Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

EBMT vs WAFD

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
EBMT
Eagle Bancorp Montana, Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$182M
5Y Perf.+32.2%
WAFD
WaFd, Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.73B
5Y Perf.+37.9%

EBMT vs WAFD — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
EBMT logoEBMT
WAFD logoWAFD
IndustryBanks - RegionalBanks - Regional
Market Cap$182M$2.73B
Revenue (TTM)$126M$1.41B
Net Income (TTM)$15M$243M
Gross Margin70.9%50.9%
Operating Margin15.0%20.5%
Forward P/E11.2x10.9x
Total Debt$82M$1.82B
Cash & Equiv.$24M$657M

EBMT vs WAFDLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

EBMT
WAFD
StockMay 20May 26Return
Eagle Bancorp Monta… (EBMT)100132.2+32.2%
WaFd, Inc. (WAFD)100137.9+37.9%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: EBMT vs WAFD

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: EBMT leads in 5 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. WaFd, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and operational efficiency and capital deployment. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
EBMT
Eagle Bancorp Montana, Inc.
The Banking Pick

EBMT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.

  • Dividend streak 14 yrs, beta 0.57, yield 2.6%
  • Rev growth 4.6%, EPS growth 53.2%
  • 114.0% 10Y total return vs WAFD's 84.4%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
WAFD
WaFd, Inc.
The Banking Pick

WAFD is the clearest fit if your priority is quality and efficiency.

  • Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs EBMT's 0.6% (lower = leaner)
  • Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs EBMT's 0.6%
Best for: quality and efficiency
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthEBMT logoEBMT4.6% NII/revenue growth vs WAFD's -1.6%
ValueEBMT logoEBMTBetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsWAFD logoWAFDEfficiency ratio 0.3% vs EBMT's 0.6% (lower = leaner)
Stability / SafetyEBMT logoEBMTBeta 0.57 vs WAFD's 0.81, lower leverage
DividendsEBMT logoEBMT2.6% yield, 14-year raise streak, vs WAFD's 3.0%
Momentum (1Y)EBMT logoEBMT+32.2% vs WAFD's +28.5%
Efficiency (ROA)WAFD logoWAFDEfficiency ratio 0.3% vs EBMT's 0.6%

EBMT vs WAFD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

EBMTEagle Bancorp Montana, Inc.
FY 2025
Bank Servicing
71.2%$11M
Debit Card
17.7%$3M
Deposit Account
11.2%$2M
WAFDWaFd, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

EBMT vs WAFD — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLEBMTLAGGINGWAFD

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

WAFD leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

WAFD is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.4B annually — 11.2x EBMT's $126M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 16.0% (WAFD) to 11.8% (EBMT).

MetricEBMT logoEBMTEagle Bancorp Mon…WAFD logoWAFDWaFd, Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$126M$1.4B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$26M$277M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$15M$243M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$28M$226M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+70.9%+50.9%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+15.0%+20.5%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+11.8%+16.0%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+22.5%+14.8%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+36.4%+46.3%
WAFD leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

EBMT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 12.0x trailing earnings, EBMT trades at a 11% valuation discount to WAFD's 13.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, EBMT's 9.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than WAFD's 13.0x.

MetricEBMT logoEBMTEagle Bancorp Mon…WAFD logoWAFDWaFd, Inc.
Market CapShares × price$182M$2.7B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$240M$3.9B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS12.03x13.56x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.11.22x10.93x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate4.41x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple9.32x12.98x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.45x1.93x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.93x0.94x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF6.42x13.09x
EBMT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

EBMT leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

EBMT delivers a 8.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $8 in annual profit, vs $8 for WAFD. EBMT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.43x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to WAFD's 0.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), EBMT scores 9/9 vs WAFD's 7/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricEBMT logoEBMTEagle Bancorp Mon…WAFD logoWAFDWaFd, Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+8.1%+8.0%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+0.7%+1.0%
ROICReturn on invested capital+4.4%+3.9%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+1.8%+5.7%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–997
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.43x0.60x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$58M$1.2B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$24M$657M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$82M$1.8B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense0.53x0.48x
EBMT leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

EBMT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in WAFD five years ago would be worth $12,248 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,133 for EBMT. Over the past 12 months, EBMT leads with a +32.2% total return vs WAFD's +28.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors EBMT at 26.4% vs WAFD's 14.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricEBMT logoEBMTEagle Bancorp Mon…WAFD logoWAFDWaFd, Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+17.6%+11.9%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+32.2%+28.5%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+101.8%+51.6%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+11.3%+22.5%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+114.0%+84.4%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+26.4%+14.9%
EBMT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — EBMT and WAFD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

EBMT is the less volatile stock with a 0.57 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than WAFD's 0.81 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WAFD currently trades 98.8% from its 52-week high vs EBMT's 95.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricEBMT logoEBMTEagle Bancorp Mon…WAFD logoWAFDWaFd, Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.57x0.81x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$23.95$36.12
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$15.10$26.31
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+95.5%+98.8%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10060.768.3
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded60K661K
Evenly matched — EBMT and WAFD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — EBMT and WAFD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Wall Street rates EBMT as "Hold" and WAFD as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 5.0% upside for EBMT (target: $24) vs -1.9% for WAFD (target: $35). For income investors, WAFD offers the higher dividend yield at 2.96% vs EBMT's 2.56%.

MetricEBMT logoEBMTEagle Bancorp Mon…WAFD logoWAFDWaFd, Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$24.00$35.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts611
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+2.6%+3.0%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises147
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.59$1.05
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+0.9%+3.7%
Evenly matched — EBMT and WAFD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

EBMT leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). WAFD leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.

Best OverallEagle Bancorp Montana, Inc. (EBMT)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

EBMT vs WAFD: Frequently Asked Questions

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is EBMT or WAFD a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Eagle Bancorp Montana, Inc.

(EBMT) is the stronger pick with 4. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 6% for WaFd, Inc. (WAFD). Eagle Bancorp Montana, Inc. (EBMT) offers the better valuation at 12. 0x trailing P/E (11. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Eagle Bancorp Montana, Inc. (EBMT) a "Hold" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — EBMT or WAFD?

On trailing P/E, Eagle Bancorp Montana, Inc.

(EBMT) is the cheapest at 12. 0x versus WaFd, Inc. at 13. 6x. On forward P/E, WaFd, Inc. is actually cheaper at 10. 9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — EBMT or WAFD?

Over the past 5 years, WaFd, Inc.

(WAFD) delivered a total return of +22. 5%, compared to +11. 3% for Eagle Bancorp Montana, Inc. (EBMT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: EBMT returned +114. 0% versus WAFD's +84. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — EBMT or WAFD?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Eagle Bancorp Montana, Inc.

(EBMT) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 57β versus WaFd, Inc. 's 0. 81β — meaning WAFD is approximately 42% more volatile than EBMT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Eagle Bancorp Montana, Inc. (EBMT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 43% versus 60% for WaFd, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — EBMT or WAFD?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Eagle Bancorp Montana, Inc.

(EBMT) is pulling ahead at 4. 6% versus -1. 6% for WaFd, Inc. (WAFD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Eagle Bancorp Montana, Inc. grew EPS 53. 2% year-over-year, compared to 5. 2% for WaFd, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — EBMT or WAFD?

WaFd, Inc.

(WAFD) is the more profitable company, earning 16. 0% net margin versus 11. 8% for Eagle Bancorp Montana, Inc. — meaning it keeps 16. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WAFD leads at 20. 5% versus 15. 0% for EBMT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — EBMT leads at 70. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is EBMT or WAFD more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, WaFd, Inc.

(WAFD) trades at 10. 9x forward P/E versus 11. 2x for Eagle Bancorp Montana, Inc. — 0. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for EBMT: 5. 0% to $24. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — EBMT or WAFD?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

WaFd, Inc. (WAFD) offers the highest yield at 3. 0%, versus 2. 6% for Eagle Bancorp Montana, Inc. (EBMT).

09

Is EBMT or WAFD better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Eagle Bancorp Montana, Inc.

(EBMT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 57), 2. 6% yield, +114. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (EBMT: +114. 0%, WAFD: +84. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between EBMT and WAFD?

Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

EBMT

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 7%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.0%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

WAFD

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 9%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.1%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform EBMT and WAFD on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(EBMT: 4.6% · WAFD: -1.6%)
Net Margin>
%
(EBMT: 11.8% · WAFD: 16.0%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(EBMT: 12.0x · WAFD: 13.6x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.