Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
EBC vs NBTB vs CNOB vs TRMK
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
EBC vs NBTB vs CNOB vs TRMK — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $4.49B | $2.35B | $1.50B | $2.64B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.06B | $867M | $606M | $1.12B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $88M | $169M | $80M | $224M |
| Gross Margin | 66.2% | 72.1% | 44.2% | 71.0% |
| Operating Margin | 9.9% | 25.3% | 18.6% | 25.5% |
| Forward P/E | 10.7x | 10.8x | 9.3x | 11.5x |
| Total Debt | $215M | $327M | $1.17B | $1.12B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $126M | $185M | $92M | $668M |
EBC vs NBTB vs CNOB vs TRMK — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Eastern Bankshares,… (EBC) | 100 | 167.0 | +67.0% |
| NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) | 100 | 164.6 | +64.6% |
| ConnectOne Bancorp,… (CNOB) | 100 | 193.8 | +93.8% |
| Trustmark Corporati… (TRMK) | 100 | 191.9 | +91.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: EBC vs NBTB vs CNOB vs TRMK
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
EBC is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.42 vs NBTB's 1.53
- +36.2% vs NBTB's +9.0%
NBTB is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.89, yield 3.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.89, Low D/E 17.3%, current ratio 1.60x
- Beta 0.89, yield 3.2%, current ratio 1.60x
- Beta 0.89 vs EBC's 1.10
CNOB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for value and quality.
- Lower P/E (9.3x vs 11.5x)
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs EBC's 0.6% (lower = leaner)
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs EBC's 0.6%
TRMK is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 34.8%, EPS growth 1.9%
- 127.7% 10Y total return vs CNOB's 109.0%
- NIM 3.4% vs CNOB's 2.5%
- 34.8% NII/revenue growth vs EBC's -1.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 34.8% NII/revenue growth vs EBC's -1.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.3x vs 11.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs EBC's 0.6% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.89 vs EBC's 1.10 | |
| Dividends | 3.2% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs CNOB's 2.1% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +36.2% vs NBTB's +9.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs EBC's 0.6% |
EBC vs NBTB vs CNOB vs TRMK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
EBC vs NBTB vs CNOB vs TRMK — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
TRMK leads in 3 of 6 categories
NBTB leads 1 • EBC leads 0 • CNOB leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — EBC and TRMK each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TRMK is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.1B annually — 1.8x CNOB's $606M. TRMK is the more profitable business, keeping 20.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to EBC's 8.4%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.1B | $867M | $606M | $1.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $157M | $241M | $122M | $323M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $88M | $169M | $80M | $224M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $413M | $225M | $102M | $230M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +66.2% | +72.1% | +44.2% | +71.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +9.9% | +25.3% | +18.6% | +25.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +8.4% | +19.5% | +13.3% | +20.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +39.1% | +25.2% | +16.7% | +20.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +53.3% | +39.5% | +53.1% | +5.4% |
Valuation Metrics
TRMK leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.1x trailing earnings, TRMK trades at a 76% valuation discount to EBC's 49.9x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), TRMK offers better value at 1.50x vs EBC's 1.98x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4.5B | $2.4B | $1.5B | $2.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4.6B | $2.5B | $2.6B | $3.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 49.90x | 13.53x | 20.21x | 12.13x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.65x | 10.80x | 9.26x | 11.50x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.98x | 1.92x | — | 1.50x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 29.14x | 10.35x | 22.90x | 9.49x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.25x | 2.71x | 2.48x | 2.36x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.00x | 1.21x | 0.96x | 1.28x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 10.87x | 10.75x | 14.89x | 11.39x |
Profitability & Efficiency
TRMK leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TRMK delivers a 10.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $2 for EBC. EBC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CNOB's 0.74x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NBTB scores 7/9 vs CNOB's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +2.3% | +9.5% | +5.5% | +10.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.3% | +1.1% | +0.6% | +1.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +1.9% | +7.9% | +3.5% | +7.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +1.0% | +2.4% | +1.5% | +3.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 7 | 4 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.05x | 0.17x | 0.74x | 0.53x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $89M | $142M | $1.1B | $448M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $126M | $185M | $92M | $668M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $215M | $327M | $1.2B | $1.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.31x | 1.05x | 0.39x | 0.75x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TRMK leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TRMK five years ago would be worth $14,756 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,964 for EBC. Over the past 12 months, EBC leads with a +36.2% total return vs NBTB's +9.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CNOB at 30.9% vs NBTB's 15.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +8.4% | +9.3% | +15.2% | +15.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +36.2% | +9.0% | +30.6% | +32.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +97.4% | +54.1% | +124.5% | +118.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -0.4% | +29.9% | +17.9% | +47.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +82.4% | +102.2% | +109.0% | +127.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +25.4% | +15.5% | +30.9% | +29.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NBTB and TRMK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NBTB is the less volatile stock with a 0.89 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than EBC's 1.10 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TRMK currently trades 97.6% from its 52-week high vs EBC's 88.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.10x | 0.89x | 1.10x | 0.94x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $22.57 | $46.92 | $30.65 | $45.99 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $14.10 | $39.20 | $21.79 | $33.39 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +88.4% | +96.1% | +97.6% | +97.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 51.7 | 57.3 | 66.7 | 56.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.0M | 236K | 354K | 392K |
Analyst Outlook
NBTB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: EBC as "Buy", NBTB as "Hold", CNOB as "Buy", TRMK as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 14.4% upside for EBC (target: $23) vs 1.4% for TRMK (target: $46). For income investors, NBTB offers the higher dividend yield at 3.17% vs CNOB's 2.12%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $22.83 | $46.00 | $34.00 | $45.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 7 | 10 | 11 | 9 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.4% | +3.2% | +2.1% | +2.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 5 | 12 | 0 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.49 | $1.43 | $0.63 | $0.97 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.4% | +0.4% | +0.1% | +3.0% |
TRMK leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). NBTB leads in 1 (Analyst Outlook). 2 tied.
EBC vs NBTB vs CNOB vs TRMK: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is EBC or NBTB or CNOB or TRMK a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) is the stronger pick with 34.
8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 4% for Eastern Bankshares, Inc. (EBC). Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) offers the better valuation at 12. 1x trailing P/E (11. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Eastern Bankshares, Inc. (EBC) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — EBC or NBTB or CNOB or TRMK?
On trailing P/E, Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) is the cheapest at 12.
1x versus Eastern Bankshares, Inc. at 49. 9x. On forward P/E, ConnectOne Bancorp, Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Eastern Bankshares, Inc. wins at 0. 42x versus NBT Bancorp Inc. 's 1. 53x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — EBC or NBTB or CNOB or TRMK?
Over the past 5 years, Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) delivered a total return of +47.
6%, compared to -0. 4% for Eastern Bankshares, Inc. (EBC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TRMK returned +127. 7% versus EBC's +82. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — EBC or NBTB or CNOB or TRMK?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 89β versus Eastern Bankshares, Inc. 's 1. 10β — meaning EBC is approximately 24% more volatile than NBTB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Eastern Bankshares, Inc. (EBC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 74% for ConnectOne Bancorp, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — EBC or NBTB or CNOB or TRMK?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) is pulling ahead at 34.
8% versus -1. 4% for Eastern Bankshares, Inc. (EBC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: NBT Bancorp Inc. grew EPS 12. 5% year-over-year, compared to -39. 4% for Eastern Bankshares, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — EBC or NBTB or CNOB or TRMK?
Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) is the more profitable company, earning 20.
0% net margin versus 8. 4% for Eastern Bankshares, Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TRMK leads at 25. 5% versus 9. 9% for EBC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NBTB leads at 72. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is EBC or NBTB or CNOB or TRMK more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Eastern Bankshares, Inc. (EBC) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 42x versus NBT Bancorp Inc. 's 1. 53x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, ConnectOne Bancorp, Inc. (CNOB) trades at 9. 3x forward P/E versus 11. 5x for Trustmark Corporation — 2. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for EBC: 14. 4% to $22. 83.
08Which pays a better dividend — EBC or NBTB or CNOB or TRMK?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) offers the highest yield at 3. 2%, versus 2. 1% for ConnectOne Bancorp, Inc. (CNOB).
09Is EBC or NBTB or CNOB or TRMK better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 89), 3. 2% yield, +102. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (NBTB: +102. 2%, EBC: +82. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between EBC and NBTB and CNOB and TRMK?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: EBC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NBTB is a small-cap deep-value stock; CNOB is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TRMK is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.