Chemicals - Specialty
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
ECL vs RPM vs SHW vs DOW
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Chemicals - Specialty
Chemicals - Specialty
Chemicals
ECL vs RPM vs SHW vs DOW — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Chemicals - Specialty | Chemicals - Specialty | Chemicals - Specialty | Chemicals |
| Market Cap | $72.46B | $12.99B | $78.98B | $26.86B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $16.08B | $7.58B | $23.94B | $39.33B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $2.08B | $667M | $2.60B | $-2.76B |
| Gross Margin | 44.5% | 41.2% | 49.1% | 6.2% |
| Operating Margin | 17.7% | 12.0% | 16.1% | -2.3% |
| Forward P/E | 30.6x | 18.5x | 27.3x | 12.6x |
| Total Debt | $9.43B | $2.96B | $14.53B | $19.60B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $646M | $302M | $207M | $3.82B |
ECL vs RPM vs SHW vs DOW — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ecolab Inc. (ECL) | 100 | 120.7 | +20.7% |
| RPM International I… (RPM) | 100 | 135.6 | +35.6% |
| The Sherwin-William… (SHW) | 100 | 161.8 | +61.8% |
| Dow Inc. (DOW) | 100 | 96.7 | -3.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ECL vs RPM vs SHW vs DOW
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ECL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 2.2%, EPS growth -1.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 4.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.63, Low D/E 96.2%, current ratio 1.08x
- 2.2% revenue growth vs DOW's -7.0%
- 12.9% margin vs DOW's -7.0%
RPM is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.
- PEG 1.03 vs SHW's 3.94
- Lower P/E (18.5x vs 27.3x), PEG 1.03 vs 3.94
SHW is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 250.0% 10Y total return vs ECL's 139.5%
- 1.0% yield, 37-year raise streak, vs DOW's 5.6%
- 10.0% ROA vs DOW's -4.6%, ROIC 16.5% vs 0.6%
DOW is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.76, yield 5.6%
- Beta 0.76, yield 5.6%, current ratio 1.97x
- +37.3% vs SHW's -8.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 2.2% revenue growth vs DOW's -7.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (18.5x vs 27.3x), PEG 1.03 vs 3.94 | |
| Quality / Margins | 12.9% margin vs DOW's -7.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.63 vs RPM's 1.01, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.0% yield, 37-year raise streak, vs DOW's 5.6% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +37.3% vs SHW's -8.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 10.0% ROA vs DOW's -4.6%, ROIC 16.5% vs 0.6% |
ECL vs RPM vs SHW vs DOW — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
ECL vs RPM vs SHW vs DOW — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
DOW leads in 1 of 6 categories
SHW leads 1 • ECL leads 1 • RPM leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — ECL and SHW each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DOW is the larger business by revenue, generating $39.3B annually — 5.2x RPM's $7.6B. ECL is the more profitable business, keeping 12.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to DOW's -7.0%. On growth, SHW holds the edge at +6.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $16.1B | $7.6B | $23.9B | $39.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $3.5B | $1.1B | $4.5B | $1.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $2.1B | $667M | $2.6B | -$2.8B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1.9B | $583M | $2.9B | -$2.0B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +44.5% | +41.2% | +49.1% | +6.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +17.7% | +12.0% | +16.1% | -2.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +12.9% | +8.8% | +10.9% | -7.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +11.8% | +7.7% | +12.1% | -5.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +4.8% | +3.5% | +6.8% | -6.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +19.3% | -11.3% | +7.5% | -68.2% |
Valuation Metrics
DOW leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 19.0x trailing earnings, RPM trades at a 46% valuation discount to ECL's 35.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), RPM offers better value at 1.05x vs SHW's 4.51x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $72.5B | $13.0B | $79.0B | $26.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $81.2B | $15.6B | $93.3B | $42.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 35.24x | 18.95x | 31.18x | -10.11x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 30.64x | 18.48x | 27.27x | 12.62x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.05x | 4.51x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 22.66x | 14.22x | 21.24x | 13.78x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.51x | 1.76x | 3.35x | 0.67x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 7.46x | 4.50x | 17.33x | 1.52x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 38.05x | 24.13x | 29.76x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
SHW leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SHW delivers a 58.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $58 in annual profit, vs $-15 for DOW. ECL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.96x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SHW's 3.16x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), RPM scores 7/9 vs DOW's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +22.0% | +21.3% | +58.2% | -15.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +8.8% | +8.5% | +10.0% | -4.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +12.7% | +13.3% | +16.5% | +0.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +15.8% | +15.9% | +21.3% | +0.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 7 | 6 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.96x | 1.03x | 3.16x | 1.12x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $8.8B | $2.7B | $14.3B | $15.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $646M | $302M | $207M | $3.8B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $9.4B | $3.0B | $14.5B | $19.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 9.82x | 8.51x | 7.83x | -1.51x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ECL leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ECL five years ago would be worth $11,734 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,281 for DOW. Over the past 12 months, DOW leads with a +37.3% total return vs SHW's -8.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ECL at 15.2% vs DOW's -6.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -2.0% | -1.2% | -2.1% | +55.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +2.0% | -5.3% | -8.0% | +37.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +52.7% | +33.3% | +42.4% | -17.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +17.3% | +13.4% | +16.1% | -27.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +139.5% | +134.7% | +250.0% | +12.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +15.2% | +10.0% | +12.5% | -6.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ECL and DOW each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ECL is the less volatile stock with a 0.63 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RPM's 1.01 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. DOW currently trades 87.3% from its 52-week high vs RPM's 78.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.63x | 1.01x | 0.79x | 0.76x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $309.27 | $129.12 | $379.65 | $42.74 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $249.04 | $92.92 | $301.58 | $20.40 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +83.0% | +78.5% | +84.3% | +87.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 46.0 | 47.7 | 47.6 | 48.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.4M | 932K | 1.6M | 14.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — SHW and DOW each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ECL as "Buy", RPM as "Buy", SHW as "Buy", DOW as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 27.5% upside for ECL (target: $327) vs 6.0% for DOW (target: $40). For income investors, DOW offers the higher dividend yield at 5.61% vs SHW's 0.99%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $327.11 | $122.67 | $389.43 | $39.55 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 37 | 22 | 38 | 35 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.0% | +2.0% | +1.0% | +5.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 12 | 30 | 37 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.64 | $1.99 | $3.17 | $2.09 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.1% | +0.7% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
DOW leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). SHW leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.
ECL vs RPM vs SHW vs DOW: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ECL or RPM or SHW or DOW a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Ecolab Inc.
(ECL) is the stronger pick with 2. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -7. 0% for Dow Inc. (DOW). RPM International Inc. (RPM) offers the better valuation at 19. 0x trailing P/E (18. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Ecolab Inc. (ECL) a "Buy" — based on 37 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ECL or RPM or SHW or DOW?
On trailing P/E, RPM International Inc.
(RPM) is the cheapest at 19. 0x versus Ecolab Inc. at 35. 2x. On forward P/E, Dow Inc. is actually cheaper at 12. 6x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: RPM International Inc. wins at 1. 03x versus The Sherwin-Williams Company's 3. 94x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ECL or RPM or SHW or DOW?
Over the past 5 years, Ecolab Inc.
(ECL) delivered a total return of +17. 3%, compared to -27. 2% for Dow Inc. (DOW). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SHW returned +250. 0% versus DOW's +12. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ECL or RPM or SHW or DOW?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Ecolab Inc.
(ECL) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 63β versus RPM International Inc. 's 1. 01β — meaning RPM is approximately 61% more volatile than ECL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Ecolab Inc. (ECL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 96% versus 3% for The Sherwin-Williams Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ECL or RPM or SHW or DOW?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Ecolab Inc.
(ECL) is pulling ahead at 2. 2% versus -7. 0% for Dow Inc. (DOW). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: RPM International Inc. grew EPS 17. 3% year-over-year, compared to -335. 0% for Dow Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ECL leads at 4. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ECL or RPM or SHW or DOW?
Ecolab Inc.
(ECL) is the more profitable company, earning 12. 9% net margin versus -6. 6% for Dow Inc. — meaning it keeps 12. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ECL leads at 18. 1% versus 0. 7% for DOW. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SHW leads at 48. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ECL or RPM or SHW or DOW more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, RPM International Inc. (RPM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 03x versus The Sherwin-Williams Company's 3. 94x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, Dow Inc. (DOW) trades at 12. 6x forward P/E versus 30. 6x for Ecolab Inc. — 18. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ECL: 27. 5% to $327. 11.
08Which pays a better dividend — ECL or RPM or SHW or DOW?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Dow Inc. (DOW) offers the highest yield at 5. 6%, versus 1. 0% for The Sherwin-Williams Company (SHW).
09Is ECL or RPM or SHW or DOW better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Ecolab Inc.
(ECL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 63), 1. 0% yield, +139. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ECL: +139. 5%, RPM: +134. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ECL and RPM and SHW and DOW?
Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: ECL is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; RPM is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; SHW is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; DOW is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.