTO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MKSI's 1.73x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MKSI scores 6/9 vs EAF's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +4.1% | +12.2% | -3.7% | +5.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -21.1% | +3.0% | +3.7% | -2.0% | +4.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -7.9% | +7.4% | +6.5% | -4.7% | +5.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -7.8% | +8.3% | +7.2% | -4.2% | +6.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 5 | 6 | 4 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.26x | 1.73x | 0.44x | 0.01x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $956M | -$39M | $4.0B | -$123M | -$329M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $138M | $381M | $675M | $1.2B | $346M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.1B | $342M | $4.7B | $1.0B | $17M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.50x | 4.89x | 2.84x | -2.80x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MKSI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ONTO five years ago would be worth $41,263 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $743 for EAF. Over the past 12 months, MKSI leads with a +306.1% total return vs NOVT's +14.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MKSI at 54.1% vs EAF's -39.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -45.3% | +22.6% | +78.8% | +25.8% | +65.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +23.5% | +14.6% | +306.1% | +192.7% | +118.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -78.2% | -15.2% | +266.0% | +221.7% | +218.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -92.6% | +5.7% | +66.5% | +149.7% | +312.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -83.5% | +853.7% | +750.6% | +591.3% | +1431.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -39.8% | -5.3% | +54.1% | +47.6% | +47.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MKSI and MP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MP is the less volatile stock with a 1.40 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ONTO's 2.66 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MKSI currently trades 92.0% from its 52-week high vs EAF's 44.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.02x | 2.02x | 2.64x | 1.40x | 2.66x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $20.32 | $149.95 | $326.83 | $100.25 | $315.86 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $4.92 | $98.27 | $71.49 | $18.64 | $85.88 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +44.2% | +90.9% | +92.0% | +69.0% | +86.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 63.2 | 62.6 | 65.3 | 66.8 | 61.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 281K | 375K | 1.2M | 5.6M | 832K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: EAF as "Hold", NOVT as "Buy", MKSI as "Buy", MP as "Buy", ONTO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 13.2% upside for MP (target: $78) vs -9.3% for MKSI (target: $273). MKSI is the only dividend payer here at 0.29% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $10.00 | $150.00 | $272.86 | $78.25 | $308.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 9 | 3 | 29 | 11 | 11 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +0.3% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $0.87 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.0% | +0.8% | +0.2% | 0.0% | +0.6% |
ONTO leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). MKSI leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). 1 tied.
EAF vs NOVT vs MKSI vs MP vs ONTO: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is EAF or NOVT or MKSI or MP or ONTO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, MP Materials Corp.
(MP) is the stronger pick with 35. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -6. 4% for GrafTech International Ltd. (EAF). MKS Inc. (MKSI) offers the better valuation at 68. 8x trailing P/E (30. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Novanta Inc. (NOVT) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — EAF or NOVT or MKSI or MP or ONTO?
On trailing P/E, MKS Inc.
(MKSI) is the cheapest at 68. 8x versus Onto Innovation Inc. at 98. 6x. On forward P/E, MKS Inc. is actually cheaper at 30. 4x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Onto Innovation Inc. wins at 1. 12x versus Novanta Inc. 's 11. 61x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — EAF or NOVT or MKSI or MP or ONTO?
Over the past 5 years, Onto Innovation Inc.
(ONTO) delivered a total return of +312. 6%, compared to -92. 6% for GrafTech International Ltd. (EAF). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ONTO returned +1432% versus EAF's -83. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — EAF or NOVT or MKSI or MP or ONTO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), MP Materials Corp.
(MP) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 40β versus Onto Innovation Inc. 's 2. 66β — meaning ONTO is approximately 90% more volatile than MP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Onto Innovation Inc. (ONTO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 173% for MKS Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — EAF or NOVT or MKSI or MP or ONTO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), MP Materials Corp.
(MP) is pulling ahead at 35. 1% versus -6. 4% for GrafTech International Ltd. (EAF). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: MKS Inc. grew EPS 55. 5% year-over-year, compared to -66. 7% for GrafTech International Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, NOVT leads at 4. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — EAF or NOVT or MKSI or MP or ONTO?
Onto Innovation Inc.
(ONTO) is the more profitable company, earning 13. 6% net margin versus -43. 6% for GrafTech International Ltd. — meaning it keeps 13. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MKSI leads at 14. 4% versus -44. 6% for MP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ONTO leads at 49. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is EAF or NOVT or MKSI or MP or ONTO more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Onto Innovation Inc. (ONTO) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 12x versus Novanta Inc. 's 11. 61x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, MKS Inc. (MKSI) trades at 30. 4x forward P/E versus 274. 3x for MP Materials Corp. — 244. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MP: 13. 2% to $78. 25.
08Which pays a better dividend — EAF or NOVT or MKSI or MP or ONTO?
In this comparison, MKSI (0.
3% yield) pays a dividend. EAF, NOVT, MP, ONTO do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is EAF or NOVT or MKSI or MP or ONTO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Onto Innovation Inc.
(ONTO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+1432% 10Y return). GrafTech International Ltd. (EAF) carries a higher beta of 2. 02 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ONTO: +1432%, EAF: -83. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between EAF and NOVT and MKSI and MP and ONTO?
These companies operate in different sectors (EAF (Industrials) and NOVT (Technology) and MKSI (Technology) and MP (Basic Materials) and ONTO (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: EAF is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NOVT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MKSI is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; MP is a mid-cap high-growth stock; ONTO is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.