Chemicals - Specialty
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
ECVT vs ASIX vs IOSP vs TROX vs KWR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Chemicals
Chemicals - Specialty
Chemicals
Chemicals - Specialty
ECVT vs ASIX vs IOSP vs TROX vs KWR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Chemicals - Specialty | Chemicals | Chemicals - Specialty | Chemicals | Chemicals - Specialty |
| Market Cap | $1.53B | $796M | $1.91B | $1.34B | $2.48B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $819M | $1.52B | $1.78B | $2.92B | $1.93B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-63M | $49M | $117M | $-359M | $4M |
| Gross Margin | 22.6% | 10.8% | 27.7% | 5.8% | 34.4% |
| Operating Margin | 15.4% | 4.2% | 8.7% | -4.8% | 3.7% |
| Forward P/E | 22.9x | 15.7x | 15.5x | — | 19.3x |
| Total Debt | $431M | $381M | $90M | $3.59B | $929M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $197M | $20M | $293M | $211M | $180M |
ECVT vs ASIX vs IOSP vs TROX vs KWR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ecovyst Inc. (ECVT) | 100 | 111.3 | +11.3% |
| AdvanSix Inc. (ASIX) | 100 | 202.8 | +102.8% |
| Innospec Inc. (IOSP) | 100 | 99.4 | -0.6% |
| Tronox Holdings plc (TROX) | 100 | 126.7 | +26.7% |
| Quaker Chemical Cor… (KWR) | 100 | 83.7 | -16.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ECVT vs ASIX vs IOSP vs TROX vs KWR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ECVT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth and momentum is your priority.
- 2.7% revenue growth vs TROX's -5.7%
- +102.7% vs IOSP's -14.9%
ASIX plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
IOSP carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.70, yield 2.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.70, Low D/E 6.7%, current ratio 2.79x
- PEG 0.48 vs ASIX's 8.38
- Beta 0.70, yield 2.2%, current ratio 2.79x
TROX is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 116.1% 10Y total return vs KWR's 88.7%
KWR is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 2.7%, EPS growth -102.2%, 3Y rev CAGR -1.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 2.7% revenue growth vs TROX's -5.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (15.5x vs 19.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 6.6% margin vs TROX's -12.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.70 vs TROX's 2.37, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.2% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs TROX's 3.6%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +102.7% vs IOSP's -14.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.5% ROA vs TROX's -7.7%, ROIC 11.2% vs -0.3% |
ECVT vs ASIX vs IOSP vs TROX vs KWR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
ECVT vs ASIX vs IOSP vs TROX vs KWR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ECVT leads in 2 of 6 categories
IOSP leads 2 • ASIX leads 0 • TROX leads 0 • KWR leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ECVT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TROX is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.9B annually — 3.6x ECVT's $819M. IOSP is the more profitable business, keeping 6.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TROX's -12.3%. On growth, ECVT holds the edge at +32.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $819M | $1.5B | $1.8B | $2.9B | $1.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $136M | $143M | $198M | $166M | $143M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$63M | $49M | $117M | -$359M | $4M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $84M | $6M | $88M | -$139M | $143M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +22.6% | +10.8% | +27.7% | +5.8% | +34.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +15.4% | +4.2% | +8.7% | -4.8% | +3.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -7.7% | +3.2% | +6.6% | -12.3% | +0.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +10.2% | +0.4% | +4.9% | -4.8% | +7.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +32.6% | +9.4% | -2.4% | +3.0% | +8.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.3% | -8.8% | +167.7% | +7.1% | +54.8% |
Valuation Metrics
IOSP leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 13.3x trailing earnings, ASIX trades at a 19% valuation discount to IOSP's 16.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), IOSP offers better value at 0.51x vs ASIX's 7.10x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.5B | $796M | $1.9B | $1.3B | $2.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.8B | $1.2B | $1.7B | $4.7B | $3.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -22.90x | 13.34x | 16.41x | -2.83x | -1021.00x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 22.87x | 15.74x | 15.45x | — | 19.32x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 7.10x | 0.51x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 13.28x | 7.86x | 8.29x | 16.80x | 11.93x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.11x | 0.52x | 1.07x | 0.46x | 1.31x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.68x | 0.80x | 1.44x | 0.92x | 1.81x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 21.87x | 124.10x | 21.68x | — | 30.74x |
Profitability & Efficiency
IOSP leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
IOSP delivers a 9.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $9 in annual profit, vs $-30 for TROX. IOSP carries lower financial leverage with a 0.07x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TROX's 2.48x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ECVT scores 6/9 vs TROX's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -10.2% | +6.0% | +9.0% | -30.4% | +0.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -4.2% | +2.9% | +6.5% | -7.7% | +0.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.2% | +4.4% | +11.2% | -0.3% | +6.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +4.6% | +5.3% | +11.0% | -0.4% | +7.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 2 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.71x | 0.47x | 0.07x | 2.48x | 0.67x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $234M | $361M | -$203M | $3.4B | $749M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $197M | $20M | $293M | $211M | $180M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $431M | $381M | $90M | $3.6B | $929M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.08x | 7.92x | — | -1.16x | 1.41x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ECVT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ECVT five years ago would be worth $11,544 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,493 for TROX. Over the past 12 months, ECVT leads with a +102.7% total return vs IOSP's -14.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ECVT at 9.9% vs KWR's -11.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +40.9% | +40.3% | +0.5% | +98.1% | +3.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +102.7% | +8.2% | -14.9% | +76.9% | +45.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +32.9% | -25.6% | -17.3% | -23.6% | -30.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +15.4% | -15.9% | -18.3% | -55.1% | -37.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +9.9% | +60.6% | +84.4% | +116.1% | +88.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +9.9% | -9.4% | -6.1% | -8.6% | -11.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ECVT and IOSP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
IOSP is the less volatile stock with a 0.70 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TROX's 2.37 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ECVT currently trades 93.5% from its 52-week high vs KWR's 78.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.90x | 0.81x | 0.70x | 2.37x | 1.35x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $14.94 | $26.73 | $95.55 | $10.59 | $183.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $6.69 | $14.10 | $65.58 | $2.86 | $99.18 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +93.5% | +89.8% | +80.2% | +79.4% | +78.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 66.9 | 60.6 | 59.1 | 58.5 | 58.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.2M | 453K | 221K | 3.1M | 176K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — IOSP and TROX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ECVT as "Buy", ASIX as "Buy", IOSP as "Hold", TROX as "Buy", KWR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 50.1% upside for IOSP (target: $115) vs -30.8% for ECVT (target: $10). For income investors, TROX offers the higher dividend yield at 3.60% vs KWR's 1.38%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $9.67 | $22.00 | $115.00 | $7.25 | $176.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 6 | 6 | 9 | 17 | 14 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +2.6% | +2.2% | +3.6% | +1.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 0 | 12 | 0 | 6 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.63 | $1.70 | $0.30 | $1.97 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.1% | +0.2% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +1.7% |
ECVT leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). IOSP leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
ECVT vs ASIX vs IOSP vs TROX vs KWR: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ECVT or ASIX or IOSP or TROX or KWR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Ecovyst Inc.
(ECVT) is the stronger pick with 2. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 7% for Tronox Holdings plc (TROX). AdvanSix Inc. (ASIX) offers the better valuation at 13. 3x trailing P/E (15. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Ecovyst Inc. (ECVT) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ECVT or ASIX or IOSP or TROX or KWR?
On trailing P/E, AdvanSix Inc.
(ASIX) is the cheapest at 13. 3x versus Innospec Inc. at 16. 4x. On forward P/E, Innospec Inc. is actually cheaper at 15. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Innospec Inc. wins at 0. 48x versus AdvanSix Inc. 's 8. 38x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ECVT or ASIX or IOSP or TROX or KWR?
Over the past 5 years, Ecovyst Inc.
(ECVT) delivered a total return of +15. 4%, compared to -55. 1% for Tronox Holdings plc (TROX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TROX returned +116. 1% versus ECVT's +9. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ECVT or ASIX or IOSP or TROX or KWR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Innospec Inc.
(IOSP) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 70β versus Tronox Holdings plc's 2. 37β — meaning TROX is approximately 239% more volatile than IOSP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Innospec Inc. (IOSP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 7% versus 2% for Tronox Holdings plc — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ECVT or ASIX or IOSP or TROX or KWR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Ecovyst Inc.
(ECVT) is pulling ahead at 2. 7% versus -5. 7% for Tronox Holdings plc (TROX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Innospec Inc. grew EPS 228. 9% year-over-year, compared to -916. 7% for Ecovyst Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, KWR leads at -1. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ECVT or ASIX or IOSP or TROX or KWR?
Innospec Inc.
(IOSP) is the more profitable company, earning 6. 6% net margin versus -16. 2% for Tronox Holdings plc — meaning it keeps 6. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KWR leads at 9. 4% versus -0. 7% for TROX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KWR leads at 36. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ECVT or ASIX or IOSP or TROX or KWR more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Innospec Inc. (IOSP) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 48x versus AdvanSix Inc. 's 8. 38x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Innospec Inc. (IOSP) trades at 15. 5x forward P/E versus 22. 9x for Ecovyst Inc. — 7. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for IOSP: 50. 1% to $115. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — ECVT or ASIX or IOSP or TROX or KWR?
In this comparison, TROX (3.
6% yield), ASIX (2. 6% yield), IOSP (2. 2% yield), KWR (1. 4% yield) pay a dividend. ECVT does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is ECVT or ASIX or IOSP or TROX or KWR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Innospec Inc.
(IOSP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 70), 2. 2% yield). Tronox Holdings plc (TROX) carries a higher beta of 2. 37 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (IOSP: +84. 4%, TROX: +116. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ECVT and ASIX and IOSP and TROX and KWR?
Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: ECVT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ASIX is a small-cap deep-value stock; IOSP is a small-cap deep-value stock; TROX is a small-cap income-oriented stock; KWR is a small-cap quality compounder stock. ASIX, IOSP, TROX, KWR pay a dividend while ECVT does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.