Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
EGY vs IMPP vs CIVI vs TOPS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Marine Shipping
EGY vs IMPP vs CIVI vs TOPS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Marine Shipping |
| Market Cap | $623M | $167M | $2.34B | $10M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $249M | $136M | $4.71B | $123M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-143M | $39M | $638M | $1M |
| Gross Margin | 18.9% | 30.5% | 43.9% | 59.5% |
| Operating Margin | 1.7% | 23.0% | 31.1% | 36.5% |
| Forward P/E | 22.4x | 2.4x | 6.8x | 2.0x |
| Total Debt | $128M | $79K | $4.49B | $251M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $59M | $68M | $76M | $8M |
EGY vs IMPP vs CIVI vs TOPS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Dec 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| VAALCO Energy, Inc. (EGY) | 100 | 186.3 | +86.3% |
| Imperial Petroleum … (IMPP) | 100 | 15.3 | -84.7% |
| Civitas Resources, … (CIVI) | 100 | 55.3 | -44.7% |
| Top Ships Inc. (TOPS) | 100 | 1.1 | -98.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: EGY vs IMPP vs CIVI vs TOPS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
EGY carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.16, yield 4.3%
- 5.4% 10Y total return vs CIVI's -86.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.16, Low D/E 29.0%, current ratio 0.69x
- Beta 0.16, yield 4.3%, current ratio 0.69x
IMPP is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and efficiency is your priority.
- 28.6% margin vs EGY's -57.4%
- 8.2% ROA vs EGY's -15.3%, ROIC 10.6% vs 6.8%
CIVI is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 49.8%, EPS growth -6.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 77.5%
- 49.8% revenue growth vs EGY's -25.0%
TOPS is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (2.0x vs 6.8x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 49.8% revenue growth vs EGY's -25.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (2.0x vs 6.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 28.6% margin vs EGY's -57.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.16 vs CIVI's 1.10, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 4.3% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs CIVI's 18.2%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +91.7% vs TOPS's -61.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.2% ROA vs EGY's -15.3%, ROIC 10.6% vs 6.8% |
EGY vs IMPP vs CIVI vs TOPS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
EGY vs IMPP vs CIVI vs TOPS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
EGY leads in 2 of 6 categories
TOPS leads 1 • IMPP leads 1 • CIVI leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — IMPP and TOPS each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CIVI is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.7B annually — 38.2x TOPS's $123M. IMPP is the more profitable business, keeping 28.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to EGY's -57.4%. On growth, TOPS holds the edge at +100.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $249M | $136M | $4.7B | $123M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $102M | $54M | $3.4B | $66M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$143M | $39M | $638M | $1M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $44M | $65M | $934M | -$63M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +18.9% | +30.5% | +43.9% | +59.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +1.7% | +23.0% | +31.1% | +36.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -57.4% | +28.6% | +13.6% | +1.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +17.5% | +47.9% | +19.8% | -50.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -100.0% | +25.4% | -8.1% | +100.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -13.2% | 0.0% | -33.9% | -3.2% |
Valuation Metrics
TOPS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 2.0x trailing earnings, TOPS trades at a 42% valuation discount to IMPP's 3.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, IMPP's 1.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than TOPS's 5.0x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $623M | $167M | $2.3B | $10M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $693M | $99M | $6.8B | $254M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -14.95x | 3.51x | 3.24x | 2.02x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 22.36x | 2.40x | 6.75x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.15x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 4.43x | 1.63x | 1.89x | 4.97x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.74x | 1.13x | 0.45x | 0.12x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.40x | 0.39x | 0.41x | 0.07x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 55.26x | 2.61x | 0.59x |
Profitability & Efficiency
IMPP leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CIVI delivers a 9.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $10 in annual profit, vs $-32 for EGY. IMPP carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TOPS's 1.74x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CIVI scores 5/9 vs EGY's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -31.7% | +8.5% | +9.5% | +0.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -15.3% | +8.2% | +4.2% | +0.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.8% | +10.6% | +10.8% | +5.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.2% | +11.3% | +12.1% | +6.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 4 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.29x | 0.00x | 0.68x | 1.74x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $70M | -$68M | $4.4B | $244M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $59M | $68M | $76M | $8M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $128M | $78,761 | $4.5B | $251M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 4.10x | 15.99x | 2.80x | 1.91x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
EGY leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in EGY five years ago would be worth $25,544 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $56 for TOPS. Over the past 12 months, EGY leads with a +91.7% total return vs TOPS's -61.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors EGY at 16.6% vs TOPS's -37.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +65.1% | +34.5% | -1.5% | -53.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +91.7% | +86.7% | +6.8% | -61.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +58.4% | +57.4% | -41.7% | -75.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +155.4% | -95.6% | +31.9% | -99.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +535.1% | -95.6% | -86.2% | -100.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +16.6% | +16.3% | -16.5% | -37.2% |
Risk & Volatility
EGY leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
EGY is the less volatile stock with a 0.16 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CIVI's 1.10 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. EGY currently trades 89.0% from its 52-week high vs TOPS's 19.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.16x | 0.65x | 1.10x | 0.54x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $6.72 | $6.57 | $37.45 | $11.47 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.14 | $2.45 | $25.38 | $2.11 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +89.0% | +74.7% | +73.1% | +19.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 48.3 | 56.0 | 54.8 | 24.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.6M | 747K | 22.4M | 210K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — EGY and CIVI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: EGY as "Buy", IMPP as "Hold", CIVI as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 22.2% upside for IMPP (target: $6) vs 13.2% for CIVI (target: $31). For income investors, CIVI offers the higher dividend yield at 18.19% vs IMPP's 1.07%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Hold | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $7.30 | $6.00 | $31.00 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 1 | 16 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +4.3% | +1.1% | +18.2% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.25 | $0.05 | $4.98 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.1% | +1.5% | +18.3% | +100.0% |
EGY leads in 2 of 6 categories (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility). TOPS leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
EGY vs IMPP vs CIVI vs TOPS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is EGY or IMPP or CIVI or TOPS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Civitas Resources, Inc.
(CIVI) is the stronger pick with 49. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -25. 0% for VAALCO Energy, Inc. (EGY). Top Ships Inc. (TOPS) offers the better valuation at 2. 0x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate VAALCO Energy, Inc. (EGY) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — EGY or IMPP or CIVI or TOPS?
On trailing P/E, Top Ships Inc.
(TOPS) is the cheapest at 2. 0x versus Imperial Petroleum Inc. at 3. 5x. On forward P/E, Imperial Petroleum Inc. is actually cheaper at 2. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — EGY or IMPP or CIVI or TOPS?
Over the past 5 years, VAALCO Energy, Inc.
(EGY) delivered a total return of +155. 4%, compared to -99. 4% for Top Ships Inc. (TOPS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: EGY returned +535. 1% versus TOPS's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — EGY or IMPP or CIVI or TOPS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), VAALCO Energy, Inc.
(EGY) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 16β versus Civitas Resources, Inc. 's 1. 10β — meaning CIVI is approximately 601% more volatile than EGY relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Imperial Petroleum Inc. (IMPP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 174% for Top Ships Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — EGY or IMPP or CIVI or TOPS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Civitas Resources, Inc.
(CIVI) is pulling ahead at 49. 8% versus -25. 0% for VAALCO Energy, Inc. (EGY). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Top Ships Inc. grew EPS 108. 8% year-over-year, compared to -171. 8% for VAALCO Energy, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, IMPP leads at 104. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — EGY or IMPP or CIVI or TOPS?
Imperial Petroleum Inc.
(IMPP) is the more profitable company, earning 34. 0% net margin versus -11. 5% for VAALCO Energy, Inc. — meaning it keeps 34. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TOPS leads at 32. 4% versus 13. 0% for EGY. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TOPS leads at 43. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is EGY or IMPP or CIVI or TOPS more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Imperial Petroleum Inc.
(IMPP) trades at 2. 4x forward P/E versus 22. 4x for VAALCO Energy, Inc. — 20. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for IMPP: 22. 2% to $6. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — EGY or IMPP or CIVI or TOPS?
In this comparison, CIVI (18.
2% yield), EGY (4. 3% yield), IMPP (1. 1% yield) pay a dividend. TOPS does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is EGY or IMPP or CIVI or TOPS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, VAALCO Energy, Inc.
(EGY) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 16), 4. 3% yield, +535. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (EGY: +535. 1%, TOPS: -100. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between EGY and IMPP and CIVI and TOPS?
These companies operate in different sectors (EGY (Energy) and IMPP (Energy) and CIVI (Energy) and TOPS (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: EGY is a small-cap income-oriented stock; IMPP is a small-cap deep-value stock; CIVI is a small-cap high-growth stock; TOPS is a small-cap deep-value stock. EGY, IMPP, CIVI pay a dividend while TOPS does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.