Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
EML logo
EML
NN logo
NN
KO logo
KO
PEP logo
PEP
TRMB logo
TRMB
JPM logo
JPM
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

EML vs NN vs KO vs PEP vs TRMB vs JPM

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
EML
The Eastern Company

Manufacturing - Tools & Accessories

IndustrialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$131M
5Y Perf.-1.6%
NN
NextNav Inc.

Internet Content & Information

Communication ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.93B
5Y Perf.+117.2%
KO
The Coca-Cola Company

Beverages - Non-Alcoholic

Consumer DefensiveNYSE • US
Market Cap$355.61B
5Y Perf.+60.1%
PEP
PepsiCo, Inc.

Beverages - Non-Alcoholic

Consumer DefensiveNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$197.17B
5Y Perf.+0.0%
TRMB
Trimble Inc.

Hardware, Equipment & Parts

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$11.94B
5Y Perf.-15.8%
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.

Banks - Diversified

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$896.00B
5Y Perf.+172.1%

EML vs NN vs KO vs PEP vs TRMB vs JPM — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
EML logoEML
NN logoNN
KO logoKO
PEP logoPEP
TRMB logoTRMB
JPM logoJPM
IndustryManufacturing - Tools & AccessoriesInternet Content & InformationBeverages - Non-AlcoholicBeverages - Non-AlcoholicHardware, Equipment & PartsBanks - Diversified
Market Cap$131M$2.93B$355.61B$197.17B$11.94B$896.00B
Revenue (TTM)$243M$4M$49.28B$93.92B$3.69B$280.33B
Net Income (TTM)$4M$-141M$13.70B$8.24B$456M$57.05B
Gross Margin21.7%-208.1%61.7%54.1%68.1%60.0%
Operating Margin3.0%-18.0%29.3%12.2%17.8%25.9%
Forward P/E11.0x25.3x16.7x16.3x14.4x
Total Debt$54M$289M$45.49B$49.90B$1.39B$942.38B
Cash & Equiv.$7M$45M$10.27B$9.16B$253M$343.34B

EML vs NN vs KO vs PEP vs TRMB vs JPMLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

EML
NN
KO
PEP
TRMB
JPM
StockNov 20Jun 26Return
The Eastern Company (EML)10098.4-1.6%
NextNav Inc. (NN)100217.2+117.2%
The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO)100160.1+60.1%
PepsiCo, Inc. (PEP)100100.0+0.0%
Trimble Inc. (TRMB)10084.2-15.8%
JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM)100272.1+172.1%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: EML vs NN vs KO vs PEP vs TRMB vs JPM

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: KO and JPM are tied at the top with 2 categories each (6-stock set) — the right choice depends on your priorities. JPMorgan Chase & Co. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. EML, NN, and PEP also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
EML
The Eastern Company
The Defensive Pick

EML ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.66, Low D/E 43.2%, current ratio 3.59x
  • Beta 0.66, yield 2.0%, current ratio 3.59x
  • Beta 0.66 vs NN's 1.49
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
NN
NextNav Inc.
The Momentum Pick

NN is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.

  • +71.7% vs TRMB's -30.3%
Best for: momentum
KO
The Coca-Cola Company
The Growth Play

KO has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 1.9%, EPS growth 23.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 3.7%
  • 27.8% margin vs NN's -35.1%
  • 13.1% ROA vs NN's -56.3%, ROIC 15.8% vs -43.9%
Best for: growth exposure
PEP
PepsiCo, Inc.
The Income Pick

PEP is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.

  • Dividend streak 54 yrs, beta -0.11, yield 3.9%
  • 3.9% yield, 54-year raise streak, vs KO's 2.5%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
Best for: income & stability
TRMB
Trimble Inc.
The Technology Pick

TRMB doesn't hold a clear category lead here; it's more of a secondary option in this specific comparison.

Best for: technology exposure
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
The Banking Pick

JPM is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding and valuation efficiency is your priority.

  • 465.8% 10Y total return vs KO's 121.1%
  • PEG 0.81 vs TRMB's 6.64
  • 3.3% NII/revenue growth vs NN's -19.3%
  • Lower P/E (14.4x vs 16.3x), PEG 0.81 vs 6.64
Best for: long-term compounding and valuation efficiency
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthJPM logoJPM3.3% NII/revenue growth vs NN's -19.3%
ValueJPM logoJPMLower P/E (14.4x vs 16.3x), PEG 0.81 vs 6.64
Quality / MarginsKO logoKO27.8% margin vs NN's -35.1%
Stability / SafetyEML logoEMLBeta 0.66 vs NN's 1.49
DividendsPEP logoPEP3.9% yield, 54-year raise streak, vs KO's 2.5%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)NN logoNN+71.7% vs TRMB's -30.3%
Efficiency (ROA)KO logoKO13.1% ROA vs NN's -56.3%, ROIC 15.8% vs -43.9%

EML vs NN vs KO vs PEP vs TRMB vs JPM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

EMLThe Eastern Company
FY 2019
Subscription
100.0%$567,000
NNNextNav Inc.
FY 2025
Commercial Services
100.0%$4M
KOThe Coca-Cola Company
FY 2025
Pacific
84.6%$31.6B
Bottling investments
15.4%$5.7B
PEPPepsiCo, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

TRMBTrimble Inc.
FY 2025
Service
68.4%$2.5B
Product
31.6%$1.1B
JPMJPMorgan Chase & Co.
FY 2025
Commercial And Investment Bank
43.0%$78.5B
Consumer & Community Banking
41.7%$76.0B
Asset and Wealth Management Segment
13.2%$24.1B
Segment Reporting, Reconciling Item, Corporate Nonsegment
3.9%$7.0B
Segment Reconciling Items
-1.7%$-3,134,000,000

EML vs NN vs KO vs PEP vs TRMB vs JPM — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 6 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLKOLAGGINGJPM

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

KO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 69578.8x NN's $4M. KO is the more profitable business, keeping 27.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NN's -35.1%. On growth, KO holds the edge at +12.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricEML logoEMLThe Eastern Compa…NN logoNNNextNav Inc.KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…PEP logoPEPPepsiCo, Inc.TRMB logoTRMBTrimble Inc.JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
RevenueTrailing 12 months$243M$4M$49.3B$93.9B$3.7B$280.3B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$12M-$67M$15.5B$14.3B$843M$81.4B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$4M-$141M$13.7B$8.2B$456M$57.0B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$10M-$49M$12.6B$7.7B$253M$100.9B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+21.7%-2.1%+61.7%+54.1%+68.1%+60.0%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+3.0%-18.0%+29.3%+12.2%+17.8%+25.9%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+1.6%-35.1%+27.8%+8.8%+12.4%+20.4%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+4.0%-12.1%+25.5%+8.2%+6.9%+36.0%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-5.7%-35.3%+12.1%+5.6%+11.8%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-65.6%+73.3%+18.2%+66.7%+55.6%+16.0%
KO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

EML leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 16.0x trailing earnings, JPM trades at a 44% valuation discount to TRMB's 28.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), JPM offers better value at 0.90x vs TRMB's 11.73x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricEML logoEMLThe Eastern Compa…NN logoNNNextNav Inc.KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…PEP logoPEPPepsiCo, Inc.TRMB logoTRMBTrimble Inc.JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Market CapShares × price$131M$2.9B$355.6B$197.2B$11.9B$896.0B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$178M$3.2B$390.8B$237.9B$13.1B$1.50T
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS25.89x-15.14x27.18x24.05x28.81x16.00x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.10.98x25.27x16.68x16.31x14.40x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate2.43x7.37x11.73x0.90x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple12.88x26.39x16.63x16.62x18.36x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.53x641.46x7.42x2.10x3.33x3.20x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.06x10.40x9.63x2.07x2.47x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF26.79x67.15x25.70x89.67x8.88x
EML leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

KO leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

KO delivers a 41.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $3 for EML. TRMB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.24x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KO scores 7/9 vs NN's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricEML logoEMLThe Eastern Compa…NN logoNNNextNav Inc.KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…PEP logoPEPPepsiCo, Inc.TRMB logoTRMBTrimble Inc.JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+3.1%+41.1%+40.1%+8.0%+15.9%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+1.7%-56.3%+13.1%+7.7%+5.0%+1.3%
ROICReturn on invested capital+4.5%-43.9%+15.8%+14.9%+6.8%+4.5%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+5.3%-36.5%+17.3%+16.1%+7.8%+8.9%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9627555
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.43x1.33x2.43x0.24x2.60x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$46M$244M$35.2B$40.7B$1.1B$599.0B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$7M$45M$10.3B$9.2B$253M$343.3B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$54M$289M$45.5B$49.9B$1.4B$942.4B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense2.90x-8.46x10.70x10.34x8.03x0.74x
KO leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

NN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth $21,820 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,399 for TRMB. Over the past 12 months, NN leads with a +71.7% total return vs TRMB's -30.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NN at 96.1% vs PEP's -4.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricEML logoEMLThe Eastern Compa…NN logoNNNextNav Inc.KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…PEP logoPEPPepsiCo, Inc.TRMB logoTRMBTrimble Inc.JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+11.9%+32.6%+20.3%+3.5%-35.6%-0.5%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-6.1%+71.7%+17.2%+13.4%-30.3%+21.8%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+35.5%+654.4%+47.0%-11.7%-1.2%+138.2%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-27.4%+113.9%+65.6%+14.3%-36.0%+118.2%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+61.1%+120.5%+121.1%+82.3%+94.4%+465.8%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+10.7%+96.1%+13.7%-4.1%-0.4%+33.6%
NN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NN's 1.49 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KO currently trades 98.3% from its 52-week high vs TRMB's 57.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricEML logoEMLThe Eastern Compa…NN logoNNNextNav Inc.KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…PEP logoPEPPepsiCo, Inc.TRMB logoTRMBTrimble Inc.JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.66x1.49x-0.20x-0.11x1.38x0.94x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$26.77$24.42$84.04$171.48$87.50$337.25
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$17.61$10.87$65.35$127.60$48.90$262.71
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+81.2%+88.0%+98.3%+84.1%+57.6%+95.1%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10043.957.160.641.624.859.1
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded16K2.8M12.7M6.0M2.2M7.0M
KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — KO and PEP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: NN as "Buy", KO as "Buy", PEP as "Hold", TRMB as "Buy", JPM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 85.1% upside for TRMB (target: $93) vs 4.2% for KO (target: $86). For income investors, PEP offers the higher dividend yield at 3.86% vs JPM's 1.86%.

MetricEML logoEMLThe Eastern Compa…NN logoNNNextNav Inc.KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…PEP logoPEPPepsiCo, Inc.TRMB logoTRMBTrimble Inc.JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyHoldBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$34.67$86.13$167.88$93.33$339.75
# AnalystsCovering analysts348452861
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+2.0%+2.5%+3.9%+1.9%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises0565415
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.44$2.04$5.57$5.95
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+2.8%0.0%+0.2%+0.5%+7.2%+3.9%
Evenly matched — KO and PEP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

KO leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). EML leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.

Best OverallThe Coca-Cola Company (KO)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

EML vs NN vs KO vs PEP vs TRMB vs JPM: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is EML or NN or KO or PEP or TRMB or JPM a better buy right now?

For growth investors, JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) is the stronger pick with 3. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -19. 3% for NextNav Inc. (NN). JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) offers the better valuation at 16. 0x trailing P/E (14. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate NextNav Inc. (NN) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — EML or NN or KO or PEP or TRMB or JPM?

On trailing P/E, JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) is the cheapest at 16. 0x versus Trimble Inc. at 28. 8x. On forward P/E, The Eastern Company is actually cheaper at 11. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: JPMorgan Chase & Co. wins at 0. 81x versus Trimble Inc. 's 6. 64x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — EML or NN or KO or PEP or TRMB or JPM?

Over the past 5 years, JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) delivered a total return of +118. 2%, compared to -36. 0% for Trimble Inc. (TRMB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +465. 8% versus EML's +61. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — EML or NN or KO or PEP or TRMB or JPM?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.

20β versus NextNav Inc. 's 1. 49β — meaning NN is approximately -846% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Trimble Inc. (TRMB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 24% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — EML or NN or KO or PEP or TRMB or JPM?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) is pulling ahead at 3. 3% versus -19. 3% for NextNav Inc. (NN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Eastern Company grew EPS 161. 3% year-over-year, compared to -71. 3% for Trimble Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, NN leads at 5. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — EML or NN or KO or PEP or TRMB or JPM?

The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the more profitable company, earning 27.

3% net margin versus -41. 4% for NextNav Inc. — meaning it keeps 27. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KO leads at 28. 7% versus -1535. 8% for NN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TRMB leads at 68. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is EML or NN or KO or PEP or TRMB or JPM more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 81x versus Trimble Inc. 's 6. 64x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, The Eastern Company (EML) trades at 11. 0x forward P/E versus 25. 3x for The Coca-Cola Company — 14. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TRMB: 85. 1% to $93. 33.

08

Which pays a better dividend — EML or NN or KO or PEP or TRMB or JPM?

In this comparison, PEP (3.

9% yield), KO (2. 5% yield), EML (2. 0% yield), JPM (1. 9% yield) pay a dividend. NN, TRMB do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is EML or NN or KO or PEP or TRMB or JPM better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.

20), 2. 5% yield, +121. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +121. 1%, NN: +120. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between EML and NN and KO and PEP and TRMB and JPM?

These companies operate in different sectors (EML (Industrials) and NN (Communication Services) and KO (Consumer Defensive) and PEP (Consumer Defensive) and TRMB (Technology) and JPM (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: EML is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock; PEP is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; TRMB is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock. EML, KO, PEP, JPM pay a dividend while NN, TRMB do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.