Advertising Agencies
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
EEX vs EVCM vs IHRT vs INVE vs MSGE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Infrastructure
Broadcasting
Computer Hardware
Entertainment
EEX vs EVCM vs IHRT vs INVE vs MSGE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Advertising Agencies | Software - Infrastructure | Broadcasting | Computer Hardware | Entertainment |
| Market Cap | $950M | $2.09B | $880M | $120M | $3.15B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $463M | $594M | $3.86B | $22M | $1.16B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-31M | $32M | $-473M | $-15M | $42M |
| Gross Margin | 56.9% | 77.5% | 78.5% | -3.6% | 31.5% |
| Operating Margin | 15.6% | 9.7% | -0.5% | -109.3% | 10.1% |
| Forward P/E | 24.6x | 16.7x | — | 1.6x | 56.8x |
| Total Debt | $512M | $537M | $5.79B | $2M | $1.20B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $7M | $130M | $271K | $136M | $43M |
EEX vs EVCM vs IHRT vs INVE vs MSGE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Emerald Holding, In… (EEX) | 100 | 121.5 | +21.5% |
| EverCommerce Inc. (EVCM) | 100 | 67.1 | -32.9% |
| iHeartMedia, Inc. (IHRT) | 100 | 21.9 | -78.1% |
| Identiv, Inc. (INVE) | 100 | 31.0 | -69.0% |
| Madison Square Gard… (MSGE) | 100 | 95.4 | -4.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: EEX vs EVCM vs IHRT vs INVE vs MSGE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
EEX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.87, yield 1.2%
- Rev growth 16.2%, EPS growth -123.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 12.4%
- Beta 0.87, yield 1.2%, current ratio 0.82x
- 16.2% revenue growth vs INVE's -38.7%
EVCM is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and efficiency is your priority.
- 5.5% margin vs INVE's -66.5%
- 2.3% ROA vs IHRT's -12.0%, ROIC 3.9% vs -0.4%
IHRT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +415.5% vs EEX's +5.9%
INVE is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.87, Low D/E 1.3%, current ratio 19.20x
- Lower P/E (1.6x vs 56.8x)
MSGE is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- -24.6% 10Y total return vs INVE's 78.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 16.2% revenue growth vs INVE's -38.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (1.6x vs 56.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 5.5% margin vs INVE's -66.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.87 vs IHRT's 1.82 | |
| Dividends | 1.2% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs IHRT's 0.2%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +415.5% vs EEX's +5.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 2.3% ROA vs IHRT's -12.0%, ROIC 3.9% vs -0.4% |
EEX vs EVCM vs IHRT vs INVE vs MSGE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
EEX vs EVCM vs IHRT vs INVE vs MSGE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
EEX leads in 1 of 6 categories
EVCM leads 0 • IHRT leads 0 • INVE leads 0 • MSGE leads 0 • 5 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — EVCM and MSGE each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IHRT is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.9B annually — 175.6x INVE's $22M. EVCM is the more profitable business, keeping 5.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to INVE's -66.5%. On growth, MSGE holds the edge at +59.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $463M | $594M | $3.9B | $22M | $1.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $103M | $122M | $339M | -$21M | $245M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$31M | $32M | -$473M | -$15M | $42M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $39M | $85M | $11M | -$17M | $289M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +56.9% | +77.5% | +78.5% | -3.6% | +31.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +15.6% | +9.7% | -0.5% | -109.3% | +10.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -6.6% | +5.5% | -12.2% | -66.5% | +3.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +8.5% | +14.3% | +0.3% | -78.3% | +25.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +24.3% | +3.6% | +0.8% | -23.3% | +59.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -7.0% | +2.0% | -20.8% | -103.9% | -123.5% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — EEX and EVCM each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 1.6x trailing earnings, INVE trades at a 99% valuation discount to EVCM's 123.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, EEX's 12.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MSGE's 24.0x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $950M | $2.1B | $880M | $120M | $3.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.5B | $2.5B | $6.7B | -$14M | $4.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -32.00x | 123.20x | -1.86x | 1.61x | 86.64x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 24.62x | 16.68x | — | — | 56.83x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 12.58x | 19.72x | 19.65x | — | 23.97x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.05x | 3.54x | 0.23x | 4.49x | 3.35x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.82x | 3.02x | — | 0.77x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 22.95x | 19.11x | 80.64x | — | 33.88x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — INVE and MSGE each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MSGE delivers a 7.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $8 in annual profit, vs $-10 for INVE. INVE carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to EEX's 1.51x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), EVCM scores 7/9 vs INVE's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -8.2% | +4.5% | — | -9.8% | +7.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -2.6% | +2.3% | -12.0% | -9.3% | +1.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +8.8% | +3.9% | -0.4% | -50.1% | +8.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.8% | +4.6% | -0.5% | -23.6% | +11.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 7 | 4 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.51x | 0.75x | — | 0.01x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $505M | $407M | $5.8B | -$134M | $1.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $7M | $130M | $270,900 | $136M | $43M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $512M | $537M | $5.8B | $2M | $1.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.38x | 2.19x | -0.17x | — | 4.43x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — INVE and MSGE each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in EEX five years ago would be worth $9,713 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,504 for IHRT. Over the past 12 months, IHRT leads with a +415.5% total return vs EEX's +5.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MSGE at 24.9% vs INVE's -8.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +5.8% | +2.1% | +36.6% | +38.5% | +22.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +5.9% | +16.5% | +415.5% | +60.5% | +83.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +43.0% | -4.2% | +85.9% | -22.7% | +94.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -2.9% | -33.0% | -75.0% | -67.8% | -26.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -70.4% | -33.0% | -68.5% | +78.7% | -24.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +12.7% | -1.4% | +23.0% | -8.2% | +24.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — EEX and MSGE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
EEX is the less volatile stock with a 0.87 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than IHRT's 1.82 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MSGE currently trades 95.5% from its 52-week high vs IHRT's 86.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.87x | 1.10x | 1.82x | 0.87x | 0.94x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $5.45 | $13.55 | $6.56 | $5.30 | $69.86 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.32 | $7.66 | $1.08 | $3.01 | $35.31 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +88.1% | +87.0% | +86.4% | +95.1% | +95.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 47.9 | 43.3 | 68.6 | 80.8 | 67.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 24K | 131K | 986K | 210K | 312K |
Analyst Outlook
EEX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: EEX as "Hold", EVCM as "Buy", IHRT as "Buy", INVE as "Buy", MSGE as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 64.6% upside for EEX (target: $8) vs -38.3% for IHRT (target: $4). For income investors, EEX offers the higher dividend yield at 1.25% vs IHRT's 0.19%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $7.90 | $12.25 | $3.50 | $5.50 | $66.29 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 15 | 10 | 14 | 12 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.2% | — | +0.2% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.06 | — | $0.01 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.8% | +4.1% | 0.0% | +1.6% | +1.3% |
EEX leads in 1 of 6 categories — strongest in Analyst Outlook. 5 categories are tied.
EEX vs EVCM vs IHRT vs INVE vs MSGE: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is EEX or EVCM or IHRT or INVE or MSGE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Emerald Holding, Inc.
(EEX) is the stronger pick with 16. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -38. 7% for Identiv, Inc. (INVE). Identiv, Inc. (INVE) offers the better valuation at 1. 6x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate EverCommerce Inc. (EVCM) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — EEX or EVCM or IHRT or INVE or MSGE?
On trailing P/E, Identiv, Inc.
(INVE) is the cheapest at 1. 6x versus EverCommerce Inc. at 123. 2x. On forward P/E, EverCommerce Inc. is actually cheaper at 16. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — EEX or EVCM or IHRT or INVE or MSGE?
Over the past 5 years, Emerald Holding, Inc.
(EEX) delivered a total return of -2. 9%, compared to -75. 0% for iHeartMedia, Inc. (IHRT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: INVE returned +78. 7% versus EEX's -70. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — EEX or EVCM or IHRT or INVE or MSGE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Emerald Holding, Inc.
(EEX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 87β versus iHeartMedia, Inc. 's 1. 82β — meaning IHRT is approximately 110% more volatile than EEX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Identiv, Inc. (INVE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 151% for Emerald Holding, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — EEX or EVCM or IHRT or INVE or MSGE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Emerald Holding, Inc.
(EEX) is pulling ahead at 16. 2% versus -38. 7% for Identiv, Inc. (INVE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Identiv, Inc. grew EPS 1183% year-over-year, compared to -123. 9% for Emerald Holding, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MSGE leads at 13. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — EEX or EVCM or IHRT or INVE or MSGE?
Identiv, Inc.
(INVE) is the more profitable company, earning 281. 0% net margin versus -12. 2% for iHeartMedia, Inc. — meaning it keeps 281. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: EEX leads at 18. 3% versus -105. 0% for INVE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — IHRT leads at 78. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is EEX or EVCM or IHRT or INVE or MSGE more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, EverCommerce Inc.
(EVCM) trades at 16. 7x forward P/E versus 56. 8x for Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp. — 40. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for EEX: 64. 6% to $7. 90.
08Which pays a better dividend — EEX or EVCM or IHRT or INVE or MSGE?
In this comparison, EEX (1.
2% yield), IHRT (0. 2% yield) pay a dividend. EVCM, INVE, MSGE do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is EEX or EVCM or IHRT or INVE or MSGE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Emerald Holding, Inc.
(EEX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 87), 1. 2% yield). iHeartMedia, Inc. (IHRT) carries a higher beta of 1. 82 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (EEX: -70. 4%, IHRT: -68. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between EEX and EVCM and IHRT and INVE and MSGE?
These companies operate in different sectors (EEX (Communication Services) and EVCM (Technology) and IHRT (Communication Services) and INVE (Technology) and MSGE (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: EEX is a small-cap high-growth stock; EVCM is a small-cap quality compounder stock; IHRT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; INVE is a small-cap deep-value stock; MSGE is a small-cap quality compounder stock. EEX pays a dividend while EVCM, IHRT, INVE, MSGE do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Revenue Growth > 12%
- Gross Margin > 34%
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Revenue Growth > 29%
- Gross Margin > 18%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.