ELTK vs APH

For growth investors, Amphenol Corporation (APH) is the stronger pick with 51.

7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 11. 3% for Eltek Ltd. (ELTK). Amphenol Corporation (APH) offers the better valuation at 40. 9x trailing P/E (29. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Amphenol Corporation (APH) a "Buy" — based on 29 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Amphenol Corporation (APH) is the cheapest at 40.

9x versus Eltek Ltd. at 68. 7x.

Over the past 5 years, Amphenol Corporation (APH) delivered a total return of +308.

8%, compared to +21. 7% for Eltek Ltd. (ELTK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: APH returned +899. 3% versus ELTK's +93. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Eltek Ltd.

(ELTK) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 34β versus Amphenol Corporation's 1. 62β — meaning APH is approximately 375% more volatile than ELTK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Eltek Ltd. (ELTK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 14% versus 115% for Amphenol Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Amphenol Corporation (APH) is pulling ahead at 51.

7% versus 11. 3% for Eltek Ltd. (ELTK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Amphenol Corporation grew EPS 74. 0% year-over-year, compared to -81. 0% for Eltek Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, APH leads at 22. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Amphenol Corporation (APH) is the more profitable company, earning 18.

5% net margin versus 1. 6% for Eltek Ltd. — meaning it keeps 18. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: APH leads at 25. 9% versus 4. 5% for ELTK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — APH leads at 36. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Eltek Ltd. (ELTK) offers the highest yield at 2. 3%, versus 0. 5% for Amphenol Corporation (APH).

For long-horizon retirement investors, Eltek Ltd.

(ELTK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 34), 2. 3% yield). Amphenol Corporation (APH) carries a higher beta of 1. 62 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ELTK: +93. 9%, APH: +899. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: ELTK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; APH is a mid-cap high-growth stock. ELTK pays a dividend while APH does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.