Advertising Agencies
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
EEX vs LYV vs MSGE vs GOOGL vs META
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Entertainment
Entertainment
Internet Content & Information
Internet Content & Information
EEX vs LYV vs MSGE vs GOOGL vs META — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Advertising Agencies | Entertainment | Entertainment | Internet Content & Information | Internet Content & Information |
| Market Cap | $950M | $38.65B | $3.15B | $4.81T | $1.56T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $463M | $25.61B | $1.16B | $422.57B | $214.96B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-31M | $84M | $42M | $160.21B | $70.59B |
| Gross Margin | 56.9% | 40.3% | 31.5% | 60.4% | 81.9% |
| Operating Margin | 15.6% | 3.4% | 10.1% | 32.7% | 41.2% |
| Forward P/E | 24.6x | 115.8x | 56.8x | 29.6x | 20.4x |
| Total Debt | $512M | $12.44B | $1.20B | $59.29B | $83.90B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $7M | $7.11B | $43M | $30.71B | $35.87B |
EEX vs LYV vs MSGE vs GOOGL vs META — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Emerald Holding, In… (EEX) | 100 | 216.2 | +116.2% |
| Live Nation Enterta… (LYV) | 100 | 338.3 | +238.3% |
| Madison Square Gard… (MSGE) | 100 | 84.2 | -15.8% |
| Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) | 100 | 555.2 | +455.2% |
| Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) | 100 | 274.0 | +174.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: EEX vs LYV vs MSGE vs GOOGL vs META
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
EEX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and defensive is your priority.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.87, yield 1.2%
- Beta 0.87, yield 1.2%, current ratio 0.82x
- 1.2% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs META's 0.3%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
LYV ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.80, current ratio 1.00x
- Beta 0.80 vs META's 1.59
Among these 5 stocks, MSGE doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
GOOGL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 10.0% 10Y total return vs LYV's 6.2%
- PEG 0.99 vs META's 1.11
- Lower P/E (29.6x vs 56.8x)
- 37.9% margin vs EEX's -6.6%
META is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 22.2%, EPS growth -1.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 19.9%
- 22.2% revenue growth vs MSGE's -1.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 22.2% revenue growth vs MSGE's -1.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (29.6x vs 56.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 37.9% margin vs EEX's -6.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.80 vs META's 1.59 | |
| Dividends | 1.2% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs META's 0.3%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +163.5% vs META's +3.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 27.4% ROA vs EEX's -2.6%, ROIC 25.1% vs 8.8% |
EEX vs LYV vs MSGE vs GOOGL vs META — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
EEX vs LYV vs MSGE vs GOOGL vs META — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
GOOGL leads in 2 of 6 categories
EEX leads 1 • LYV leads 0 • MSGE leads 0 • META leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — MSGE and GOOGL and META each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GOOGL is the larger business by revenue, generating $422.6B annually — 911.9x EEX's $463M. GOOGL is the more profitable business, keeping 37.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to EEX's -6.6%. On growth, MSGE holds the edge at +59.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $463M | $25.6B | $1.2B | $422.6B | $215.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $103M | $1.6B | $245M | $161.3B | $109.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$31M | $84M | $42M | $160.2B | $70.6B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $39M | $1.2B | $289M | $73.3B | $48.3B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +56.9% | +40.3% | +31.5% | +60.4% | +81.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +15.6% | +3.4% | +10.1% | +32.7% | +41.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -6.6% | +0.3% | +3.6% | +37.9% | +32.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +8.5% | +4.8% | +25.0% | +17.3% | +22.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +24.3% | +12.1% | +59.4% | +21.8% | +33.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -7.0% | -4.8% | -123.5% | +81.9% | +62.4% |
Valuation Metrics
EEX leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 26.3x trailing earnings, META trades at a 70% valuation discount to MSGE's 86.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), GOOGL offers better value at 1.23x vs META's 1.43x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $950M | $38.6B | $3.2B | $4.81T | $1.56T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.5B | $44.0B | $4.3B | $4.84T | $1.61T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -32.00x | -692.98x | 86.64x | 36.82x | 26.26x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 24.62x | 115.80x | 56.83x | 29.61x | 20.36x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 1.23x | 1.43x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 12.58x | 19.89x | 23.97x | 32.22x | 15.81x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.05x | 1.53x | 3.35x | 11.95x | 7.78x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.82x | 21.20x | — | 11.72x | 7.31x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 22.95x | 115.84x | 33.88x | 65.72x | 33.90x |
Profitability & Efficiency
GOOGL leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GOOGL delivers a 39.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $39 in annual profit, vs $-8 for EEX. GOOGL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.14x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LYV's 6.84x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GOOGL scores 7/9 vs EEX's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -8.2% | +4.4% | +7.7% | +39.0% | +33.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -2.6% | +0.4% | +1.8% | +27.4% | +20.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +8.8% | +19.7% | +8.5% | +25.1% | +27.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.8% | +13.4% | +11.0% | +30.3% | +29.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.51x | 6.84x | — | 0.14x | 0.39x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $505M | $5.3B | $1.2B | $28.6B | $48.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $7M | $7.1B | $43M | $30.7B | $35.9B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $512M | $12.4B | $1.2B | $59.3B | $83.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.38x | 3.68x | 4.43x | 392.15x | 78.84x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GOOGL leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GOOGL five years ago would be worth $33,982 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,384 for MSGE. Over the past 12 months, GOOGL leads with a +163.5% total return vs META's +3.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GOOGL at 54.8% vs EEX's 12.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +5.8% | +14.5% | +22.8% | +26.4% | -5.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +5.9% | +24.0% | +83.6% | +163.5% | +3.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +43.0% | +113.7% | +94.8% | +270.8% | +166.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -2.9% | +108.0% | -26.2% | +239.8% | +94.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -70.4% | +622.5% | -24.6% | +996.1% | +421.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +12.7% | +28.8% | +24.9% | +54.8% | +38.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — LYV and GOOGL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LYV is the less volatile stock with a 0.80 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than META's 1.59 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GOOGL currently trades 99.5% from its 52-week high vs META's 77.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.87x | 0.80x | 0.94x | 1.26x | 1.59x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $5.45 | $175.25 | $69.86 | $400.10 | $796.25 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.32 | $125.34 | $35.31 | $147.84 | $520.26 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +88.1% | +94.9% | +95.5% | +99.5% | +77.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 47.9 | 63.6 | 67.6 | 83.4 | 42.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 24K | 2.8M | 312K | 28.3M | 15.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — EEX and GOOGL and META each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: EEX as "Hold", LYV as "Buy", MSGE as "Buy", GOOGL as "Buy", META as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 64.6% upside for EEX (target: $8) vs -0.6% for MSGE (target: $66). For income investors, EEX offers the higher dividend yield at 1.25% vs GOOGL's 0.21%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $7.90 | $181.00 | $66.29 | $406.28 | $821.80 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 44 | 12 | 82 | 60 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.2% | — | — | +0.2% | +0.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 1 | — | 2 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.06 | — | — | $0.82 | $2.07 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.8% | +0.1% | +1.3% | +0.9% | +1.7% |
GOOGL leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). EEX leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.
EEX vs LYV vs MSGE vs GOOGL vs META: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is EEX or LYV or MSGE or GOOGL or META a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Meta Platforms, Inc.
(META) is the stronger pick with 22. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 7% for Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp. (MSGE). Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) offers the better valuation at 26. 3x trailing P/E (20. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Live Nation Entertainment, Inc. (LYV) a "Buy" — based on 44 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — EEX or LYV or MSGE or GOOGL or META?
On trailing P/E, Meta Platforms, Inc.
(META) is the cheapest at 26. 3x versus Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp. at 86. 6x. On forward P/E, Meta Platforms, Inc. is actually cheaper at 20. 4x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Alphabet Inc. wins at 0. 99x versus Meta Platforms, Inc. 's 1. 11x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — EEX or LYV or MSGE or GOOGL or META?
Over the past 5 years, Alphabet Inc.
(GOOGL) delivered a total return of +239. 8%, compared to -26. 2% for Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp. (MSGE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GOOGL returned +996. 1% versus EEX's -70. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — EEX or LYV or MSGE or GOOGL or META?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Live Nation Entertainment, Inc.
(LYV) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 80β versus Meta Platforms, Inc. 's 1. 59β — meaning META is approximately 100% more volatile than LYV relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 14% versus 7% for Live Nation Entertainment, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — EEX or LYV or MSGE or GOOGL or META?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Meta Platforms, Inc.
(META) is pulling ahead at 22. 2% versus -1. 7% for Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp. (MSGE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Alphabet Inc. grew EPS 34. 5% year-over-year, compared to -123. 9% for Emerald Holding, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, META leads at 19. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — EEX or LYV or MSGE or GOOGL or META?
Alphabet Inc.
(GOOGL) is the more profitable company, earning 32. 8% net margin versus -6. 6% for Emerald Holding, Inc. — meaning it keeps 32. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: META leads at 41. 4% versus 5. 9% for LYV. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — META leads at 82. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is EEX or LYV or MSGE or GOOGL or META more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 99x versus Meta Platforms, Inc. 's 1. 11x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) trades at 20. 4x forward P/E versus 115. 8x for Live Nation Entertainment, Inc. — 95. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for EEX: 64. 6% to $7. 90.
08Which pays a better dividend — EEX or LYV or MSGE or GOOGL or META?
In this comparison, EEX (1.
2% yield), META (0. 3% yield), GOOGL (0. 2% yield) pay a dividend. LYV, MSGE do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is EEX or LYV or MSGE or GOOGL or META better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Live Nation Entertainment, Inc.
(LYV) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 80), +622. 5% 10Y return). Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) carries a higher beta of 1. 59 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (LYV: +622. 5%, META: +421. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between EEX and LYV and MSGE and GOOGL and META?
Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: EEX is a small-cap high-growth stock; LYV is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; MSGE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GOOGL is a mega-cap high-growth stock; META is a mega-cap high-growth stock. EEX pays a dividend while LYV, MSGE, GOOGL, META do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Revenue Growth > 12%
- Gross Margin > 34%
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Revenue Growth > 6%
- Gross Margin > 24%
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Revenue Growth > 29%
- Gross Margin > 18%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.