EPAC vs HLIO

For growth investors, Enerpac Tool Group Corp.

(EPAC) is the stronger pick with 4. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 4. 1% for Helios Technologies, Inc. (HLIO). Enerpac Tool Group Corp. (EPAC) offers the better valuation at 20. 9x trailing P/E (18. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Helios Technologies, Inc. (HLIO) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Enerpac Tool Group Corp.

(EPAC) is the cheapest at 20. 9x versus Helios Technologies, Inc. at 46. 9x. On forward P/E, Enerpac Tool Group Corp. is actually cheaper at 18. 8x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Enerpac Tool Group Corp. wins at 0. 11x versus Helios Technologies, Inc. 's 1. 00x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, Enerpac Tool Group Corp.

(EPAC) delivered a total return of +26. 0%, compared to -8. 1% for Helios Technologies, Inc. (HLIO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HLIO returned +109. 8% versus EPAC's +40. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Enerpac Tool Group Corp.

(EPAC) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 10β versus Helios Technologies, Inc. 's 1. 56β — meaning HLIO is approximately 42% more volatile than EPAC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Helios Technologies, Inc. (HLIO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 12% versus 53% for Enerpac Tool Group Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Enerpac Tool Group Corp.

(EPAC) is pulling ahead at 4. 6% versus 4. 1% for Helios Technologies, Inc. (HLIO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Helios Technologies, Inc. grew EPS 23. 9% year-over-year, compared to 9. 0% for Enerpac Tool Group Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, EPAC leads at 2. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Enerpac Tool Group Corp.

(EPAC) is the more profitable company, earning 15. 0% net margin versus 5. 8% for Helios Technologies, Inc. — meaning it keeps 15. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: EPAC leads at 22. 6% versus 7. 9% for HLIO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — EPAC leads at 49. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Enerpac Tool Group Corp. (EPAC) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 11x versus Helios Technologies, Inc. 's 1. 00x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Enerpac Tool Group Corp. (EPAC) trades at 18. 8x forward P/E versus 26. 9x for Helios Technologies, Inc. — 8. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HLIO: 13. 3% to $77. 00.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Helios Technologies, Inc. (HLIO) offers the highest yield at 0. 5%, versus 0. 1% for Enerpac Tool Group Corp. (EPAC).

For long-horizon retirement investors, Helios Technologies, Inc.

(HLIO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (0. 5% yield, +109. 8% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (HLIO: +109. 8%, EPAC: +40. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

HLIO pays a dividend while EPAC does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.