Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
EDSA logo
EDSA
IMVT logo
IMVT
HALO logo
HALO
PRAX logo
PRAX
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

EDSA vs IMVT vs HALO vs PRAX

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
EDSA
Edesa Biotech, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • CA
Market Cap$50M
5Y Perf.-86.3%
IMVT
Immunovant, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$6.75B
5Y Perf.-22.9%
HALO
Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$8.39B
5Y Perf.+148.2%
PRAX
Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$7.16B
5Y Perf.-49.2%

EDSA vs IMVT vs HALO vs PRAX — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
EDSA logoEDSA
IMVT logoIMVT
HALO logoHALO
PRAX logoPRAX
IndustryBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBiotechnology
Market Cap$50M$6.75B$8.39B$7.16B
Revenue (TTM)$0.00$0.00$1.51B$0.00
Net Income (TTM)$-10M$-506M$349M$-327M
Gross Margin76.9%
Operating Margin57.0%
Forward P/E8.6x
Total Debt$0.00$72K$2.14B$110K
Cash & Equiv.$11M$902M$134M$357M

EDSA vs IMVT vs HALO vs PRAXLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

EDSA
IMVT
HALO
PRAX
StockOct 20Jun 26Return
Edesa Biotech, Inc. (EDSA)10013.7-86.3%
Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT)10077.1-22.9%
Halozyme Therapeuti… (HALO)100248.2+148.2%
Praxis Precision Me… (PRAX)10050.8-49.2%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: EDSA vs IMVT vs HALO vs PRAX

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: HALO leads in 4 of 6 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for recent price momentum and sentiment. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
🥇HALO emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
EDSA
Edesa Biotech, Inc.
The Lower-Volatility Pick

EDSA plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.

Best for: healthcare exposure
IMVT
Immunovant, Inc.
The Secondary Option

IMVT lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: healthcare exposure
HALO
Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc.
The Income Pick

HALO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.

  • beta 0.60
  • Rev growth 37.6%, EPS growth -25.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 28.4%
  • 7.2% 10Y total return vs IMVT's 230.5%
  • 37.6% revenue growth vs PRAX's -100.0%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
PRAX
Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc.
The Defensive Pick

PRAX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and defensive is your priority.

  • Lower volatility, beta 1.55, Low D/E 0.0%, current ratio 10.22x
  • Beta 1.55, current ratio 10.22x
  • +456.0% vs HALO's +31.3%
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthHALO logoHALO37.6% revenue growth vs PRAX's -100.0%
Quality / MarginsHALO logoHALO23.1% margin vs EDSA's 0.0%
Stability / SafetyHALO logoHALOBeta 0.60 vs IMVT's 1.67
DividendsTieNone of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)PRAX logoPRAX+456.0% vs HALO's +31.3%
Efficiency (ROA)HALO logoHALO14.7% ROA vs EDSA's -75.2%, ROIC 32.1% vs -452.3%

EDSA vs IMVT vs HALO vs PRAX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

EDSAEdesa Biotech, Inc.
FY 2018
Product
100.0%$211,849
IMVTImmunovant, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

HALOHalozyme Therapeutics, Inc.
FY 2025
Royalty
53.6%$868M
Product
23.3%$376M
Collaborative Agreements
9.4%$152M
Bulk rHuPH20
8.2%$133M
Sales-based milestone
4.3%$70M
Upfront Fees
1.1%$18M
PRAXPraxis Precision Medicines, Inc.
FY 2024
License
76.8%$9M
Upfront Payment
23.2%$3M

EDSA vs IMVT vs HALO vs PRAX — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLHALOLAGGINGIMVT

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

HALO leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

HALO and PRAX operate at a comparable scale, with $1.5B and $0 in trailing revenue.

MetricEDSA logoEDSAEdesa Biotech, In…IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.HALO logoHALOHalozyme Therapeu…PRAX logoPRAXPraxis Precision …
RevenueTrailing 12 months$0$0$1.5B$0
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$11M-$532M$961M-$357M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$10M-$506M$349M-$327M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$8M-$407M$668M-$283M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+76.9%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+57.0%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+23.1%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+44.3%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+42.2%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-66.7%-14.1%+31.2%+2.7%
HALO leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — EDSA and PRAX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
MetricEDSA logoEDSAEdesa Biotech, In…IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.HALO logoHALOHalozyme Therapeu…PRAX logoPRAXPraxis Precision …
Market CapShares × price$50M$6.8B$8.4B$7.2B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$39M$5.8B$10.4B$6.8B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-4.45x-11.87x27.63x-18.40x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.8.57x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.20x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple11.50x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue6.01x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share2.58x7.04x179.53x6.36x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF13.02x
Evenly matched — EDSA and PRAX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

HALO leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.

HALO delivers a 126.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $126 in annual profit, vs $-82 for EDSA. IMVT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HALO's 43.89x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HALO scores 5/9 vs IMVT's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricEDSA logoEDSAEdesa Biotech, In…IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.HALO logoHALOHalozyme Therapeu…PRAX logoPRAXPraxis Precision …
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-82.3%-68.2%+126.3%-43.0%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-75.2%-62.2%+14.7%-40.2%
ROICReturn on invested capital-4.5%+32.1%-65.0%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-109.6%-68.3%+38.2%-49.3%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–92253
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.00x43.89x0.00x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$11M-$902M$2.0B-$357M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$11M$902M$134M$357M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$0$72,000$2.1B$110,000
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense44.97x
HALO leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

PRAX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in IMVT five years ago would be worth $30,700 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,382 for EDSA. Over the past 12 months, PRAX leads with a +456.0% total return vs HALO's +31.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PRAX at 158.5% vs EDSA's -1.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricEDSA logoEDSAEdesa Biotech, In…IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.HALO logoHALOHalozyme Therapeu…PRAX logoPRAXPraxis Precision …
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+276.7%+26.9%+0.6%-13.4%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+203.8%+103.6%+31.3%+456.0%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-3.9%+51.6%+110.0%+1628.1%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-86.2%+207.0%+65.3%-17.6%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-99.3%+230.5%+715.8%-40.5%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-1.3%+14.9%+28.1%+158.5%
PRAX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — EDSA and IMVT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

EDSA is the less volatile stock with a -0.29 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than IMVT's 1.67 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. IMVT currently trades 90.6% from its 52-week high vs EDSA's 27.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricEDSA logoEDSAEdesa Biotech, In…IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.HALO logoHALOHalozyme Therapeu…PRAX logoPRAXPraxis Precision …
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500-0.18x1.66x0.58x1.55x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$20.32$36.27$82.22$366.52
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.72$14.32$51.06$37.19
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+27.8%+90.6%+86.0%+67.7%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10034.351.956.428.6
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded617K1.9M1.5M394K
Evenly matched — EDSA and IMVT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: EDSA as "Buy", IMVT as "Buy", HALO as "Buy", PRAX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 144.8% upside for PRAX (target: $607) vs 24.8% for HALO (target: $88).

MetricEDSA logoEDSAEdesa Biotech, In…IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.HALO logoHALOHalozyme Therapeu…PRAX logoPRAXPraxis Precision …
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$43.67$88.25$607.15
# AnalystsCovering analysts2232716
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%+4.1%0.0%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

HALO leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). PRAX leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.

Best OverallHalozyme Therapeutics, Inc. (HALO)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

EDSA vs IMVT vs HALO vs PRAX: Key Questions Answered

9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is EDSA or IMVT or HALO or PRAX a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc.

(HALO) is the stronger pick with 37. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc. (HALO) offers the better valuation at 27. 6x trailing P/E (8. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Edesa Biotech, Inc. (EDSA) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which is the better long-term investment — EDSA or IMVT or HALO or PRAX?

Over the past 5 years, Immunovant, Inc.

(IMVT) delivered a total return of +207. 0%, compared to -86. 2% for Edesa Biotech, Inc. (EDSA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HALO returned +701. 6% versus EDSA's -99. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

03

Which is safer — EDSA or IMVT or HALO or PRAX?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Edesa Biotech, Inc.

(EDSA) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 18β versus Immunovant, Inc. 's 1. 66β — meaning IMVT is approximately -1028% more volatile than EDSA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 44% for Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

04

Which is growing faster — EDSA or IMVT or HALO or PRAX?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc.

(HALO) is pulling ahead at 37. 6% versus -100. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Edesa Biotech, Inc. grew EPS 34. 2% year-over-year, compared to -32. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

05

Which has better profit margins — EDSA or IMVT or HALO or PRAX?

Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc.

(HALO) is the more profitable company, earning 22. 7% net margin versus 0. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. — meaning it keeps 22. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HALO leads at 58. 4% versus 0. 0% for PRAX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HALO leads at 78. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

06

Is EDSA or IMVT or HALO or PRAX more undervalued right now?

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PRAX: 144.

8% to $607. 15.

07

Which pays a better dividend — EDSA or IMVT or HALO or PRAX?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

08

Is EDSA or IMVT or HALO or PRAX better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Edesa Biotech, Inc.

(EDSA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 18)). Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX) carries a higher beta of 1. 55 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (EDSA: -99. 3%, PRAX: -36. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

09

What are the main differences between EDSA and IMVT and HALO and PRAX?

Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: EDSA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; IMVT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; HALO is a small-cap high-growth stock; PRAX is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.