EMX vs OR

For growth investors, OR Royalties Inc.

(OR) is the stronger pick with 47. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 17. 3% for EMX Royalty Corporation (EMX). OR Royalties Inc. (OR) offers the better valuation at 33. 7x trailing P/E (18. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate EMX Royalty Corporation (EMX) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On forward P/E, OR Royalties Inc.

is actually cheaper at 18. 3x.

Over the past 5 years, OR Royalties Inc.

(OR) delivered a total return of +184. 8%, compared to +15. 6% for EMX Royalty Corporation (EMX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: EMX returned +429. 8% versus OR's +217. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), EMX Royalty Corporation (EMX) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

44β versus OR Royalties Inc. 's 0. 54β — meaning OR is approximately 23% more volatile than EMX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, OR Royalties Inc. (OR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 30% for EMX Royalty Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), OR Royalties Inc.

(OR) is pulling ahead at 47. 5% versus 17. 3% for EMX Royalty Corporation (EMX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: OR Royalties Inc. grew EPS 825. 0% year-over-year, compared to 28. 0% for EMX Royalty Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, EMX leads at 54. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

OR Royalties Inc.

(OR) is the more profitable company, earning 74. 3% net margin versus -13. 8% for EMX Royalty Corporation — meaning it keeps 74. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: OR leads at 72. 9% versus 4. 0% for EMX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — OR leads at 83. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, OR Royalties Inc.

(OR) trades at 18. 3x forward P/E versus 45. 0x for EMX Royalty Corporation — 26. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for EMX: 38. 2% to $5. 75.

In this comparison, OR (0.

5% yield) pays a dividend. EMX does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, OR Royalties Inc.

(OR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 54), 0. 5% yield, +217. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (OR: +217. 0%, EMX: +429. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

OR pays a dividend while EMX does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.