Electrical Equipment & Parts
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
ENS vs AMTX vs CLNE vs PLUG vs BE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing
Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing
Electrical Equipment & Parts
Electrical Equipment & Parts
ENS vs AMTX vs CLNE vs PLUG vs BE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Electrical Equipment & Parts | Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing | Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing | Electrical Equipment & Parts | Electrical Equipment & Parts |
| Market Cap | $8.19B | $213M | $507M | $4.36B | $62.18B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3.74B | $209M | $439M | $710M | $2.45B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $313M | $-74M | $-99M | $-1.63B | $6M |
| Gross Margin | 29.7% | 3.4% | 11.7% | 99.8% | 31.1% |
| Operating Margin | 11.6% | -13.4% | 7.4% | 38.1% | 8.2% |
| Forward P/E | 21.6x | — | — | — | 123.6x |
| Total Debt | $1.20B | $318M | $99M | $997M | $2.99B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $343M | $5M | $158M | $1M | $2.45B |
ENS vs AMTX vs CLNE vs PLUG vs BE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| EnerSys (ENS) | 100 | 352.2 | +252.2% |
| Aemetis, Inc. (AMTX) | 100 | 390.0 | +290.0% |
| Clean Energy Fuels … (CLNE) | 100 | 110.5 | +10.5% |
| Plug Power Inc. (PLUG) | 100 | 74.3 | -25.7% |
| Bloom Energy Corpor… (BE) | 100 | 3220.9 | +3120.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ENS vs AMTX vs CLNE vs PLUG vs BE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ENS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 1.71, yield 0.4%
- Beta 1.71, yield 0.4%, current ratio 2.70x
- Lower P/E (21.6x vs 123.6x)
- 8.4% margin vs PLUG's -229.8%
AMTX lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
CLNE ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.19, Low D/E 17.5%, current ratio 2.32x
- Beta 1.19 vs BE's 3.61, lower leverage
PLUG is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 12.9%, EPS growth 100.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 0.4%
BE is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 9.3% 10Y total return vs ENS's 298.5%
- 37.3% revenue growth vs AMTX's -22.3%
- +14.6% vs CLNE's +44.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 37.3% revenue growth vs AMTX's -22.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (21.6x vs 123.6x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 8.4% margin vs PLUG's -229.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.19 vs BE's 3.61, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.4% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +14.6% vs CLNE's +44.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 7.7% ROA vs PLUG's -64.3%, ROIC 13.6% vs 10.9% |
ENS vs AMTX vs CLNE vs PLUG vs BE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
ENS vs AMTX vs CLNE vs PLUG vs BE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ENS leads in 2 of 6 categories
BE leads 1 • AMTX leads 0 • CLNE leads 0 • PLUG leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — ENS and PLUG and BE each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ENS is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.7B annually — 17.9x AMTX's $209M. ENS is the more profitable business, keeping 8.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PLUG's -2.3%. On growth, BE holds the edge at +130.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3.7B | $209M | $439M | $710M | $2.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $515M | -$21M | $62M | -$1.5B | $240M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $313M | -$74M | -$99M | -$1.6B | $6M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $441M | -$38M | $19M | -$2M | $233M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +29.7% | +3.4% | +11.7% | +99.8% | +31.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +11.6% | -13.4% | +7.4% | +38.1% | +8.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +8.4% | -35.4% | -22.7% | -2.3% | +0.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +11.8% | -18.2% | +4.3% | -0.3% | +9.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +1.4% | +27.4% | +13.3% | +17.6% | +130.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -16.7% | +29.8% | +90.0% | +95.9% | +3.3% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — ENS and CLNE each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, ENS's 16.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than BE's 508.4x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $8.2B | $213M | $507M | $4.4B | $62.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $9.0B | $526M | $448M | $5.4B | $62.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 24.80x | -2.44x | -2.29x | — | -699.03x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 21.55x | — | — | — | 123.56x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.08x | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 16.00x | — | 94.64x | — | 508.37x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.26x | 1.02x | 1.19x | 6.14x | 30.72x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.70x | — | 0.90x | — | 78.41x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 58.81x | — | 8.47x | — | 1087.24x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ENS leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ENS delivers a 16.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $17 in annual profit, vs $-124 for PLUG. CLNE carries lower financial leverage with a 0.18x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PLUG's 19.75x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ENS scores 6/9 vs BE's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +16.5% | — | -17.2% | -124.4% | +0.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +7.7% | -29.3% | -9.2% | -64.3% | +0.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +13.6% | -70.3% | -9.4% | +10.9% | +4.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +15.7% | -19.0% | -9.4% | +18.6% | +2.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.63x | — | 0.18x | 19.75x | 3.77x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $859M | $313M | -$59M | $996M | $538M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $343M | $5M | $158M | $1M | $2.5B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.2B | $318M | $99M | $997M | $3.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 5.21x | -0.27x | -1.07x | -36.18x | 1.05x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BE leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BE five years ago would be worth $111,339 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,358 for PLUG. Over the past 12 months, BE leads with a +1464.7% total return vs CLNE's +44.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BE at 148.0% vs PLUG's -30.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +48.1% | +96.2% | +6.9% | +40.4% | +162.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +147.5% | +140.0% | +44.4% | +303.6% | +1464.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +167.0% | +37.4% | -46.3% | -66.3% | +1425.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +149.2% | -76.1% | -73.8% | -86.4% | +1013.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +298.5% | +31.1% | -26.9% | +62.2% | +934.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +38.7% | +11.2% | -18.7% | -30.4% | +148.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ENS and CLNE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CLNE is the less volatile stock with a 1.19 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BE's 3.61 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ENS currently trades 98.3% from its 52-week high vs PLUG's 68.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.71x | 1.46x | 1.19x | 2.57x | 3.61x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $226.78 | $3.80 | $3.11 | $4.58 | $302.99 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $76.60 | $1.22 | $1.56 | $0.69 | $16.18 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +98.3% | +82.1% | +74.3% | +68.3% | +85.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 77.0 | 58.2 | 44.6 | 63.3 | 72.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 323K | 1.8M | 1.3M | 76.5M | 10.1M |
Analyst Outlook
ENS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ENS as "Buy", AMTX as "Buy", CLNE as "Buy", PLUG as "Buy", BE as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 51.5% upside for CLNE (target: $4) vs -43.9% for AMTX (target: $2). ENS is the only dividend payer here at 0.42% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $189.67 | $1.75 | $3.50 | $3.91 | $187.56 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 16 | 7 | 22 | 38 | 31 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.4% | — | — | — | +0.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 3 | — | — | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.93 | — | — | — | $0.00 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.9% | 0.0% | +1.6% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
ENS leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Analyst Outlook). BE leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.
ENS vs AMTX vs CLNE vs PLUG vs BE: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ENS or AMTX or CLNE or PLUG or BE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Bloom Energy Corporation (BE) is the stronger pick with 37.
3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -22. 3% for Aemetis, Inc. (AMTX). EnerSys (ENS) offers the better valuation at 24. 8x trailing P/E (21. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate EnerSys (ENS) a "Buy" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ENS or AMTX or CLNE or PLUG or BE?
On forward P/E, EnerSys is actually cheaper at 21.
6x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ENS or AMTX or CLNE or PLUG or BE?
Over the past 5 years, Bloom Energy Corporation (BE) delivered a total return of +1013%, compared to -86.
4% for Plug Power Inc. (PLUG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BE returned +934. 6% versus CLNE's -26. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ENS or AMTX or CLNE or PLUG or BE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Clean Energy Fuels Corp.
(CLNE) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 19β versus Bloom Energy Corporation's 3. 61β — meaning BE is approximately 203% more volatile than CLNE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Clean Energy Fuels Corp. (CLNE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 18% versus 20% for Plug Power Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ENS or AMTX or CLNE or PLUG or BE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Bloom Energy Corporation (BE) is pulling ahead at 37.
3% versus -22. 3% for Aemetis, Inc. (AMTX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Plug Power Inc. grew EPS 100. 0% year-over-year, compared to -184. 6% for Bloom Energy Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, BE leads at 19. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ENS or AMTX or CLNE or PLUG or BE?
EnerSys (ENS) is the more profitable company, earning 10.
1% net margin versus -229. 8% for Plug Power Inc. — meaning it keeps 10. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PLUG leads at 38. 1% versus -22. 1% for CLNE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PLUG leads at 99. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ENS or AMTX or CLNE or PLUG or BE more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, EnerSys (ENS) trades at 21.
6x forward P/E versus 123. 6x for Bloom Energy Corporation — 102. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CLNE: 51. 5% to $3. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — ENS or AMTX or CLNE or PLUG or BE?
In this comparison, ENS (0.
4% yield) pays a dividend. AMTX, CLNE, PLUG, BE do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is ENS or AMTX or CLNE or PLUG or BE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Clean Energy Fuels Corp.
(CLNE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 19)). Plug Power Inc. (PLUG) carries a higher beta of 2. 57 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CLNE: -26. 9%, PLUG: +62. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ENS and AMTX and CLNE and PLUG and BE?
These companies operate in different sectors (ENS (Industrials) and AMTX (Energy) and CLNE (Energy) and PLUG (Industrials) and BE (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: ENS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AMTX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CLNE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PLUG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BE is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.