Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

EOLS vs INMD vs NVCR vs SKIN

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
EOLS
Evolus, Inc.

Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$421M
5Y Perf.+71.3%
INMD
InMode Ltd.

Medical - Devices

HealthcareNASDAQ • IL
Market Cap$882M
5Y Perf.-35.4%
NVCR
NovoCure Limited

Medical - Instruments & Supplies

HealthcareNASDAQ • JE
Market Cap$1.92B
5Y Perf.-86.6%
SKIN
The Beauty Health Company

Household & Personal Products

Consumer DefensiveNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$118M
5Y Perf.-91.0%

EOLS vs INMD vs NVCR vs SKIN — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
EOLS logoEOLS
INMD logoINMD
NVCR logoNVCR
SKIN logoSKIN
IndustryDrug Manufacturers - Specialty & GenericMedical - DevicesMedical - Instruments & SuppliesHousehold & Personal Products
Market Cap$421M$882M$1.92B$118M
Revenue (TTM)$301M$375M$674M$296M
Net Income (TTM)$-43M$87M$-173M$-6M
Gross Margin65.7%77.8%75.2%64.9%
Operating Margin-9.6%21.3%-27.2%-3.6%
Forward P/E9.6x
Total Debt$155M$13M$290M$379M
Cash & Equiv.$54M$303M$103M$233M

EOLS vs INMD vs NVCR vs SKINLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

EOLS
INMD
NVCR
SKIN
StockNov 20May 26Return
Evolus, Inc. (EOLS)100171.3+71.3%
InMode Ltd. (INMD)10064.6-35.4%
NovoCure Limited (NVCR)10013.4-86.6%
The Beauty Health C… (SKIN)1009.0-91.0%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: EOLS vs INMD vs NVCR vs SKIN

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: INMD leads in 3 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. Evolus, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion. NVCR and SKIN also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
EOLS
Evolus, Inc.
The Growth Play

EOLS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.

  • Rev growth 11.6%, EPS growth 1.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 26.0%
  • 11.6% revenue growth vs SKIN's -10.0%
Best for: growth exposure
INMD
InMode Ltd.
The Income Pick

INMD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.

  • beta 1.04
  • 105.0% 10Y total return vs EOLS's -44.4%
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.04, Low D/E 1.9%, current ratio 9.88x
  • Beta 1.04, current ratio 9.88x
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
NVCR
NovoCure Limited
The Momentum Pick

NVCR is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.

  • +1.1% vs EOLS's -45.7%
Best for: momentum
SKIN
The Beauty Health Company
The Value Play

SKIN is the clearest fit if your priority is value.

  • Better valuation composite
Best for: value
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthEOLS logoEOLS11.6% revenue growth vs SKIN's -10.0%
ValueSKIN logoSKINBetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsINMD logoINMD23.3% margin vs NVCR's -25.7%
Stability / SafetyINMD logoINMDBeta 1.04 vs NVCR's 2.20, lower leverage
DividendsTieNone of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)NVCR logoNVCR+1.1% vs EOLS's -45.7%
Efficiency (ROA)INMD logoINMD11.8% ROA vs EOLS's -19.4%, ROIC 13.5% vs -44.5%

EOLS vs INMD vs NVCR vs SKIN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

EOLSEvolus, Inc.
FY 2025
Product
99.3%$295M
Service
0.7%$2M
INMDInMode Ltd.
FY 2025
Capital Equipment
100.0%$289M
NVCRNovoCure Limited

Segment breakdown not available.

SKINThe Beauty Health Company
FY 2025
Consumables
70.7%$213M
Delivery Systems
29.3%$88M

EOLS vs INMD vs NVCR vs SKIN — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLINMDLAGGINGSKIN

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

INMD leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

NVCR is the larger business by revenue, generating $674M annually — 2.3x SKIN's $296M. INMD is the more profitable business, keeping 23.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NVCR's -25.7%. On growth, NVCR holds the edge at +12.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricEOLS logoEOLSEvolus, Inc.INMD logoINMDInMode Ltd.NVCR logoNVCRNovoCure LimitedSKIN logoSKINThe Beauty Health…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$301M$375M$674M$296M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$21M$81M-$165M$9M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$43M$87M-$173M-$6M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$41M$91M-$48M$29M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+65.7%+77.8%+75.2%+64.9%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-9.6%+21.3%-27.2%-3.6%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-14.4%+23.3%-25.7%-2.0%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-13.7%+24.2%-7.1%+9.8%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+6.2%+5.3%+12.3%-6.7%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+46.7%-30.8%-100.0%+38.0%
INMD leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — INMD and SKIN each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

On an enterprise value basis, INMD's 6.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SKIN's 7331.2x.

MetricEOLS logoEOLSEvolus, Inc.INMD logoINMDInMode Ltd.NVCR logoNVCRNovoCure LimitedSKIN logoSKINThe Beauty Health…
Market CapShares × price$421M$882M$1.9B$118M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$522M$593M$2.1B$264M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-7.99x9.73x-13.80x-5.69x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.9.64x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.98x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple6.88x7331.15x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.42x2.38x2.92x0.39x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.33x5.51x2.02x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF10.46x3.17x
Evenly matched — INMD and SKIN each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

INMD leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

INMD delivers a 13.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $-51 for NVCR. INMD carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SKIN's 6.20x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SKIN scores 7/9 vs INMD's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricEOLS logoEOLSEvolus, Inc.INMD logoINMDInMode Ltd.NVCR logoNVCRNovoCure LimitedSKIN logoSKINThe Beauty Health…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+13.3%-50.8%-9.4%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-19.4%+11.8%-16.5%-1.2%
ROICReturn on invested capital-44.5%+13.5%-16.4%-6.8%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-23.5%+12.1%-28.9%-4.5%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–93357
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.02x0.85x6.20x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$101M-$289M$187M$146M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$54M$303M$103M$233M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$155M$13M$290M$379M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-1.92x-96.80x0.81x
INMD leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

EOLS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in EOLS five years ago would be worth $6,991 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $707 for SKIN. Over the past 12 months, NVCR leads with a +1.1% total return vs EOLS's -45.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors EOLS at -10.6% vs SKIN's -56.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricEOLS logoEOLSEvolus, Inc.INMD logoINMDInMode Ltd.NVCR logoNVCRNovoCure LimitedSKIN logoSKINThe Beauty Health…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-4.9%-5.9%+28.3%-35.0%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-45.7%-2.1%+1.1%-35.9%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-28.4%-60.2%-75.7%-91.7%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-30.1%-63.9%-91.3%-92.9%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-44.4%+105.0%+30.3%-91.6%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-10.6%-26.4%-37.6%-56.4%
EOLS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — INMD and NVCR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

INMD is the less volatile stock with a 1.04 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NVCR's 2.20 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NVCR currently trades 83.9% from its 52-week high vs SKIN's 33.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricEOLS logoEOLSEvolus, Inc.INMD logoINMDInMode Ltd.NVCR logoNVCRNovoCure LimitedSKIN logoSKINThe Beauty Health…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.27x1.04x2.20x2.00x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$12.16$16.74$20.06$2.69
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$3.86$12.72$9.82$0.76
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+52.5%+83.2%+83.9%+33.8%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10076.139.869.852.1
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded1.1M804K1.5M760K
Evenly matched — INMD and NVCR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: EOLS as "Buy", INMD as "Buy", NVCR as "Buy", SKIN as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 134.7% upside for EOLS (target: $15) vs 14.9% for INMD (target: $16).

MetricEOLS logoEOLSEvolus, Inc.INMD logoINMDInMode Ltd.NVCR logoNVCRNovoCure LimitedSKIN logoSKINThe Beauty Health…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$15.00$16.00$33.50$1.30
# AnalystsCovering analysts13111513
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+14.5%0.0%0.0%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

INMD leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). EOLS leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.

Best OverallInMode Ltd. (INMD)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

EOLS vs INMD vs NVCR vs SKIN: Key Questions Answered

9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is EOLS or INMD or NVCR or SKIN a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Evolus, Inc.

(EOLS) is the stronger pick with 11. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -10. 0% for The Beauty Health Company (SKIN). InMode Ltd. (INMD) offers the better valuation at 9. 7x trailing P/E (9. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Evolus, Inc. (EOLS) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which is the better long-term investment — EOLS or INMD or NVCR or SKIN?

Over the past 5 years, Evolus, Inc.

(EOLS) delivered a total return of -30. 1%, compared to -92. 9% for The Beauty Health Company (SKIN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: INMD returned +105. 0% versus SKIN's -91. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

03

Which is safer — EOLS or INMD or NVCR or SKIN?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), InMode Ltd.

(INMD) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 04β versus NovoCure Limited's 2. 20β — meaning NVCR is approximately 112% more volatile than INMD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, InMode Ltd. (INMD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 6% for The Beauty Health Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

04

Which is growing faster — EOLS or INMD or NVCR or SKIN?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Evolus, Inc.

(EOLS) is pulling ahead at 11. 6% versus -10. 0% for The Beauty Health Company (SKIN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Beauty Health Company grew EPS 55. 6% year-over-year, compared to -36. 4% for InMode Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, EOLS leads at 26. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

05

Which has better profit margins — EOLS or INMD or NVCR or SKIN?

InMode Ltd.

(INMD) is the more profitable company, earning 25. 3% net margin versus -20. 8% for NovoCure Limited — meaning it keeps 25. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: INMD leads at 23. 0% versus -23. 5% for NVCR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — INMD leads at 78. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

06

Is EOLS or INMD or NVCR or SKIN more undervalued right now?

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for EOLS: 134.

7% to $15. 00.

07

Which pays a better dividend — EOLS or INMD or NVCR or SKIN?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

08

Is EOLS or INMD or NVCR or SKIN better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, InMode Ltd.

(INMD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 04), +105. 0% 10Y return). The Beauty Health Company (SKIN) carries a higher beta of 2. 00 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (INMD: +105. 0%, SKIN: -91. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

09

What are the main differences between EOLS and INMD and NVCR and SKIN?

These companies operate in different sectors (EOLS (Healthcare) and INMD (Healthcare) and NVCR (Healthcare) and SKIN (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: EOLS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; INMD is a small-cap deep-value stock; NVCR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SKIN is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

EOLS

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Gross Margin > 39%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

INMD

Quality Mega-Cap Compounder

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 13%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

NVCR

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 6%
  • Gross Margin > 45%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SKIN

Quality Business

  • Sector: Consumer Defensive
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 38%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform EOLS and INMD and NVCR and SKIN on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(EOLS: 6.2% · INMD: 5.3%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.