EME vs MTZ

For growth investors, EMCOR Group, Inc.

(EME) is the stronger pick with 16. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 16. 2% for MasTec, Inc. (MTZ). EMCOR Group, Inc. (EME) offers the better valuation at 33. 5x trailing P/E (32. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate EMCOR Group, Inc. (EME) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, EMCOR Group, Inc.

(EME) is the cheapest at 33. 5x versus MasTec, Inc. at 85. 5x. On forward P/E, EMCOR Group, Inc. is actually cheaper at 32. 2x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: EMCOR Group, Inc. wins at 0. 51x versus MasTec, Inc. 's 17. 21x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, EMCOR Group, Inc.

(EME) delivered a total return of +663. 9%, compared to +296. 2% for MasTec, Inc. (MTZ). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: EME returned +1896% versus MTZ's +1840%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), MasTec, Inc.

(MTZ) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 64β versus EMCOR Group, Inc. 's 1. 64β — meaning EME is approximately 0% more volatile than MTZ relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, EMCOR Group, Inc. (EME) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 23% versus 84% for MasTec, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), EMCOR Group, Inc.

(EME) is pulling ahead at 16. 6% versus 16. 2% for MasTec, Inc. (MTZ). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: MasTec, Inc. grew EPS 146. 1% year-over-year, compared to 31. 0% for EMCOR Group, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, EME leads at 15. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

EMCOR Group, Inc.

(EME) is the more profitable company, earning 7. 5% net margin versus 2. 8% for MasTec, Inc. — meaning it keeps 7. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: EME leads at 9. 8% versus 4. 6% for MTZ. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — EME leads at 19. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, EMCOR Group, Inc. (EME) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 51x versus MasTec, Inc. 's 17. 21x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, EMCOR Group, Inc. (EME) trades at 32. 2x forward P/E versus 51. 1x for MasTec, Inc. — 18. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for EME: -1. 3% to $931. 50.

In this comparison, EME (0.

1% yield) pays a dividend. MTZ does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, MasTec, Inc.

(MTZ) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+1840% 10Y return). EMCOR Group, Inc. (EME) carries a higher beta of 1. 64 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MTZ: +1840%, EME: +1896%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.