Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

EAF vs SPIR vs ASTS vs MP

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
EAF
GrafTech International Ltd.

Electrical Equipment & Parts

IndustrialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$2.42B
5Y Perf.-88.2%
SPIR
Spire Global, Inc.

Specialty Business Services

IndustrialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$607.77B
5Y Perf.-76.5%
ASTS
AST SpaceMobile, Inc.

Communication Equipment

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$21.96B
5Y Perf.+641.2%
MP
MP Materials Corp.

Industrial Materials

Basic MaterialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$11.98B
5Y Perf.+213.3%

EAF vs SPIR vs ASTS vs MP — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
EAF logoEAF
SPIR logoSPIR
ASTS logoASTS
MP logoMP
IndustryElectrical Equipment & PartsSpecialty Business ServicesCommunication EquipmentIndustrial Materials
Market Cap$2.42B$607.77B$21.96B$11.98B
Revenue (TTM)$517M$72M$71M$305M
Net Income (TTM)$-224M$-25.02B$-342M$-71M
Gross Margin-2.7%40.8%53.4%8.3%
Operating Margin-11.4%-121.4%-405.7%-40.9%
Forward P/E11.5x254.2x
Total Debt$1.09B$8.76B$32M$1.04B
Cash & Equiv.$138M$24.81B$2.34B$1.17B

EAF vs SPIR vs ASTS vs MPLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

EAF
SPIR
ASTS
MP
StockNov 20May 26Return
GrafTech Internatio… (EAF)10011.8-88.2%
Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR)10023.5-76.5%
AST SpaceMobile, In… (ASTS)100741.2+641.2%
MP Materials Corp. (MP)100313.3+213.3%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: EAF vs SPIR vs ASTS vs MP

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: MP leads in 3 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. AST SpaceMobile, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and recent price momentum and sentiment. SPIR also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
EAF
GrafTech International Ltd.
The Secondary Option

EAF lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: industrials exposure
SPIR
Spire Global, Inc.
The Value Play

SPIR is the clearest fit if your priority is value.

  • Lower P/E (11.5x vs 254.2x)
Best for: value
ASTS
AST SpaceMobile, Inc.
The Growth Play

ASTS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.

  • Rev growth 15.1%, EPS growth 30.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 72.5%
  • 6.7% 10Y total return vs MP's 5.7%
  • 15.1% revenue growth vs SPIR's -35.2%
  • +197.2% vs EAF's +30.3%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
MP
MP Materials Corp.
The Income Pick

MP carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.

  • beta 1.44
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.44, Low D/E 43.6%, current ratio 7.24x
  • Beta 1.44, current ratio 7.24x
  • -23.3% margin vs SPIR's -349.6%
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthASTS logoASTS15.1% revenue growth vs SPIR's -35.2%
ValueSPIR logoSPIRLower P/E (11.5x vs 254.2x)
Quality / MarginsMP logoMP-23.3% margin vs SPIR's -349.6%
Stability / SafetyMP logoMPBeta 1.44 vs SPIR's 3.10
DividendsTieNone of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)ASTS logoASTS+197.2% vs EAF's +30.3%
Efficiency (ROA)MP logoMP-2.0% ROA vs SPIR's -47.3%, ROIC -4.7% vs -0.1%

EAF vs SPIR vs ASTS vs MP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

EAFGrafTech International Ltd.
FY 2021
Product
100.0%$47M
SPIRSpire Global, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

ASTSAST SpaceMobile, Inc.
FY 2025
Product
62.6%$44M
Service
37.4%$27M
MPMP Materials Corp.
FY 2024
Materials Segment
100.0%$204M

EAF vs SPIR vs ASTS vs MP — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLSPIRLAGGINGEAF

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — EAF and ASTS and MP each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

EAF is the larger business by revenue, generating $517M annually — 7.3x ASTS's $71M. MP is the more profitable business, keeping -23.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SPIR's -349.6%. On growth, ASTS holds the edge at +27.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricEAF logoEAFGrafTech Internat…SPIR logoSPIRSpire Global, Inc.ASTS logoASTSAST SpaceMobile, …MP logoMPMP Materials Corp.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$517M$72M$71M$305M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$11M-$74M-$237M-$24M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$224M-$25.0B-$342M-$71M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$105M-$16.2B-$1.1B-$314M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue-2.7%+40.8%+53.4%+8.3%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-11.4%-121.4%-4.1%-40.9%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-43.2%-349.6%-4.8%-23.3%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-20.3%-227.0%-16.0%-102.8%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+11.9%-26.9%+27.3%+49.1%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-13.3%+59.5%-55.6%+71.4%
Evenly matched — EAF and ASTS and MP each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

MP leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
MetricEAF logoEAFGrafTech Internat…SPIR logoSPIRSpire Global, Inc.ASTS logoASTSAST SpaceMobile, …MP logoMPMP Materials Corp.
Market CapShares × price$2.4B$607.8B$22.0B$12.0B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$3.4B$591.7B$19.7B$11.9B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-10.93x11.48x-56.01x-134.86x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.254.17x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue4.81x8493.94x309.69x43.49x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share5.23x6.53x4.80x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF
MP leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

SPIR leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

MP delivers a -3.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-4 in annual profit, vs $-88 for SPIR. ASTS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MP's 0.44x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SPIR scores 5/9 vs EAF's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricEAF logoEAFGrafTech Internat…SPIR logoSPIRSpire Global, Inc.ASTS logoASTSAST SpaceMobile, …MP logoMPMP Materials Corp.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-88.4%-21.1%-3.7%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-21.1%-47.3%-12.6%-2.0%
ROICReturn on invested capital-7.9%-0.1%-47.1%-4.7%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-7.8%-0.1%-10.0%-4.2%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–93554
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.08x0.01x0.44x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$956M-$16.1B-$2.3B-$123M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$138M$24.8B$2.3B$1.2B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$1.1B$8.8B$32M$1.0B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-0.50x9.20x-21.20x-2.80x
SPIR leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

ASTS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in ASTS five years ago would be worth $97,215 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $816 for EAF. Over the past 12 months, ASTS leads with a +197.2% total return vs EAF's +30.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ASTS at 145.9% vs EAF's -39.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricEAF logoEAFGrafTech Internat…SPIR logoSPIRSpire Global, Inc.ASTS logoASTSAST SpaceMobile, …MP logoMPMP Materials Corp.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-43.4%+136.7%-10.1%+22.7%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+30.3%+93.8%+197.2%+182.7%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-77.4%+242.0%+1386.1%+213.8%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-91.8%-76.6%+872.1%+154.6%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-83.3%-75.7%+668.2%+574.3%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-39.1%+50.7%+145.9%+46.4%
ASTS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — SPIR and MP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

MP is the less volatile stock with a 1.44 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SPIR's 3.10 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SPIR currently trades 78.4% from its 52-week high vs EAF's 45.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricEAF logoEAFGrafTech Internat…SPIR logoSPIRSpire Global, Inc.ASTS logoASTSAST SpaceMobile, …MP logoMPMP Materials Corp.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.99x3.10x2.83x1.44x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$20.32$23.59$129.89$100.25
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$4.92$6.60$22.47$18.64
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+45.7%+78.4%+57.8%+67.3%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10056.847.738.160.1
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded279K1.6M15.1M5.7M
Evenly matched — SPIR and MP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: EAF as "Hold", SPIR as "Buy", ASTS as "Buy", MP as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 38.1% upside for ASTS (target: $104) vs -6.7% for SPIR (target: $17).

MetricEAF logoEAFGrafTech Internat…SPIR logoSPIRSpire Global, Inc.ASTS logoASTSAST SpaceMobile, …MP logoMPMP Materials Corp.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$10.00$17.25$103.65$81.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts912712
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises0
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

MP leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). SPIR leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.

Best OverallSpire Global, Inc. (SPIR)Leads 1 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

EAF vs SPIR vs ASTS vs MP: Key Questions Answered

9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is EAF or SPIR or ASTS or MP a better buy right now?

For growth investors, AST SpaceMobile, Inc.

(ASTS) is the stronger pick with 1505% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -35. 2% for Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR). Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR) offers the better valuation at 11. 5x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which is the better long-term investment — EAF or SPIR or ASTS or MP?

Over the past 5 years, AST SpaceMobile, Inc.

(ASTS) delivered a total return of +872. 1%, compared to -91. 8% for GrafTech International Ltd. (EAF). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ASTS returned +668. 2% versus EAF's -83. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

03

Which is safer — EAF or SPIR or ASTS or MP?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), MP Materials Corp.

(MP) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 44β versus Spire Global, Inc. 's 3. 10β — meaning SPIR is approximately 115% more volatile than MP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, AST SpaceMobile, Inc. (ASTS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 44% for MP Materials Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

04

Which is growing faster — EAF or SPIR or ASTS or MP?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), AST SpaceMobile, Inc.

(ASTS) is pulling ahead at 1505% versus -35. 2% for Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Spire Global, Inc. grew EPS 137. 8% year-over-year, compared to -66. 7% for GrafTech International Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ASTS leads at 72. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

05

Which has better profit margins — EAF or SPIR or ASTS or MP?

Spire Global, Inc.

(SPIR) is the more profitable company, earning 71. 7% net margin versus -482. 2% for AST SpaceMobile, Inc. — meaning it keeps 71. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: EAF leads at -15. 3% versus -405. 7% for ASTS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ASTS leads at 53. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

06

Is EAF or SPIR or ASTS or MP more undervalued right now?

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ASTS: 38.

1% to $103. 65.

07

Which pays a better dividend — EAF or SPIR or ASTS or MP?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

08

Is EAF or SPIR or ASTS or MP better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, MP Materials Corp.

(MP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+574. 3% 10Y return). Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR) carries a higher beta of 3. 10 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MP: +574. 3%, SPIR: -75. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

09

What are the main differences between EAF and SPIR and ASTS and MP?

These companies operate in different sectors (EAF (Industrials) and SPIR (Industrials) and ASTS (Technology) and MP (Basic Materials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: EAF is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SPIR is a large-cap deep-value stock; ASTS is a mid-cap high-growth stock; MP is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

EAF

Quality Business

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SPIR

Quality Business

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 24%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ASTS

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 1365%
  • Gross Margin > 32%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

MP

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 24%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform EAF and SPIR and ASTS and MP on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(EAF: 11.9% · SPIR: -26.9%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.