Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
EOLS vs INMD vs NVCR vs SKIN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Devices
Medical - Instruments & Supplies
Household & Personal Products
EOLS vs INMD vs NVCR vs SKIN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic | Medical - Devices | Medical - Instruments & Supplies | Household & Personal Products |
| Market Cap | $421M | $882M | $1.92B | $118M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $301M | $375M | $674M | $296M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-43M | $87M | $-173M | $-6M |
| Gross Margin | 65.7% | 77.8% | 75.2% | 64.9% |
| Operating Margin | -9.6% | 21.3% | -27.2% | -3.6% |
| Forward P/E | — | 9.6x | — | — |
| Total Debt | $155M | $13M | $290M | $379M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $54M | $303M | $103M | $233M |
EOLS vs INMD vs NVCR vs SKIN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Nov 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Evolus, Inc. (EOLS) | 100 | 171.3 | +71.3% |
| InMode Ltd. (INMD) | 100 | 64.6 | -35.4% |
| NovoCure Limited (NVCR) | 100 | 13.4 | -86.6% |
| The Beauty Health C… (SKIN) | 100 | 9.0 | -91.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: EOLS vs INMD vs NVCR vs SKIN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
EOLS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 11.6%, EPS growth 1.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 26.0%
- 11.6% revenue growth vs SKIN's -10.0%
INMD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- beta 1.04
- 105.0% 10Y total return vs EOLS's -44.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.04, Low D/E 1.9%, current ratio 9.88x
- Beta 1.04, current ratio 9.88x
NVCR is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +1.1% vs EOLS's -45.7%
SKIN is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Better valuation composite
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 11.6% revenue growth vs SKIN's -10.0% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 23.3% margin vs NVCR's -25.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.04 vs NVCR's 2.20, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +1.1% vs EOLS's -45.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.8% ROA vs EOLS's -19.4%, ROIC 13.5% vs -44.5% |
EOLS vs INMD vs NVCR vs SKIN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
EOLS vs INMD vs NVCR vs SKIN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
INMD leads in 2 of 6 categories
EOLS leads 1 • NVCR leads 0 • SKIN leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
INMD leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NVCR is the larger business by revenue, generating $674M annually — 2.3x SKIN's $296M. INMD is the more profitable business, keeping 23.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NVCR's -25.7%. On growth, NVCR holds the edge at +12.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $301M | $375M | $674M | $296M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$21M | $81M | -$165M | $9M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$43M | $87M | -$173M | -$6M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$41M | $91M | -$48M | $29M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +65.7% | +77.8% | +75.2% | +64.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -9.6% | +21.3% | -27.2% | -3.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -14.4% | +23.3% | -25.7% | -2.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -13.7% | +24.2% | -7.1% | +9.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +6.2% | +5.3% | +12.3% | -6.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +46.7% | -30.8% | -100.0% | +38.0% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — INMD and SKIN each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, INMD's 6.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SKIN's 7331.2x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $421M | $882M | $1.9B | $118M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $522M | $593M | $2.1B | $264M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -7.99x | 9.73x | -13.80x | -5.69x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 9.64x | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.98x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 6.88x | — | 7331.15x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.42x | 2.38x | 2.92x | 0.39x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 1.33x | 5.51x | 2.02x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 10.46x | — | 3.17x |
Profitability & Efficiency
INMD leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
INMD delivers a 13.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $-51 for NVCR. INMD carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SKIN's 6.20x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SKIN scores 7/9 vs INMD's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +13.3% | -50.8% | -9.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -19.4% | +11.8% | -16.5% | -1.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -44.5% | +13.5% | -16.4% | -6.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -23.5% | +12.1% | -28.9% | -4.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.02x | 0.85x | 6.20x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $101M | -$289M | $187M | $146M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $54M | $303M | $103M | $233M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $155M | $13M | $290M | $379M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1.92x | — | -96.80x | 0.81x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
EOLS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in EOLS five years ago would be worth $6,991 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $707 for SKIN. Over the past 12 months, NVCR leads with a +1.1% total return vs EOLS's -45.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors EOLS at -10.6% vs SKIN's -56.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -4.9% | -5.9% | +28.3% | -35.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -45.7% | -2.1% | +1.1% | -35.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -28.4% | -60.2% | -75.7% | -91.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -30.1% | -63.9% | -91.3% | -92.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -44.4% | +105.0% | +30.3% | -91.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -10.6% | -26.4% | -37.6% | -56.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — INMD and NVCR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
INMD is the less volatile stock with a 1.04 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NVCR's 2.20 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NVCR currently trades 83.9% from its 52-week high vs SKIN's 33.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.27x | 1.04x | 2.20x | 2.00x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $12.16 | $16.74 | $20.06 | $2.69 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.86 | $12.72 | $9.82 | $0.76 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +52.5% | +83.2% | +83.9% | +33.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 76.1 | 39.8 | 69.8 | 52.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.1M | 804K | 1.5M | 760K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: EOLS as "Buy", INMD as "Buy", NVCR as "Buy", SKIN as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 134.7% upside for EOLS (target: $15) vs 14.9% for INMD (target: $16).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $15.00 | $16.00 | $33.50 | $1.30 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 13 | 11 | 15 | 13 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +14.5% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
INMD leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). EOLS leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
EOLS vs INMD vs NVCR vs SKIN: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is EOLS or INMD or NVCR or SKIN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Evolus, Inc.
(EOLS) is the stronger pick with 11. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -10. 0% for The Beauty Health Company (SKIN). InMode Ltd. (INMD) offers the better valuation at 9. 7x trailing P/E (9. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Evolus, Inc. (EOLS) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — EOLS or INMD or NVCR or SKIN?
Over the past 5 years, Evolus, Inc.
(EOLS) delivered a total return of -30. 1%, compared to -92. 9% for The Beauty Health Company (SKIN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: INMD returned +105. 0% versus SKIN's -91. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — EOLS or INMD or NVCR or SKIN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), InMode Ltd.
(INMD) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 04β versus NovoCure Limited's 2. 20β — meaning NVCR is approximately 112% more volatile than INMD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, InMode Ltd. (INMD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 6% for The Beauty Health Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — EOLS or INMD or NVCR or SKIN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Evolus, Inc.
(EOLS) is pulling ahead at 11. 6% versus -10. 0% for The Beauty Health Company (SKIN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Beauty Health Company grew EPS 55. 6% year-over-year, compared to -36. 4% for InMode Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, EOLS leads at 26. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — EOLS or INMD or NVCR or SKIN?
InMode Ltd.
(INMD) is the more profitable company, earning 25. 3% net margin versus -20. 8% for NovoCure Limited — meaning it keeps 25. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: INMD leads at 23. 0% versus -23. 5% for NVCR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — INMD leads at 78. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is EOLS or INMD or NVCR or SKIN more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for EOLS: 134.
7% to $15. 00.
07Which pays a better dividend — EOLS or INMD or NVCR or SKIN?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is EOLS or INMD or NVCR or SKIN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, InMode Ltd.
(INMD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 04), +105. 0% 10Y return). The Beauty Health Company (SKIN) carries a higher beta of 2. 00 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (INMD: +105. 0%, SKIN: -91. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between EOLS and INMD and NVCR and SKIN?
These companies operate in different sectors (EOLS (Healthcare) and INMD (Healthcare) and NVCR (Healthcare) and SKIN (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: EOLS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; INMD is a small-cap deep-value stock; NVCR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SKIN is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.