Asset Management
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
ECCX vs ECC vs OXLC vs EIC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Asset Management
Asset Management
Asset Management - Income
ECCX vs ECC vs OXLC vs EIC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Asset Management | Asset Management | Asset Management | Asset Management - Income |
| Market Cap | $2.35B | $552M | $974M | $246M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $116M | $116M | $96M | $46M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $34M | $34M | $189M | $28M |
| Gross Margin | 84.2% | 84.2% | 59.8% | 94.1% |
| Operating Margin | 73.7% | 73.7% | 50.6% | 107.6% |
| Forward P/E | 29.3x | 4.6x | 2.5x | 7.6x |
| Total Debt | $272M | $272M | $487M | $2M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $42M | $42M | $295M | $8M |
ECCX vs ECC vs OXLC vs EIC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Eagle Point Credit … (ECCX) | 100 | 105.5 | +5.5% |
| Eagle Point Credit … (ECC) | 100 | 57.6 | -42.4% |
| Oxford Lane Capital… (OXLC) | 100 | 59.0 | -41.0% |
| Eagle Point Income … (EIC) | 100 | 98.7 | -1.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ECCX vs ECC vs OXLC vs EIC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ECCX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding and bank quality is your priority.
- 59.2% 10Y total return vs ECC's 33.8%
- NIM 10.2% vs EIC's 8.5%
- Beta 0.50 vs ECC's 0.68
- +9.5% vs OXLC's -36.8%
ECC is the clearest fit if your priority is value and dividends.
- Lower P/E (4.6x vs 7.6x)
- 41.6% yield, vs EIC's 22.1%
OXLC lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
EIC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.52, yield 22.1%
- Rev growth 70.7%, EPS growth -8.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.52, Low D/E 0.6%, current ratio 224.31x
- Beta 0.52, yield 22.1%, current ratio 224.31x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 70.7% NII/revenue growth vs OXLC's -65.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (4.6x vs 7.6x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.1% vs ECC's 0.1% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.50 vs ECC's 0.68 | |
| Dividends | 41.6% yield, vs EIC's 22.1% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +9.5% vs OXLC's -36.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.1% vs ECC's 0.1% |
ECCX vs ECC vs OXLC vs EIC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
EIC leads in 2 of 6 categories
ECCX leads 2 • ECC leads 1 • OXLC leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
EIC leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ECCX is the larger business by revenue, generating $116M annually — 2.5x EIC's $46M. EIC is the more profitable business, keeping 91.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to OXLC's 50.6%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $116M | $116M | $96M | $46M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $63M | $63M | $271M | $30M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $34M | $34M | $189M | $28M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $65M | $65M | $1.5B | -$4M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +84.2% | +84.2% | +59.8% | +94.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +73.7% | +73.7% | +50.6% | +107.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +69.3% | +69.3% | +50.6% | +91.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +89.3% | +89.3% | -7.3% | -3.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.9% | +3.9% | -7.7% | +6.9% |
Valuation Metrics
ECC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 3.7x trailing earnings, EIC trades at a 96% valuation discount to OXLC's 93.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, ECC's 9.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ECCX's 30.2x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.4B | $552M | $974M | $246M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.6B | $782M | $1.2B | $240M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 29.28x | 4.91x | 93.83x | 3.73x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 4.60x | 2.51x | 7.61x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 0.21x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 30.19x | 9.15x | 24.05x | 20.85x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 20.28x | 4.76x | 10.17x | 5.38x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.51x | 0.42x | 0.46x | 0.49x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 22.71x | 5.33x | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
EIC leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
OXLC delivers a 10.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $10 in annual profit, vs $3 for ECC. EIC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ECC's 0.29x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), EIC scores 4/9 vs OXLC's 2/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +3.1% | +3.1% | +10.2% | +8.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.2% | +2.2% | +7.1% | +5.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.1% | +6.1% | +1.9% | +15.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +7.1% | +7.1% | +2.1% | +14.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.29x | 0.29x | 0.25x | 0.01x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $230M | $230M | $192M | -$6M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $42M | $42M | $295M | $8M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $272M | $272M | $487M | $2M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 12.34x | 12.34x | 1.26x | 10.41x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ECCX leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ECCX five years ago would be worth $13,463 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,473 for OXLC. Over the past 12 months, ECCX leads with a +9.5% total return vs OXLC's -36.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ECCX at 9.3% vs ECC's -6.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +2.6% | -20.3% | -24.1% | -3.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +9.5% | -28.3% | -36.8% | -16.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +30.6% | -17.5% | -3.9% | +12.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +34.6% | +6.5% | -5.3% | +26.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +59.2% | +33.8% | +23.9% | +12.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +9.3% | -6.2% | -1.3% | +4.1% |
Risk & Volatility
ECCX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ECCX is the less volatile stock with a 0.50 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ECC's 0.68 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ECCX currently trades 99.7% from its 52-week high vs OXLC's 40.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.50x | 0.68x | 0.62x | 0.52x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $25.26 | $8.23 | $24.90 | $14.80 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $6.58 | $3.46 | $8.01 | $9.17 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.7% | +51.3% | +40.3% | +70.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 74.7 | 62.6 | 53.6 | 74.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3K | 1.7M | 1.5M | 163K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — ECC and EIC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ECC as "Buy", OXLC as "Buy", EIC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 67.0% upside for EIC (target: $18) vs 12.6% for ECC (target: $5). For income investors, ECC offers the higher dividend yield at 41.58% vs ECCX's 6.97%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $4.75 | — | $17.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 11 | 4 | 2 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +7.0% | +41.6% | +33.9% | +22.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.75 | $1.75 | $3.40 | $2.32 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
EIC leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). ECCX leads in 2 (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility). 1 tied.
ECCX vs ECC vs OXLC vs EIC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ECCX or ECC or OXLC or EIC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Eagle Point Income Company Inc.
(EIC) is the stronger pick with 70. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -65. 7% for Oxford Lane Capital Corp. (OXLC). Eagle Point Income Company Inc. (EIC) offers the better valuation at 3. 7x trailing P/E (7. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Eagle Point Credit Company Inc. (ECC) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ECCX or ECC or OXLC or EIC?
On trailing P/E, Eagle Point Income Company Inc.
(EIC) is the cheapest at 3. 7x versus Oxford Lane Capital Corp. at 93. 8x. On forward P/E, Oxford Lane Capital Corp. is actually cheaper at 2. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ECCX or ECC or OXLC or EIC?
Over the past 5 years, Eagle Point Credit Company Inc.
6. 6875% NT 28 (ECCX) delivered a total return of +34. 6%, compared to -5. 3% for Oxford Lane Capital Corp. (OXLC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ECCX returned +59. 2% versus EIC's +12. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ECCX or ECC or OXLC or EIC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Eagle Point Credit Company Inc.
6. 6875% NT 28 (ECCX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 50β versus Eagle Point Credit Company Inc. 's 0. 68β — meaning ECC is approximately 36% more volatile than ECCX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Eagle Point Income Company Inc. (EIC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 29% for Eagle Point Credit Company Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ECCX or ECC or OXLC or EIC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Eagle Point Income Company Inc.
(EIC) is pulling ahead at 70. 7% versus -65. 7% for Oxford Lane Capital Corp. (OXLC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Eagle Point Income Company Inc. grew EPS -8. 8% year-over-year, compared to -90. 5% for Oxford Lane Capital Corp.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ECCX or ECC or OXLC or EIC?
Eagle Point Income Company Inc.
(EIC) is the more profitable company, earning 91. 0% net margin versus 50. 6% for Oxford Lane Capital Corp. — meaning it keeps 91. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: EIC leads at 107. 6% versus 50. 6% for OXLC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — EIC leads at 94. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ECCX or ECC or OXLC or EIC more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Oxford Lane Capital Corp.
(OXLC) trades at 2. 5x forward P/E versus 7. 6x for Eagle Point Income Company Inc. — 5. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for EIC: 67. 0% to $17. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — ECCX or ECC or OXLC or EIC?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Eagle Point Credit Company Inc. (ECC) offers the highest yield at 41. 6%, versus 7. 0% for Eagle Point Credit Company Inc. 6. 6875% NT 28 (ECCX).
09Is ECCX or ECC or OXLC or EIC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Eagle Point Credit Company Inc.
6. 6875% NT 28 (ECCX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 50), 7. 0% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ECCX: +59. 2%, ECC: +33. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ECCX and ECC and OXLC and EIC?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: ECCX is a small-cap income-oriented stock; ECC is a small-cap deep-value stock; OXLC is a small-cap income-oriented stock; EIC is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.