Consulting Services
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
EPOW vs NRGV vs MVST vs PLUG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Renewable Utilities
Electrical Equipment & Parts
Electrical Equipment & Parts
EPOW vs NRGV vs MVST vs PLUG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Consulting Services | Renewable Utilities | Electrical Equipment & Parts | Electrical Equipment & Parts |
| Market Cap | $21M | $716M | $611M | $4.36B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $117M | $217M | $428M | $710M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-33M | $-115M | $-29M | $-1.63B |
| Gross Margin | -12.9% | 22.1% | 28.6% | 99.8% |
| Operating Margin | -36.1% | -35.8% | 1.6% | 38.1% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 31.5x | — |
| Total Debt | $50M | $95M | $186M | $997M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1M | $58M | $105M | $1M |
EPOW vs NRGV vs MVST vs PLUG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Mar 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sunrise New Energy … (EPOW) | 100 | 21.4 | -78.6% |
| Energy Vault Holdin… (NRGV) | 100 | 42.7 | -57.3% |
| Microvast Holdings,… (MVST) | 100 | 15.4 | -84.6% |
| Plug Power Inc. (PLUG) | 100 | 8.7 | -91.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: EPOW vs NRGV vs MVST vs PLUG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
EPOW is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 0.34
- Rev growth 44.3%, EPS growth 52.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 106.2%
- Beta 0.34 vs NRGV's 3.08
NRGV carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- -57.1% 10Y total return vs PLUG's 62.2%
- 340.9% revenue growth vs MVST's 12.6%
- +447.1% vs EPOW's -14.8%
MVST is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and defensive is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 2.45, Low D/E 45.3%, current ratio 0.92x
- Beta 2.45, current ratio 0.92x
- -6.8% margin vs PLUG's -229.8%
- -2.9% ROA vs PLUG's -64.3%, ROIC 0.9% vs 10.9%
PLUG lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 340.9% revenue growth vs MVST's 12.6% | |
| Quality / Margins | -6.8% margin vs PLUG's -229.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.34 vs NRGV's 3.08 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +447.1% vs EPOW's -14.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -2.9% ROA vs PLUG's -64.3%, ROIC 0.9% vs 10.9% |
EPOW vs NRGV vs MVST vs PLUG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
EPOW vs NRGV vs MVST vs PLUG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MVST leads in 2 of 6 categories
EPOW leads 1 • NRGV leads 1 • PLUG leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MVST leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PLUG is the larger business by revenue, generating $710M annually — 6.1x EPOW's $117M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from -6.8% (MVST) to -2.3% (PLUG). On growth, NRGV holds the edge at +156.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $117M | $217M | $428M | $710M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$31M | -$72M | $32M | -$1.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$33M | -$115M | -$29M | -$1.6B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$53M | -$98M | $56M | -$2M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -12.9% | +22.1% | +28.6% | +99.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -36.1% | -35.8% | +1.6% | +38.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -27.8% | -53.0% | -6.8% | -2.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -45.5% | -45.2% | +13.1% | -0.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +25.5% | +156.4% | -15.0% | +17.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +77.8% | -42.9% | +119.2% | +95.9% |
Valuation Metrics
EPOW leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $21M | $716M | $611M | $4.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $70M | $752M | $692M | $5.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.72x | -6.37x | -21.00x | — |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 31.50x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 99.04x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.32x | 3.52x | 1.43x | 6.14x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.75x | 7.50x | 1.49x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 10.89x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
MVST leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MVST delivers a -7.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-7 in annual profit, vs $-147 for NRGV. MVST carries lower financial leverage with a 0.45x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PLUG's 19.75x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), EPOW scores 5/9 vs NRGV's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -128.8% | -146.8% | -7.4% | -124.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -18.6% | -40.3% | -2.9% | -64.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -16.8% | -49.5% | +0.9% | +10.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -29.3% | -53.7% | +1.2% | +18.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.85x | 1.07x | 0.45x | 19.75x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $49M | $36M | $81M | $996M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1M | $58M | $105M | $1M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $50M | $95M | $186M | $997M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -7.16x | -10.33x | -16.53x | -36.18x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NRGV leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NRGV five years ago would be worth $4,233 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,358 for PLUG. Over the past 12 months, NRGV leads with a +447.1% total return vs EPOW's -14.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NRGV at 34.0% vs PLUG's -30.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -23.2% | -15.3% | -33.0% | +40.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -14.8% | +447.1% | -2.1% | +303.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -60.0% | +140.7% | +58.8% | -66.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -74.7% | -57.7% | -84.4% | -86.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -85.4% | -57.1% | -80.7% | +62.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -26.3% | +34.0% | +16.7% | -30.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — EPOW and PLUG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
EPOW is the less volatile stock with a 0.34 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NRGV's 3.08 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PLUG currently trades 68.3% from its 52-week high vs MVST's 26.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.34x | 3.08x | 2.45x | 2.57x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $1.86 | $6.35 | $7.12 | $4.58 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.66 | $0.65 | $1.37 | $0.69 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +41.7% | +65.2% | +26.5% | +68.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 37.0 | 53.3 | 54.4 | 63.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 259K | 3.7M | 3.9M | 76.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NRGV as "Buy", MVST as "Buy", PLUG as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 154.0% upside for MVST (target: $5) vs -33.6% for NRGV (target: $3).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $2.75 | $4.80 | $3.91 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 7 | 6 | 38 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
MVST leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). EPOW leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
EPOW vs NRGV vs MVST vs PLUG: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is EPOW or NRGV or MVST or PLUG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Energy Vault Holdings, Inc.
(NRGV) is the stronger pick with 340. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 12. 6% for Microvast Holdings, Inc. (MVST). Analysts rate Energy Vault Holdings, Inc. (NRGV) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — EPOW or NRGV or MVST or PLUG?
Over the past 5 years, Energy Vault Holdings, Inc.
(NRGV) delivered a total return of -57. 7%, compared to -86. 4% for Plug Power Inc. (PLUG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PLUG returned +62. 2% versus EPOW's -85. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — EPOW or NRGV or MVST or PLUG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Sunrise New Energy Co.
, Ltd. (EPOW) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 34β versus Energy Vault Holdings, Inc. 's 3. 08β — meaning NRGV is approximately 815% more volatile than EPOW relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Microvast Holdings, Inc. (MVST) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 45% versus 20% for Plug Power Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — EPOW or NRGV or MVST or PLUG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Energy Vault Holdings, Inc.
(NRGV) is pulling ahead at 340. 9% versus 12. 6% for Microvast Holdings, Inc. (MVST). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Plug Power Inc. grew EPS 100. 0% year-over-year, compared to 28. 6% for Energy Vault Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, EPOW leads at 106. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — EPOW or NRGV or MVST or PLUG?
Microvast Holdings, Inc.
(MVST) is the more profitable company, earning -6. 8% net margin versus -229. 8% for Plug Power Inc. — meaning it keeps -6. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PLUG leads at 38. 1% versus -36. 5% for NRGV. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PLUG leads at 99. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is EPOW or NRGV or MVST or PLUG more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MVST: 154.
0% to $4. 80.
07Which pays a better dividend — EPOW or NRGV or MVST or PLUG?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is EPOW or NRGV or MVST or PLUG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Sunrise New Energy Co.
, Ltd. (EPOW) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 34)). Microvast Holdings, Inc. (MVST) carries a higher beta of 2. 45 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (EPOW: -85. 4%, MVST: -80. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between EPOW and NRGV and MVST and PLUG?
These companies operate in different sectors (EPOW (Industrials) and NRGV (Utilities) and MVST (Industrials) and PLUG (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: EPOW is a small-cap high-growth stock; NRGV is a small-cap high-growth stock; MVST is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PLUG is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.