Biotechnology
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
EDSA vs IMVT vs HALO vs PRAX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
EDSA vs IMVT vs HALO vs PRAX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $50M | $6.75B | $8.39B | $7.16B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $0.00 | $1.51B | $0.00 |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-10M | $-506M | $349M | $-327M |
| Gross Margin | — | — | 76.9% | — |
| Operating Margin | — | — | 57.0% | — |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 8.6x | — |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $72K | $2.14B | $110K |
| Cash & Equiv. | $11M | $902M | $134M | $357M |
EDSA vs IMVT vs HALO vs PRAX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Edesa Biotech, Inc. (EDSA) | 100 | 13.7 | -86.3% |
| Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT) | 100 | 77.1 | -22.9% |
| Halozyme Therapeuti… (HALO) | 100 | 248.2 | +148.2% |
| Praxis Precision Me… (PRAX) | 100 | 50.8 | -49.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: EDSA vs IMVT vs HALO vs PRAX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
EDSA plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
IMVT lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
HALO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 0.60
- Rev growth 37.6%, EPS growth -25.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 28.4%
- 7.2% 10Y total return vs IMVT's 230.5%
- 37.6% revenue growth vs PRAX's -100.0%
PRAX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and defensive is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.55, Low D/E 0.0%, current ratio 10.22x
- Beta 1.55, current ratio 10.22x
- +456.0% vs HALO's +31.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 37.6% revenue growth vs PRAX's -100.0% | |
| Quality / Margins | 23.1% margin vs EDSA's 0.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.60 vs IMVT's 1.67 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +456.0% vs HALO's +31.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 14.7% ROA vs EDSA's -75.2%, ROIC 32.1% vs -452.3% |
EDSA vs IMVT vs HALO vs PRAX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
EDSA vs IMVT vs HALO vs PRAX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
HALO leads in 2 of 6 categories
PRAX leads 1 • EDSA leads 0 • IMVT leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HALO leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HALO and PRAX operate at a comparable scale, with $1.5B and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $0 | $1.5B | $0 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$11M | -$532M | $961M | -$357M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$10M | -$506M | $349M | -$327M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$8M | -$407M | $668M | -$283M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | — | +76.9% | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | — | +57.0% | — |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | — | +23.1% | — |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | — | +44.3% | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | +42.2% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -66.7% | -14.1% | +31.2% | +2.7% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — EDSA and PRAX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $50M | $6.8B | $8.4B | $7.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $39M | $5.8B | $10.4B | $6.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -4.45x | -11.87x | 27.63x | -18.40x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 8.57x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 1.20x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 11.50x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | — | 6.01x | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.58x | 7.04x | 179.53x | 6.36x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 13.02x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
HALO leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HALO delivers a 126.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $126 in annual profit, vs $-82 for EDSA. IMVT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HALO's 43.89x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HALO scores 5/9 vs IMVT's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -82.3% | -68.2% | +126.3% | -43.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -75.2% | -62.2% | +14.7% | -40.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -4.5% | — | +32.1% | -65.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -109.6% | -68.3% | +38.2% | -49.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.00x | 43.89x | 0.00x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$11M | -$902M | $2.0B | -$357M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $11M | $902M | $134M | $357M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $72,000 | $2.1B | $110,000 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — | 44.97x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PRAX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in IMVT five years ago would be worth $30,700 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,382 for EDSA. Over the past 12 months, PRAX leads with a +456.0% total return vs HALO's +31.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PRAX at 158.5% vs EDSA's -1.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +276.7% | +26.9% | +0.6% | -13.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +203.8% | +103.6% | +31.3% | +456.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -3.9% | +51.6% | +110.0% | +1628.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -86.2% | +207.0% | +65.3% | -17.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.3% | +230.5% | +715.8% | -40.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -1.3% | +14.9% | +28.1% | +158.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — EDSA and IMVT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
EDSA is the less volatile stock with a -0.29 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than IMVT's 1.67 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. IMVT currently trades 90.6% from its 52-week high vs EDSA's 27.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.18x | 1.66x | 0.58x | 1.55x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $20.32 | $36.27 | $82.22 | $366.52 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.72 | $14.32 | $51.06 | $37.19 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +27.8% | +90.6% | +86.0% | +67.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 34.3 | 51.9 | 56.4 | 28.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 617K | 1.9M | 1.5M | 394K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: EDSA as "Buy", IMVT as "Buy", HALO as "Buy", PRAX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 144.8% upside for PRAX (target: $607) vs 24.8% for HALO (target: $88).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $43.67 | $88.25 | $607.15 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 23 | 27 | 16 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +4.1% | 0.0% |
HALO leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). PRAX leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
EDSA vs IMVT vs HALO vs PRAX: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is EDSA or IMVT or HALO or PRAX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc.
(HALO) is the stronger pick with 37. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc. (HALO) offers the better valuation at 27. 6x trailing P/E (8. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Edesa Biotech, Inc. (EDSA) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — EDSA or IMVT or HALO or PRAX?
Over the past 5 years, Immunovant, Inc.
(IMVT) delivered a total return of +207. 0%, compared to -86. 2% for Edesa Biotech, Inc. (EDSA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HALO returned +701. 6% versus EDSA's -99. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — EDSA or IMVT or HALO or PRAX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Edesa Biotech, Inc.
(EDSA) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 18β versus Immunovant, Inc. 's 1. 66β — meaning IMVT is approximately -1028% more volatile than EDSA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 44% for Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — EDSA or IMVT or HALO or PRAX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc.
(HALO) is pulling ahead at 37. 6% versus -100. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Edesa Biotech, Inc. grew EPS 34. 2% year-over-year, compared to -32. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — EDSA or IMVT or HALO or PRAX?
Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc.
(HALO) is the more profitable company, earning 22. 7% net margin versus 0. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. — meaning it keeps 22. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HALO leads at 58. 4% versus 0. 0% for PRAX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HALO leads at 78. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is EDSA or IMVT or HALO or PRAX more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PRAX: 144.
8% to $607. 15.
07Which pays a better dividend — EDSA or IMVT or HALO or PRAX?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is EDSA or IMVT or HALO or PRAX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Edesa Biotech, Inc.
(EDSA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 18)). Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX) carries a higher beta of 1. 55 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (EDSA: -99. 3%, PRAX: -36. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between EDSA and IMVT and HALO and PRAX?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: EDSA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; IMVT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; HALO is a small-cap high-growth stock; PRAX is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.