EMBC
Embecta Corp.
Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
Market Cap$214M
5Y Perf.-89.2%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
EMBC vs ITGR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
ITGR
Integer Holdings Corporation
Medical - Devices
Market Cap$3.03B
5Y Perf.+9.1%
EMBC vs ITGR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | EMBC | ITGR |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic | Medical - Devices |
| Market Cap | $214M | $3.03B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.04B | $1.85B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $112M | $142M |
| Gross Margin | 61.4% | 23.3% |
| Operating Margin | 27.7% | 10.4% |
| Forward P/E | 1.3x | 13.5x |
| Total Debt | $1.43B | $1.40B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $226M | $17M |
EMBC vs ITGR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
EMBC
ITGR
| Stock | Mar 22 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Embecta Corp. (EMBC) | 100 | 10.8 | -89.2% |
| Integer Holdings Co… (ITGR) | 100 | 109.1 | +9.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: EMBC vs ITGR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: EMBC leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Integer Holdings Corporation is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and capital preservation and lower volatility. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
EMBC
Embecta Corp.
The Value Play
EMBC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for value and quality.
- Lower P/E (1.3x vs 13.5x)
- 10.7% margin vs ITGR's 7.7%
- 16.5% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend
Best for: value and quality
ITGR
Integer Holdings Corporation
The Income Pick
ITGR is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 0.72
- Rev growth 7.6%, EPS growth -15.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 11.5%
- 165.1% 10Y total return vs EMBC's -87.6%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | ITGR | 7.6% revenue growth vs EMBC's -3.8% |
| Value | EMBC | Lower P/E (1.3x vs 13.5x) |
| Quality / Margins | EMBC | 10.7% margin vs ITGR's 7.7% |
| Stability / Safety | ITGR | Beta 0.72 vs EMBC's 1.31 |
| Dividends | EMBC | 16.5% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | ITGR | -26.1% vs EMBC's -66.3% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | EMBC | 10.3% ROA vs ITGR's 4.2%, ROIC 42.7% vs 5.4% |
EMBC vs ITGR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2025
FY 2025
EMBC vs ITGR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLEMBCLAGGINGITGR
ITGRInteger Holdings Corp…
2leads
EMBCEmbecta Corp.
3leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs ITGRMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
EMBC4/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
EMBC5/5
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
EMBC6/7
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
ITGR6/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
ITGR2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
—
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
EMBC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ITGR is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.8B annually — 1.8x EMBC's $1.0B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 10.7% (EMBC) to 7.7% (ITGR). On growth, ITGR holds the edge at +0.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | EMBCEmbecta Corp. | ITGRInteger Holdings … |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.0B | $1.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $316M | $328M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $112M | $142M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $174M | $168M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +61.4% | +23.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +27.7% | +10.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +10.7% | +7.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +16.7% | +9.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -14.4% | +0.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.9% | +172.7% |
EMBC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
EMBC leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 2.2x trailing earnings, EMBC trades at a 93% valuation discount to ITGR's 30.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, EMBC's 3.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ITGR's 13.1x.
| Metric | EMBCEmbecta Corp. | ITGRInteger Holdings … |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $214M | $3.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.4B | $4.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 2.22x | 30.42x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 1.28x | 13.55x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 6.91x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 3.73x | 13.15x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.20x | 1.64x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 1.79x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 1.17x | 28.78x |
EMBC leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
EMBC leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), EMBC scores 6/9 vs ITGR's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | EMBCEmbecta Corp. | ITGRInteger Holdings … |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +8.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +10.3% | +4.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +42.7% | +5.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +37.8% | +6.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.80x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.2B | $1.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $226M | $17M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.4B | $1.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 39.48x | 5.07x |
EMBC leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ITGR leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ITGR five years ago would be worth $9,252 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,245 for EMBC. Over the past 12 months, ITGR leads with a -26.1% total return vs EMBC's -66.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ITGR at 2.9% vs EMBC's -43.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | EMBCEmbecta Corp. | ITGRInteger Holdings … |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -67.8% | +14.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -66.3% | -26.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -81.6% | +8.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -87.6% | -7.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -87.6% | +165.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -43.1% | +2.9% |
ITGR leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ITGR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ITGR is the less volatile stock with a 0.72 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than EMBC's 1.31 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ITGR currently trades 71.0% from its 52-week high vs EMBC's 23.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | EMBCEmbecta Corp. | ITGRInteger Holdings … |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.31x | 0.72x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $15.55 | $123.78 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.45 | $62.00 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +23.2% | +71.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 13.7 | 50.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.3M | 628K |
ITGR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates EMBC as "Sell" and ITGR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 233.3% upside for EMBC (target: $12) vs 11.5% for ITGR (target: $98). EMBC is the only dividend payer here at 16.50% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | EMBCEmbecta Corp. | ITGRInteger Holdings … |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Sell | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $12.00 | $98.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 4 | 14 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +16.5% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.59 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.7% | +1.7% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway
EMBC leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). ITGR leads in 2 (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility).
Best OverallEmbecta Corp. (EMBC)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
EMBC vs ITGR: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is EMBC or ITGR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Integer Holdings Corporation (ITGR) is the stronger pick with 7.
6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 8% for Embecta Corp. (EMBC). Embecta Corp. (EMBC) offers the better valuation at 2. 2x trailing P/E (1. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Integer Holdings Corporation (ITGR) a "Buy" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — EMBC or ITGR?
On trailing P/E, Embecta Corp.
(EMBC) is the cheapest at 2. 2x versus Integer Holdings Corporation at 30. 4x. On forward P/E, Embecta Corp. is actually cheaper at 1. 3x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — EMBC or ITGR?
Over the past 5 years, Integer Holdings Corporation (ITGR) delivered a total return of -7.
5%, compared to -87. 6% for Embecta Corp. (EMBC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ITGR returned +165. 1% versus EMBC's -87. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — EMBC or ITGR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Integer Holdings Corporation (ITGR) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
72β versus Embecta Corp. 's 1. 31β — meaning EMBC is approximately 82% more volatile than ITGR relative to the S&P 500.
05Which is growing faster — EMBC or ITGR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Integer Holdings Corporation (ITGR) is pulling ahead at 7.
6% versus -3. 8% for Embecta Corp. (EMBC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Embecta Corp. grew EPS 20. 9% year-over-year, compared to -15. 0% for Integer Holdings Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, ITGR leads at 11. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — EMBC or ITGR?
Embecta Corp.
(EMBC) is the more profitable company, earning 8. 8% net margin versus 5. 6% for Integer Holdings Corporation — meaning it keeps 8. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: EMBC leads at 30. 5% versus 11. 3% for ITGR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — EMBC leads at 62. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is EMBC or ITGR more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Embecta Corp.
(EMBC) trades at 1. 3x forward P/E versus 13. 5x for Integer Holdings Corporation — 12. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for EMBC: 233. 3% to $12. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — EMBC or ITGR?
In this comparison, EMBC (16.
5% yield) pays a dividend. ITGR does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is EMBC or ITGR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Integer Holdings Corporation (ITGR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
72), +165. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ITGR: +165. 1%, EMBC: -87. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between EMBC and ITGR?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: EMBC is a small-cap deep-value stock; ITGR is a small-cap quality compounder stock. EMBC pays a dividend while ITGR does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(EMBC: -14.4% · ITGR: 0.8%)Net Margin>
%
(EMBC: 10.7% · ITGR: 7.7%)P/E Ratio<
x
(EMBC: 2.2x · ITGR: 30.4x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.