EFTY
ETOILES CAPITAL GROUP CO., LTD
Asset Management
Market Cap$227M
5Y Perf.+25.2%
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
EFTY vs FTFT vs CLPS vs RCON
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
FTFT
Future FinTech Group Inc.
Software - Application
Market Cap$6M
5Y Perf.-98.1%
CLPS
CLPS Incorporation
Information Technology Services
Market Cap$27M
5Y Perf.-49.2%
RCON
Recon Technology, Ltd.
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
Market Cap$15M
5Y Perf.-97.7%
EFTY vs FTFT vs CLPS vs RCON — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | EFTY | FTFT | CLPS | RCON |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Asset Management | Software - Application | Information Technology Services | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services |
| Market Cap | $227M | $6M | $27M | $15M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3M | $4M | $299M | $66M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $852K | $-5M | $-4M | $-43M |
| Gross Margin | 78.8% | 10.7% | 22.8% | 23.0% |
| Operating Margin | 39.6% | -8.9% | -1.4% | -86.5% |
| Total Debt | $53K | $2M | $34M | $34M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1M | $2M | $28M | $99M |
EFTY vs FTFT vs CLPS vs RCON — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
EFTY
FTFT
CLPS
RCON
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Future FinTech Grou… (FTFT) | 100 | 1.9 | -98.1% |
| CLPS Incorporation (CLPS) | 100 | 50.8 | -49.2% |
| Recon Technology, L… (RCON) | 100 | 2.3 | -97.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: EFTY vs FTFT vs CLPS vs RCON
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: EFTY leads in 3 of 6 categories, making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and recent price momentum and sentiment. CLPS Incorporation is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility and dividend income and shareholder returns. FTFT also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
EFTY
ETOILES CAPITAL GROUP CO., LTD
The Banking Pick
EFTY carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 207.8% 10Y total return vs CLPS's -77.7%
- 33.8% margin vs FTFT's -120.6%
- +207.8% vs RCON's -60.3%
- 41.2% ROA vs FTFT's -11.9%, ROIC 79.7% vs -97.5%
Best for: long-term compounding
FTFT
Future FinTech Group Inc.
The Growth Play
FTFT is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 77.5%, EPS growth 85.2%, 3Y rev CAGR -45.7%
- 77.5% revenue growth vs RCON's -3.7%
Best for: growth exposure
CLPS
CLPS Incorporation
The Income Pick
CLPS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.19, yield 13.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.19, Low D/E 58.8%, current ratio 1.58x
- Beta 0.19, yield 13.9%, current ratio 1.58x
- Beta 0.19 vs FTFT's 2.36
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
RCON
Recon Technology, Ltd.
The Lower-Volatility Pick
RCON lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Best for: energy exposure
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | FTFT | 77.5% revenue growth vs RCON's -3.7% |
| Quality / Margins | EFTY | 33.8% margin vs FTFT's -120.6% |
| Stability / Safety | CLPS | Beta 0.19 vs FTFT's 2.36 |
| Dividends | CLPS | 13.9% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | EFTY | +207.8% vs RCON's -60.3% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | EFTY | 41.2% ROA vs FTFT's -11.9%, ROIC 79.7% vs -97.5% |
EFTY vs FTFT vs CLPS vs RCON — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FY 2023
FY 2025
FY 2025
EFTY vs FTFT vs CLPS vs RCON — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLEFTYLAGGINGRCON
Who Leads Where
EFTY leads in 3 of 6 categories
CLPS leads 2 • FTFT leads 0 • RCON leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓RCONRecon Technology, Ltd.
0leads
FTFTFuture FinTech Group …
0leads
CLPSCLPS Incorporation
2leads
EFTYETOILES CAPITAL GROUP…
3leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs CLPSvs FTFTMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
Tied
—
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
CLPS2/3
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
EFTY7/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
EFTY5/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
EFTY2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
CLPS1/1
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — EFTY and FTFT each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CLPS is the larger business by revenue, generating $299M annually — 118.4x EFTY's $3M. EFTY is the more profitable business, keeping 33.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FTFT's -120.6%. On growth, FTFT holds the edge at +110.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | EFTYETOILES CAPITAL G… | FTFTFuture FinTech Gr… | CLPSCLPS Incorporation | RCONRecon Technology,… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3M | $4M | $299M | $66M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | — | -$34M | -$1M | -$54M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | — | -$5M | -$4M | -$43M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | — | $56.6B | $0 | -$44M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +78.8% | +10.7% | +22.8% | +23.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +39.6% | -8.9% | -1.4% | -86.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +33.8% | -120.6% | -1.3% | -64.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +61.3% | +14767.2% | -2.3% | -65.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +110.9% | +15.3% | +2.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +100.0% | +75.8% | +35.7% |
Evenly matched — EFTY and FTFT each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
CLPS leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | EFTYETOILES CAPITAL G… | FTFTFuture FinTech Gr… | CLPSCLPS Incorporation | RCONRecon Technology,… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $227M | $6M | $27M | $15M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $226M | $5M | $32M | $6M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | — | -0.48x | -3.65x | -1.09x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 209.68x | — | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 89.85x | 1.48x | 0.16x | 1.54x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 0.05x | 0.45x | 0.10x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 146.64x | — | — | — |
CLPS leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
EFTY leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
EFTY delivers a 96.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $96 in annual profit, vs $-16 for FTFT. FTFT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CLPS's 0.59x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), EFTY scores 8/9 vs CLPS's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | EFTYETOILES CAPITAL G… | FTFTFuture FinTech Gr… | CLPSCLPS Incorporation | RCONRecon Technology,… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +96.0% | -16.4% | -6.1% | -9.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +41.2% | -11.9% | -3.2% | -8.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +79.7% | -97.5% | -7.9% | -10.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +112.1% | -117.5% | -9.8% | -11.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 5 | 2 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.06x | 0.04x | 0.59x | 0.08x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$1M | -$457,223 | $6M | -$64M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1M | $2M | $28M | $99M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $53,418 | $2M | $34M | $34M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 265.41x | -228.78x | — | -372.30x |
EFTY leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
EFTY leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in EFTY five years ago would be worth $30,779 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $48 for RCON. Over the past 12 months, EFTY leads with a +207.8% total return vs RCON's -60.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors EFTY at 45.5% vs FTFT's -53.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | EFTYETOILES CAPITAL G… | FTFTFuture FinTech Gr… | CLPSCLPS Incorporation | RCONRecon Technology,… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | 0.0% | +49.3% | -5.9% | -51.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +207.8% | -31.7% | -6.9% | -60.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +207.8% | -90.1% | +4.4% | -89.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +207.8% | -99.2% | -67.1% | -99.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +207.8% | -98.9% | -77.7% | -99.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +45.5% | -53.7% | +1.5% | -53.1% |
EFTY leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
EFTY leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
EFTY is the less volatile stock with a -0.29 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FTFT's 2.36 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. EFTY currently trades 82.5% from its 52-week high vs RCON's 10.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | EFTYETOILES CAPITAL G… | FTFTFuture FinTech Gr… | CLPSCLPS Incorporation | RCONRecon Technology,… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.29x | 2.36x | 0.19x | 0.49x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $18.20 | $4.03 | $1.88 | $7.16 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.88 | $0.56 | $0.80 | $0.73 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +82.5% | +27.8% | +50.5% | +10.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 73.7 | 40.9 | 47.7 | 34.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.6M | 110K | 15K | 77K |
EFTY leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
CLPS leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
CLPS is the only dividend payer here at 13.92% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | EFTYETOILES CAPITAL G… | FTFTFuture FinTech Gr… | CLPSCLPS Incorporation | RCONRecon Technology,… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | — | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +13.9% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 | 3 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $0.13 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
CLPS leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway
EFTY leads in 3 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). CLPS leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
Best OverallETOILES CAPITAL GROUP CO., … (EFTY)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
EFTY vs FTFT vs CLPS vs RCON: Key Questions Answered
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is EFTY or FTFT or CLPS or RCON a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Future FinTech Group Inc.
(FTFT) is the stronger pick with 77. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 7% for Recon Technology, Ltd. (RCON). The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — EFTY or FTFT or CLPS or RCON?
Over the past 5 years, ETOILES CAPITAL GROUP CO.
, LTD (EFTY) delivered a total return of +207. 8%, compared to -99. 5% for Recon Technology, Ltd. (RCON). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: EFTY returned +207. 8% versus RCON's -99. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — EFTY or FTFT or CLPS or RCON?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), ETOILES CAPITAL GROUP CO.
, LTD (EFTY) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 29β versus Future FinTech Group Inc. 's 2. 36β — meaning FTFT is approximately -903% more volatile than EFTY relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Future FinTech Group Inc. (FTFT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 59% for CLPS Incorporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — EFTY or FTFT or CLPS or RCON?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Future FinTech Group Inc.
(FTFT) is pulling ahead at 77. 5% versus -3. 7% for Recon Technology, Ltd. (RCON). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Future FinTech Group Inc. grew EPS 85. 2% year-over-year, compared to -181. 4% for CLPS Incorporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, CLPS leads at 2. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — EFTY or FTFT or CLPS or RCON?
ETOILES CAPITAL GROUP CO.
, LTD (EFTY) is the more profitable company, earning 33. 8% net margin versus -120. 6% for Future FinTech Group Inc. — meaning it keeps 33. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: EFTY leads at 39. 6% versus -888. 0% for FTFT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — EFTY leads at 78. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — EFTY or FTFT or CLPS or RCON?
In this comparison, CLPS (13.
9% yield) pays a dividend. EFTY, FTFT, RCON do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is EFTY or FTFT or CLPS or RCON better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, ETOILES CAPITAL GROUP CO.
, LTD (EFTY) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 29), +207. 8% 10Y return). Future FinTech Group Inc. (FTFT) carries a higher beta of 2. 36 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (EFTY: +207. 8%, FTFT: -98. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between EFTY and FTFT and CLPS and RCON?
These companies operate in different sectors (EFTY (Financial Services) and FTFT (Technology) and CLPS (Technology) and RCON (Energy)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: EFTY is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FTFT is a small-cap high-growth stock; CLPS is a small-cap high-growth stock; RCON is a small-cap quality compounder stock. CLPS pays a dividend while EFTY, FTFT, RCON do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.