EKSO vs ATAI vs CMPS vs IRBT

For growth investors, Atai Beckley N.

V (ATAI) is the stronger pick with -1. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -28. 6% for Ekso Bionics Holdings, Inc. (EKSO). Analysts rate Ekso Bionics Holdings, Inc. (EKSO) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

Over the past 5 years, COMPASS Pathways plc (CMPS) delivered a total return of -72.

4%, compared to -99. 9% for iRobot Corporation (IRBT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ATAI returned -47. 6% versus IRBT's -99. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), COMPASS Pathways plc (CMPS) is the lower-risk stock at 1.

28β versus iRobot Corporation's 5. 31β — meaning IRBT is approximately 315% more volatile than CMPS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Atai Beckley N. V (ATAI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 21% versus 4% for iRobot Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Atai Beckley N.

V (ATAI) is pulling ahead at -1. 9% versus -28. 6% for Ekso Bionics Holdings, Inc. (EKSO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: iRobot Corporation grew EPS 55. 3% year-over-year, compared to -776. 8% for Ekso Bionics Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, EKSO leads at -0. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

COMPASS Pathways plc (CMPS) is the more profitable company, earning 0.

0% net margin versus -484. 6% for Atai Beckley N. V — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CMPS leads at 0. 0% versus -333. 4% for ATAI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ATAI leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

In this comparison, EKSO (0.

8% yield) pays a dividend. ATAI, CMPS, IRBT do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, COMPASS Pathways plc (CMPS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.

28)). iRobot Corporation (IRBT) carries a higher beta of 5. 31 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CMPS: -65. 8%, IRBT: -99. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (EKSO (Healthcare) and ATAI (Healthcare) and CMPS (Healthcare) and IRBT (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

EKSO pays a dividend while ATAI, CMPS, IRBT do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.