Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
ECBK logo
ECBK
CARE logo
CARE
KO logo
KO
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

ECBK vs CARE vs KO

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
ECBK
ECB Bancorp, Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$178M
5Y Perf.+45.3%
CARE
Carter Bankshares, Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$686M
5Y Perf.+121.9%
KO
The Coca-Cola Company

Beverages - Non-Alcoholic

Consumer DefensiveNYSE • US
Market Cap$341.71B
5Y Perf.+23.7%

ECBK vs CARE vs KO — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
ECBK logoECBK
CARE logoCARE
KO logoKO
IndustryBanks - RegionalBanks - RegionalBeverages - Non-Alcoholic
Market Cap$178M$686M$341.71B
Revenue (TTM)$80M$252M$49.28B
Net Income (TTM)$8M$31M$13.70B
Gross Margin39.9%61.2%61.7%
Operating Margin13.1%15.9%29.3%
Forward P/E21.6x5.7x24.3x
Total Debt$285M$179M$45.49B
Cash & Equiv.$95M$105M$10.27B

ECBK vs CARE vs KOLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

ECBK
CARE
KO
StockJul 22Jun 26Return
ECB Bancorp, Inc. (ECBK)100145.3+45.3%
Carter Bankshares, … (CARE)100221.9+121.9%
The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO)100123.7+23.7%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: ECBK vs CARE vs KO

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: ECBK and KO are tied at the top with 3 categories each — the right choice depends on your priorities. The Coca-Cola Company is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and dividend income and shareholder returns. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
ECBK
ECB Bancorp, Inc.
The Banking Pick

ECBK has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and growth exposure.

  • beta 0.44
  • Rev growth 16.5%, EPS growth 95.8%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.44, current ratio 0.10x
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
CARE
Carter Bankshares, Inc.
The Banking Pick

CARE is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and bank quality.

  • 150.2% 10Y total return vs KO's 115.0%
  • NIM 2.7% vs ECBK's 2.0%
  • +86.8% vs KO's +17.7%
Best for: long-term compounding and bank quality
KO
The Coca-Cola Company
The Quality Compounder

KO is the clearest fit if your priority is quality and dividends.

  • 27.8% margin vs ECBK's 9.8%
  • 2.6% yield; 56-year raise streak; the other 2 pay no meaningful dividend
  • 13.1% ROA vs ECBK's 0.5%, ROIC 15.8% vs 1.8%
Best for: quality and dividends
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthECBK logoECBK16.5% NII/revenue growth vs KO's 1.9%
ValueECBK logoECBKLower P/E (21.6x vs 24.3x), PEG 1.16 vs 2.17
Quality / MarginsKO logoKO27.8% margin vs ECBK's 9.8%
Stability / SafetyECBK logoECBKBeta 0.44 vs CARE's 0.50
DividendsKO logoKO2.6% yield; 56-year raise streak; the other 2 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)CARE logoCARE+86.8% vs KO's +17.7%
Efficiency (ROA)KO logoKO13.1% ROA vs ECBK's 0.5%, ROIC 15.8% vs 1.8%

ECBK vs CARE vs KO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

ECBKECB Bancorp, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

CARECarter Bankshares, Inc.
FY 2025
Bank Owned Life Insurance Income
74.0%$2M
Other Revenue
26.0%$532,000
KOThe Coca-Cola Company
FY 2025
Pacific
84.6%$31.6B
Bottling investments
15.4%$5.7B

ECBK vs CARE vs KO — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLKOLAGGINGCARE

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

KO leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.

KO is the larger business by revenue, generating $49.3B annually — 619.9x ECBK's $80M. KO is the more profitable business, keeping 27.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ECBK's 9.8%.

MetricECBK logoECBKECB Bancorp, Inc.CARE logoCARECarter Bankshares…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$80M$252M$49.3B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$11M$46M$15.5B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$8M$31M$13.7B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$9M$30M$12.6B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+39.9%+61.2%+61.7%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+13.1%+15.9%+29.3%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+9.8%+12.5%+27.8%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+11.3%+11.9%+25.5%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+12.1%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+82.4%+8.3%+18.2%
KO leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

ECBK leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 21.6x trailing earnings, ECBK trades at a 17% valuation discount to KO's 26.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), ECBK offers better value at 1.16x vs KO's 2.34x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricECBK logoECBKECB Bancorp, Inc.CARE logoCARECarter Bankshares…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
Market CapShares × price$178M$686M$341.7B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$368M$759M$376.9B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS21.61x22.11x26.12x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.5.67x24.27x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.16x2.34x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple35.47x18.98x25.45x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue2.24x2.69x7.13x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.98x1.66x9.99x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF19.80x21.57x64.52x
ECBK leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

KO leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

KO delivers a 41.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $5 for ECBK. CARE carries lower financial leverage with a 0.43x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ECBK's 1.66x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CARE scores 8/9 vs KO's 7/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricECBK logoECBKECB Bancorp, Inc.CARE logoCARECarter Bankshares…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+4.6%+7.6%+41.1%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+0.5%+0.7%+13.1%
ROICReturn on invested capital+1.8%+5.7%+15.8%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+2.3%+1.5%+17.3%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9787
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage1.66x0.43x1.33x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$190M$73M$35.2B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$95M$105M$10.3B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$285M$179M$45.5B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense0.22x0.39x10.70x
KO leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

CARE leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in CARE five years ago would be worth $23,985 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $14,414 for ECBK. Over the past 12 months, CARE leads with a +86.8% total return vs KO's +17.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CARE at 26.8% vs KO's 11.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricECBK logoECBKECB Bancorp, Inc.CARE logoCARECarter Bankshares…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+17.3%+59.9%+16.4%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+34.3%+86.8%+17.7%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+55.6%+103.8%+39.3%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+44.1%+139.8%+65.3%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+44.1%+150.2%+115.0%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+15.9%+26.8%+11.7%
CARE leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — ECBK and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.23 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CARE's 0.50 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ECBK currently trades 99.1% from its 52-week high vs KO's 94.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricECBK logoECBKECB Bancorp, Inc.CARE logoCARECarter Bankshares…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.45x0.50x-0.24x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$20.50$31.40$84.04
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$14.82$16.27$65.35
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+99.1%+98.6%+94.5%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10059.476.849.2
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded11K323K13.6M
Evenly matched — ECBK and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

KO leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: CARE as "Hold", KO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 8.5% upside for KO (target: $86) vs -7.9% for CARE (target: $29). KO is the only dividend payer here at 2.56% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricECBK logoECBKECB Bancorp, Inc.CARE logoCARECarter Bankshares…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$28.50$86.13
# AnalystsCovering analysts548
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+2.6%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises056
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$2.04
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+2.6%+2.9%+0.2%
KO leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

KO leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). ECBK leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.

Best OverallThe Coca-Cola Company (KO)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

ECBK vs CARE vs KO: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is ECBK or CARE or KO a better buy right now?

For growth investors, ECB Bancorp, Inc.

(ECBK) is the stronger pick with 16. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 9% for The Coca-Cola Company (KO). ECB Bancorp, Inc. (ECBK) offers the better valuation at 21. 6x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate The Coca-Cola Company (KO) a "Buy" — based on 48 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — ECBK or CARE or KO?

On trailing P/E, ECB Bancorp, Inc.

(ECBK) is the cheapest at 21. 6x versus The Coca-Cola Company at 26. 1x. On forward P/E, Carter Bankshares, Inc. is actually cheaper at 5. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — ECBK or CARE or KO?

Over the past 5 years, Carter Bankshares, Inc.

(CARE) delivered a total return of +139. 8%, compared to +44. 1% for ECB Bancorp, Inc. (ECBK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CARE returned +150. 2% versus ECBK's +44. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — ECBK or CARE or KO?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.

24β versus Carter Bankshares, Inc. 's 0. 50β — meaning CARE is approximately -310% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Carter Bankshares, Inc. (CARE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 43% versus 166% for ECB Bancorp, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — ECBK or CARE or KO?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), ECB Bancorp, Inc.

(ECBK) is pulling ahead at 16. 5% versus 1. 9% for The Coca-Cola Company (KO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: ECB Bancorp, Inc. grew EPS 95. 8% year-over-year, compared to 23. 6% for The Coca-Cola Company. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — ECBK or CARE or KO?

The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the more profitable company, earning 27.

3% net margin versus 9. 8% for ECB Bancorp, Inc. — meaning it keeps 27. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KO leads at 28. 7% versus 13. 1% for ECBK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CARE leads at 61. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is ECBK or CARE or KO more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Carter Bankshares, Inc.

(CARE) trades at 5. 7x forward P/E versus 24. 3x for The Coca-Cola Company — 18. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for KO: 8. 5% to $86. 13.

08

Which pays a better dividend — ECBK or CARE or KO?

In this comparison, KO (2.

6% yield) pays a dividend. ECBK, CARE do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is ECBK or CARE or KO better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.

24), 2. 6% yield, +115. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +115. 0%, ECBK: +44. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between ECBK and CARE and KO?

These companies operate in different sectors (ECBK (Financial Services) and CARE (Financial Services) and KO (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: ECBK is a small-cap high-growth stock; CARE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock. KO pays a dividend while ECBK, CARE do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.