Publishing
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
EDUC vs SCHL vs SSP vs WH vs PRTS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Publishing
Broadcasting
Travel Lodging
Specialty Retail
EDUC vs SCHL vs SSP vs WH vs PRTS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Publishing | Publishing | Broadcasting | Travel Lodging | Specialty Retail |
| Market Cap | $12M | $968M | $552M | $6.30B | $59M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $25M | $1.61B | $2.15B | $1.44B | $548M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $4M | $63M | $-101M | $193M | $-50M |
| Gross Margin | 59.7% | 52.3% | 33.7% | 55.7% | 32.8% |
| Operating Margin | -24.8% | 1.9% | 7.5% | 28.8% | -8.9% |
| Forward P/E | — | 22.0x | 18.7x | 17.4x | — |
| Total Debt | $32M | $375M | $2.73B | $3.06B | $25M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $428K | $124M | $28M | $64M | $26M |
EDUC vs SCHL vs SSP vs WH vs PRTS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Educational Develop… (EDUC) | 100 | 17.7 | -82.3% |
| Scholastic Corporat… (SCHL) | 100 | 136.0 | +36.0% |
| The E.W. Scripps Co… (SSP) | 100 | 54.0 | -46.0% |
| Wyndham Hotels & Re… (WH) | 100 | 182.5 | +82.5% |
| CarParts.com, Inc. (PRTS) | 100 | 12.2 | -87.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: EDUC vs SCHL vs SSP vs WH vs PRTS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
EDUC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.66, Low D/E 79.9%, current ratio 1.40x
- 16.1% margin vs PRTS's -9.2%
- Beta 0.66 vs SSP's 1.50, lower leverage
- 6.9% ROA vs PRTS's -25.5%, ROIC -6.7% vs -51.3%
SCHL is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and growth exposure is your priority.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.77, yield 2.0%
- Rev growth 2.3%, EPS growth -117.2%, 3Y rev CAGR -0.4%
- Beta 0.77, yield 2.0%, current ratio 1.16x
- 2.3% revenue growth vs EDUC's -33.0%
SSP lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
WH ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding.
- 43.8% 10Y total return vs SCHL's 27.1%
- Better valuation composite
Among these 5 stocks, PRTS doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 2.3% revenue growth vs EDUC's -33.0% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 16.1% margin vs PRTS's -9.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.66 vs SSP's 1.50, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.0% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs WH's 2.0%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +120.5% vs WH's +2.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.9% ROA vs PRTS's -25.5%, ROIC -6.7% vs -51.3% |
EDUC vs SCHL vs SSP vs WH vs PRTS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
EDUC vs SCHL vs SSP vs WH vs PRTS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
WH leads in 3 of 6 categories
EDUC leads 0 • SCHL leads 0 • SSP leads 0 • PRTS leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WH leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SSP is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.2B annually — 84.8x EDUC's $25M. EDUC is the more profitable business, keeping 16.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PRTS's -9.2%. On growth, WH holds the edge at +3.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $25M | $1.6B | $2.2B | $1.4B | $548M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$5M | $111M | $237M | $478M | -$33M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $4M | $63M | -$101M | $193M | -$50M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $2M | $22M | $7M | $304M | -$52M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +59.7% | +52.3% | +33.7% | +55.7% | +32.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -24.8% | +1.9% | +7.5% | +28.8% | -8.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +16.1% | +3.9% | -4.7% | +13.4% | -9.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +7.3% | +1.4% | +0.3% | +21.1% | -9.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -36.6% | -1.9% | -23.1% | +3.5% | -9.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +10.1% | +19.6% | -155.4% | +2.6% | +55.2% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — EDUC and SCHL each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, SCHL's 9.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SSP's 285.5x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $12M | $968M | $552M | $6.3B | $59M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $44M | $1.2B | $3.3B | $9.3B | $59M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -2.28x | -581.25x | -2.50x | 33.94x | -1.03x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 22.03x | 18.72x | 17.38x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 9.26x | 285.46x | 19.86x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.36x | 0.60x | 0.26x | 4.41x | 0.11x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.30x | 1.17x | 0.33x | 13.56x | 0.97x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 4.48x | 13.45x | 84.68x | 19.63x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
WH leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
WH delivers a 37.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $37 in annual profit, vs $-80 for PRTS. SCHL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.40x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to WH's 6.53x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), WH scores 5/9 vs SSP's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +8.9% | +6.9% | -7.9% | +37.3% | -79.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +6.9% | +3.8% | -2.0% | +4.5% | -25.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -6.7% | +1.4% | +3.1% | +9.4% | -51.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -11.9% | +1.7% | +3.5% | +10.9% | -43.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.80x | 0.40x | 2.19x | 6.53x | 0.47x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $32M | $251M | $2.7B | $3.0B | -$660,000 |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $428,400 | $124M | $28M | $64M | $26M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $32M | $375M | $2.7B | $3.1B | $25M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 4.00x | 1.01x | 0.55x | 3.00x | -49.49x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WH leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SCHL five years ago would be worth $13,986 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $564 for PRTS. Over the past 12 months, SCHL leads with a +120.5% total return vs WH's +2.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WH at 9.4% vs PRTS's -43.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +8.1% | +34.8% | +18.5% | +12.0% | +69.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +15.0% | +120.5% | +95.8% | +2.7% | +3.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -20.7% | +12.3% | -40.9% | +30.9% | -81.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -89.3% | +39.9% | -76.9% | +21.8% | -94.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -59.9% | +27.1% | -66.5% | +43.8% | -73.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -7.4% | +3.9% | -16.1% | +9.4% | -43.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — EDUC and SCHL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
EDUC is the less volatile stock with a 0.66 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SSP's 1.50 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SCHL currently trades 92.2% from its 52-week high vs PRTS's 62.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.66x | 0.77x | 1.50x | 0.81x | 1.28x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $1.84 | $43.39 | $5.39 | $92.69 | $1.36 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.00 | $16.78 | $2.02 | $69.21 | $0.39 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +79.3% | +92.2% | +86.8% | +90.5% | +62.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 70.2 | 53.9 | 60.9 | 50.0 | 55.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 31K | 609K | 715K | 1.2M | 662K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — SCHL and WH each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SCHL as "Hold", SSP as "Hold", WH as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 17.0% upside for WH (target: $98) vs -16.7% for SSP (target: $4). For income investors, SCHL offers the higher dividend yield at 2.05% vs WH's 2.00%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Hold | Buy | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $3.90 | $98.13 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 4 | 8 | 22 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +2.0% | — | +2.0% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.82 | — | $1.68 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.0% | +7.2% | 0.0% | +4.6% | 0.0% |
WH leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 3 categories are tied.
EDUC vs SCHL vs SSP vs WH vs PRTS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is EDUC or SCHL or SSP or WH or PRTS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Scholastic Corporation (SCHL) is the stronger pick with 2.
3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -33. 0% for Educational Development Corporation (EDUC). Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc. (WH) offers the better valuation at 33. 9x trailing P/E (17. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc. (WH) a "Buy" — based on 22 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — EDUC or SCHL or SSP or WH or PRTS?
On forward P/E, Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 17. 4x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — EDUC or SCHL or SSP or WH or PRTS?
Over the past 5 years, Scholastic Corporation (SCHL) delivered a total return of +39.
9%, compared to -94. 4% for CarParts. com, Inc. (PRTS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WH returned +43. 8% versus PRTS's -73. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — EDUC or SCHL or SSP or WH or PRTS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Educational Development Corporation (EDUC) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
66β versus The E. W. Scripps Company's 1. 50β — meaning SSP is approximately 126% more volatile than EDUC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Scholastic Corporation (SCHL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 40% versus 7% for Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — EDUC or SCHL or SSP or WH or PRTS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Scholastic Corporation (SCHL) is pulling ahead at 2.
3% versus -33. 0% for Educational Development Corporation (EDUC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: CarParts. com, Inc. grew EPS -15. 5% year-over-year, compared to -1071. 2% for Educational Development Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, SCHL leads at -0. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — EDUC or SCHL or SSP or WH or PRTS?
Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc.
(WH) is the more profitable company, earning 13. 5% net margin versus -15. 4% for Educational Development Corporation — meaning it keeps 13. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WH leads at 28. 4% versus -19. 8% for EDUC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — EDUC leads at 61. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is EDUC or SCHL or SSP or WH or PRTS more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc.
(WH) trades at 17. 4x forward P/E versus 22. 0x for Scholastic Corporation — 4. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for WH: 17. 0% to $98. 13.
08Which pays a better dividend — EDUC or SCHL or SSP or WH or PRTS?
In this comparison, SCHL (2.
0% yield), WH (2. 0% yield) pay a dividend. EDUC, SSP, PRTS do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is EDUC or SCHL or SSP or WH or PRTS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Scholastic Corporation (SCHL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
77), 2. 0% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SCHL: +27. 1%, SSP: -66. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between EDUC and SCHL and SSP and WH and PRTS?
These companies operate in different sectors (EDUC (Communication Services) and SCHL (Communication Services) and SSP (Communication Services) and WH (Consumer Cyclical) and PRTS (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
SCHL, WH pay a dividend while EDUC, SSP, PRTS do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Gross Margin > 31%
- Dividend Yield > 0.8%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.