ECL vs SHW vs IFF vs RPM vs FMC

For growth investors, Ecolab Inc.

(ECL) is the stronger pick with 2. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -18. 3% for FMC Corporation (FMC). RPM International Inc. (RPM) offers the better valuation at 18. 6x trailing P/E (18. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Ecolab Inc. (ECL) a "Buy" — based on 37 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, RPM International Inc.

(RPM) is the cheapest at 18. 6x versus Ecolab Inc. at 35. 4x. On forward P/E, FMC Corporation is actually cheaper at 8. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: RPM International Inc. wins at 1. 01x versus The Sherwin-Williams Company's 3. 85x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.

Over the past 5 years, Ecolab Inc.

(ECL) delivered a total return of +18. 1%, compared to -79. 4% for FMC Corporation (FMC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SHW returned +245. 5% versus FMC's -25. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Ecolab Inc.

(ECL) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 63β versus FMC Corporation's 1. 63β — meaning FMC is approximately 160% more volatile than ECL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, International Flavors & Fragrances Inc. (IFF) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 47% versus 3% for The Sherwin-Williams Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Ecolab Inc.

(ECL) is pulling ahead at 2. 2% versus -18. 3% for FMC Corporation (FMC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: RPM International Inc. grew EPS 17. 3% year-over-year, compared to -757. 4% for FMC Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, ECL leads at 4. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Ecolab Inc.

(ECL) is the more profitable company, earning 12. 9% net margin versus -64. 6% for FMC Corporation — meaning it keeps 12. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ECL leads at 18. 1% versus -54. 4% for FMC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SHW leads at 48. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, RPM International Inc. (RPM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 01x versus The Sherwin-Williams Company's 3. 85x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, FMC Corporation (FMC) trades at 8. 4x forward P/E versus 30. 8x for Ecolab Inc. — 22. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ECL: 27. 0% to $327. 11.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

FMC Corporation (FMC) offers the highest yield at 15. 6%, versus 1. 0% for The Sherwin-Williams Company (SHW).

For long-horizon retirement investors, Ecolab Inc.

(ECL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 63), 1. 0% yield, +141. 3% 10Y return). FMC Corporation (FMC) carries a higher beta of 1. 63 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ECL: +141. 3%, FMC: -25. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: ECL is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; SHW is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; IFF is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; RPM is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; FMC is a small-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.