Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

EOLS vs ABBV vs ACLX vs SKIN vs INMD

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
EOLS
Evolus, Inc.

Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$421M
5Y Perf.-30.2%
ABBV
AbbVie Inc.

Drug Manufacturers - General

HealthcareNYSE • US
Market Cap$358.42B
5Y Perf.+37.1%
ACLX
Arcellx, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$6.73B
5Y Perf.+499.9%
SKIN
The Beauty Health Company

Household & Personal Products

Consumer DefensiveNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$118M
5Y Perf.-95.3%
INMD
InMode Ltd.

Medical - Devices

HealthcareNASDAQ • IL
Market Cap$882M
5Y Perf.-67.4%

EOLS vs ABBV vs ACLX vs SKIN vs INMD — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
EOLS logoEOLS
ABBV logoABBV
ACLX logoACLX
SKIN logoSKIN
INMD logoINMD
IndustryDrug Manufacturers - Specialty & GenericDrug Manufacturers - GeneralBiotechnologyHousehold & Personal ProductsMedical - Devices
Market Cap$421M$358.42B$6.73B$118M$882M
Revenue (TTM)$301M$61.16B$22M$296M$375M
Net Income (TTM)$-43M$4.23B$-229M$-6M$87M
Gross Margin65.7%70.2%-64.8%64.9%77.8%
Operating Margin-9.6%26.7%-11.4%-3.6%21.3%
Forward P/E14.3x9.6x
Total Debt$155M$69.07B$96M$379M$13M
Cash & Equiv.$54M$5.23B$80M$233M$303M

EOLS vs ABBV vs ACLX vs SKIN vs INMDLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

EOLS
ABBV
ACLX
SKIN
INMD
StockFeb 22May 26Return
Evolus, Inc. (EOLS)10069.8-30.2%
AbbVie Inc. (ABBV)100137.1+37.1%
Arcellx, Inc. (ACLX)100599.9+499.9%
The Beauty Health C… (SKIN)1004.7-95.3%
InMode Ltd. (INMD)10032.6-67.4%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: EOLS vs ABBV vs ACLX vs SKIN vs INMD

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: INMD leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. AbbVie Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility and dividend income and shareholder returns. EOLS and ACLX also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
EOLS
Evolus, Inc.
The Growth Play

EOLS ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 11.6%, EPS growth 1.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 26.0%
  • 11.6% revenue growth vs ACLX's -79.4%
Best for: growth exposure
ABBV
AbbVie Inc.
The Income Pick

ABBV is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 13 yrs, beta 0.34, yield 3.2%
  • Beta 0.34 vs SKIN's 2.00
  • 3.2% yield; 13-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Best for: income & stability
ACLX
Arcellx, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

ACLX is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.

  • 5.8% 10Y total return vs ABBV's 295.5%
  • +117.4% vs EOLS's -45.7%
Best for: long-term compounding
SKIN
The Beauty Health Company
The Quality Angle

Among these 5 stocks, SKIN doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: consumer defensive exposure
INMD
InMode Ltd.
The Defensive Pick

INMD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.

  • Lower volatility, beta 1.04, Low D/E 1.9%, current ratio 9.88x
  • Beta 1.04, current ratio 9.88x
  • Better valuation composite
  • 23.3% margin vs ACLX's -10.3%
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthEOLS logoEOLS11.6% revenue growth vs ACLX's -79.4%
ValueINMD logoINMDBetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsINMD logoINMD23.3% margin vs ACLX's -10.3%
Stability / SafetyABBV logoABBVBeta 0.34 vs SKIN's 2.00
DividendsABBV logoABBV3.2% yield; 13-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)ACLX logoACLX+117.4% vs EOLS's -45.7%
Efficiency (ROA)INMD logoINMD11.8% ROA vs ACLX's -36.2%, ROIC 13.5% vs -46.2%

EOLS vs ABBV vs ACLX vs SKIN vs INMD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

EOLSEvolus, Inc.
FY 2025
Product
99.3%$295M
Service
0.7%$2M
ABBVAbbVie Inc.
FY 2025
SKYRIZI
30.2%$17.6B
RINVOQ
14.3%$8.3B
H U M I R A
7.8%$4.5B
Botox Therapeutic
6.5%$3.8B
Vraylar
6.2%$3.6B
Imbruvica
4.9%$2.9B
VENCLEXTA
4.8%$2.8B
Other (14)
25.3%$14.7B
ACLXArcellx, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

SKINThe Beauty Health Company
FY 2025
Consumables
70.7%$213M
Delivery Systems
29.3%$88M
INMDInMode Ltd.
FY 2025
Capital Equipment
100.0%$289M

EOLS vs ABBV vs ACLX vs SKIN vs INMD — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLACLXLAGGINGSKIN

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

ABBV leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

ABBV is the larger business by revenue, generating $61.2B annually — 2744.3x ACLX's $22M. INMD is the more profitable business, keeping 23.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ACLX's -10.3%. On growth, ABBV holds the edge at +10.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricEOLS logoEOLSEvolus, Inc.ABBV logoABBVAbbVie Inc.ACLX logoACLXArcellx, Inc.SKIN logoSKINThe Beauty Health…INMD logoINMDInMode Ltd.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$301M$61.2B$22M$296M$375M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$21M$24.5B-$246M$9M$81M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$43M$4.2B-$229M-$6M$87M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$41M$18.7B-$213M$29M$91M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+65.7%+70.2%-64.8%+64.9%+77.8%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-9.6%+26.7%-11.4%-3.6%+21.3%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-14.4%+6.9%-10.3%-2.0%+23.3%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-13.7%+30.6%-9.5%+9.8%+24.2%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+6.2%+10.0%-89.2%-6.7%+5.3%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+46.7%+57.4%-13.6%+38.0%-30.8%
ABBV leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

INMD leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 9.7x trailing earnings, INMD trades at a 89% valuation discount to ABBV's 85.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, INMD's 6.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SKIN's 7331.2x.

MetricEOLS logoEOLSEvolus, Inc.ABBV logoABBVAbbVie Inc.ACLX logoACLXArcellx, Inc.SKIN logoSKINThe Beauty Health…INMD logoINMDInMode Ltd.
Market CapShares × price$421M$358.4B$6.7B$118M$882M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$522M$422.3B$6.7B$264M$593M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-7.99x85.50x-28.27x-5.69x9.73x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.14.28x9.64x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.98x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple14.96x7331.15x6.88x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.42x5.86x302.09x0.39x2.38x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share16.10x2.02x1.33x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF20.12x3.17x10.46x
INMD leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

Evenly matched — ABBV and INMD each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

ABBV delivers a 62.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $62 in annual profit, vs $-55 for ACLX. INMD carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SKIN's 6.20x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SKIN scores 7/9 vs ACLX's 1/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricEOLS logoEOLSEvolus, Inc.ABBV logoABBVAbbVie Inc.ACLX logoACLXArcellx, Inc.SKIN logoSKINThe Beauty Health…INMD logoINMDInMode Ltd.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+62.1%-55.4%-9.4%+13.3%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-19.4%+3.1%-36.2%-1.2%+11.8%
ROICReturn on invested capital-44.5%+23.9%-46.2%-6.8%+13.5%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-23.5%+21.5%-46.6%-4.5%+12.1%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–936173
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.24x6.20x0.02x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$101M$63.8B$16M$146M-$289M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$54M$5.2B$80M$233M$303M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$155M$69.1B$96M$379M$13M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-1.92x3.28x-8.45x0.81x
Evenly matched — ABBV and INMD each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

ACLX leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in ACLX five years ago would be worth $68,494 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $707 for SKIN. Over the past 12 months, ACLX leads with a +117.4% total return vs EOLS's -45.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ACLX at 38.6% vs SKIN's -56.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricEOLS logoEOLSEvolus, Inc.ABBV logoABBVAbbVie Inc.ACLX logoACLXArcellx, Inc.SKIN logoSKINThe Beauty Health…INMD logoINMDInMode Ltd.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-4.9%-10.1%+81.7%-35.0%-5.9%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-45.7%+11.3%+117.4%-35.9%-2.1%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-28.4%+50.4%+166.2%-91.7%-60.2%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-30.1%+101.3%+584.9%-92.9%-63.9%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-44.4%+295.5%+584.9%-91.6%+105.0%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-10.6%+14.6%+38.6%-56.4%-26.4%
ACLX leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

ACLX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

ACLX is the less volatile stock with a -0.34 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SKIN's 2.00 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ACLX currently trades 99.9% from its 52-week high vs SKIN's 33.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricEOLS logoEOLSEvolus, Inc.ABBV logoABBVAbbVie Inc.ACLX logoACLXArcellx, Inc.SKIN logoSKINThe Beauty Health…INMD logoINMDInMode Ltd.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.27x0.34x-0.34x2.00x1.04x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$12.16$244.81$115.13$2.69$16.74
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$3.86$176.57$47.86$0.76$12.72
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+52.5%+82.8%+99.9%+33.8%+83.2%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10076.146.879.952.139.8
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded1.1M5.8M1.6M760K804K
ACLX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: EOLS as "Buy", ABBV as "Buy", ACLX as "Hold", SKIN as "Hold", INMD as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 134.7% upside for EOLS (target: $15) vs -2.3% for ACLX (target: $112). ABBV is the only dividend payer here at 3.24% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricEOLS logoEOLSEvolus, Inc.ABBV logoABBVAbbVie Inc.ACLX logoACLXArcellx, Inc.SKIN logoSKINThe Beauty Health…INMD logoINMDInMode Ltd.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyHoldHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$15.00$256.64$112.45$1.30$16.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts1341181311
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+3.2%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises13
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$6.57
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+0.3%0.0%0.0%+14.5%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

ACLX leads in 2 of 6 categories (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility). ABBV leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 1 tied.

Best OverallArcellx, Inc. (ACLX)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

EOLS vs ABBV vs ACLX vs SKIN vs INMD: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is EOLS or ABBV or ACLX or SKIN or INMD a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Evolus, Inc.

(EOLS) is the stronger pick with 11. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -79. 4% for Arcellx, Inc. (ACLX). InMode Ltd. (INMD) offers the better valuation at 9. 7x trailing P/E (9. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Evolus, Inc. (EOLS) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — EOLS or ABBV or ACLX or SKIN or INMD?

On trailing P/E, InMode Ltd.

(INMD) is the cheapest at 9. 7x versus AbbVie Inc. at 85. 5x. On forward P/E, InMode Ltd. is actually cheaper at 9. 6x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — EOLS or ABBV or ACLX or SKIN or INMD?

Over the past 5 years, Arcellx, Inc.

(ACLX) delivered a total return of +584. 9%, compared to -92. 9% for The Beauty Health Company (SKIN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ACLX returned +584. 9% versus SKIN's -91. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — EOLS or ABBV or ACLX or SKIN or INMD?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Arcellx, Inc.

(ACLX) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 34β versus The Beauty Health Company's 2. 00β — meaning SKIN is approximately -690% more volatile than ACLX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, InMode Ltd. (INMD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 6% for The Beauty Health Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — EOLS or ABBV or ACLX or SKIN or INMD?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Evolus, Inc.

(EOLS) is pulling ahead at 11. 6% versus -79. 4% for Arcellx, Inc. (ACLX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Beauty Health Company grew EPS 55. 6% year-over-year, compared to -103. 5% for Arcellx, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, EOLS leads at 26. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — EOLS or ABBV or ACLX or SKIN or INMD?

InMode Ltd.

(INMD) is the more profitable company, earning 25. 3% net margin versus -1027. 3% for Arcellx, Inc. — meaning it keeps 25. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ABBV leads at 32. 8% versus -1135. 6% for ACLX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — INMD leads at 78. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is EOLS or ABBV or ACLX or SKIN or INMD more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, InMode Ltd.

(INMD) trades at 9. 6x forward P/E versus 14. 3x for AbbVie Inc. — 4. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for EOLS: 134. 7% to $15. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — EOLS or ABBV or ACLX or SKIN or INMD?

In this comparison, ABBV (3.

2% yield) pays a dividend. EOLS, ACLX, SKIN, INMD do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is EOLS or ABBV or ACLX or SKIN or INMD better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Arcellx, Inc.

(ACLX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 34), +584. 9% 10Y return). The Beauty Health Company (SKIN) carries a higher beta of 2. 00 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ACLX: +584. 9%, SKIN: -91. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between EOLS and ABBV and ACLX and SKIN and INMD?

These companies operate in different sectors (EOLS (Healthcare) and ABBV (Healthcare) and ACLX (Healthcare) and SKIN (Consumer Defensive) and INMD (Healthcare)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: EOLS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ABBV is a large-cap income-oriented stock; ACLX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SKIN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; INMD is a small-cap deep-value stock. ABBV pays a dividend while EOLS, ACLX, SKIN, INMD do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

EOLS

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Gross Margin > 39%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ABBV

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ACLX

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SKIN

Quality Business

  • Sector: Consumer Defensive
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 38%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

INMD

Quality Mega-Cap Compounder

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 13%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform EOLS and ABBV and ACLX and SKIN and INMD on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(EOLS: 6.2% · ABBV: 10.0%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.