Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
EBMT vs WAFD
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
EBMT vs WAFD — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $182M | $2.73B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $126M | $1.41B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $15M | $243M |
| Gross Margin | 70.9% | 50.9% |
| Operating Margin | 15.0% | 20.5% |
| Forward P/E | 11.2x | 10.9x |
| Total Debt | $82M | $1.82B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $24M | $657M |
EBMT vs WAFD — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Eagle Bancorp Monta… (EBMT) | 100 | 132.2 | +32.2% |
| WaFd, Inc. (WAFD) | 100 | 137.9 | +37.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: EBMT vs WAFD
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
EBMT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 14 yrs, beta 0.57, yield 2.6%
- Rev growth 4.6%, EPS growth 53.2%
- 114.0% 10Y total return vs WAFD's 84.4%
WAFD is the clearest fit if your priority is quality and efficiency.
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs EBMT's 0.6% (lower = leaner)
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs EBMT's 0.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 4.6% NII/revenue growth vs WAFD's -1.6% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs EBMT's 0.6% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.57 vs WAFD's 0.81, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.6% yield, 14-year raise streak, vs WAFD's 3.0% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +32.2% vs WAFD's +28.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs EBMT's 0.6% |
EBMT vs WAFD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
EBMT vs WAFD — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WAFD leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WAFD is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.4B annually — 11.2x EBMT's $126M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 16.0% (WAFD) to 11.8% (EBMT).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $126M | $1.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $26M | $277M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $15M | $243M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $28M | $226M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +70.9% | +50.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +15.0% | +20.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +11.8% | +16.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +22.5% | +14.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +36.4% | +46.3% |
Valuation Metrics
EBMT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.0x trailing earnings, EBMT trades at a 11% valuation discount to WAFD's 13.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, EBMT's 9.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than WAFD's 13.0x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $182M | $2.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $240M | $3.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 12.03x | 13.56x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 11.22x | 10.93x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 4.41x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.32x | 12.98x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.45x | 1.93x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.93x | 0.94x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 6.42x | 13.09x |
Profitability & Efficiency
EBMT leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
EBMT delivers a 8.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $8 in annual profit, vs $8 for WAFD. EBMT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.43x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to WAFD's 0.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), EBMT scores 9/9 vs WAFD's 7/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +8.1% | +8.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.7% | +1.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.4% | +3.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +1.8% | +5.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 9 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.43x | 0.60x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $58M | $1.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $24M | $657M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $82M | $1.8B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.53x | 0.48x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
EBMT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WAFD five years ago would be worth $12,248 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,133 for EBMT. Over the past 12 months, EBMT leads with a +32.2% total return vs WAFD's +28.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors EBMT at 26.4% vs WAFD's 14.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +17.6% | +11.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +32.2% | +28.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +101.8% | +51.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +11.3% | +22.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +114.0% | +84.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +26.4% | +14.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — EBMT and WAFD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
EBMT is the less volatile stock with a 0.57 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than WAFD's 0.81 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WAFD currently trades 98.8% from its 52-week high vs EBMT's 95.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.57x | 0.81x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $23.95 | $36.12 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $15.10 | $26.31 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +95.5% | +98.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 60.7 | 68.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 60K | 661K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — EBMT and WAFD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates EBMT as "Hold" and WAFD as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 5.0% upside for EBMT (target: $24) vs -1.9% for WAFD (target: $35). For income investors, WAFD offers the higher dividend yield at 2.96% vs EBMT's 2.56%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $24.00 | $35.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 6 | 11 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.6% | +3.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 14 | 7 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.59 | $1.05 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.9% | +3.7% |
EBMT leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). WAFD leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
EBMT vs WAFD: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is EBMT or WAFD a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Eagle Bancorp Montana, Inc.
(EBMT) is the stronger pick with 4. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 6% for WaFd, Inc. (WAFD). Eagle Bancorp Montana, Inc. (EBMT) offers the better valuation at 12. 0x trailing P/E (11. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Eagle Bancorp Montana, Inc. (EBMT) a "Hold" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — EBMT or WAFD?
On trailing P/E, Eagle Bancorp Montana, Inc.
(EBMT) is the cheapest at 12. 0x versus WaFd, Inc. at 13. 6x. On forward P/E, WaFd, Inc. is actually cheaper at 10. 9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — EBMT or WAFD?
Over the past 5 years, WaFd, Inc.
(WAFD) delivered a total return of +22. 5%, compared to +11. 3% for Eagle Bancorp Montana, Inc. (EBMT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: EBMT returned +114. 0% versus WAFD's +84. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — EBMT or WAFD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Eagle Bancorp Montana, Inc.
(EBMT) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 57β versus WaFd, Inc. 's 0. 81β — meaning WAFD is approximately 42% more volatile than EBMT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Eagle Bancorp Montana, Inc. (EBMT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 43% versus 60% for WaFd, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — EBMT or WAFD?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Eagle Bancorp Montana, Inc.
(EBMT) is pulling ahead at 4. 6% versus -1. 6% for WaFd, Inc. (WAFD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Eagle Bancorp Montana, Inc. grew EPS 53. 2% year-over-year, compared to 5. 2% for WaFd, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — EBMT or WAFD?
WaFd, Inc.
(WAFD) is the more profitable company, earning 16. 0% net margin versus 11. 8% for Eagle Bancorp Montana, Inc. — meaning it keeps 16. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WAFD leads at 20. 5% versus 15. 0% for EBMT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — EBMT leads at 70. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is EBMT or WAFD more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, WaFd, Inc.
(WAFD) trades at 10. 9x forward P/E versus 11. 2x for Eagle Bancorp Montana, Inc. — 0. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for EBMT: 5. 0% to $24. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — EBMT or WAFD?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
WaFd, Inc. (WAFD) offers the highest yield at 3. 0%, versus 2. 6% for Eagle Bancorp Montana, Inc. (EBMT).
09Is EBMT or WAFD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Eagle Bancorp Montana, Inc.
(EBMT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 57), 2. 6% yield, +114. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (EBMT: +114. 0%, WAFD: +84. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between EBMT and WAFD?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.