Banks - Regional
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
ECBK vs NECB vs KO vs JPM vs ICE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Beverages - Non-Alcoholic
Banks - Diversified
Financial - Data & Stock Exchanges
ECBK vs NECB vs KO vs JPM vs ICE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Beverages - Non-Alcoholic | Banks - Diversified | Financial - Data & Stock Exchanges |
| Market Cap | $178M | $356M | $341.71B | $908.57B | $75.83B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $80M | $156M | $49.28B | $280.33B | $12.64B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $8M | $44M | $13.70B | $57.05B | $3.30B |
| Gross Margin | 39.9% | 65.9% | 61.7% | 60.0% | 61.9% |
| Operating Margin | 13.1% | 39.8% | 29.3% | 25.9% | 38.7% |
| Forward P/E | 21.6x | 8.2x | 24.3x | 14.6x | 16.5x |
| Total Debt | $285M | $75M | $45.49B | $942.38B | $20.28B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $95M | $81M | $10.27B | $343.34B | $837M |
ECBK vs NECB vs KO vs JPM vs ICE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 22 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| ECB Bancorp, Inc. (ECBK) | 100 | 145.3 | +45.3% |
| Northeast Community… (NECB) | 100 | 205.9 | +105.9% |
| The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO) | 100 | 123.7 | +23.7% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 281.9 | +181.9% |
| Intercontinental Ex… (ICE) | 100 | 131.3 | +31.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ECBK vs NECB vs KO vs JPM vs ICE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ECBK is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 16.5%, EPS growth 95.8%
- 16.5% NII/revenue growth vs NECB's -1.6%
- +34.3% vs ICE's -24.4%
NECB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.65, yield 3.8%
- 485.8% 10Y total return vs JPM's 481.2%
- PEG 0.24 vs KO's 2.17
- NIM 4.9% vs ECBK's 2.0%
KO ranks third and is worth considering specifically for efficiency.
- 13.1% ROA vs ECBK's 0.5%, ROIC 15.8% vs 1.8%
Among these 5 stocks, JPM doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
ICE is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.38, Low D/E 69.9%, current ratio 1.02x
- Beta 0.38, yield 1.4%, current ratio 1.02x
- Beta 0.38 vs JPM's 0.87, lower leverage
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 16.5% NII/revenue growth vs NECB's -1.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.2x vs 16.5x), PEG 0.24 vs 1.86 | |
| Quality / Margins | 28.4% margin vs ECBK's 9.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.38 vs JPM's 0.87, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.8% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs KO's 2.6%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +34.3% vs ICE's -24.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.1% ROA vs ECBK's 0.5%, ROIC 15.8% vs 1.8% |
ECBK vs NECB vs KO vs JPM vs ICE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
ECBK vs NECB vs KO vs JPM vs ICE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NECB leads in 2 of 6 categories
KO leads 1 • ECBK leads 0 • JPM leads 0 • ICE leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NECB leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 3525.9x ECBK's $80M. NECB is the more profitable business, keeping 28.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ECBK's 9.8%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $80M | $156M | $49.3B | $280.3B | $12.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $11M | $63M | $15.5B | $81.4B | $6.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $8M | $44M | $13.7B | $57.0B | $3.3B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $9M | $51M | $12.6B | $100.9B | $4.3B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +39.9% | +65.9% | +61.7% | +60.0% | +61.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +13.1% | +39.8% | +29.3% | +25.9% | +38.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +9.8% | +28.4% | +27.8% | +20.4% | +26.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +11.3% | +32.5% | +25.5% | +36.0% | +33.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | +12.1% | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +82.4% | +6.8% | +18.2% | +16.0% | +23.1% |
Valuation Metrics
NECB leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 7.9x trailing earnings, NECB trades at a 70% valuation discount to KO's 26.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), NECB offers better value at 0.23x vs ICE's 2.61x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $178M | $356M | $341.7B | $908.6B | $75.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $368M | $350M | $376.9B | $1.51T | $95.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 21.61x | 7.92x | 26.12x | 16.22x | 23.20x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 8.22x | 24.27x | 14.60x | 16.52x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.16x | 0.23x | 2.34x | 0.92x | 2.61x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 35.47x | 5.52x | 25.45x | 18.52x | 14.76x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.24x | 2.26x | 7.13x | 3.25x | 6.00x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.98x | 1.00x | 9.99x | 2.51x | 2.64x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 19.80x | 7.00x | 64.52x | 9.01x | 17.68x |
Profitability & Efficiency
KO leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KO delivers a 41.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $5 for ECBK. NECB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.21x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ICE scores 9/9 vs JPM's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +4.6% | +13.1% | +41.1% | +15.9% | +11.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.5% | +2.2% | +13.1% | +1.3% | +2.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +1.8% | +12.5% | +15.8% | +4.5% | +7.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.3% | +16.2% | +17.3% | +8.9% | +9.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 5 | 7 | 5 | 9 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.66x | 0.21x | 1.33x | 2.60x | 0.70x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $190M | -$6M | $35.2B | $599.0B | $19.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $95M | $81M | $10.3B | $343.3B | $837M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $285M | $75M | $45.5B | $942.4B | $20.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.22x | 1.17x | 10.70x | 0.74x | 6.53x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — ECBK and NECB and JPM each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NECB five years ago would be worth $23,831 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,637 for ICE. Over the past 12 months, ECBK leads with a +34.3% total return vs ICE's -24.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JPM at 33.7% vs ICE's 7.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +17.3% | +14.8% | +16.4% | +0.8% | -15.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +34.3% | +19.0% | +17.7% | +20.9% | -24.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +55.6% | +93.0% | +39.3% | +138.8% | +24.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +44.1% | +138.3% | +65.3% | +135.5% | +26.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +44.1% | +485.8% | +115.0% | +481.2% | +192.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +15.9% | +24.5% | +11.7% | +33.7% | +7.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ECBK and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.23 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than JPM's 0.87 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ECBK currently trades 99.1% from its 52-week high vs ICE's 70.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.45x | 0.65x | -0.24x | 0.87x | 0.37x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $20.50 | $26.14 | $84.04 | $338.09 | $189.35 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $14.82 | $19.27 | $65.35 | $269.72 | $132.84 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.1% | +98.5% | +94.5% | +96.2% | +70.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 59.4 | 58.5 | 49.2 | 72.1 | 29.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 11K | 33K | 13.6M | 7.4M | 3.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — NECB and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NECB as "Hold", KO as "Buy", JPM as "Buy", ICE as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 44.9% upside for ICE (target: $194) vs 4.5% for JPM (target: $340). For income investors, NECB offers the higher dividend yield at 3.79% vs ICE's 1.45%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $86.13 | $339.75 | $194.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 1 | 48 | 61 | 36 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +3.8% | +2.6% | +1.8% | +1.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 2 | 56 | 15 | 13 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.98 | $2.04 | $5.95 | $1.93 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.6% | +0.4% | +0.2% | +3.8% | +1.8% |
NECB leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). KO leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.
ECBK vs NECB vs KO vs JPM vs ICE: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ECBK or NECB or KO or JPM or ICE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, ECB Bancorp, Inc.
(ECBK) is the stronger pick with 16. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 6% for Northeast Community Bancorp, Inc. (NECB). Northeast Community Bancorp, Inc. (NECB) offers the better valuation at 7. 9x trailing P/E (8. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate The Coca-Cola Company (KO) a "Buy" — based on 48 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ECBK or NECB or KO or JPM or ICE?
On trailing P/E, Northeast Community Bancorp, Inc.
(NECB) is the cheapest at 7. 9x versus The Coca-Cola Company at 26. 1x. On forward P/E, Northeast Community Bancorp, Inc. is actually cheaper at 8. 2x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Northeast Community Bancorp, Inc. wins at 0. 24x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 17x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ECBK or NECB or KO or JPM or ICE?
Over the past 5 years, Northeast Community Bancorp, Inc.
(NECB) delivered a total return of +138. 3%, compared to +26. 4% for Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. (ICE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NECB returned +485. 8% versus ECBK's +44. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ECBK or NECB or KO or JPM or ICE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
24β versus JPMorgan Chase & Co. 's 0. 87β — meaning JPM is approximately -468% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Northeast Community Bancorp, Inc. (NECB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 21% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ECBK or NECB or KO or JPM or ICE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), ECB Bancorp, Inc.
(ECBK) is pulling ahead at 16. 5% versus -1. 6% for Northeast Community Bancorp, Inc. (NECB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: ECB Bancorp, Inc. grew EPS 95. 8% year-over-year, compared to -7. 7% for Northeast Community Bancorp, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ECBK or NECB or KO or JPM or ICE?
Northeast Community Bancorp, Inc.
(NECB) is the more profitable company, earning 28. 2% net margin versus 9. 8% for ECB Bancorp, Inc. — meaning it keeps 28. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NECB leads at 39. 6% versus 13. 1% for ECBK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NECB leads at 66. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ECBK or NECB or KO or JPM or ICE more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Northeast Community Bancorp, Inc. (NECB) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 24x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 17x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Northeast Community Bancorp, Inc. (NECB) trades at 8. 2x forward P/E versus 24. 3x for The Coca-Cola Company — 16. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ICE: 44. 9% to $194. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — ECBK or NECB or KO or JPM or ICE?
In this comparison, NECB (3.
8% yield), KO (2. 6% yield), JPM (1. 8% yield), ICE (1. 4% yield) pay a dividend. ECBK does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is ECBK or NECB or KO or JPM or ICE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
24), 2. 6% yield, +115. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +115. 0%, ECBK: +44. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ECBK and NECB and KO and JPM and ICE?
These companies operate in different sectors (ECBK (Financial Services) and NECB (Financial Services) and KO (Consumer Defensive) and JPM (Financial Services) and ICE (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: ECBK is a small-cap high-growth stock; NECB is a small-cap deep-value stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock; ICE is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. NECB, KO, JPM, ICE pay a dividend while ECBK does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.