Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
EML logo
EML
ASTE logo
ASTE
TWIN logo
TWIN
JPM logo
JPM
CMI logo
CMI
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

EML vs ASTE vs TWIN vs JPM vs CMI

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
EML
The Eastern Company

Manufacturing - Tools & Accessories

IndustrialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$131M
5Y Perf.+21.7%
ASTE
Astec Industries, Inc.

Agricultural - Machinery

IndustrialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.18B
5Y Perf.+10.9%
TWIN
Twin Disc, Incorporated

Industrial - Machinery

IndustrialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$289M
5Y Perf.+261.4%
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.

Banks - Diversified

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$896.00B
5Y Perf.+241.0%
CMI
Cummins Inc.

Industrial - Machinery

IndustrialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$91.13B
5Y Perf.+280.7%

EML vs ASTE vs TWIN vs JPM vs CMI — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
EML logoEML
ASTE logoASTE
TWIN logoTWIN
JPM logoJPM
CMI logoCMI
IndustryManufacturing - Tools & AccessoriesAgricultural - MachineryIndustrial - MachineryBanks - DiversifiedIndustrial - Machinery
Market Cap$131M$1.18B$289M$896.00B$91.13B
Revenue (TTM)$243M$1.48B$364M$280.33B$33.89B
Net Income (TTM)$4M$26M$27M$57.05B$2.67B
Gross Margin21.7%26.1%28.2%60.0%25.4%
Operating Margin3.0%3.7%4.3%25.9%11.2%
Forward P/E11.0x14.3x27.4x14.4x22.7x
Total Debt$54M$320M$49M$942.38B$8.11B
Cash & Equiv.$7M$72M$16M$343.34B$2.85B

EML vs ASTE vs TWIN vs JPM vs CMILong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

EML
ASTE
TWIN
JPM
CMI
StockJun 20Jun 26Return
The Eastern Company (EML)100121.7+21.7%
Astec Industries, I… (ASTE)100110.9+10.9%
Twin Disc, Incorpor… (TWIN)100361.4+261.4%
JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM)100341.0+241.0%
Cummins Inc. (CMI)100380.7+280.7%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: EML vs ASTE vs TWIN vs JPM vs CMI

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: EML and TWIN are tied at the top with 2 categories each (5-stock set) — the right choice depends on your priorities. Twin Disc, Incorporated is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and recent price momentum and sentiment. JPM and CMI also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
EML
The Eastern Company
The Income Pick

EML has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.66, yield 2.0%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.66, Low D/E 43.2%, current ratio 3.59x
  • Beta 0.66, yield 2.0%, current ratio 3.59x
  • Beta 0.66 vs CMI's 1.64, lower leverage
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
ASTE
Astec Industries, Inc.
The Growth Play

ASTE is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 8.1%, EPS growth 7.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 3.4%
Best for: growth exposure
TWIN
Twin Disc, Incorporated
The Growth Leader

TWIN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth and momentum is your priority.

  • 15.5% revenue growth vs EML's -8.7%
  • +163.8% vs EML's -6.1%
Best for: growth and momentum
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
The Banking Pick

JPM ranks third and is worth considering specifically for valuation efficiency.

  • PEG 0.81 vs CMI's 2.01
  • Lower P/E (14.4x vs 22.7x), PEG 0.81 vs 2.01
  • 20.4% margin vs EML's 1.6%
Best for: valuation efficiency
CMI
Cummins Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

CMI is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.

  • 5.3% 10Y total return vs JPM's 465.8%
  • 7.8% ROA vs JPM's 1.3%, ROIC 16.1% vs 4.5%
Best for: long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthTWIN logoTWIN15.5% revenue growth vs EML's -8.7%
ValueJPM logoJPMLower P/E (14.4x vs 22.7x), PEG 0.81 vs 2.01
Quality / MarginsJPM logoJPM20.4% margin vs EML's 1.6%
Stability / SafetyEML logoEMLBeta 0.66 vs CMI's 1.64, lower leverage
DividendsEML logoEML2.0% yield, vs CMI's 1.2%
Momentum (1Y)TWIN logoTWIN+163.8% vs EML's -6.1%
Efficiency (ROA)CMI logoCMI7.8% ROA vs JPM's 1.3%, ROIC 16.1% vs 4.5%

EML vs ASTE vs TWIN vs JPM vs CMI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

Discover the Infrastructure Stocks Theme

These companies are key players in the Infrastructure Stocks ecosystem. See how they stack up against the rest of the sector.

Explore Theme
EMLThe Eastern Company
FY 2019
Subscription
100.0%$567,000
ASTEAstec Industries, Inc.
FY 2025
Infrastructure Group
61.6%$893M
Material Solutions
38.4%$558M
TWINTwin Disc, Incorporated
FY 2025
Marine and Propulsion Systems
59.0%$201M
Land Based Transmissions
23.5%$80M
Industrial
12.2%$42M
Other
5.3%$18M
JPMJPMorgan Chase & Co.
FY 2025
Commercial And Investment Bank
43.0%$78.5B
Consumer & Community Banking
41.7%$76.0B
Asset and Wealth Management Segment
13.2%$24.1B
Segment Reporting, Reconciling Item, Corporate Nonsegment
3.9%$7.0B
Segment Reconciling Items
-1.7%$-3,134,000,000
CMICummins Inc.
FY 2025
Distribution
36.8%$12.4B
Engine
32.3%$10.9B
Components
30.1%$10.1B
Power Systems
22.2%$7.5B
Accelera
1.4%$460M
Total Segment
-22.8%$-7,682,000,000

EML vs ASTE vs TWIN vs JPM vs CMI — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLCMILAGGINGTWIN

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 1155.0x EML's $243M. JPM is the more profitable business, keeping 20.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to EML's 1.6%. On growth, ASTE holds the edge at +20.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricEML logoEMLThe Eastern Compa…ASTE logoASTEAstec Industries,…TWIN logoTWINTwin Disc, Incorp…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …CMI logoCMICummins Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$243M$1.5B$364M$280.3B$33.9B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$12M$84M$30M$81.4B$4.6B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$4M$26M$27M$57.0B$2.7B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$10M$37M$774,000$100.9B$2.7B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+21.7%+26.1%+28.2%+60.0%+25.4%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+3.0%+3.7%+4.3%+25.9%+11.2%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+1.6%+1.7%+7.3%+20.4%+7.9%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+4.0%+2.5%+0.2%+36.0%+7.9%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-5.7%+20.3%+19.0%+2.7%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-65.6%-90.3%+3.1%+16.0%-21.0%
JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

EML leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 16.0x trailing earnings, JPM trades at a 50% valuation discount to CMI's 32.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), JPM offers better value at 0.90x vs CMI's 2.85x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricEML logoEMLThe Eastern Compa…ASTE logoASTEAstec Industries,…TWIN logoTWINTwin Disc, Incorp…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …CMI logoCMICummins Inc.
Market CapShares × price$131M$1.2B$289M$896.0B$91.1B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$178M$1.4B$322M$1.50T$96.4B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS25.89x30.58x-143.00x16.00x32.17x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.10.98x14.27x27.42x14.40x22.72x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.90x2.85x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple12.88x14.03x12.98x18.36x19.40x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.53x0.84x0.85x3.20x2.71x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.06x1.75x1.69x2.47x6.82x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF26.79x54.94x32.73x8.88x38.19x
EML leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

CMI leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

CMI delivers a 20.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $20 in annual profit, vs $3 for EML. TWIN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.30x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CMI scores 7/9 vs JPM's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricEML logoEMLThe Eastern Compa…ASTE logoASTEAstec Industries,…TWIN logoTWINTwin Disc, Incorp…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …CMI logoCMICummins Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+3.1%+3.8%+15.3%+15.9%+20.3%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+1.7%+2.0%+7.1%+1.3%+7.8%
ROICReturn on invested capital+4.5%+6.2%+3.9%+4.5%+16.1%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+5.3%+7.2%+4.5%+8.9%+17.3%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–965557
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.43x0.47x0.30x2.60x0.61x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$46M$248M$33M$599.0B$5.3B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$7M$72M$16M$343.3B$2.8B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$54M$320M$49M$942.4B$8.1B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense2.90x5.48x6.79x0.74x12.15x
CMI leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

CMI leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in CMI five years ago would be worth $27,921 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,258 for EML. Over the past 12 months, TWIN leads with a +163.8% total return vs EML's -6.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CMI at 43.7% vs ASTE's 5.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricEML logoEMLThe Eastern Compa…ASTE logoASTEAstec Industries,…TWIN logoTWINTwin Disc, Incorp…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …CMI logoCMICummins Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+11.9%+15.7%+24.1%-0.5%+27.1%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-6.1%+26.1%+163.8%+21.8%+105.6%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+35.5%+18.4%+76.8%+138.2%+196.7%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-27.4%-15.7%+46.7%+118.2%+179.2%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+61.1%+3.4%+105.6%+465.8%+530.6%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+10.7%+5.8%+20.9%+33.6%+43.7%
CMI leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — EML and TWIN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

EML is the less volatile stock with a 0.66 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CMI's 1.64 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TWIN currently trades 95.7% from its 52-week high vs ASTE's 78.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricEML logoEMLThe Eastern Compa…ASTE logoASTEAstec Industries,…TWIN logoTWINTwin Disc, Incorp…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …CMI logoCMICummins Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.66x1.55x1.10x0.94x1.64x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$26.77$65.65$20.92$337.25$718.08
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$17.61$36.43$7.43$262.71$307.90
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+81.2%+78.2%+95.7%+95.1%+91.9%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10043.945.262.059.149.0
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded16K197K70K7.0M759K
Evenly matched — EML and TWIN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — EML and CMI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: ASTE as "Buy", TWIN as "Hold", JPM as "Buy", CMI as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 10.4% upside for CMI (target: $728) vs -29.9% for ASTE (target: $36). For income investors, EML offers the higher dividend yield at 2.03% vs TWIN's 0.82%.

MetricEML logoEMLThe Eastern Compa…ASTE logoASTEAstec Industries,…TWIN logoTWINTwin Disc, Incorp…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …CMI logoCMICummins Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyHoldBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$36.00$339.75$727.91
# AnalystsCovering analysts1246151
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+2.0%+1.0%+0.8%+1.9%+1.2%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises0001520
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.44$0.51$0.16$5.95$7.61
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+2.8%0.0%+0.4%+3.9%0.0%
Evenly matched — EML and CMI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

CMI leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). JPM leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.

Best OverallCummins Inc. (CMI)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

EML vs ASTE vs TWIN vs JPM vs CMI: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is EML or ASTE or TWIN or JPM or CMI a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Twin Disc, Incorporated (TWIN) is the stronger pick with 15.

5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -8. 7% for The Eastern Company (EML). JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) offers the better valuation at 16. 0x trailing P/E (14. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Astec Industries, Inc. (ASTE) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — EML or ASTE or TWIN or JPM or CMI?

On trailing P/E, JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) is the cheapest at 16. 0x versus Cummins Inc. at 32. 2x. On forward P/E, The Eastern Company is actually cheaper at 11. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: JPMorgan Chase & Co. wins at 0. 81x versus Cummins Inc. 's 2. 01x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — EML or ASTE or TWIN or JPM or CMI?

Over the past 5 years, Cummins Inc.

(CMI) delivered a total return of +179. 2%, compared to -27. 4% for The Eastern Company (EML). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CMI returned +530. 6% versus ASTE's +3. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — EML or ASTE or TWIN or JPM or CMI?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Eastern Company (EML) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

66β versus Cummins Inc. 's 1. 64β — meaning CMI is approximately 150% more volatile than EML relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Twin Disc, Incorporated (TWIN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 30% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — EML or ASTE or TWIN or JPM or CMI?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Twin Disc, Incorporated (TWIN) is pulling ahead at 15.

5% versus -8. 7% for The Eastern Company (EML). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Astec Industries, Inc. grew EPS 784. 2% year-over-year, compared to -117. 7% for Twin Disc, Incorporated. Over a 3-year CAGR, TWIN leads at 11. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — EML or ASTE or TWIN or JPM or CMI?

JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 4% net margin versus -0. 6% for Twin Disc, Incorporated — meaning it keeps 20. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: JPM leads at 26. 0% versus 2. 9% for TWIN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — JPM leads at 59. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is EML or ASTE or TWIN or JPM or CMI more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 81x versus Cummins Inc. 's 2. 01x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, The Eastern Company (EML) trades at 11. 0x forward P/E versus 27. 4x for Twin Disc, Incorporated — 16. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CMI: 10. 4% to $727. 91.

08

Which pays a better dividend — EML or ASTE or TWIN or JPM or CMI?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

The Eastern Company (EML) offers the highest yield at 2. 0%, versus 0. 8% for Twin Disc, Incorporated (TWIN).

09

Is EML or ASTE or TWIN or JPM or CMI better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 94), 1. 9% yield, +465. 8% 10Y return). Astec Industries, Inc. (ASTE) carries a higher beta of 1. 55 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (JPM: +465. 8%, ASTE: +3. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between EML and ASTE and TWIN and JPM and CMI?

These companies operate in different sectors (EML (Industrials) and ASTE (Industrials) and TWIN (Industrials) and JPM (Financial Services) and CMI (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: EML is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ASTE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TWIN is a small-cap high-growth stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock; CMI is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.