Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

EAF vs NOVT vs MKSI vs MP vs ONTO

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
EAF
GrafTech International Ltd.

Electrical Equipment & Parts

IndustrialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$2.34B
5Y Perf.-88.7%
NOVT
Novanta Inc.

Hardware, Equipment & Parts

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$4.86B
5Y Perf.+27.6%
MKSI
MKS Inc.

Hardware, Equipment & Parts

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$20.25B
5Y Perf.+165.6%
MP
MP Materials Corp.

Industrial Materials

Basic MaterialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$12.28B
5Y Perf.+593.4%
ONTO
Onto Innovation Inc.

Semiconductors

TechnologyNYSE • US
Market Cap$13.63B
5Y Perf.+705.0%

EAF vs NOVT vs MKSI vs MP vs ONTO — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
EAF logoEAF
NOVT logoNOVT
MKSI logoMKSI
MP logoMP
ONTO logoONTO
IndustryElectrical Equipment & PartsHardware, Equipment & PartsHardware, Equipment & PartsIndustrial MaterialsSemiconductors
Market Cap$2.34B$4.86B$20.25B$12.28B$13.63B
Revenue (TTM)$517M$981M$4.07B$305M$1.03B
Net Income (TTM)$-224M$54M$327M$-71M$106M
Gross Margin-2.7%44.4%45.2%8.3%48.8%
Operating Margin-11.4%11.9%14.8%-36.4%10.0%
Forward P/E38.2x30.4x274.3x38.7x
Total Debt$1.09B$342M$4.69B$1.04B$17M
Cash & Equiv.$138M$381M$675M$1.17B$346M

EAF vs NOVT vs MKSI vs MP vs ONTOLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

EAF
NOVT
MKSI
MP
ONTO
StockJun 20May 26Return
GrafTech Internatio… (EAF)10011.3-88.7%
Novanta Inc. (NOVT)100127.6+27.6%
MKS Inc. (MKSI)100265.6+165.6%
MP Materials Corp. (MP)100693.4+593.4%
Onto Innovation Inc. (ONTO)100805.0+705.0%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: EAF vs NOVT vs MKSI vs MP vs ONTO

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: MKSI leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and dividend income and shareholder returns. MP Materials Corp. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and capital preservation and lower volatility. ONTO also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
EAF
GrafTech International Ltd.
The Income Pick

EAF is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.

  • Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 2.02
Best for: income & stability
NOVT
Novanta Inc.
The Technology Pick

Among these 5 stocks, NOVT doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: technology exposure
MKSI
MKS Inc.
The Growth Play

MKSI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 9.6%, EPS growth 55.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 3.5%
  • Lower P/E (30.4x vs 274.3x)
  • 0.3% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
  • +306.1% vs NOVT's +14.6%
Best for: growth exposure
MP
MP Materials Corp.
The Defensive Pick

MP is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and defensive is your priority.

  • Lower volatility, beta 1.40, Low D/E 43.6%, current ratio 7.24x
  • Beta 1.40, current ratio 7.24x
  • 35.1% revenue growth vs EAF's -6.4%
  • Beta 1.40 vs ONTO's 2.66
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
ONTO
Onto Innovation Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

ONTO ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.

  • 14.3% 10Y total return vs NOVT's 8.5%
  • PEG 1.12 vs NOVT's 11.61
  • 10.3% margin vs EAF's -43.2%
  • 4.7% ROA vs EAF's -21.1%, ROIC 5.7% vs -7.9%
Best for: long-term compounding and valuation efficiency
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthMP logoMP35.1% revenue growth vs EAF's -6.4%
ValueMKSI logoMKSILower P/E (30.4x vs 274.3x)
Quality / MarginsONTO logoONTO10.3% margin vs EAF's -43.2%
Stability / SafetyMP logoMPBeta 1.40 vs ONTO's 2.66
DividendsMKSI logoMKSI0.3% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)MKSI logoMKSI+306.1% vs NOVT's +14.6%
Efficiency (ROA)ONTO logoONTO4.7% ROA vs EAF's -21.1%, ROIC 5.7% vs -7.9%

EAF vs NOVT vs MKSI vs MP vs ONTO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

EAFGrafTech International Ltd.
FY 2021
Product
100.0%$47M
NOVTNovanta Inc.
FY 2025
Robotics and Automation
32.5%$319M
Advanced Surgery
24.7%$242M
Precision Medicine
24.2%$237M
Precision Manufacturing
18.6%$182M
MKSIMKS Inc.
FY 2025
Product
87.4%$3.4B
Service
12.6%$495M
MPMP Materials Corp.
FY 2024
Materials Segment
100.0%$204M
ONTOOnto Innovation Inc.
FY 2025
Systems And Software Revenue
84.3%$848M
Parts Revenue
8.4%$84M
Service Revenue
7.3%$73M

EAF vs NOVT vs MKSI vs MP vs ONTO — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLMKSILAGGINGMP

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

ONTO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

MKSI is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.1B annually — 13.3x MP's $305M. ONTO is the more profitable business, keeping 10.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to EAF's -43.2%. On growth, MP holds the edge at +49.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricEAF logoEAFGrafTech Internat…NOVT logoNOVTNovanta Inc.MKSI logoMKSIMKS Inc.MP logoMPMP Materials Corp.ONTO logoONTOOnto Innovation I…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$517M$981M$4.1B$305M$1.0B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$11M$179M$945M-$43M$158M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$224M$54M$327M-$71M$106M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$105M$48M$401M-$314M$239M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue-2.7%+44.4%+45.2%+8.3%+48.8%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-11.4%+11.9%+14.8%-36.4%+10.0%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-43.2%+5.5%+8.0%-23.3%+10.3%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-20.3%+4.9%+9.8%-102.8%+23.2%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+11.9%+8.5%+15.2%+49.1%+9.5%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-13.3%-2.2%+53.2%+121.4%-48.5%
ONTO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

MKSI leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 68.8x trailing earnings, MKSI trades at a 30% valuation discount to ONTO's 98.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), ONTO offers better value at 2.85x vs NOVT's 28.13x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricEAF logoEAFGrafTech Internat…NOVT logoNOVTNovanta Inc.MKSI logoMKSIMKS Inc.MP logoMPMP Materials Corp.ONTO logoONTOOnto Innovation I…
Market CapShares × price$2.3B$4.9B$20.2B$12.3B$13.6B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$3.3B$4.8B$24.3B$12.2B$13.3B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-10.56x92.71x68.83x-138.26x98.57x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.38.25x30.36x274.33x38.74x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate28.13x2.85x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple27.00x26.70x68.79x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue4.65x4.96x5.15x44.59x13.56x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share3.81x7.49x4.92x6.43x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF100.38x40.74x45.47x
MKSI leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

ONTO leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

MKSI delivers a 12.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $-4 for MP. ONTO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MKSI's 1.73x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MKSI scores 6/9 vs EAF's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricEAF logoEAFGrafTech Internat…NOVT logoNOVTNovanta Inc.MKSI logoMKSIMKS Inc.MP logoMPMP Materials Corp.ONTO logoONTOOnto Innovation I…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+4.1%+12.2%-3.7%+5.2%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-21.1%+3.0%+3.7%-2.0%+4.7%
ROICReturn on invested capital-7.9%+7.4%+6.5%-4.7%+5.7%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-7.8%+8.3%+7.2%-4.2%+6.5%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–935644
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.26x1.73x0.44x0.01x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$956M-$39M$4.0B-$123M-$329M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$138M$381M$675M$1.2B$346M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$1.1B$342M$4.7B$1.0B$17M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-0.50x4.89x2.84x-2.80x
ONTO leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

MKSI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in ONTO five years ago would be worth $41,263 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $743 for EAF. Over the past 12 months, MKSI leads with a +306.1% total return vs NOVT's +14.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MKSI at 54.1% vs EAF's -39.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricEAF logoEAFGrafTech Internat…NOVT logoNOVTNovanta Inc.MKSI logoMKSIMKS Inc.MP logoMPMP Materials Corp.ONTO logoONTOOnto Innovation I…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-45.3%+22.6%+78.8%+25.8%+65.2%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+23.5%+14.6%+306.1%+192.7%+118.9%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-78.2%-15.2%+266.0%+221.7%+218.0%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-92.6%+5.7%+66.5%+149.7%+312.6%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-83.5%+853.7%+750.6%+591.3%+1431.7%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-39.8%-5.3%+54.1%+47.6%+47.1%
MKSI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — MKSI and MP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

MP is the less volatile stock with a 1.40 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ONTO's 2.66 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MKSI currently trades 92.0% from its 52-week high vs EAF's 44.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricEAF logoEAFGrafTech Internat…NOVT logoNOVTNovanta Inc.MKSI logoMKSIMKS Inc.MP logoMPMP Materials Corp.ONTO logoONTOOnto Innovation I…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5002.02x2.02x2.64x1.40x2.66x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$20.32$149.95$326.83$100.25$315.86
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$4.92$98.27$71.49$18.64$85.88
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+44.2%+90.9%+92.0%+69.0%+86.8%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10063.262.665.366.861.0
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded281K375K1.2M5.6M832K
Evenly matched — MKSI and MP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: EAF as "Hold", NOVT as "Buy", MKSI as "Buy", MP as "Buy", ONTO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 13.2% upside for MP (target: $78) vs -9.3% for MKSI (target: $273). MKSI is the only dividend payer here at 0.29% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricEAF logoEAFGrafTech Internat…NOVT logoNOVTNovanta Inc.MKSI logoMKSIMKS Inc.MP logoMPMP Materials Corp.ONTO logoONTOOnto Innovation I…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$10.00$150.00$272.86$78.25$308.33
# AnalystsCovering analysts93291111
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.3%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises00
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.87
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+0.0%+0.8%+0.2%0.0%+0.6%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

ONTO leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). MKSI leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). 1 tied.

Best OverallMKS Inc. (MKSI)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

EAF vs NOVT vs MKSI vs MP vs ONTO: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is EAF or NOVT or MKSI or MP or ONTO a better buy right now?

For growth investors, MP Materials Corp.

(MP) is the stronger pick with 35. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -6. 4% for GrafTech International Ltd. (EAF). MKS Inc. (MKSI) offers the better valuation at 68. 8x trailing P/E (30. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Novanta Inc. (NOVT) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — EAF or NOVT or MKSI or MP or ONTO?

On trailing P/E, MKS Inc.

(MKSI) is the cheapest at 68. 8x versus Onto Innovation Inc. at 98. 6x. On forward P/E, MKS Inc. is actually cheaper at 30. 4x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Onto Innovation Inc. wins at 1. 12x versus Novanta Inc. 's 11. 61x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — EAF or NOVT or MKSI or MP or ONTO?

Over the past 5 years, Onto Innovation Inc.

(ONTO) delivered a total return of +312. 6%, compared to -92. 6% for GrafTech International Ltd. (EAF). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ONTO returned +1432% versus EAF's -83. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — EAF or NOVT or MKSI or MP or ONTO?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), MP Materials Corp.

(MP) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 40β versus Onto Innovation Inc. 's 2. 66β — meaning ONTO is approximately 90% more volatile than MP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Onto Innovation Inc. (ONTO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 173% for MKS Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — EAF or NOVT or MKSI or MP or ONTO?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), MP Materials Corp.

(MP) is pulling ahead at 35. 1% versus -6. 4% for GrafTech International Ltd. (EAF). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: MKS Inc. grew EPS 55. 5% year-over-year, compared to -66. 7% for GrafTech International Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, NOVT leads at 4. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — EAF or NOVT or MKSI or MP or ONTO?

Onto Innovation Inc.

(ONTO) is the more profitable company, earning 13. 6% net margin versus -43. 6% for GrafTech International Ltd. — meaning it keeps 13. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MKSI leads at 14. 4% versus -44. 6% for MP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ONTO leads at 49. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is EAF or NOVT or MKSI or MP or ONTO more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Onto Innovation Inc. (ONTO) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 12x versus Novanta Inc. 's 11. 61x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, MKS Inc. (MKSI) trades at 30. 4x forward P/E versus 274. 3x for MP Materials Corp. — 244. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MP: 13. 2% to $78. 25.

08

Which pays a better dividend — EAF or NOVT or MKSI or MP or ONTO?

In this comparison, MKSI (0.

3% yield) pays a dividend. EAF, NOVT, MP, ONTO do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is EAF or NOVT or MKSI or MP or ONTO better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Onto Innovation Inc.

(ONTO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+1432% 10Y return). GrafTech International Ltd. (EAF) carries a higher beta of 2. 02 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ONTO: +1432%, EAF: -83. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between EAF and NOVT and MKSI and MP and ONTO?

These companies operate in different sectors (EAF (Industrials) and NOVT (Technology) and MKSI (Technology) and MP (Basic Materials) and ONTO (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: EAF is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NOVT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MKSI is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; MP is a mid-cap high-growth stock; ONTO is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

EAF

Quality Business

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

NOVT

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

MKSI

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 7%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

MP

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 24%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ONTO

Steady Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 6%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform EAF and NOVT and MKSI and MP and ONTO on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(EAF: 11.9% · NOVT: 8.5%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.