Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
ECBK logo
ECBK
CARE logo
CARE
KO logo
KO
NBTB logo
NBTB
NFBK logo
NFBK
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

ECBK vs CARE vs KO vs NBTB vs NFBK

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
ECBK
ECB Bancorp, Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$178M
5Y Perf.+45.3%
CARE
Carter Bankshares, Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$686M
5Y Perf.+121.9%
KO
The Coca-Cola Company

Beverages - Non-Alcoholic

Consumer DefensiveNYSE • US
Market Cap$341.71B
5Y Perf.+23.7%
NBTB
NBT Bancorp Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.44B
5Y Perf.+15.1%
NFBK
Northfield Bancorp, Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$602M
5Y Perf.-2.1%

ECBK vs CARE vs KO vs NBTB vs NFBK — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
ECBK logoECBK
CARE logoCARE
KO logoKO
NBTB logoNBTB
NFBK logoNFBK
IndustryBanks - RegionalBanks - RegionalBeverages - Non-AlcoholicBanks - RegionalBanks - Regional
Market Cap$178M$686M$341.71B$2.44B$602M
Revenue (TTM)$80M$252M$49.28B$902M$266M
Net Income (TTM)$8M$31M$13.70B$169M$796K
Gross Margin39.9%61.2%61.7%73.6%55.3%
Operating Margin13.1%15.9%29.3%24.3%6.4%
Forward P/E21.6x5.7x24.3x11.2x10.7x
Total Debt$285M$179M$45.49B$327M$992M
Cash & Equiv.$95M$105M$10.27B$185M$12M

ECBK vs CARE vs KO vs NBTB vs NFBKLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

ECBK
CARE
KO
NBTB
NFBK
StockJul 22Jun 26Return
ECB Bancorp, Inc. (ECBK)100145.3+45.3%
Carter Bankshares, … (CARE)100221.9+121.9%
The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO)100123.7+23.7%
NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB)100115.1+15.1%
Northfield Bancorp,… (NFBK)10097.9-2.1%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: ECBK vs CARE vs KO vs NBTB vs NFBK

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: ECBK leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. The Coca-Cola Company is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and operational efficiency and capital deployment. CARE and NFBK also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
🥇ECBK emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
ECBK
ECB Bancorp, Inc.
The Banking Pick

ECBK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and valuation efficiency.

  • Rev growth 16.5%, EPS growth 95.8%
  • PEG 1.16 vs KO's 2.17
  • 16.5% NII/revenue growth vs NFBK's -26.7%
  • Lower P/E (21.6x vs 24.3x), PEG 1.16 vs 2.17
Best for: growth exposure and valuation efficiency
CARE
Carter Bankshares, Inc.
The Banking Pick

CARE ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.

  • 150.2% 10Y total return vs KO's 115.0%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.50, Low D/E 42.5%, current ratio 0.75x
  • +86.8% vs KO's +17.7%
Best for: long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night
KO
The Coca-Cola Company
The Quality Compounder

KO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and efficiency is your priority.

  • 27.8% margin vs NFBK's 0.3%
  • 13.1% ROA vs NFBK's 0.0%, ROIC 15.8% vs 0.8%
Best for: quality and efficiency
NBTB
NBT Bancorp Inc.
The Banking Pick

NBTB is the clearest fit if your priority is bank quality.

  • NIM 3.1% vs ECBK's 2.0%
Best for: bank quality
NFBK
Northfield Bancorp, Inc.
The Banking Pick

NFBK is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.

  • Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.67, yield 3.7%
  • Beta 0.67, yield 3.7%, current ratio 0.36x
  • 3.7% yield, vs KO's 2.6%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
Best for: income & stability and defensive
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthECBK logoECBK16.5% NII/revenue growth vs NFBK's -26.7%
ValueECBK logoECBKLower P/E (21.6x vs 24.3x), PEG 1.16 vs 2.17
Quality / MarginsKO logoKO27.8% margin vs NFBK's 0.3%
Stability / SafetyECBK logoECBKBeta 0.44 vs NBTB's 0.73
DividendsNFBK logoNFBK3.7% yield, vs KO's 2.6%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)CARE logoCARE+86.8% vs KO's +17.7%
Efficiency (ROA)KO logoKO13.1% ROA vs NFBK's 0.0%, ROIC 15.8% vs 0.8%

ECBK vs CARE vs KO vs NBTB vs NFBK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

ECBKECB Bancorp, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

CARECarter Bankshares, Inc.
FY 2025
Bank Owned Life Insurance Income
74.0%$2M
Other Revenue
26.0%$532,000
KOThe Coca-Cola Company
FY 2025
Pacific
84.6%$31.6B
Bottling investments
15.4%$5.7B
NBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.
FY 2025
Insurance Revenue
100.0%$18M
NFBKNorthfield Bancorp, Inc.
FY 2025
Reportable Segment
100.0%$266M

ECBK vs CARE vs KO vs NBTB vs NFBK — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLKOLAGGINGNFBK

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

KO leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

KO is the larger business by revenue, generating $49.3B annually — 619.9x ECBK's $80M. KO is the more profitable business, keeping 27.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NFBK's 0.3%.

MetricECBK logoECBKECB Bancorp, Inc.CARE logoCARECarter Bankshares…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…NBTB logoNBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.NFBK logoNFBKNorthfield Bancor…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$80M$252M$49.3B$902M$266M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$11M$46M$15.5B$241M$25M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$8M$31M$13.7B$169M$796,000
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$9M$30M$12.6B$225M$52M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+39.9%+61.2%+61.7%+73.6%+55.3%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+13.1%+15.9%+29.3%+24.3%+6.4%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+9.8%+12.5%+27.8%+18.8%+0.3%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+11.3%+11.9%+25.5%+24.9%+19.6%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+12.1%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+82.4%+8.3%+18.2%+39.5%+68.8%
KO leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

NBTB leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 14.0x trailing earnings, NBTB trades at a 98% valuation discount to NFBK's 727.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), ECBK offers better value at 1.16x vs KO's 2.34x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricECBK logoECBKECB Bancorp, Inc.CARE logoCARECarter Bankshares…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…NBTB logoNBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.NFBK logoNFBKNorthfield Bancor…
Market CapShares × price$178M$686M$341.7B$2.4B$602M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$368M$759M$376.9B$2.6B$1.6B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS21.61x22.11x26.12x14.02x727.78x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.5.67x24.27x11.18x10.67x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.16x2.34x1.99x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple35.47x18.98x25.45x10.70x63.21x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue2.24x2.69x7.13x2.81x3.27x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.98x1.66x9.99x1.25x0.84x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF19.80x21.57x64.52x11.13x11.53x
NBTB leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

KO leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

KO delivers a 41.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $0 for NFBK. NBTB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ECBK's 1.66x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CARE scores 8/9 vs NFBK's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricECBK logoECBKECB Bancorp, Inc.CARE logoCARECarter Bankshares…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…NBTB logoNBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.NFBK logoNFBKNorthfield Bancor…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+4.6%+7.6%+41.1%+9.5%+0.1%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+0.5%+0.7%+13.1%+1.1%+0.0%
ROICReturn on invested capital+1.8%+5.7%+15.8%+7.9%+0.8%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+2.3%+1.5%+17.3%+2.4%+1.0%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–978775
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage1.66x0.43x1.33x0.17x1.44x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$190M$73M$35.2B$142M$979M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$95M$105M$10.3B$185M$12M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$285M$179M$45.5B$327M$992M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense0.22x0.39x10.70x1.05x0.15x
KO leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

CARE leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in CARE five years ago would be worth $23,985 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,732 for NFBK. Over the past 12 months, CARE leads with a +86.8% total return vs KO's +17.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CARE at 26.8% vs KO's 11.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricECBK logoECBKECB Bancorp, Inc.CARE logoCARECarter Bankshares…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…NBTB logoNBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.NFBK logoNFBKNorthfield Bancor…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+17.3%+59.9%+16.4%+14.0%+29.5%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+34.3%+86.8%+17.7%+20.5%+28.5%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+55.6%+103.8%+39.3%+49.9%+43.4%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+44.1%+139.8%+65.3%+46.9%+7.3%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+44.1%+150.2%+115.0%+103.1%+28.9%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+15.9%+26.8%+11.7%+14.5%+12.8%
CARE leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — ECBK and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.23 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NBTB's 0.73 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ECBK currently trades 99.1% from its 52-week high vs KO's 94.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricECBK logoECBKECB Bancorp, Inc.CARE logoCARECarter Bankshares…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…NBTB logoNBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.NFBK logoNFBKNorthfield Bancor…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.45x0.50x-0.24x0.73x0.66x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$20.50$31.40$84.04$48.81$14.81
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$14.82$16.27$65.35$39.20$9.90
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+99.1%+98.6%+94.5%+95.6%+97.3%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10059.476.849.251.053.3
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded11K323K13.6M277K243K
Evenly matched — ECBK and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — KO and NFBK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: CARE as "Hold", KO as "Buy", NBTB as "Hold", NFBK as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 8.5% upside for KO (target: $86) vs -7.9% for CARE (target: $29). For income investors, NFBK offers the higher dividend yield at 3.65% vs KO's 2.56%.

MetricECBK logoECBKECB Bancorp, Inc.CARE logoCARECarter Bankshares…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…NBTB logoNBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.NFBK logoNFBKNorthfield Bancor…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuyHoldHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$28.50$86.13$46.00$14.50
# AnalystsCovering analysts548109
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+2.6%+3.1%+3.7%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises056130
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$2.04$1.43$0.53
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+2.6%+2.9%+0.2%+0.4%+2.6%
Evenly matched — KO and NFBK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

KO leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). NBTB leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.

Best OverallThe Coca-Cola Company (KO)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

ECBK vs CARE vs KO vs NBTB vs NFBK: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is ECBK or CARE or KO or NBTB or NFBK a better buy right now?

For growth investors, ECB Bancorp, Inc.

(ECBK) is the stronger pick with 16. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -26. 7% for Northfield Bancorp, Inc. (NFBK). NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) offers the better valuation at 14. 0x trailing P/E (11. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate The Coca-Cola Company (KO) a "Buy" — based on 48 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — ECBK or CARE or KO or NBTB or NFBK?

On trailing P/E, NBT Bancorp Inc.

(NBTB) is the cheapest at 14. 0x versus Northfield Bancorp, Inc. at 727. 8x. On forward P/E, Carter Bankshares, Inc. is actually cheaper at 5. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: NBT Bancorp Inc. wins at 1. 59x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 17x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — ECBK or CARE or KO or NBTB or NFBK?

Over the past 5 years, Carter Bankshares, Inc.

(CARE) delivered a total return of +139. 8%, compared to +7. 3% for Northfield Bancorp, Inc. (NFBK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CARE returned +150. 2% versus NFBK's +28. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — ECBK or CARE or KO or NBTB or NFBK?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.

24β versus NBT Bancorp Inc. 's 0. 73β — meaning NBTB is approximately -408% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 166% for ECB Bancorp, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — ECBK or CARE or KO or NBTB or NFBK?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), ECB Bancorp, Inc.

(ECBK) is pulling ahead at 16. 5% versus -26. 7% for Northfield Bancorp, Inc. (NFBK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: ECB Bancorp, Inc. grew EPS 95. 8% year-over-year, compared to -97. 3% for Northfield Bancorp, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — ECBK or CARE or KO or NBTB or NFBK?

The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the more profitable company, earning 27.

3% net margin versus 0. 4% for Northfield Bancorp, Inc. — meaning it keeps 27. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KO leads at 28. 7% versus 9. 3% for NFBK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NBTB leads at 72. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is ECBK or CARE or KO or NBTB or NFBK more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 59x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 17x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Carter Bankshares, Inc. (CARE) trades at 5. 7x forward P/E versus 24. 3x for The Coca-Cola Company — 18. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for KO: 8. 5% to $86. 13.

08

Which pays a better dividend — ECBK or CARE or KO or NBTB or NFBK?

In this comparison, NFBK (3.

7% yield), NBTB (3. 1% yield), KO (2. 6% yield) pay a dividend. ECBK, CARE do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is ECBK or CARE or KO or NBTB or NFBK better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.

24), 2. 6% yield, +115. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +115. 0%, ECBK: +44. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between ECBK and CARE and KO and NBTB and NFBK?

These companies operate in different sectors (ECBK (Financial Services) and CARE (Financial Services) and KO (Consumer Defensive) and NBTB (Financial Services) and NFBK (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: ECBK is a small-cap high-growth stock; CARE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock; NBTB is a small-cap deep-value stock; NFBK is a small-cap income-oriented stock. KO, NBTB, NFBK pay a dividend while ECBK, CARE do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.