Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
EGBN vs WAL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
EGBN vs WAL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $808M | $9.16B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $634M | $5.28B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-128M | $969M |
| Gross Margin | 3.2% | 61.1% |
| Operating Margin | -26.9% | 22.9% |
| Forward P/E | 15.9x | 8.7x |
| Total Debt | $147M | $6.48B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $12M | $3.60B |
EGBN vs WAL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Eagle Bancorp, Inc. (EGBN) | 100 | 81.9 | -18.1% |
| Western Alliance Ba… (WAL) | 100 | 218.4 | +118.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: EGBN vs WAL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
EGBN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.21, Low D/E 12.9%, current ratio 0.33x
- Beta 1.21, yield 1.9%, current ratio 0.33x
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs WAL's 0.4% (lower = leaner)
WAL is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 7 yrs, beta 1.72, yield 2.0%
- Rev growth 5.2%, EPS growth 23.1%
- 168.4% 10Y total return vs EGBN's -30.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 5.2% NII/revenue growth vs EGBN's -10.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.7x vs 15.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs WAL's 0.4% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.21 vs WAL's 1.72, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.0% yield, 7-year raise streak, vs EGBN's 1.9% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +46.2% vs WAL's +19.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs WAL's 0.4% |
EGBN vs WAL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
EGBN vs WAL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WAL leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WAL is the larger business by revenue, generating $5.3B annually — 8.3x EGBN's $634M. WAL is the more profitable business, keeping 18.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to EGBN's -20.2%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $634M | $5.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$168M | $1.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$128M | $969M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$6M | -$2.8B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +3.2% | +61.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -26.9% | +22.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -20.2% | +18.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +3.3% | -52.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -50.0% | +32.8% |
Valuation Metrics
EGBN leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $808M | $9.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $944M | $12.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -6.30x | 9.55x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 15.91x | 8.67x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.82x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 9.97x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.27x | 1.74x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.70x | 1.15x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 38.94x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
WAL leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
WAL delivers a 12.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $-11 for EGBN. EGBN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.13x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to WAL's 0.82x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), WAL scores 5/9 vs EGBN's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -10.9% | +12.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -1.2% | +1.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -8.2% | +6.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -2.9% | +10.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.13x | 0.82x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $135M | $2.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $12M | $3.6B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $147M | $6.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.51x | 0.66x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WAL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WAL five years ago would be worth $8,568 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,967 for EGBN. Over the past 12 months, EGBN leads with a +46.2% total return vs WAL's +19.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WAL at 47.6% vs EGBN's 14.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +27.2% | -2.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +46.2% | +19.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +48.7% | +221.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -40.3% | -14.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -30.8% | +168.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +14.1% | +47.6% |
Risk & Volatility
EGBN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
EGBN is the less volatile stock with a 1.21 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than WAL's 1.72 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. EGBN currently trades 90.6% from its 52-week high vs WAL's 85.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.21x | 1.72x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $29.26 | $97.23 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $15.03 | $65.81 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +90.6% | +85.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.4 | 61.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 282K | 1.3M |
Analyst Outlook
WAL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates EGBN as "Hold" and WAL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 8.1% upside for EGBN (target: $29) vs 5.4% for WAL (target: $88). For income investors, WAL offers the higher dividend yield at 2.03% vs EGBN's 1.91%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $28.67 | $87.83 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 14 | 24 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.9% | +2.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 7 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.51 | $1.69 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.8% |
WAL leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). EGBN leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Risk & Volatility).
EGBN vs WAL: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is EGBN or WAL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Western Alliance Bancorporation (WAL) is the stronger pick with 5.
2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -10. 4% for Eagle Bancorp, Inc. (EGBN). Western Alliance Bancorporation (WAL) offers the better valuation at 9. 5x trailing P/E (8. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Western Alliance Bancorporation (WAL) a "Buy" — based on 24 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — EGBN or WAL?
On forward P/E, Western Alliance Bancorporation is actually cheaper at 8.
7x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — EGBN or WAL?
Over the past 5 years, Western Alliance Bancorporation (WAL) delivered a total return of -14.
3%, compared to -40. 3% for Eagle Bancorp, Inc. (EGBN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WAL returned +168. 4% versus EGBN's -30. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — EGBN or WAL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Eagle Bancorp, Inc.
(EGBN) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 21β versus Western Alliance Bancorporation's 1. 72β — meaning WAL is approximately 42% more volatile than EGBN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Eagle Bancorp, Inc. (EGBN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 13% versus 82% for Western Alliance Bancorporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — EGBN or WAL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Western Alliance Bancorporation (WAL) is pulling ahead at 5.
2% versus -10. 4% for Eagle Bancorp, Inc. (EGBN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Western Alliance Bancorporation grew EPS 23. 1% year-over-year, compared to -169. 9% for Eagle Bancorp, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — EGBN or WAL?
Western Alliance Bancorporation (WAL) is the more profitable company, earning 18.
4% net margin versus -20. 2% for Eagle Bancorp, Inc. — meaning it keeps 18. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WAL leads at 22. 9% versus -26. 9% for EGBN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — WAL leads at 61. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is EGBN or WAL more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Western Alliance Bancorporation (WAL) trades at 8.
7x forward P/E versus 15. 9x for Eagle Bancorp, Inc. — 7. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for EGBN: 8. 1% to $28. 67.
08Which pays a better dividend — EGBN or WAL?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Western Alliance Bancorporation (WAL) offers the highest yield at 2. 0%, versus 1. 9% for Eagle Bancorp, Inc. (EGBN).
09Is EGBN or WAL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Eagle Bancorp, Inc.
(EGBN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 21), 1. 9% yield). Western Alliance Bancorporation (WAL) carries a higher beta of 1. 72 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (EGBN: -30. 8%, WAL: +168. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between EGBN and WAL?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: EGBN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; WAL is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.