Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

EM vs BTBT vs NXRT vs PSHG vs BEEM

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
EM
Smart Share Global Limited

Personal Products & Services

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • CN
Market Cap$153M
5Y Perf.-84.2%
BTBT
Bit Digital, Inc.

Financial - Capital Markets

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$589M
5Y Perf.-88.6%
NXRT
NexPoint Residential Trust, Inc.

REIT - Residential

Real EstateNYSE • US
Market Cap$756M
5Y Perf.-42.4%
PSHG
Performance Shipping Inc.

Marine Shipping

IndustrialsNASDAQ • GR
Market Cap$71M
5Y Perf.-97.2%
BEEM
Beam Global

Solar

EnergyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$35M
5Y Perf.-42.9%

EM vs BTBT vs NXRT vs PSHG vs BEEM — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
EM logoEM
BTBT logoBTBT
NXRT logoNXRT
PSHG logoPSHG
BEEM logoBEEM
IndustryPersonal Products & ServicesFinancial - Capital MarketsREIT - ResidentialMarine ShippingSolar
Market Cap$153M$589M$756M$71M$35M
Revenue (TTM)$3.07B$164M$252M$80M$28M
Net Income (TTM)$-250M$137M$-32M$52M$-29M
Gross Margin62.4%61.9%91.1%55.4%15.0%
Operating Margin-6.6%16.8%11.5%63.7%-108.4%
Forward P/E2.3x9.2x1.7x
Total Debt$7M$14M$1.56B$48M$2M
Cash & Equiv.$787M$95M$14M$70M$5M

EM vs BTBT vs NXRT vs PSHG vs BEEMLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

EM
BTBT
NXRT
PSHG
BEEM
StockApr 21Apr 26Return
Smart Share Global … (EM)10015.8-84.2%
Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT)10011.4-88.6%
NexPoint Residentia… (NXRT)10057.6-42.4%
Performance Shippin… (PSHG)1002.8-97.2%
Beam Global (BEEM)1005.5-94.5%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: EM vs BTBT vs NXRT vs PSHG vs BEEM

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: BTBT and PSHG are tied at the top with 2 categories each (5-stock set) — the right choice depends on your priorities. Performance Shipping Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. EM, NXRT, and BEEM also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
EM
Smart Share Global Limited
The Defensive Pick

EM ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.07, Low D/E 0.2%, current ratio 3.17x
  • Beta 0.07, yield 5.3%, current ratio 3.17x
  • Beta 0.07 vs BTBT's 3.37, lower leverage
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
BTBT
Bit Digital, Inc.
The Banking Pick

BTBT has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 264.6%, EPS growth 225.0%
  • 264.6% NII/revenue growth vs EM's -36.0%
  • 19.0% ROA vs BEEM's -65.7%, ROIC 6.5% vs -22.1%
Best for: growth exposure
NXRT
NexPoint Residential Trust, Inc.
The Real Estate Income Play

NXRT is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.

  • Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.62, yield 7.1%
  • 211.1% 10Y total return vs BTBT's -60.4%
  • 7.1% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs EM's 5.3%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
PSHG
Performance Shipping Inc.
The Value Play

PSHG is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value and quality is your priority.

  • Better valuation composite
  • 65.4% margin vs BEEM's -105.9%
Best for: value and quality
BEEM
Beam Global
The Momentum Pick

BEEM is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.

  • +32.2% vs NXRT's -15.2%
Best for: momentum
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthBTBT logoBTBT264.6% NII/revenue growth vs EM's -36.0%
ValuePSHG logoPSHGBetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsPSHG logoPSHG65.4% margin vs BEEM's -105.9%
Stability / SafetyEM logoEMBeta 0.07 vs BTBT's 3.37, lower leverage
DividendsNXRT logoNXRT7.1% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs EM's 5.3%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)BEEM logoBEEM+32.2% vs NXRT's -15.2%
Efficiency (ROA)BTBT logoBTBT19.0% ROA vs BEEM's -65.7%, ROIC 6.5% vs -22.1%

EM vs BTBT vs NXRT vs PSHG vs BEEM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

EMSmart Share Global Limited
FY 2024
Mobile Device Charging Business
73.1%$1.4B
Electricity, Generation
25.3%$480M
Service, Other
1.6%$30M
BTBTBit Digital, Inc.
FY 2024
Other Member
100.0%$550,260
NXRTNexPoint Residential Trust, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

PSHGPerformance Shipping Inc.
FY 2024
Voyage charters
100.0%$982,000
BEEMBeam Global
FY 2024
Product
92.9%$46M
Shipping and Handling
4.6%$2M
Professional Services
2.3%$1M
Maintenance
0.3%$129,000

EM vs BTBT vs NXRT vs PSHG vs BEEM — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLNXRTLAGGINGBEEM

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

NXRT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

EM is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.1B annually — 110.9x BEEM's $28M. PSHG is the more profitable business, keeping 65.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BEEM's -105.9%. On growth, NXRT holds the edge at +0.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricEM logoEMSmart Share Globa…BTBT logoBTBTBit Digital, Inc.NXRT logoNXRTNexPoint Resident…PSHG logoPSHGPerformance Shipp…BEEM logoBEEMBeam Global
RevenueTrailing 12 months$3.1B$164M$252M$80M$28M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$106M$166M$125M$64M-$25M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$250M$137M-$32M$52M-$29M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$0-$448M$79M-$35M-$7M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+62.4%+61.9%+91.1%+55.4%+15.0%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-6.6%+16.8%+11.5%+63.7%-108.4%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-8.2%+17.3%-12.7%+65.4%-105.9%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-11.4%-65.3%+31.2%-44.4%-24.0%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-24.7%+0.5%-19.0%-49.6%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+149.4%+2.8%0.0%-70.5%-4.2%
NXRT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

PSHG leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

At 1.7x trailing earnings, PSHG trades at a 82% valuation discount to BTBT's 9.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, PSHG's 0.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than NXRT's 18.6x.

MetricEM logoEMSmart Share Globa…BTBT logoBTBTBit Digital, Inc.NXRT logoNXRTNexPoint Resident…PSHG logoPSHGPerformance Shipp…BEEM logoBEEMBeam Global
Market CapShares × price$153M$589M$756M$71M$35M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$38M$508M$2.3B$48M$33M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-73.93x9.15x-23.65x1.69x-2.45x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.2.28x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple2.99x8.49x18.60x0.86x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.55x3.60x3.01x0.81x0.71x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.39x0.56x2.52x0.26x0.67x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF9.05x5.69x
PSHG leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

Evenly matched — BTBT and PSHG each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.

BTBT delivers a 21.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $21 in annual profit, vs $-110 for BEEM. EM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NXRT's 5.18x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BTBT scores 6/9 vs BEEM's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricEM logoEMSmart Share Globa…BTBT logoBTBTBit Digital, Inc.NXRT logoNXRTNexPoint Resident…PSHG logoPSHGPerformance Shipp…BEEM logoBEEMBeam Global
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-9.0%+21.4%-10.1%+16.5%-110.5%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-5.7%+19.0%-1.7%+9.4%-65.7%
ROICReturn on invested capital-2.6%+6.5%+1.1%+13.3%-22.1%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-2.4%+8.5%+1.5%+14.0%-21.4%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–936453
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.00x0.03x5.18x0.17x0.05x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$781M-$81M$1.5B-$23M-$3M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$787M$95M$14M$70M$5M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$7M$14M$1.6B$48M$2M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-11.98x0.47x19.08x-715.85x
Evenly matched — BTBT and PSHG each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

Evenly matched — NXRT and PSHG and BEEM each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in NXRT five years ago would be worth $7,705 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $271 for PSHG. Over the past 12 months, BEEM leads with a +32.2% total return vs NXRT's -15.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PSHG at 34.1% vs BEEM's -42.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricEM logoEMSmart Share Globa…BTBT logoBTBTBit Digital, Inc.NXRT logoNXRTNexPoint Resident…PSHG logoPSHGPerformance Shipp…BEEM logoBEEMBeam Global
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+3.9%-10.3%+2.6%-17.4%+16.7%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+8.6%-9.0%-15.2%+14.6%+32.2%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+28.9%-19.7%-15.5%+141.3%-80.8%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-83.9%-84.6%-23.0%-97.3%-93.9%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-85.7%-60.4%+211.1%-99.8%-76.5%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+8.8%-7.1%-5.5%+34.1%-42.3%
Evenly matched — NXRT and PSHG and BEEM each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

EM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

EM is the less volatile stock with a 0.07 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BTBT's 3.37 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. EM currently trades 81.8% from its 52-week high vs BTBT's 40.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricEM logoEMSmart Share Globa…BTBT logoBTBTBit Digital, Inc.NXRT logoNXRTNexPoint Resident…PSHG logoPSHGPerformance Shipp…BEEM logoBEEMBeam Global
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.07x3.37x0.62x0.68x2.69x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$1.46$4.55$38.30$2.58$4.04
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$1.01$1.25$23.79$1.40$1.33
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+81.8%+40.2%+77.8%+70.2%+46.8%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10066.669.171.049.359.7
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded65K18.5M216K139K483K
EM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

NXRT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: EM as "Hold", BTBT as "Buy", NXRT as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 173.2% upside for BTBT (target: $5) vs -9.4% for NXRT (target: $27). For income investors, NXRT offers the higher dividend yield at 7.07% vs BTBT's 0.31%.

MetricEM logoEMSmart Share Globa…BTBT logoBTBTBit Digital, Inc.NXRT logoNXRTNexPoint Resident…PSHG logoPSHGPerformance Shipp…BEEM logoBEEMBeam Global
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuyHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$5.00$27.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts3210
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+5.3%+0.3%+7.1%+2.6%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises10120
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.43$0.01$2.11$0.05
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+4.3%0.0%+1.0%0.0%0.0%
NXRT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

NXRT leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Analyst Outlook). PSHG leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.

Best OverallNexPoint Residential Trust,… (NXRT)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

EM vs BTBT vs NXRT vs PSHG vs BEEM: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is EM or BTBT or NXRT or PSHG or BEEM a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Bit Digital, Inc.

(BTBT) is the stronger pick with 264. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -36. 0% for Smart Share Global Limited (EM). Performance Shipping Inc. (PSHG) offers the better valuation at 1. 7x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — EM or BTBT or NXRT or PSHG or BEEM?

On trailing P/E, Performance Shipping Inc.

(PSHG) is the cheapest at 1. 7x versus Bit Digital, Inc. at 9. 2x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — EM or BTBT or NXRT or PSHG or BEEM?

Over the past 5 years, NexPoint Residential Trust, Inc.

(NXRT) delivered a total return of -23. 0%, compared to -97. 3% for Performance Shipping Inc. (PSHG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NXRT returned +211. 1% versus PSHG's -99. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — EM or BTBT or NXRT or PSHG or BEEM?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Smart Share Global Limited (EM) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

07β versus Bit Digital, Inc. 's 3. 37β — meaning BTBT is approximately 4647% more volatile than EM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Smart Share Global Limited (EM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 5% for NexPoint Residential Trust, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — EM or BTBT or NXRT or PSHG or BEEM?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Bit Digital, Inc.

(BTBT) is pulling ahead at 264. 6% versus -36. 0% for Smart Share Global Limited (EM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Bit Digital, Inc. grew EPS 225. 0% year-over-year, compared to -30. 8% for NexPoint Residential Trust, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, BEEM leads at 76. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — EM or BTBT or NXRT or PSHG or BEEM?

Performance Shipping Inc.

(PSHG) is the more profitable company, earning 50. 0% net margin versus -22. 9% for Beam Global — meaning it keeps 50. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PSHG leads at 47. 8% versus -23. 6% for BEEM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NXRT leads at 84. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is EM or BTBT or NXRT or PSHG or BEEM more undervalued right now?

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BTBT: 173.

2% to $5. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — EM or BTBT or NXRT or PSHG or BEEM?

In this comparison, NXRT (7.

1% yield), EM (5. 3% yield), PSHG (2. 6% yield), BTBT (0. 3% yield) pay a dividend. BEEM does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is EM or BTBT or NXRT or PSHG or BEEM better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Smart Share Global Limited (EM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

07), 5. 3% yield). Beam Global (BEEM) carries a higher beta of 2. 69 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (EM: -85. 7%, BEEM: -76. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between EM and BTBT and NXRT and PSHG and BEEM?

These companies operate in different sectors (EM (Consumer Cyclical) and BTBT (Financial Services) and NXRT (Real Estate) and PSHG (Industrials) and BEEM (Energy)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: EM is a small-cap income-oriented stock; BTBT is a small-cap high-growth stock; NXRT is a small-cap income-oriented stock; PSHG is a small-cap deep-value stock; BEEM is a small-cap quality compounder stock. EM, NXRT, PSHG pay a dividend while BTBT, BEEM do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

EM

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 37%
  • Dividend Yield > 2.1%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

BTBT

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 132%
  • Net Margin > 10%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

NXRT

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Real Estate
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 54%
  • Dividend Yield > 2.8%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

PSHG

Dividend Mega-Cap Quality

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 39%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.0%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

BEEM

Quality Business

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform EM and BTBT and NXRT and PSHG and BEEM on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(EM: -24.7% · BTBT: 264.6%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.